Jump to content
  • joelha
    joelha

    It Is The Best of Times . . . Hands Down

     

     

        

        Audio: Listen to this article.

     

     

     

    It is the best of times . . . hands down.

     

    While it’s hard to know how many readers agree, I’ll first deal with the reasons to disagree:

     

    High-end audio stores are becoming a rarity in the U.S. and many stores now reside in store owners’ homes. As a result, we have fewer opportunities to audition equipment, leaving us with audio shows, friends who live nearby who might have the component we’re interested in, and audio reviews. Hardly ideal alternatives.

     

    Speaking of audio shows, they’re infrequent and, if you have to travel a long way, expensive. What’s more, the show’s rooms (typically hotel rooms) are rarely ideal for critical listening. Finally, it’s always frustrated me that there’s an acceptance of conversation during listening sessions. I know people want to share opinions and conduct business but the primary reason for an audio show should be to hear audio.

     

    Online trolls are a downside of the industry. For reasons that are hard to understand, some people delight in trying to make others miserable. I’ll offer a theory in spite of the fact that it doesn’t reflect well on our hobby. Ours is generally a hobby enjoyed alone. Unlike a group getting together to watch a televised football game, we usually don’t invite “the guys” over to listen to Mahler. Does that mean we audiophiles are a bunch of social misfits? No, and I have a number of dear friends in the industry who certainly don’t fit that description. But I wonder, because of the nature of our hobby, if we have more than our share of maladjusted hobbyists.

     

    You might be thinking that there’s nothing new about trolling. People have always raised their “issues”. While that’s true, the internet has brought us online forums and anonymity which allows for far more obnoxious behavior. Where there used to be disagreeable letters to magazines, now there can be tiresome exchanges which often substitute vitriol for substance.

     

    There’s also the economy. Many people are struggling to pay their bills. How can it be “the best of times” when people struggle to pay for gas, groceries, and rent?

     

    Probably the best objection to my “best of times” claim is that, at least in the U.S., the high-end audio industry is shrinking. This is an existential issue that has been well documented and frequently discussed. In general, the younger generations seem to care more about audio convenience than audio quality. It’s not only their loss but ours as well. As we lose hobbyists we lose the high-end industry. It’s disappointing to see the advancing age of the average U.S. audio show attendee. Furthermore, how many non-audiophiles know of even reasonably priced audio brands such as Magneplanar and NAD let alone the higher-priced brands such as Wilson Audio or D’Agostino? I’ll bet a pretty small percentage. At least I can dream of owning a Learjet because I know what it is. But how does one aspire to own a product they’ve never even heard of?

     

    After all of that, what could be good?

     

    Fortunately, quite a bit.

     

    Without a doubt, the most significant advancement in our industry is technology and the internet.

     

    When I was a teen, the only way to add to my audio system or music collection was to either buy mail order products or hope there was an audio or music store nearby.

     

    Today, we have easy access to products in almost any part of the world. We can quickly learn about and order products from China, Europe, and Australia. We can view various manufacturers’ information online and quickly make comparisons between products. Internet searches not only help us find product reviews but find forums which allows us to interact with listeners internationally.

     

    Forums can also be indispensable for problem-solving. I can’t count the number of times I’ve been helped by someone willing to sacrifice their time to solve my audio issue.

     

    How about music downloads? It’s not easy to list all the sources of downloadable music (Qobuz, Hdtracks, Bandcamp, etc.). And the selection is growing, not only in terms of variety but also in terms of high resolution and surround options.

     

    You’d rather buy cd’s and vinyl instead of downloads? Discogs, Amazon, Analog Productions, and so many other companies offer a tremendous variety of music in almost any genre, new and used. Here again, an internet search will produce purchase options from all over the world.

     

    How about the renaissance in tape playback? Some are not only going back to reel-to-reel tape but even cassette tape.

     

    At least to some listeners, sound can be upgraded using a variety of upsamplers and programs minimizing the processes employed by Windows. There are countless other programs and tweaks available at the click of a mouse tempting many audiophiles to continually explore the possibility of getting even better sound.

     

    Room correction software is yet another method many are using to improve the sound they get in their listening space. While not as simple as a music download, the software is easy to get and can be installed and operated by someone with average computer skills.

     

    The benefits of these technical advancements don’t stop with the end-user. The ability of manufacturers to measure their products and globally source components is greater than it’s ever been. Ultimately, we are the beneficiaries.

     

    And how could I leave out streaming? Literally millions and millions of tracks are available, not only in two-channels but in surround as well, delivered to our rooms (or phones) in seconds for a relatively modest monthly charge.

     

    As for prices, I never understood the complaints I’ve read so often about high-priced audio. Sure, there are many uber-priced components which roughly equate to the price of a nice home. But in what way do those products affect our ability to shop at the lower end of the market? With a laptop or PC, even $100 will get you a decent tiny USB dac and in-ear monitors. For $500 you can get a nice dac, deskop amplifier and desktop speakers. And $1,000 will you a surprisingly good system including stand mount speakers, integrated amplifier and dac. And that’s shopping for new product. Shopping on-line for used products offers even more possibilities.

     

    I realize almost everyone reading this article is well aware of most if not all of the points I’ve made. But I’m not sure how many audiophiles have taken the time to reflect on the great audiophile times in which we live. It is easy to take all that we have for granted and, given the frustrations we experience in our hobby and even in life, it’s important to reflect on what is right in our lives. The title of my article doesn’t say or even imply “perfect”. I’ve listed a number of reasons to be frustrated but I’ll take today to any time in the past . . . hands-down.

     

     




    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Hi @joelha, I absolutely love this article. If people read only one paragraph, they must read the final one. It really hits the nail on the head, at least for me. Some of the stuff that's possible today, wasn't even a dream of mine many years ago. I remember thinking, what if Apple sold lossless audio via iTunes? That would be the most amazing thing ever. I'd never have to leave the iTunes app or my house for that matter. Now, that seems laughable. We have high resolution streaming everywhere, all the time, different versions available, different mixes available, it's really endless. 

     

    When I think about my audiophile wish list, it has some really cool items, but none of them are moonshots. They are all doable becuase of some of the things you mentioned. 

     

    Thanks for the article. It's great to take stock in how far things have come and the enviable position we as audiophiles are in today. I'd say that even the most fantatical objectivists and subjectivists can agree upon the items you mentioned. That's saying something!

     

    Nice way to start the week Joel.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Thanks very much for your encouragement, Chris, and for giving me the opportunity to post the article.

     

    Joel

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    bbosler,

     

    While I did say "relatively modest monthly charge" regarding streaming, your numbers drive the point home very well.

     

    Thanks for that.

     

    Joel

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Can’t agree more about the things cited here. There are so many choices of high quality products at so many price points. Getting the word out to the masses is an issue as when the youngins are exposed to good audio, they understand it. While video is a sore point with some here, cough cough, the quality of video production in your home today was even unimaginable 15 years ago for a fraction of what used to be considered high end. The best of times indeed. As for conversations during audio demos at shows, the irony is amazing that people who profess to be audiophiles can’t shut up to actually hear the music. Even worse are the constant chatters at jazz clubs and movie theaters. We are not there to listen to you folks. End rant. Thanks for the article.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, botrytis said:

    I disagree that streaming is a good deal, but I don't stream. Just me.

     

    I respect your opinion, but if you don't state why it is impossible to agree or disagree.

     

    "I don't stream" makes as much sense to me as "video does not belong in my listening room."

     

    If your goal is to support the artists, then the idea that someone avoids streaming when it would afford them access to music they would never otherwise experience makes no sense to me because you are then free to pay for downloads or physical media. Streaming and buying are not mutually exclusive. 

     

    The idea that someone loves to go see live shows but refuses to recreate that experience in their home makes no sense to me either. Audio and video are symbiotic, so again, not mutually exclusive. Example ....  I would probably never listen to an AC/DC album, but watching them perform live is mesmerizing. The energy they bring to a live performance is impossible to experience just listening to them.

     

    I know, off topic..... I'm done

     

     

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    10 minutes ago, bbosler said:

     

    I respect your opinion, but if you don't state why it is impossible to agree or disagree.

     

    "I don't stream" makes as much sense to me as "video does not belong in my listening room."

     

    If your goal is to support the artists, then the idea that someone avoids streaming when it would afford them access to music they would never otherwise experience makes no sense to me because you are then free to pay for downloads or physical media. Streaming and buying are not mutually exclusive. 

     

    The idea that someone loves to go see live shows but refuses to recreate that experience in their home makes no sense to me either. Audio and video are symbiotic, so again, not mutually exclusive. Example ....  I would probably never listen to an AC/DC album, but watching them perform live is mesmerizing. The energy they bring to a live performance is impossible to experience just listening to them.

     

    I know, off topic..... I'm done

     

     

    I support bandcamp because artists get more from it. Labels like streaming because they get more money than the artists do.

     

     

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    35 minutes ago, botrytis said:

    I support bandcamp because artists get more from it. Labels like streaming because they get more money than the artists do.

     

     

    fair enough, but put yourself in an artists' shoes

     

    As an artist I get about a penny whenever somebody plays my song on Tidal. However,  I also get exposure to someone that may never have heard of me that may come to my live show or buy something from me. In that sense it is much better than the days I had to get a label behind me to promote me and press my discs and get them into stores and pay disc jockeys to get me airplay. The labels have always had the upper hand and perhaps always will so streaming is just another version of that.

     

    If nobody streams me then nobody will ever hear about me. So as an artist at least I get out there and have a chance, and in today's environment it is one of the few chances I have.

     

     

     

     

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, botrytis said:

    I support bandcamp because artists get more from it. Labels like streaming because they get more money than the artists do.

     

     

     

    According to an artist I have talked to about this, she gets paid the most per song from TIDAL, and as far as I know isn't even on Bandcamp but sells her own merch on her website, where I have bought many items. If she felt she would make more on bandcamp, she would be there.

     

    Also, by only using bandcamp, you're intentionally limiting your music choices and ability to discover more artists. For a pittance, streaming from Qobuz or TIDAL,. or Apple Music, etc... opens you up to millions of albums that just aren't on bandcamp.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    47 minutes ago, AudioDoctor said:

     

    According to an artist I have talked to about this, she gets paid the most per song from TIDAL, and as far as I know isn't even on Bandcamp but sells her own merch on her website, where I have bought many items. If she felt she would make more on bandcamp, she would be there.

     

    Also, by only using bandcamp, you're intentionally limiting your music choices and ability to discover more artists. For a pittance, streaming from Qobuz or TIDAL,. or Apple Music, etc... opens you up to millions of albums that just aren't on bandcamp.

     

    I have 6 TB of music - I could listen non-stop for 2 years and would not even repeat an LP. I have plenty.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, botrytis said:

     

    It depends - TIDAL is NOT ALWAYS the highest. It varies. It depends on Country and tier. On tidal an artist needs to have 80,000 streams in order to get 1000 USD. Avg right now for Tidal is 0.00715 per stream, less than a penny per stream.

     

    How Much Does Tidal Pay Musicians? | Xposure Music

     

     

    So you're going to argue with the woman who actually puts music on TIDAL and makes music for a living?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, botrytis said:

     

    I have 6 TB of music - I could listen non-stop for 2 years and would not even repeat an LP. I have plenty.

     

    I guess thats fine if you never want to hear anything new.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    25 minutes ago, AudioDoctor said:

     

    I guess thats fine if you never want to hear anything new.

     

    I don't need a streaming service to point me at new music. I find plenty.

     

    Why do people assume that I don't listen to new music? That is a moronic statement if you look at my posts, you will see that I post about new music A LOT without a streaming service. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    15 hours ago, botrytis said:

    I support bandcamp because artists get more from it. Labels like streaming because they get more money than the artists do.

     

     

    Afaik Dave is on of the avid concert go-ers, too. Which may count more for the artist, than a "free" Spotify or Amazon tier.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    21 minutes ago, DuckToller said:

    Afaik Dave is on of the avid concert go-ers, too. Which may count more for the artist, than a "free" Spotify or Amazon tier.

     

    I feel live music is important to see and to support artists. I am lucky to be living in an area where there are plenty of small venues, that artists like to go to and experiment. I have seen in concert: Aimee Cyrille, Jose James, John Pizzarelli, Jane Monheit, Peter Gabriel, Bryan Ferry, and could go on. 

     

    I also tend to go to Music school recitals - Northwestern University has a great music program and concerts all the time. 

     

    I have also lived in various 'musical deserts' like Western Iowa (no concert venues closer than 2 hours away). So, I learned to appreciate seeing live music when it is so easy to go to.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It is the best of times!  I hope more artists can see their way through eliminating middlemen in their distribution chain.  The tech is there to self-publish.  I know that touring seems to be the way to connect with fans, but I worry that it also requires a lot of spare change.  We all have to learn how to market our wares directly.  We must learn how to leverage the giants to focus on our work.  How can we "use" Facebook, etc., in our own best interest?    

     

    What can artists do?  Publish a lyric snippet on Facebook, Learn marketing, and build your website (ignore the SEO trap). I do not know what exactly will work.  I am still figuring that out for my businesses.

     

     

    How about an artist's corner at an audio show? Remember that the digital world is GLOBAL! Link to other people's music and sites.

     

    RJF

     

     

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    16 minutes ago, bobfa said:

    It is the best of times!  I hope more artists can see their way through eliminating middlemen in their distribution chain.  The tech is there to self-publish.  I know that touring seems to be the way to connect with fans, but I worry that it also requires a lot of spare change.  We all have to learn how to market our wares directly.  We must learn how to leverage the giants to focus on our work.  How can we "use" Facebook, etc., in our own best interest?    

     

    What can artists do?  Publish a lyric snippet on Facebook, Learn marketing, and build your website (ignore the SEO trap). I do not know what exactly will work.  I am still figuring that out for my businesses.

     

     

    How about an artist's corner at an audio show? Remember that the digital world is GLOBAL! Link to other people's music and sites.

     

    RJF

     

     

     

    I totally agree with you.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now




×
×
  • Create New...