Jump to content

How To Use Polestar | Polestar Feedback


Recommended Posts

Hi Guys - I hope you all saw our newest feature here at AS called Polestar. Here is the introductory post - LINK

 

To access the feature, click the Polestar tab at the top of any page.

 

This forum topic is for instructions on how to use the feature and for people to leave feedback. Please note the feature is in beta and we are working out inevitable kinks. If we waited to perfect it, the feature would never be launched. Thanks in advance for your feedback and to those who helped during the Alpha stage. 

 

 

How To Use Polestar (Find, Review, Rate Products)

 

 

 

 

 

How To Add A Missing Product

 

 

Founder of Audiophile Style

Announcing Polestar | Quick Community Reviews and Ratings

Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, One and a half said:

Maybe a rating for the review, the same as for posts, thanks, upvote, laughing, and the D....

I think this is what you're talking about. 

 

People can mark a review as helpful.

People can upvote/thank/like/laugh/etc... each review.

People can sort by newest or most helpful. 

 

 

Screen Shot 2020-02-05 at 9.43.58 PM.png

Founder of Audiophile Style

Announcing Polestar | Quick Community Reviews and Ratings

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, The Computer Audiophile said:

I think this is what you're talking about. 

 

People can mark a review as helpful.

People can upvote/thank/like/laugh/etc... each review.

People can sort by newest or most helpful. 

 

 

Screen Shot 2020-02-05 at 9.43.58 PM.png

Yes that interface is familiar and well used, that’s what was on my mind. 
To make an example of a headfi review, the op review of hardware is then commented on, and can and does spiral into meaningless conversation. Would you be willing to moderate quite a bit of nonsense which could be demanding. 
I’m thinking of cable reviews where a powder keg is just sitting and waiting.

AS Profile Equipment List        Say NO to MQA

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, One and a half said:

Yes that interface is familiar and well used, that’s what was on my mind. 
To make an example of a headfi review, the op review of hardware is then commented on, and can and does spiral into meaningless conversation. Would you be willing to moderate quite a bit of nonsense which could be demanding. 
I’m thinking of cable reviews where a powder keg is just sitting and waiting.

Absolutely yes. Polestar isn't a place for comments or conversation. It will be an easy one to remove that kind of stuff because a moderator doesn't have to take into account the context of a conversation or anything. If it isn't an honest review, it's gone. 

Founder of Audiophile Style

Announcing Polestar | Quick Community Reviews and Ratings

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Chris-

A little unclear to me: do you want just the dry facts about devices, or also a short evaluation?

Main listening (small home office):

Main setup: Surge protector +_iFi  AC iPurifiers >Isol-8 Mini sub Axis Power Conditioning+Isolation>QuietPC Low Noise Server>Roon (Audiolense DRC)>Stack Audio Link II>Kii Control>Kii Three >GIK Room Treatments.

Secondary Listening: Server with Audiolense RC>RPi4 or analog>Matrix Element i Streamer/DAC (XLR)>Kii Three .

Bedroom: SBTouch to Cambridge Soundworks Desktop Setup.
Living Room/Kitchen: RPi 3B+ running RoPieee to a pair of Morel Hogtalare. 

All absolute statements about audio are false :)

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, firedog said:

Hi Chris-

A little unclear to me: do you want just the dry facts about devices, or also a short evaluation?

Thanks for the question.

 

Dry facts or even some marketing info goes into the main product page. Below that are the user reviews and ratings, just like any review. Can contain objective and / or subjective information. 

Founder of Audiophile Style

Announcing Polestar | Quick Community Reviews and Ratings

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/6/2020 at 3:30 AM, One and a half said:

Perhaps a series of checkboxes about the reviewer that could create some authenticity.

The checkboxes could be:

- Own this product

 - Heard at a friends'

- Heard at a show/dealer

- Read online review and want to make comments here

 

Maybe a rating for the review, the same as for posts, thanks, upvote, laughing, and the D....

How to stop the review from becoming a dissing match of opinions? That would be my worry.

 

 

Perhaps another option: received review unit. 

 

And, if reviews specified how long the reviewer has had an item, that can be helpful. First impressions can be very different to impressions after a few months. 

I write about Macs, music, and more at Kirkville.

Author of Take Control of macOS Media Apps

Co-host of The Next Track podcast.

Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, The Computer Audiophile said:

It might, but I'm not sure how to implement it without making it a mess. How do you envision this? Maybe we are thinking of two different things?

You would really have to create different price categories for each type of item. I've seen some sites that use pricing indicators like this:

 

$

$$

$$$

$$$$

 

Where each level correlates to the average or expected price of the item in question. So a $$$$ pair of headphones might be the same actual price as a $$ amplifier. 

I write about Macs, music, and more at Kirkville.

Author of Take Control of macOS Media Apps

Co-host of The Next Track podcast.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, mlknez said:

Perhaps a category for Preamps/Integrated Amps/AVRs

Preamps go into the Analog Components category for now.

 

Integrated are amps, so for now they'll be in the amplifiers category. 

 

AVR is a new category that I should add. 

Founder of Audiophile Style

Announcing Polestar | Quick Community Reviews and Ratings

Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, The Computer Audiophile said:

Preamps go into the Analog Components category for now.

 

Integrated are amps, so for now they'll be in the amplifiers category. 

 

AVR is a new category that I should add. 

 

Where would you put a product such as the Marantz AV-8805.  A preamp with both digital and analog processing with no amplifier built in?  It is a preamp but not analog only.  It is not an AVR as it has no amplifier.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, mlknez said:

 

Where would you put a product such as the Marantz AV-8805.  A preamp with both digital and analog processing with no amplifier built in?  It is a preamp but no analog.  It is not an AVR as it has no amplifier.

I would look at its most likely use and that's a preamp. Marantz calls it a preamp. For now let's go with this. It isn't perfect, but I don't know that these needs their own category for now. 

Founder of Audiophile Style

Announcing Polestar | Quick Community Reviews and Ratings

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×
×
  • Create New...