Jump to content

firedog

  • Content Count

    10142
  • Joined

  • Last visited

2 Followers

About firedog

  • Rank
    Masters Level Member

Recent Profile Visitors

24329 profile views
  1. No way to tell. Sometimes labels only allow certain tracks to be streamed. Don't know why, maybe they think that will encourage people will buy downloads.
  2. I personally am also anti-spaghetti; tha's a personal preference. I think that at the level you are talking about all those choices will sound great and what will make more of a difference to you over the long term is the software usability and features and the HW features and options/usability. So I'd first think about which option best matches my present and future use needs.
  3. Not really. It's just a preference for something that seems to have a better design. In situations where devices all measure well, I'd probably go for the one that had the best feature set/UI, anyway.
  4. They don't need to predict what you are talking about. They are claiming if you put such a device inline it improves the output of DACs. The marketing implies it works for all or almost all DACs/setups. That's their "prediction". So they should measure some commonly sold DACs at different price levels in typical setups and show us the improved results, if they exist.
  5. I think that's the wrong question. It doesn't matter how the switch itself measures. It matters how the switch does or doesn't change the output at the DAC. What if the switch is "low noise" but that changes nothing at the output of the DAC when compared to a standard "noisey" switch? I'm not interested in the measurements of the switch. I'm interested in how it does or doesn't change the output of the DAC. That's part of my problem here. Why is it so hard for manufacturers of such devices to provide such measurements? And if they somehow need "special devices" to measure DAC output, why
  6. Wow, those measurements show a tiny difference. Is it audible? There is such a thing as "good enough" performance - meaning that slightly better measured results aren't audible. Both subjectivists and objectivists need to remember this, I think. The main takeaway I have from those measurements is that I'd rather get an item like the Arcam or the Mytek that doesn't need "improvement", as opposed to the Lumin, that needs "help".
  7. Some will tell you yes. Some will disagree. Some will always say the newer more expensive device is better. Others disagree. There's no consensus. Have you compared your SOtM to anything else? Compare it unsighted to another device - even a $40 Raspberry Pi, and see what you think.
  8. Hi- Just got one of these. It replaced a RPI4 running diet-pi. For perspective, other streamers I've had in my system: SB Touch SOtM SMS-100 Highly modded SB Touch (connected to outboard clocks and PS)-a $2k setup. microRendu Fanless NUC Bricasti M5 Standard RPi 3B+ Standard RPi 4 Various PS for the above from the $10 wall wart to the $1000 audiophile PS. Why the Link II? Mostly for the form factor. I didn't like the Pi for practical reasons-too small (didn't stay in one place, cables outweighed it), didn't look go
  9. Yeah, that stuff really was bad. But for many it was all they could afford.
  10. There are lots of Kef dealers, maybe you can find one who will let you bring in your Chord at an audition.
  11. Agree. I don't think measurements at ASR tell the whole story: For instance, does my -110db SINAD DAC sound audibly different from a -114db SINAD DAC of similar design from same company? I doubt it. Bruno Putzeys talked about how he thinks measurements can tell you what you need to know about an amp, but you have to run many different meaurements, and not just the standard ones, to see how an amp actually behaves. Some of the people at ASR seem caught up in the numbers for the numbers sake. Others seem to just be looking for good values - units that seem to have near state of the art performa
  12. That makes a lot of sense, but I'd hesitate to leave my server/router on for such a use if I was away from home for more than a few days. Just don't like the idea of something unattended being left on and running for extended periods of time.
  13. Based on my not extensive knowledge, online storage is not cheap if you have a big library. If it was me, I'd make portable backups, and just update each location and the backup drives as necessary. You can move the portable backup with you as you travel between the 2 locations. Of course, if you have a very large collection, what Kal described above would seem to be the best bet.
  14. That's not what I said. I will sometimes post about how something sounds to me. I try to be very careful not to imply or say that that means anything about how it will sound to others or what it does to a system/SQ in general. In my present setup with the Kii Control and Kiis I don't think add-ons do much, if anything. In general over the years I've come to doubt such devices do much in general, as almost all the "evidence" is based on sighted anecdotes, and in my own testing I can't find consistent improvement if testing is unsighted. But, of course, there may be specific setups w
  15. Again, you miss the point and think somehow if you look at my setup you can catch me being a hypocrite. Wrong both times. I don't make or manufacture any of the devices, and make no claims about them other than how they sound to me. I'm not the manufacturer, so I don't have to back up any claim I would make, as long as I present it as a personal impression and not a "fact" of audio reproduction that applies to others or generally to audio reproduction. In general, I've measured how my Kiis perform in my room, so I can make claims about that. As far as iFi or other devices,
×
×
  • Create New...