Ishmael Slapowitz Posted July 16, 2019 Share Posted July 16, 2019 4 minutes ago, The Computer Audiophile said: Just because MQA is good for your bottom line doesn’t make it good for ours. Eggg...Zactly. Link to comment
Popular Post MetalNuts Posted July 17, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted July 17, 2019 6 hours ago, esldude said: MQA has gone Chinese. What's Cantonese for shill. 做媒 esldude, crenca, new_media and 1 other 2 2 MetalNuts Link to comment
MetalNuts Posted July 17, 2019 Share Posted July 17, 2019 A desperate move of MQA? I do not have the data of mainland Chinese buying legitimate copies of CD or files but I believe it is relatively low in those who have the habit of listening music and most of them on their PC or mobile. MetalNuts Link to comment
Popular Post KeenObserver Posted July 17, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted July 17, 2019 The Chinese are not allowed full access to the web. They are allowed a carefully screened version. Now, with MQA, they will not be allowed access to full resolution audio. Sad. Ran, bambadoo and esldude 3 Boycott Warner Boycott Tidal Boycott Roon Boycott Lenbrook Link to comment
Ishmael Slapowitz Posted July 17, 2019 Share Posted July 17, 2019 24 minutes ago, MetalNuts said: A desperate move of MQA? I do not have the data of mainland Chinese buying legitimate copies of CD or files but I believe it is relatively low in those who have the habit of listening music and most of them on their PC or mobile. this deal is like signing u to supply ham to the Synagogue cafeteria. 🤣 Link to comment
skikirkwood Posted July 17, 2019 Share Posted July 17, 2019 On 7/12/2019 at 9:30 AM, Ishmael Slapowitz said: Well this is curious. Interesting proposition from Flutteringmachines. Lavagnah says: "...digital recordings should be offered in the working sample rate." also "..And if you want to make an argument in favor of 16/44.1 or lossy formats in terms of space, storage or bandwidth, check your calendar. Just the year will do." He unknowingly makes two points as to why MQA should not exist in 2019. https://twitteringmachines.com/pet-peeves-hi-res-downloads/ I have to admit I kind of miss Lavorgna running Audiostream. He was just such a predictable jerk, and always provided a great deal of entertainment. Picking fights with anyone who posted a comment that did not line up with his shill-centric editorial garbage. Having his buddy Steve Plaskin write the most outrageous glowing reviews of the snake oil from Synergistic Research. Rafe Arnott doesn't post info that is more useful, helpful, or accurate than Lavorgna did, but he's kind of a likable guy. Unlike ML. Ralf11 1 Link to comment
Ishmael Slapowitz Posted July 17, 2019 Share Posted July 17, 2019 6 minutes ago, skikirkwood said: I have to admit I kind of miss Lavorgna running Audiostream. He was just such a predictable jerk, and always provided a great deal of entertainment. Picking fights with anyone who posted a comment that did not line up with his shill-centric editorial garbage. Having his buddy Steve Plaskin write the most outrageous glowing reviews of the snake oil from Synergistic Research. Rafe Arnott doesn't post info that is more useful, helpful, or accurate than Lavorgna did, but he's kind of a likable guy. Unlike ML. Have to agree. The way he ran AudioStream was befitting of a baby boomer with a liberal arts degree. They were all brought to think they were smarter than everybody else and oh-so-special lol. I guess it is worse now with all the 20 something snow flakes. In the end the grizzled hipster persona was grating. And he was expendable to their new UK owners. crenca 1 Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted July 17, 2019 Share Posted July 17, 2019 15 minutes ago, skikirkwood said: I have to admit I kind of miss Lavorgna running Audiostream. He was just such a predictable jerk, and always provided a great deal of entertainment. Picking fights with anyone who posted a comment that did not line up with his shill-centric editorial garbage. Having his buddy Steve Plaskin write the most outrageous glowing reviews of the snake oil from Synergistic Research. Rafe Arnott doesn't post info that is more useful, helpful, or accurate than Lavorgna did, but he's kind of a likable guy. Unlike ML. I didn't know Lasagna was gone from Audiostream - what happened to him? Link to comment
skikirkwood Posted July 17, 2019 Share Posted July 17, 2019 3 minutes ago, Ralf11 said: I didn't know Lasagna was gone from Audiostream - what happened to him? Link to comment
lucretius Posted July 17, 2019 Share Posted July 17, 2019 1 hour ago, KeenObserver said: The Chinese are not allowed full access to the web. They are allowed a carefully screened version. Now, with MQA, they will not be allowed access to full resolution audio. Sad. The Great Firewall and the Great Lie. ☺️ mQa is dead! Link to comment
The Computer Audiophile Posted July 17, 2019 Share Posted July 17, 2019 4 hours ago, Rt66indierock said: Matrix Audio X? Matrix is about it. But MQA Ltd shouldn’t let facts get in its way. https://m.aliexpress.com/wholesale/MQA.html?channel=direct&keywords=MQA Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems Link to comment
MetalNuts Posted July 17, 2019 Share Posted July 17, 2019 If the mainland Chinese know the potential DRM in MQA, I wonder how many will buy CD or file with MQA. MetalNuts Link to comment
jabbr Posted July 17, 2019 Share Posted July 17, 2019 4 minutes ago, MetalNuts said: If the mainland Chinese know the potential DRM in MQA, I wonder how many will buy CD or file with MQA. Reverse engineered, copied, distributed ... done deal, who cares? Paul R 1 Custom room treatments for headphone users. Link to comment
MetalNuts Posted July 17, 2019 Share Posted July 17, 2019 2 minutes ago, jabbr said: Reverse engineered, copied, distributed ... done deal, who cares? Not necessary! What is the purpose of all that trouble for copying MQA lies? Is it worthwhile to waste effort in reverse engineering, copying? Are there anything worth copying? Here in the forum, most agreed or understood that there is no benefit that MQA will bring. If the Chinese were to lie, they could lie on their own and invent their own Voodoo.🤣 MetalNuts Link to comment
Paul R Posted July 17, 2019 Share Posted July 17, 2019 1 hour ago, MetalNuts said: Not necessary! What is the purpose of all that trouble for copying MQA lies? Is it worthwhile to waste effort in reverse engineering, copying? Are there anything worth copying? Here in the forum, most agreed or understood that there is no benefit that MQA will bring. If the Chinese were to lie, they could lie on their own and invent their own Voodoo.🤣 Seems like a case for Detective Dee... MQA sorcery? Anyone who considers protocol unimportant has never dealt with a cat DAC. Robert A. Heinlein Link to comment
Fast and Bulbous Posted July 17, 2019 Share Posted July 17, 2019 Are we all familiar with HyperNormalisation? As a thing and the documentary that lays it all out clearly. MQA and the like seem to follow this pattern of using media and messaging to generate a "reality" that isn't there but convince us it is. Actors as influencers... Until it is the only reality we see and then make judgment calls and decisions based on it. https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/p04b183c/adam-curtis-hypernormalisation Currawong 1 Link to comment
Popular Post Fast and Bulbous Posted July 17, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted July 17, 2019 And if you look at MQA through the lens of models of innovation diffusion, they are, and have been from the beginning, making the moves to get their tech as standard infrastructure. That's the end game that the opening moves are designed to steer towards. The key is often to fix a broken mission critical process for pragmatic organisation(s). Question is whose process are they fixing? Ain't mine that's for sure. The record companies and manufacturers seem the obvious candidates, always have been. A lot was learned from the effort and investment in MLP years ago. That delivered infrastructure, but not huge revenue. This time....? #Yoda# and Currawong 2 Link to comment
Rt66indierock Posted July 17, 2019 Author Share Posted July 17, 2019 13 hours ago, Fast and Bulbous said: Are we all familiar with HyperNormalisation? As a thing and the documentary that lays it all out clearly. MQA and the like seem to follow this pattern of using media and messaging to generate a "reality" that isn't there but convince us it is. Actors as influencers... Until it is the only reality we see and then make judgment calls and decisions based on it. https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/p04b183c/adam-curtis-hypernormalisation Well they do say they use journalists to advance their marketing in their financial statements. Link to comment
lucretius Posted July 18, 2019 Share Posted July 18, 2019 22 hours ago, jabbr said: Reverse engineered, copied, distributed ... done deal, who cares? Don't need to reverse engineer MQA in order to copy files and distribute them (at least now without the DRM code to prevent playback of copies). In any case, if some DRM code is applied that would prevent playback of copies, then MQA CD's would not be playable on most disk players in existence. And as along as non-MQA files/CDs are available, then who needs MQA anyway? botrytis 1 mQa is dead! Link to comment
Popular Post Confused Posted July 18, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted July 18, 2019 I attended a Devialet event at Oxford Audio Consultants in the UK yesterday. OAC were hosting Mathieu Pernot, who is now Devialet’s “Global Head of Development, Devialet Expert Pro”. Grand job titles apart, he was Chief Engineer during the development and release of d-Premier and Expert amps. The event included a Q&A session, using questions compiled from members of Unofficial Devialet forum. Question 6, and the response, have some relevance here. 6) What plans are there to support MQA directly in the Expert?There are no plans for MQA support directly in the Expert. Devialet see less and less call for it, and it is technically incompatible with SAM. crenca and The Computer Audiophile 1 1 Windows 11 PC, Roon, HQPlayer, Focus Fidelity convolutions, iFi Zen Stream, Paul Hynes SR4, Mutec REF10, Mutec MC3+USB, Devialet 1000Pro, KEF Blade. Plus Pro-Ject Signature 12 TT for playing my 'legacy' vinyl collection. Desktop system; RME ADI-2 DAC fs, Meze Empyrean headphones. Link to comment
The Computer Audiophile Posted July 18, 2019 Share Posted July 18, 2019 People still saying “Thank you sir, may I have another.” https://community.roonlabs.com/t/mqa-disappointing/44057/1932 Ran 1 Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems Link to comment
Tintinabulum Posted July 18, 2019 Share Posted July 18, 2019 Is that a shout out to the “gang” to go over and keep up the tirade? Others to rain on the parade? Link to comment
The Computer Audiophile Posted July 18, 2019 Share Posted July 18, 2019 12 minutes ago, Tintinabulum said: Is that a shout out to the “gang” to go over and keep up the tirade? Others to rain on the parade? You’re the one who thought of it, so what does that say about you? don’t read between the lines of my writing. I’m not afraid to say what I mean, unlike the old guard. Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems Link to comment
Popular Post Samuel T Cogley Posted July 18, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted July 18, 2019 Am I the only one noticing that MQA and its most loyal fanbois have transitioned to a defensive posture? Perhaps I'm imagining it. Rt66indierock, Ishmael Slapowitz and MikeyFresh 1 1 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now