Jump to content
IGNORED

New Objective-Fi Sub-forum


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, bobflood said:

I hope this works but I have my doubts. My personal opinion is that much of what you are trying to get people to post here is deliberately posted in the threads with the express intention of creating ill will and controversy. If it is posted here and can be ignored then it will not have the desired effect. One way to really damp this stuff down would be to eliminate anonymity. Make everyone post everywhere under their real name instead of hiding behind masks. I have always used my real name and if I say something here I take responsibility for it.

 

Good Luck,

 

Bob Flood 

 

When people post in the wrong spot, their comments can easily be moved to this sub-forum.

 

If people stop posting those comments because they'd rather cause ill will and controversy, then it's a win-win for all. 

 

Real identities are impossible to enforce and often have bad unintended consequences. People's employers have been contacted because of posts here on AS. 

Founder of Audiophile Style

Announcing Polestar | Quick Community Reviews and Ratings

Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, The Computer Audiophile said:

When people post in the wrong spot, their comments can easily be moved to this sub-forum.

 

This sounds like a penalty box. You must be a hockey fan?  ☺️

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, pkane2001 said:

 

Generally, the crazies are the ones moved into a containment area where they can be isolated and monitored, not the sane population :)

 

There are 80% of the people in the middle and "crazies" at the poles. It goes both ways :~)

 

I'm not calling objectivists crazies. I do think it's a little crazy that people are up in arms with a separate space to discuss matters that most people in the original spaces didn't want to read anyway. In a USB listening thread, almost nobody wants to read anything from objectivists. Yet, when I provide a space for objectivists to refute anything said in the USB cable threads, the objectivists get mad. Makes no sense to me. 

Founder of Audiophile Style

Announcing Polestar | Quick Community Reviews and Ratings

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, The Computer Audiophile said:

 

I'm not calling objectivists crazies. I do think it's a little crazy that people are up in arms with a separate space to discuss matters that most people in the original spaces didn't want to read anyway. In a USB listening thread, almost nobody wants to read anything from objectivists. Yet, when I provide a space for objectivists to refute anything said in the USB cable threads, the objectivists get mad. Makes no sense to me. 

 

No, it's just that they like behaving in a crazy way ... at times. A lot of it is really directed at "their gang"; the drinking buddies who are having a great time slagging off at the other lot, down at the local.

Frank

 

http://artofaudioconjuring.blogspot.com/

 

 

Over and out.

.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, mansr said:

You keep saying that, yet your actions speak strongly to the contrary.

I call the 10 percent of people on each pole crazies. The 80 percent in the middle aren't crazies. Nothing wrong with crazies, but they don't make for a good community when one combines the complete 100% in one basket.

Founder of Audiophile Style

Announcing Polestar | Quick Community Reviews and Ratings

Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, pkane2001 said:

 

The split seems to be a recognition that the larger audience of this site isn't interested in science, facts, or proper engineering discussions. Too bad.

 

Unfortunately, this fails to recognise that many who stir the most are really in the scientism camp, as compared to the field of science.

Frank

 

http://artofaudioconjuring.blogspot.com/

 

 

Over and out.

.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, The Computer Audiophile said:

You're free to walk at any time, free to see through your self fulfilling prophecy, or free to be part of the solution. 

You'd love that, wouldn't you?

Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, jabbr said:

In the past, it was the OP which set the rules of the individual thread. What is wrong with that rule?

 

 There is nothing wrong with that rule.

 The problem is that a few members refuse to abide by it.

How a Digital Audio file sounds, or a Digital Video file looks, is governed to a large extent by the Power Supply area. All that Identical Checksums gives is the possibility of REGENERATING the file to close to that of the original file.

PROFILE UPDATED 28-06-2020

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×
×
  • Create New...