Jump to content

daverich4

Members
  • Content Count

    541
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About daverich4

  • Rank
    Newbie

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Well, he uses the term “true high resolution audio” several times and describes MQA as “a miracle of modern digital-audio technology”. I can’t imagine that you’d disagree. AMIRITE?
  2. It doesn’t seem like it would take any more effort to be accurate than changing the word “unfolded” to “upsampled”. Not sure why that would be unwieldy.
  3. I’ve been gone for 2 or 3 days and when I come back the General Forum is full of iFi Advertising/Marketing. Shouldn’t all these threads be in a sponsored forum?
  4. Wish I could but as I said in an earlier post, my Orbi router doesn’t allow changing the lease time. I guess my opticalRendu is going to be what it’s going to be, awesome sound with an occasional hiccup.
  5. I’m not sure what the previous posters were talking about. What I’ve done is exactly what you said, assign static addresses in my router.
  6. I use a Netgear Orbi which doesn’t have an adjustable lease time. My microRendu, ultraRendu and opticalRendu all have fixed addresses. The only one that drops off the network is the opticalRendu.
  7. Forced to leap from my chair and boogie around the room...
  8. As long as it’s not Tribbles...
  9. You said more than that. You said he had something to gain financially from the success of MQA. I’m willing to take you at your word, I simply asked if you would explain how.
  10. I’ve seen this claim about Peter McGrath before but never quite caught what his financial interest in MQA would be. He works for a speaker manufacturer so no gain there as far as I can tell. He does his own recordings but it’s not clear to me how promoting MQA would increase sales of them. Or does he even sell them? I don’t know. I’m aware that he DOES promote MQA, I just don’t see how he gains financially by doing so.
  11. Not sure which JA you were referring to but it is a quote from a review by Jim Austin.
  12. From the September 2019 issue of Stereophile... ”MQA files will still unfold to their full resolution (although it must be acknowledged, without going into detail, that above 96kHZ, an unfolded MQA file is not equivalent to a PCM file of the same specification).” Is that because of this thread? Could be. At least it’s the desired result.
  13. Why on earth would I care if people want to post in this thread? The post you referred to suggested that new information about MQA in this thread mostly ceased being posted 100’s of pages ago. The majority of the posts since then are things being reposted... again. I see no harm in that but your repeated claim that I “want people to shut up” or “stop posting” is a figment of your imagination. You and I have had what I consider to be reasonable discussions/disagreements in the past but this is getting tedious. I just hit play on an album by Lauren Henderson that I read about today and I think I’d rather do that than this. You can continue talking to yourself if you want.
  14. You would have a better idea what that’s about than I as it’s something that exists solely in your mind.
  15. Then I apologize. I misunderstood what you do for a living.
×
×
  • Create New...