Jump to content
IGNORED

MQA is Vaporware


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, The Computer Audiophile said:

Here's the MQA provided image for 16 bit data. It doesn't look pretty.

 

MQA Core 5_23.jpg

 

Furthermore, blanking 8 LSB bits from a 24 bit MQA file, so that we have 16 bits of entropy padded to 24 bit, still authenticates the file.

Designer of the 432 EVO music server and Linux specialist

Discoverer of the independent open source sox based mqa playback method with optional one cycle postringing.

Link to comment
3 minutes ago, Brinkman Ship said:

...you kill one MQA gnat, and more just keep a comin'...

 

That was my way of noting how Peter Markus went SPATTTTT....:D

 I see! And yes, they keep coming. Who will be next?

 

Isn’t Lee Scoggins supposed to report back here, once he does an analysis or test? 

 

I saw him post in the Shunyata forum on W B F recently. Looks like he has moved on...

Link to comment
3 minutes ago, Indydan said:

MQA "enthusiast"                        Reason for no longer posting on CA

Peter Veth                                                          BANNED

Peter Veth (as Peter Markus)  BANNED for acting like a dick and being an MQA shill


In the past Peter Veth would announce to his followers in the secret MQA facebook group which pseudonym he would use.

Here he writes "I have challenged Archimago under my Pedro pseudonym":

image.thumb.png.ec0b0bd41e718299d74f8fd665bea52b.png
 

 

So I am not surprised he tries to come back.

 

Designer of the 432 EVO music server and Linux specialist

Discoverer of the independent open source sox based mqa playback method with optional one cycle postringing.

Link to comment
9 minutes ago, FredericV said:


In the past Peter Veth would announce to his followers in the secret MQA facebook group which pseudonym he would use.

Here he writes "I have challenged Archimago under my Pedro pseudonym":

image.thumb.png.ec0b0bd41e718299d74f8fd665bea52b.png
 

 

So I am not surprised he tries to come back.

 

 

He is a slimy shill. 

Link to comment
Just now, FredericV said:

I remember the days with DRM CD's which had a bad TOC. Any CD transport would read the first TOC.
Any computer would read the latest TOC on the CD, which had been tampered with, so ripping would go crazy.
There was special software such as EAC which could read the original TOC, and this special version was banned also.

With MQA CD, we are back in early 2000.

Philips stated that such discs were not permitted to bear the trademarked Compact Disc Digital Audio logo because they violate the Red Book specification.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compact_Disc_and_DVD_copy_protection

Maybe Philips should do some kicking?

Same for the Sony malware CDs. In both cases, there was a clear spec violation. This is different. The structure of the CD is, as far as we know, correct. The alteration lies within the data stream only. In this respect it is similar to HDCD. It is not clear to me that this should preclude displaying the Compact Disc logo. Of course, in the extreme you get those DTS encoded CDs that produce only noise when played on a normal player. At least those were clearly labeled.

Link to comment
38 minutes ago, Indydan said:

MQA "enthusiast"                        Reason for no longer posting on CA

Peter Veth                                                          BANNED

WitchDoctor                                                      BANNED

Lee Scoggins                             SCARED of his BS being called             

out

Michael Lavorgna                    BANNED for telling someone to go fuck his mother

Peter Veth (as Peter Markus)  BANNED for acting like a dick and being an MQA shill

 


 

 
  •  

 

Good work!  You're on the job - maybe add dates?

Link to comment
2 hours ago, mansr said:

Can we put a Scottish twist on that?

Thinking Sean Connery

Computer setup - Roon/Qobuz - PS Audio P5 Regenerator - HIFI Rose 250A Streamer - Emotiva XPA-2 Harbeth P3ESR XD - Rel  R-528 Sub

Comfy Chair - Schitt Jotunheim - Meze Audio Empyrean w/Mitch Barnett's Accurate Sound FilterSet

Link to comment
2 hours ago, FredericV said:


I remember the days with DRM CD's which had a bad TOC. Any CD transport would read the first TOC.
Any computer would read the latest TOC on the CD, which had been tampered with, so ripping would go crazy.
There was special software such as EAC which could read the original TOC, and this special version was banned also.

With MQA CD, we are back in early 2000.

Philips stated that such discs were not permitted to bear the trademarked Compact Disc Digital Audio logo because they violate the Red Book specification.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compact_Disc_and_DVD_copy_protection

Maybe Philips should do some kicking?

According to Stuart  he did it deliberately  so the customer knows what he'd buying :D

 

Is there no end to Stuart's BS?   

Link to comment
8 minutes ago, Spacehound said:

There's a 'white paper' generator  too..

The Postmodernism Generator is also great. And for more serious things there's SCIgen.

 

8 minutes ago, Spacehound said:

Isacc Asimov did it manually:  "The Endochronic Properties of Resublimated Thiotimoline"

As did Alan Sokal in Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity.

Link to comment
1 hour ago, mansr said:

The Postmodernism Generator is also great. And for more serious things there's SCIgen.

 

As did Alan Sokal in Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity.

I've only read a part of the second one, but I WILL read them fully.

 

"An aspect of quantum mechanics is liberal hegemony in  central Europe' - It's a Booker prize  literature  candidate review by the Times literary supplement!

Link to comment
1 hour ago, mansr said:

The Postmodernism Generator is also great. And for more serious things there's SCIgen.

 

As did Alan Sokal in Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity.

 

Mans and Spacehound. Come on guys, this is pretty low brow stuff. We're trying to have an intellectually elevated conversation here. Try and keep up...

 

 

:-)

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...