Jeff Dorgay & TONEAudio Declare War on CA

[phototristan]

Just now, jtwrace said:

Seem like you and ToneAudio have something in common.  You both don't know how to click a mouse button.  Stop RSS for him and "forgot my password" for you.  

 

Don't think I didn't try.  I think my old account is no longer, it's been years. 

[plissken]

Just now, jtwrace said:

Seem like you and ToneAudio have something in common.  You both don't know how to click a mouse button.  Stop RSS for him and "forgot my password" for you.  

 

BOOM!

[phototristan]

30 minutes ago, crenca said:

You don't get to drink, drive, and say "my intent was not to break the law or harm anyone"!

 

Legally, you can. Say the drunk-driver hits and kills someone. There's manslaughter vs. murder, all based on intent proven. 

 

 

[jtwrace]

2 minutes ago, phototristan said:

 

Don't think I didn't try.  I think my old account is no longer, it's been years. 

....and Tone didn't try hard enough to handle this like a pro.  It's only as hard as one makes it!  

[jtwrace]

Just now, phototristan said:

 

Legally, you can. Say the drunk-driver hits and kills someone. There's manslaughter vs. murder, all based on intent proven. 

 

 

OMG.  

[Hugo9000]

While everyone I know on facebook has been talking about that press conference today, I've managed to read every post in this nail-biter of a thread.  lol

[Jud]

1 minute ago, Hugo9000 said:

While everyone I know on facebook has been talking about that press conference today, I've managed to read every post in this nail-biter of a thread.  lol

 

That's at least one thing you can say for this thread. 

[FredM]

The non cooperative and aggressive attitude is also wrong in my book (resp simply adjust the RSS setting and verbals). What honestly surprised me even more, why did @computeraudiophile post this online? What's there to gain, other then escalate the situation and publicly mock and bully Jeff? 

 

My vote: Time to add dignity and respect in the forum rules.

[phototristan]

1 minute ago, FredM said:

The non cooperative and aggressive attitude is also wrong in my book (resp simply adjust the RSS setting and verbals). What honestly surprised me even more, why did @computeraudiophile post this online? What's there to gain, other then escalate the situation and publicly mock and bully Jeff? 

 

My vote: Time to add dignity and respect in the forum rules.

 

Yep, that's what I've been saying. 

[jtwrace]

Just now, phototristan said:

 

Yep, that's what I've been saying. 

Dear phototristan,

 

It would be so nice if you could stop posting on this thread as you've made your point.  Can you please stop posting on this thread?  

 

Respectfully,

jtwrace

[The Computer Audiophile]

 

4 minutes ago, FredM said:

The non cooperative and aggressive attitude is also wrong in my book (resp simply adjust the RSS setting and verbals). What honestly surprised me even more, why did @computeraudiophile post this online? What's there to gain, other then escalate the situation and publicly mock and bully Jeff? 

 

My vote: Time to add dignity and respect in the forum rules.

 

 

 

2 hours ago, The Computer Audiophile said:

 

No worries. I prefer to expose bullies who threaten to call lawyers and who literally say the war is on. 

 

This isn't about a spectacle. It's about shedding light on threatening behavior.

 

 

[phototristan]

2 minutes ago, jtwrace said:

It would be so nice if you could stop posting on this thread as you've made your point.  Can you please stop posting on this thread?  

 

Thanks, no. 

[jtwrace]

2 minutes ago, phototristan said:

 

Thanks, no. 

Ah, so you're a hypocrite.

[davide256]

17 hours ago, sandyk said:

Hi Chris

 Publishing email conversations without first seeking the permission of the sender is a very grey area, and possibly not a good move.

Perhaps they should be removed and just an overview given ?

Jud may be able to assist with some general advice in this area. 

 

 Kind Regards

Alex

Your dead wrong. From past legal advisement no expectation of privacy exists unless the email specifically includes a proviso of privileged communication.

[crenca]

2 minutes ago, phototristan said:

 

Thanks, no. 

 

So you wag your finger at others about dignity and respect, but are unwilling to walk the walk yourself.  You are consistence in several ways...

[Jud]

16 minutes ago, jtwrace said:

OMG.  

 

I think @Allan F is right. Just stop feeding the "legal expert"/troll and the thread returns to normality or dies out naturally. 

[phototristan]

1 minute ago, crenca said:

 

So you wag your finger at others about dignity and respect, but are unwilling to walk the walk yourself.  You are consistence in several ways...

 

No, you mean "consistent". 

[jabbr]

2 hours ago, The Computer Audiophile said:

 

... I prefer to expose bullies who threaten to call lawyers and who literally say the war is on. 

 

This isn't about a spectacle. It's about shedding light on threatening behavior.

 

Perfectly acceptable to bring this into the court of public opinion.

[jtwrace]

3 minutes ago, Jud said:

 

I think @Allan F is right. Just stop feeding the "legal expert"/troll and the thread returns to normality or dies out naturally. 

Agreed.  

[phototristan]

Just now, jtwrace said:

Agreed.  

 

As he continues on..

[Milt99]

Jeff D. used to post on SHF generally that a new edition of his webzine was available but also in response to reviews on his site.

I responded once to a new gear listing of device isolators, basically pucks of sorbothane with some kind of shiny metal.

The price listed was really expensive like in the thousands.

 

I posted that I thought for the price these pucks, customer were getting bent over.

No swearing, calling their mag a fake, nothing just about the picks.

 

Well, he ripped me a new one, MF'er the whole 9 yards. I was attacking his credibility and the credibility of site.

He also informed that the price on site was incorrect and that the pucks were only several hundred dollars.

This guy can put M. Lavorgna to shame

 

I tried to sincerely apologize and say that I never meant to call into question anything about his site.

Afterall, it wasn't even a review.

I think he told me shove my apology or something like that.

Sheesh.

[firedog]

24 minutes ago, phototristan said:

 

Thanks, no. 

Let’s just all put him on ignore.

[crenca]

4 minutes ago, Milt99 said:

Jeff D. used to post on SHF generally that a new edition of his webzine was available but also in response to reviews on his site.

I responded once to a new gear listing of device isolators, basically pucks of sorbothane with some kind of shiny metal.

The price listed was really expensive like in the thousands.

 

I posted that I thought for the price these pucks, customer were getting bent over.

No swearing, calling their mag a fake, nothing just about the picks.

 

Well, he ripped me a new one, MF'er the whole 9 yards. I was attacking his credibility and the credibility of site.

He also informed that the price on site was incorrect and that the pucks were only several hundred dollars.

This guy can put M. Lavorgna to shame

 

I tried to sincerely apologize and say that I never meant to call into question anything about his site.

Afterall, it wasn't even a review.

I think he told me shove my apology or something like that.

Sheesh.

 

Which brings us to voodooism in Audiophiledom and yet another mouthpiece for it in ToneAudio.  Scoundrels jealously guard their con...

[phototristan]

1 minute ago, crenca said:

 

Which brings us to voodooism in Audiophiledom and yet another mouthpiece for it in ToneAudio.  Scoundrels jealously guard their con...

 

 

Don't think they don't have sponsors. But this site does too. 

[mansr]

9 minutes ago, Milt99 said:

Jeff D. used to post on SHF generally that a new edition of his webzine was available but also in response to reviews on his site.

I responded once to a new gear listing of device isolators, basically pucks of sorbothane with some kind of shiny metal.

The price listed was really expensive like in the thousands.

 

I posted that I thought for the price these pucks, customer were getting bent over.

No swearing, calling their mag a fake, nothing just about the picks.

 

Well, he ripped me a new one, MF'er the whole 9 yards. I was attacking his credibility and the credibility of site.

He also informed that the price on site was incorrect and that the pucks were only several hundred dollars.

This guy can put M. Lavorgna to shame

 

I tried to sincerely apologize and say that I never meant to call into question anything about his site.

Afterall, it wasn't even a review.

I think he told me shove my apology or something like that.

Sheesh.

You should have mentioned reading it on your specially made, gold plated iPad while sat in one of your BMWs.