Jump to content
IGNORED

MQA is Vaporware


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, bambadoo said:

No more light. 

The struggle is real!

Screenshot2023-08-03at07_24_53.thumb.png.be29c71261f3b148fafa9c6cd3d18c8a.png

Wow the "lights" are going out all over the world then, this means that these files are un-decoded MQA files and not even PCM as Morten at 2L never gave anyone the option to hear PCM on streaming sites, Qobuz "lights" up MQA on these files, could this be just a bug at Tidal or is it the end ??

Link to comment

It seems Michael Lavorgna deserves praise for being the very first pro-MQA journalist to break away, albeit very timidly, from MQA.

 

'The last thing, the very last thing I ever want to do is re-purchase the same handful of audiophile chestnuts that get dusted off and repackaged with every Next Big Thing while spending multiples more on the new hardware I need to play ‘em. What’s even worse, to my mind, is having a music delivery format dictate the music I get excited about. If I were to picture an audiophile Hell, that’s exactly what it would look like.'

 

However, not a word about the role of audio journalism and his own writings in trying to build the MQA Hell he is now criticizing.

 

https://twitteringmachines.com/my-thoughts-on-music-delivery-formats-and-the-biggest-advance-in-hifi/

Link to comment
4 minutes ago, Gustave said:

It seems Michael Lavorgna deserves praise for being the very first pro-MQA journalist to break away, albeit very timidly, from MQA.

 

 

The one thing I will say about Michael Lavorgna is that he is a lover of music, his tastes are all over the genre map and he clearly uses music to relax, to change/manage mood, for pure enjoyment. I might not like all of his music selections, but I've found some great titles/bands by following his reviews - and Friday new music postings. Gear seems to be a means to an end to enjoy the music, and I can respect that.  

Link to comment
2 hours ago, Gustave said:

It seems Michael Lavorgna deserves praise for being the very first pro-MQA journalist to break away, albeit very timidly, from MQA.

 

'The last thing, the very last thing I ever want to do is re-purchase the same handful of audiophile chestnuts that get dusted off and repackaged with every Next Big Thing while spending multiples more on the new hardware I need to play ‘em. What’s even worse, to my mind, is having a music delivery format dictate the music I get excited about. If I were to picture an audiophile Hell, that’s exactly what it would look like.'

 

However, not a word about the role of audio journalism and his own writings in trying to build the MQA Hell he is now criticizing.

 

https://twitteringmachines.com/my-thoughts-on-music-delivery-formats-and-the-biggest-advance-in-hifi/

 

Of course, they won't. Why would ANYONE stand behind what they say. I mean it is not like that they want to be held responsible for what they say.

Current:  Daphile on an AMD A10-9500 with 16 GB RAM

DAC - TEAC UD-501 DAC 

Pre-amp - Rotel RC-1590

Amplification - Benchmark AHB2 amplifier

Speakers - Revel M126Be with 2 REL 7/ti subwoofers

Cables - Tara Labs RSC Reference and Blue Jean Cable Balanced Interconnects

Link to comment
4 hours ago, UkPhil said:

Wow the "lights" are going out all over the world then, this means that these files are un-decoded MQA files and not even PCM as Morten at 2L never gave anyone the option to hear PCM on streaming sites,

 

Demise of MQA fever appears to have effected your MQA/TIDAL basics 😀. Undecoded MQA files, aka MQA distribution files, are what TIDAL sends out as MQA - which of course leads to the "lights" being switched on in MQA supporting kit.

 

 

 

4 hours ago, UkPhil said:

Morten at 2L never gave anyone the option to hear PCM on streaming sites, Qobuz "lights" up MQA on these files, could this be just a bug at Tidal or is it the end ??

 

If the 'bug' at TIDAL is them resampling MQA files before streaming, then that would corrupt the MQA encoding & make them undetectable as MQA by MQA supporting devices. TIDAL's max quality tracks with a resolution of 24bit/44.1kHz or 24bit/48kHz could potentially be suspect, plus tracks with a sample rate above 48kHz that don't exhibit any ultrasonic content with a spectrum analyser.

 

 

 

 

We are far more united and have far more in common with each other than things that divide us.

-- Jo Cox

Link to comment
23 hours ago, loop7 said:

I'm confused about TIDAL today and the transition to or addition of high resolution.

 

A few albums are showing as MAX in the Mac OS app and as MQA in the iOS and Android apps. 

 

I was unable to find multiple versions of this album but I assume I'm doing something wrong.

 

Mac OS app

 

 

iOS app

 

 

Android app

 

 

 

 

 

Only desktop apps have been updated for flac

iOS still on the old app. They have a beta app that has the new Max setting but only for beta testers. I would anticipate it getting rolled out this month once it is table. 

 

I believe Tidal API also not updated since my aurender and ifi streamers still are seeing the MQA version of the songs, whereas my desktop app is fully on flac

Link to comment
10 minutes ago, honeymustardsteve said:

 

Only desktop apps have been updated for flac

iOS still on the old app. They have a beta app that has the new Max setting but only for beta testers. I would anticipate it getting rolled out this month once it is table. 

 

I believe Tidal API also not updated since my aurender and ifi streamers still are seeing the MQA version of the songs, whereas my desktop app is fully on flac

My iOS app says max. Not beta. 

Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems AudiophileStyleStickerWhite2.0.png AudiophileStyleStickerWhite7.1.4.png

Link to comment

When I updated the Tidal Windows desktop app, it reset the exclusive mode setting to off. Turning it on restored mqa core decoding.

 

To see if a max track is mqa or standard pcm flac, toggle the mqa passthru setting. Passthru on disables core decoding, off performs core decoding. If it's 44.1/48 with passthru on and 88.2/96 with passthru off it's mqa. If it's the same either way it's flac.

Link to comment
On 8/5/2023 at 5:03 AM, Currawong said:

I can only conclude that they are in denial that someone whom I imagine has been a friend of theirs for decades has not only deceived them, but revealed their own level of ignorance.  Unlike myself, where I'm happy to admit that there is much I don't know, and I can be wrong (and am happy to post corrections to mistakes I make), these types of reviewers don't seem to be capable of that. 

Oh, he's one of the sensitive ones. Back in 2020 i wrote him in connection with the article https://twitteringmachines.com/amazon-to-remaster-titles-from-universal-and-warner-in-ultra-hd-why/ and pointed out to him that he himself had been instrumental in promoting "snake oil" better than cd formats. His reaction.....

 

I’ve taken the liberty of blocking your email from any further communication as I don’t have time for nonsense.
😅

Link to comment

Is Peter Veth's mqa audio - development and reviews on FaceBook still up? Or did I get banned for saying if Block Inc's other revenue wasn't at least $70 million in Q2 2024 they might as well shut Tidal down and stop the earnings drag. It was $50 million so Tidal's growth has been flat since 2020.

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Rt66indierock said:

Is Peter Veth's mqa audio - development and reviews on FaceBook still up? Or did I get banned for saying if Block Inc's other revenue wasn't at least $70 million in Q2 2024 they might as well shut Tidal down and stop the earnings drag. It was $50 million so Tidal's growth has been flat since 2020.

I still see it up on Facebook with 7 messages in the last day. Wonder what kind of 'developments' talking about today! I assume they're still trying to hock SCL6.

 

Archimago's Musings: A "more objective" take for the Rational Audiophile.

Beyond mere fidelity, into immersion and realism.

:nomqa: R.I.P. MQA 2014-2023: Hyped product thanks to uneducated, uncritical advocates & captured press.

 

 

Link to comment
52 minutes ago, Archimago said:

I still see it up on Facebook with 7 messages in the last day. Wonder what kind of 'developments' talking about today! I assume they're still trying to hock SCL6.

 

Good to know thanks. They can talk all they want but unless somebody steps up with some money time is running out. 

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...