kumakuma Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 9 minutes ago, John Dyson said: (sorry, shouldn't be so opinionated, but Harry's life seems to have gotten a lot worse in the longer term with his 'partner'. Sadly, probably too inexperienced to realize the fantastic life that he could have had -- just had some rules and some discretion that needed to be followed.) I personally couldn't imagine anything duller than being a member of the British royal family. Sometimes it's like someone took a knife, baby Edgy and dull and cut a six inch valley Through the middle of my skull Link to comment
John Dyson Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 3 minutes ago, kumakuma said: I personally couldn't imagine anything duller than being a member of the British royal family. It all depends on what you do with yourself. If I had the personal (quiet) freedom that someone so wealthy & aspects of privacy, even if officially quitting the 'firm', I would have resources to do all kinds of research projects. If it isn't about 'research projects', it could be many other activities about personal growth and learning -- geesh, be the 100,000'th person to climb Everest... :-). Again, it is all about how one takes advantage of the freedoms that they have. Link to comment
JoeWhip Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 Hey, I am not living their lives in their skins. I have no basis or reason to criticize them. If they are happy, who cares. kumakuma 1 Link to comment
Allan F Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 23 minutes ago, John Dyson said: I thought that it was spelled: Witch. (sorry, shouldn't be so opinionated, but Harry's life seems to have gotten a lot worse in the longer term with his 'partner'. Sadly, probably too inexperienced to realize the fantastic life that he could have had -- just had some rules and some discretion that needed to be followed.) IMO, rather than being sorry, you should be ashamed of such a sexist misogynistic opinion, worthy only of the most vicious English tabloids. "Relax, it's only hi-fi. There's never been a hi-fi emergency." - Roy Hall "Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted." - William Bruce Cameron Link to comment
kumakuma Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 17 minutes ago, John Dyson said: It all depends on what you do with yourself. If I had the personal (quiet) freedom that someone so wealthy & aspects of privacy, even if officially quitting the 'firm', I would have resources to do all kinds of research projects. If it isn't about 'research projects', it could be many other activities about personal growth and learning -- geesh, be the 100,000'th person to climb Everest... :-). Again, it is all about how one takes advantage of the freedoms that they have. I know from experience that I'm too boring to spend that much time with myself... John Dyson 1 Sometimes it's like someone took a knife, baby Edgy and dull and cut a six inch valley Through the middle of my skull Link to comment
Popular Post AudioDoctor Posted March 9, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted March 9, 2021 This might just be the Queen Mother of off topics... ha MikeyFresh, KeenObserver and John Dyson 2 1 No electron left behind. Link to comment
Popular Post Ishmael Slapowitz Posted March 9, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted March 9, 2021 So in this review of the $10,500 (without storage) Grimm streamer, Atkinson insists, yet again, on interjecting MQA where it has no place. This paragraph- "The MU1's specifications say that it supports "all sample rates and formats." I asked Eelco about how the MU1 handles MQA, as the instructions say to set the MU1 to "No MQA Support" in Roon. "By telling Roon that the MU1 does not offer MQA support, Roon will do the first unfold," he replied. "If you tell Roon that the MU1 supports MQA, it will just forward the stream unaltered to the MU1. If you then turn off volume control and upsampling in the MU1, the MQA stream will transfer transparently to its AES output. If you have a DAC connected that recognizes MQA on its AES stream, it will be able to do the full MQA unfold and filter stuff. The disadvantage is that you lose the volume control and the upsampling on non-MQA streams." .......could have been easily summed up with one sentance.."The MU1 offers no MQA support, and never will".... Either Atkinson has no integrity, or he is obsessed with giving MQA as many mentions as he possibly can before he rides off into the sunset. Pathetic, and sad. I would not buy a box of paperclips based on his recommendation. https://www.stereophile.com/content/grimm-audio-mu1-music-streamer maxijazz, lucretius, yahooboy and 1 other 4 Link to comment
John Dyson Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 41 minutes ago, Allan F said: IMO, rather than being sorry, you should be ashamed of such a sexist misogynistic opinion, worthy only of the most vicious English tabloids. I haven't seen the English tabloids -- I am not vicious, but a proper observation shows the SERIOUSLY DAMAGING AND DESTRUCTIVE INFLUENCE to be true. Sorry for the distraction. Link to comment
Popular Post The Computer Audiophile Posted March 9, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted March 9, 2021 Let's stick to MQA guys. John Dyson, Confused, mav52 and 2 others 5 Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems Link to comment
Allan F Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 4 hours ago, John Dyson said: I haven't seen the English tabloids... Using bold and caps serves only to emphasize your prejudice. EOM John Dyson 1 "Relax, it's only hi-fi. There's never been a hi-fi emergency." - Roy Hall "Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted." - William Bruce Cameron Link to comment
FredericV Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 7 hours ago, Ishmael Slapowitz said: So in this review of the $10,500 (without storage) Grimm streamer, Atkinson insists, yet again, on interjecting MQA where it has no place. This paragraph- .......could have been easily summed up with one sentance.."The MU1 offers no MQA support, and never will".... Either Atkinson has no integrity, or he is obsessed with giving MQA as many mentions as he possibly can before he rides off into the sunset. Pathetic, and sad. I would not buy a box of paperclips based on his recommendation. https://www.stereophile.com/content/grimm-audio-mu1-music-streamer This is not correct. Music servers can contain software and/or hardware which can do DSP outside of Roon. In the MU1 this is an FPGA based upsampling PCIe soundcard with digital outputs, in our case it's our custom upsampling code running on a separate core, which uses Archimago's intermediate phase as one of the recipes. So how do you support MQA when your own product also does upsampling outside of Roon? If you want the Roon based music server to decode MQA, then just leave the core MQA decoder enabled in Roon for this zone, and the upsampling process can still be applied in another part of your server which Roon does not control. This process replaces the second unfold, so any attached MQA dac will no longer see the instructions for the second unfold. In essence, it no longer matters if you use an external MQA dac or not, MQA metadata will never be passed to the DAC. If you want the Roon based music server to pass the MQA bitperfect to an external device which will fully decode MQA, disable the MQA core decoder in Roon and disable any further DSP in the music server product so that the metadata is being passed so that the MQA product recognizes it. Per design, you can truncate 24 bit to 16 bit or corrupt the bottom 8 bits and the blue light will still shine, but that's the only allowable transformation. You must leave at least 16 bits of an MQA file intact ;) Then variations of both exist, where you would allow Roon to do the first unfold, and still disable any further processing in your product, and then any MQA DAC including the usually cheaper render-only MQA DAC's would do the upsampling step. So Roon gives you a lot of choices Designer of the 432 EVO music server and Linux specialist Discoverer of the independent open source sox based mqa playback method with optional one cycle postringing. Link to comment
Rt66indierock Posted March 10, 2021 Author Share Posted March 10, 2021 A little off topic. lucretius 1 Link to comment
Fast and Bulbous Posted March 10, 2021 Share Posted March 10, 2021 Good news. I had my first one a few weeks ago. Got some serious COVID symptoms after it but it seems that if you have had COVID the side effects are much worse after the vaccination. Was not nice to have them back again, but they passed. Link to comment
JoeWhip Posted March 10, 2021 Share Posted March 10, 2021 Congrats rt66inderock. Due for shot 2 in three weeks, wife in 2 and my 91 year old mon had both with the only side effect being a little tired for a day or two, now back to MQA. lucretius 1 Link to comment
Popular Post John_Atkinson Posted March 11, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted March 11, 2021 On 3/8/2021 at 8:42 PM, Ishmael Slapowitz said: Either Atkinson has no integrity, or he is obsessed with giving MQA as many mentions as he possibly can before he rides off into the sunset. Pathetic, and sad. I would not buy a box of paperclips based on his recommendation. https://www.stereophile.com/content/grimm-audio-mu1-music-streamer Thank you for reading my review so thoroughly, Mr, Slapowitz. However, I am afraid I don't know enough about different kinds of paperclips to be able to make a recommendation. John Atkinson Technical Editor, Stereophile Ishmael Slapowitz, opus101, Jeff_N and 2 others 5 Link to comment
KeenObserver Posted March 12, 2021 Share Posted March 12, 2021 44 minutes ago, John_Atkinson said: Thank you for reading my review so thoroughly, Mr, Slapowitz. However, I am afraid I don't know enough about different kinds of paperclips to be able to make a recommendation. John Atkinson Technical Editor, Stereophile Years ago, when I still read Stereophile, I valued your testing of equipment specs. With your support of MQA, that is the only opinion of yours that I would put any credence in. Boycott Warner Boycott Tidal Boycott Roon Boycott Lenbrook Link to comment
Ishmael Slapowitz Posted March 12, 2021 Share Posted March 12, 2021 1 hour ago, John_Atkinson said: Thank you for reading my review so thoroughly, Mr, Slapowitz. However, I am afraid I don't know enough about different kinds of paperclips to be able to make a recommendation. John Atkinson Technical Editor, Stereophile since you decided to waste your readers time with numerous gratuitous mentions of Master Quack Audio in a review of a $10,500 streamer, it is clear you don't know enough about modern digital audio either, Or you are knowingly ignorant. Just admit you were wrong, and laid an egg with your endorsement of Master Quack. There is a small possibility it will save your legacy. Or not. Link to comment
Ishmael Slapowitz Posted March 12, 2021 Share Posted March 12, 2021 Not sure if it was posted here before, but that Mytek Brooklyn ADC....with "MQA Mastering" died a royal death. It is now a "legacy" product. Oh well. I am sure you can find one for pennies on the dollar now, or in a scrap heap. 😅 Link to comment
JoeWhip Posted March 12, 2021 Share Posted March 12, 2021 Just saw that. Imagine that. Link to comment
Kal Rubinson Posted March 12, 2021 Share Posted March 12, 2021 24 minutes ago, JoeWhip said: Just saw that. Imagine that. It seems like a side-effect of Mytek separating themselves from their former manufacturing partner in Poland and the subsequent discontinuation of the entire product line produced by them. It is only significant if Mytek has also deleted MQA from their new and current line of products. I doubt it. lucretius 1 Kal Rubinson Senior Contributing Editor, Stereophile Link to comment
yahooboy Posted March 12, 2021 Share Posted March 12, 2021 On 3/9/2021 at 2:42 AM, Ishmael Slapowitz said: Either Atkinson has no integrity, or he is obsessed with giving MQA as many mentions as he possibly can before he rides off into the sunset. Pathetic, and sad. I would not buy a box of paperclips based on his recommendation. https://www.stereophile.com/content/grimm-audio-mu1-music-streamer It's called working on commission Link to comment
Ishmael Slapowitz Posted March 12, 2021 Share Posted March 12, 2021 4 minutes ago, Kal Rubinson said: It seems like a side-effect of Mytek separating themselves from their former manufacturing partner in Poland and the subsequent discontinuation of the entire product line produced by them. It is only significant if Mytek has also deleted MQA from their new and current line of products. I doubt it. Wrong take. It is significant because of the lies told by the Master Quack society...that magical MQA mastering tools were around the corner, and that shiny new MQA encoding ADCs would be in every studio. The fact this product sunk like the titanic with no replacement means the market rejected it soundly. Any recording, mixing, or mastering engineer who touts MQA would be laughed out of the room. Link to comment
John Dyson Posted March 12, 2021 Share Posted March 12, 2021 9 minutes ago, Ishmael Slapowitz said: Wrong take. It is significant because of the lies told by the Master Quack society...that magical MQA mastering tools were around the corner, and that shiny new MQA encoding ADCs would be in every studio. The fact this product sunk like the titanic with no replacement means the market rejected it soundly. Any recording, mixing, or mastering engineer who touts MQA would be laughed out of the room. There is ONLY ONE way that I could accept MQA -- if they get totally rid of FA. I wouldn't mind 14 bits of clean audio with slightly lower SNR vs the 16bits of hash that most/many recordings are today. Link to comment
Ishmael Slapowitz Posted March 12, 2021 Share Posted March 12, 2021 7 minutes ago, John Dyson said: There is ONLY ONE way that I could accept MQA -- if they get totally rid of FA. I wouldn't mind 14 bits of clean audio with slightly lower SNR vs the 16bits of hash that most/many recordings are today. That is still a major step backwards..MQA not only truncates bits, but adds aliasing and actually worsens "time domain" performance. There is zero benefit, and zero reason to ever accept it. Link to comment
Kal Rubinson Posted March 12, 2021 Share Posted March 12, 2021 22 minutes ago, Ishmael Slapowitz said: Wrong take. It is significant because of the lies told by the Master Quack society...that magical MQA mastering tools were around the corner, and that shiny new MQA encoding ADCs would be in every studio. The fact this product sunk like the titanic with no replacement means the market rejected it soundly. Any recording, mixing, or mastering engineer who touts MQA would be laughed out of the room. Skew it as you wish. Kal Rubinson Senior Contributing Editor, Stereophile Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now