NOMBEDES Posted August 21, 2019 Share Posted August 21, 2019 A quote from Neil: (from the Boing Boing site) "The compressed, hollow sound of free streaming music was a big step down from the CD and a huge step down from vinyl." "We are poisoning ourselves with degraded sound. The development of our brains is led by our senses; take away too many of the necessary cues, and we are trapped inside a room with no doors or windows. Substituting smoothed-out algorithms for the contingent complexity of biological existence is bad for us." "Engineers often responded to the smaller size and lower quality of these packages by using cheap engineering tricks like masking the softer parts of the song as loud as the loudest parts. This flattened out the sound of recording and fooled listeners's brains into ignoring the stuff that wasn't there anymore" (MQA?) And further: "It is an insult to the human mind and the human soul" I can't argue with Neil. Plastic nano particles are in the rain and in the snow, no fish is plastic free, governments are worthless. Hate is ascendant, big insurance companies have tame police forces chasing "insurance fraud", people actually purchase surveillance devices and place them in their homes. Right wing dictators cut down the rain forest. And now we know why, low rez compressed music has destroyed our brains. Teresa 1 In any dispute the intensity of feeling is inversely proportional to the value of the issues at stake ~ Sayre's Law Link to comment
Popular Post lucretius Posted August 21, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted August 21, 2019 5 minutes ago, NOMBEDES said: A quote from Neil: (from the Boing Boing site) "The compressed, hollow sound of free streaming music was a big step down from the CD and a huge step down from vinyl." "We are poisoning ourselves with degraded sound. The development of our brains is led by our senses; take away too many of the necessary cues, and we are trapped inside a room with no doors or windows. Substituting smoothed-out algorithms for the contingent complexity of biological existence is bad for us." "Engineers often responded to the smaller size and lower quality of these packages by using cheap engineering tricks like masking the softer parts of the song as loud as the loudest parts. This flattened out the sound of recording and fooled listeners's brains into ignoring the stuff that wasn't there anymore" (MQA?) And further: "It is an insult to the human mind and the human soul" I can't argue with Neil. Plastic nano particles are in the rain and in the snow, no fish is plastic free, governments are worthless. Hate is ascendant, big insurance companies have tame police forces chasing "insurance fraud", people actually purchase surveillance devices and place them in their homes. Right wing dictators cut down the rain forest. And now we know why, low rez compressed music has destroyed our brains. Neil is an artist, not a scientist. I take everything he says on this matter with a grain of salt. tmtomh and wgscott 2 mQa is dead! Link to comment
fas42 Posted August 21, 2019 Share Posted August 21, 2019 9 minutes ago, NOMBEDES said: "We are poisoning ourselves with degraded sound. ... Have to agree with this ... a big disappointment years ago was going to a "big show" - and copping an earful of awful sound - "I'm paying money to listen to this !!?" ... Ended up stopping going to anything with a musical accompaniment, via a so-called PA system - the few jewels one came across didn't compensate for all the dross ... Link to comment
Popular Post AnotherSpin Posted August 21, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted August 21, 2019 I heard Neil Young recordings (in CD format) which were not too kind for brains and souls. lucretius and crenca 1 1 Link to comment
marce Posted August 21, 2019 Share Posted August 21, 2019 Reading it I would say the medicine cabinets been raided! lucretius 1 Link to comment
mansr Posted August 21, 2019 Share Posted August 21, 2019 10 hours ago, lucretius said: Neil is an artist, not a scientist. I take everything he says on this matter with a grain of salt. When it comes to Neil and (digital) audio engineering, you need to take what he says with all of the salt. Depleting the world's salt supplies would obviously be a bad thing, so it's better to simply ignore Neil. lucretius 1 Link to comment
Popular Post psjug Posted August 21, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted August 21, 2019 Neil's ideas on digital audio would seem to go best with bath salts. lucretius, crenca and Hugo9000 3 Link to comment
StephenJK Posted August 21, 2019 Share Posted August 21, 2019 11 hours ago, fas42 said: Have to agree with this ... a big disappointment years ago was going to a "big show" - and copping an earful of awful sound - "I'm paying money to listen to this !!?" ... Ended up stopping going to anything with a musical accompaniment, via a so-called PA system - the few jewels one came across didn't compensate for all the dross ... That hasn't been my experience. I find that, on average the PA systems in place today provide a musical presentation with an accuracy, clarity and detail that was never there before. Sure, sometimes they get the mix wrong or the singer has a hot mike, but whether big arena events or small local theater, the sound has never been better. rando 1 Link to comment
STC Posted August 21, 2019 Share Posted August 21, 2019 42 minutes ago, psjug said: Neil's ideas on digital audio would seem to go best with bath salts. He was the founding member of Musicians against Digital in the 80s. The surprise was his Pono which supposedly designed to address the digital deficiency. ST My Ambiophonics System with Virtual Concert Hall Ambience Link to comment
Popular Post StephenJK Posted August 21, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted August 21, 2019 35 minutes ago, STC said: He was the founding member of Musicians against Digital in the 80s. The surprise was his Pono which supposedly designed to address the digital deficiency. Yeah, but I think most of his criticism was with Redbook CD, and that analogy of looking at slices of music because of the sample rate instead of the whole thing. I think he's been using a digital board since the late 80's simply due to the fact that you can't fight the world. With the Neil Young Archives web site you can listen to anything he has ever released in 24/192 master tape quality. From what I understand he owns the master tapes and has been digitizing them as a preservation effort. His comment in the NYTimes article is rather poignant - if only that preservation of a full catalog for artists no longer with us had been done for the benefit of future generations. I had a Pono, I was a Kickstarter supporter. It filled a need, but not to the extent necessary for it to be a commercial success. Having a small, portable player with a lot of storage capacity that could play up to 24/192 music files just didn't appeal to a lot of people, and I think too many were highly critical of that effort. If you're happy listening to iTunes lossy files from your iPhone with little earbuds and think that sounds great then you just don't have a frame of reference for anything better - in the same way that some people think cooked frozen burgers from the supermarket taste just great. crenca, #Yoda#, Teresa and 1 other 3 1 Link to comment
Popular Post wgscott Posted August 21, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted August 21, 2019 Compression and dynamic range limitation on analogue media is "musical." Compression and dynamic range limitation, even to a much lesser extent, on digital media is a crime against civilization. One thing Neil Young is very good at is summoning up some righteous anger. crenca, Ralf11 and lucretius 2 1 Link to comment
botrytis Posted August 21, 2019 Share Posted August 21, 2019 15 minutes ago, wgscott said: Compression and dynamic range limitation on analogue media is "musical." Compression and dynamic range limitation, even to a much lesser extent, on digital media is a crime against civilization. One thing Neil Young is very good at is summoning up some righteous anger. Not always. NY is just like everyone else, he puts his pants on one leg at a time. Yo know the old saying about opinions...... Listen to some old Julie London LP's and tell me if you think analog range limitation and compression is good. On a decent system, it sounds like ass. Current: Daphile on an AMD A10-9500 with 16 GB RAM DAC - TEAC UD-501 DAC Pre-amp - Rotel RC-1590 Amplification - Benchmark AHB2 amplifier Speakers - Revel M126Be with 2 REL 7/ti subwoofers Cables - Tara Labs RSC Reference and Blue Jean Cable Balanced Interconnects Link to comment
wgscott Posted August 21, 2019 Share Posted August 21, 2019 14 minutes ago, botrytis said: Not always. NY is just like everyone else, he puts his pants on one leg at a time. Yo know the old saying about opinions...... Listen to some old Julie London LP's and tell me if you think analog range limitation and compression is good. On a decent system, it sounds like ass. Sarcasm isn't your thing this morning? lucretius 1 Link to comment
Popular Post psjug Posted August 21, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted August 21, 2019 I think his heart is in the right place. It is just too bad that he doesn't seem to have learned the very basics of digital audio. For example the misleading stairstep illustration in his new book. He wants to be a teacher or preacher on this but he doesn't know the material. lucretius, tmtomh and crenca 1 2 Link to comment
marce Posted August 21, 2019 Share Posted August 21, 2019 1 hour ago, SJK said: If you're happy listening to iTunes lossy files from your iPhone with little earbuds and think that sounds great then you just don't have a frame of reference for anything better - in the same way that some people think cooked frozen burgers from the supermarket taste just great. Bit of a patronising statement... Link to comment
Popular Post StephenJK Posted August 21, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted August 21, 2019 25 minutes ago, marce said: Bit of a patronising statement... How so? People have different expectations. I work with people who are perfectly happy listening to low res files on their phone. It's still music. The fact there may be something better just isn't on their radar. crenca, botrytis and Teresa 3 Link to comment
botrytis Posted August 21, 2019 Share Posted August 21, 2019 57 minutes ago, wgscott said: Sarcasm isn't your thing this morning? Is it morning? I have been at work too long this morning....... Current: Daphile on an AMD A10-9500 with 16 GB RAM DAC - TEAC UD-501 DAC Pre-amp - Rotel RC-1590 Amplification - Benchmark AHB2 amplifier Speakers - Revel M126Be with 2 REL 7/ti subwoofers Cables - Tara Labs RSC Reference and Blue Jean Cable Balanced Interconnects Link to comment
marce Posted August 21, 2019 Share Posted August 21, 2019 25 minutes ago, SJK said: How so? People have different expectations. I work with people who are perfectly happy listening to low res files on their phone. It's still music. The fact there may be something better just isn't on their radar. OK withdrawn.. Link to comment
mansr Posted August 21, 2019 Share Posted August 21, 2019 31 minutes ago, SJK said: How so? People have different expectations. I work with people who are perfectly happy listening to low res files on their phone. It's still music. The fact there may be something better just isn't on their radar. John Harriman records his performances using one of these in case he wants to revisit some aspect. For his purposes, that quality is sufficient, though he obviously wouldn't release it on CD. Link to comment
StephenJK Posted August 21, 2019 Share Posted August 21, 2019 22 minutes ago, marce said: OK withdrawn.. Hey, no worries - it's all part of any reasonable discussion. Link to comment
wgscott Posted August 21, 2019 Share Posted August 21, 2019 46 minutes ago, botrytis said: Is it morning? I have been at work too long this morning....... Sounds like Steve Jobs compressed your whole day. Link to comment
botrytis Posted August 21, 2019 Share Posted August 21, 2019 12 minutes ago, wgscott said: Sounds like Steve Jobs compressed your whole day. Just crummy management....... Current: Daphile on an AMD A10-9500 with 16 GB RAM DAC - TEAC UD-501 DAC Pre-amp - Rotel RC-1590 Amplification - Benchmark AHB2 amplifier Speakers - Revel M126Be with 2 REL 7/ti subwoofers Cables - Tara Labs RSC Reference and Blue Jean Cable Balanced Interconnects Link to comment
tmtomh Posted August 21, 2019 Share Posted August 21, 2019 Yes, Young's anger is based on a deeply flawed understanding of the digital medium, not to mention his position is filled with contradictions since most of the negative things he says about digital, if true, cannot be remedied simply with higher-res recording and a Pono player. However, I do feel he touches on one important point, which I would be inclined to call a truth even though it is not a quantitative, easily measurable truth: I do think that production trends and techniques are influenced by what the dominant the medium and format is at the time, and that this influence includes both the technical qualities of the medium/format and also engineers' and producers' perceptions or believe about those media/formats, even if those perceptions and beliefs are wrong. So just as the sound of '60s and early '70s rock was in large measure the sound the mics and mixing desks of the time - and also the sound of mixes and compression applied for an AM-radio audience, I do think that Young is correct that the wide availability of compressed digital formats, file sharing, and DAWs, has been a factor in the rise not only of excessive peak-limiting and digital compression, but also in the well-documented decrease in complexity of both lyrics and melodic/chord variety in popular music in the last decade or two. Of course I don't think Young is correct that engineers used compression to louden soft passages because mp3 only provides "5%" of the musical content. But I do think he is correct in that compressed digital music has contributed to a technical and artistic cultural trend that is not a good one. Along with that, I do think there's a decent chance that, had his Pono ecosystem succeeded, it would've given dynamics more prominence in the mainstream cultural landscape around music and might have helped push back against the Loudness Wars. Of course, if that happened we'd still have to contend with an overpriced Pono player, BS claims about it sounding better than iPods, and the annoyingly slow, leaky filters Young seems to prefer. crenca 1 Link to comment
crenca Posted August 21, 2019 Share Posted August 21, 2019 2 hours ago, psjug said: I think his heart is in the right place. It is just too bad that he doesn't seem to have learned the very basics of digital audio. For example the misleading stairstep illustration in his new book. He wants to be a teacher or preacher on this but he doesn't know the material. This. The truth of what Nyquist–Shannon is telling us about sampling and the fidelity of the resultant waveform to the "original", is hard. Calculus is hard. The physics of sound-as-waveform-through-medium is hard. Most folks don't have the education or interest to get it right. This is perhaps the truth of certain audiophiles and the 'audiophile press' deference to gurus such Bob Stuart. Yet in reality Bob Stuart is a charlatan - a "post-Shannon" genius on the level of Copernicus, or so they say Another example: John Atkinson is a believer in the allegedly erroneous "leading edge" or "transient leading edge" behavior of digital sampling/DAC reconstruction. Why? What is the evidence? Bob S and others (who mostly sell stuff) allege it, but is it true? Hey MQA, if it is not all $voodoo$, show us the math! Link to comment
Rt66indierock Posted August 21, 2019 Share Posted August 21, 2019 5 hours ago, mansr said: When it comes to Neil and (digital) audio engineering, you need to take what he says with all of the salt. Depleting the world's salt supplies would obviously be a bad thing, so it's better to simply ignore Neil. I prefer to imagine Neil standing on the Bonneville Salt Flats. mansr 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now