Jump to content

PeterG

  • Content Count

    203
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About PeterG

  • Rank
    Newbie

Personal Information

  • Location
    Cambridge, MA

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Hi Josh, Just when I thought you couldn't top the selection of Aja! Enjoying my Fish People version as I read/respond; I will pick up 2018 soon. You might consider Talking Heads's Remain in Light for a future column. Like Hounds it is a complex and multilayered classic. But a recent listen to Angelique Kidjo's magnificent reinterpretation shows (at least my copy of) the original to be muddled. It deserves the The Best. Cheers!
  2. Burn in and warm up are two different things. More importantly, you might consider a Transparent Powerbank 6 for protection of your system--they guarantee component replacement, and I don't think you will notice any difference in sound.
  3. Emily King--WOW--thanks for the tip! Just ordered the new CD and about to buy a pair of tix to see her in Cambridge. Good luck with your expanding family--in just a few years you can take your "baby" to concerts--you'll drag her to Emily King, she'll drag you to Taylor Swift. You'll have a blast at both....That's love!
  4. Nice write up! I especially appreciate a bits is bits guy acknowledging that it is not always the case, and also like seeing China come in with an audiophile-level component. Cheers!
  5. Nina Simone and Joni Mitchell both delivered by Morgan James. Surprised no mentions yet, Morgan's sold a lot of systems at my local dealer: http://www.morganjamesonline.com/music/
  6. Having dissed your video format before, I must now admit that it works very well for this type of thing. Nice job!
  7. Congratulations, Chris! It's a pleasure to be on the site and also to see an entrepreneur succeed at something he loves. But I don't believe you when you say digital will always be the focus. The guy who wanted a TAS system 20 years ago, now wants to crush TAS (in very friendly and respectful way). That's awesome. But for Audio Style to have enough audiophile style to topple the old regime, it will need to pursue beautiful sound with every tool available. I look forward to cheering you on!
  8. You raise an interesting philosophical question--should we evaluate a system's ability to reproduce art which is (presumably) created to move us by removing the system's ability to move us? My answer would be absolutely not, but there are obvious arguments on both sides of the equation and I would not expect unanimity on this point. To the specific remedy you propose--a system's ability to reproduce voce is critical, but so is a system's ability to reproduce bass and everything else in between. So I would describe your voice test as perhaps helpful but not sufficient.
  9. Sadly, digital room correction also comes at a sonic price. I tried the McIntosh MEN220 ($5K would not have been a problem, see previous post on wife's eyebrow). The bass and transients were better, quicker, sharper. But the mids and highs, especially voices, lost texture and a bit of sparkle (to use a technical term). My take--for certain combinations of room/existing system/musical tastes it could be a definite plus--but with my room/system/library/ear, it was a definite minus overall.
  10. Hi Joe--nice post. A couple of thoughts. First, I agree completely, that engineering, recording, mixing, etc is WAY more important than format, at least once we're at PCM. The loudness wars are my personal bogeyman in all of this. It is terribly sad that so many artists are reduced (or reduce themselves). Second, I take issue with your argument on the room. I agree that the room is critical. But the room is often not controllable, or controllable only at great expense. While $1,000 dollars in bass traps, just for example, might get be better bang for the buck than $10,000 on a new DAC or power treatment or whatever; you are assuming that each of us has complete control over the room itself. But architecture and wives have a say on the room that can be more in the $100,000 to $1,000,000 range. Seriously, I could drop $10,000 on a DAC, and my wife would barely raise an eyebrow, but it would be a complete nonstarter to drape the living room in treatments.
  11. I cannot speak to the MoFi versions, but the recent Original Mono 6 CD box set is incredibly good compared to whatever stereo versions you might have. They are a must buy for any Dylan fan. Once you've heard the mono, you will only hold on to the stereo versions so that you can tell yourself you would have done a better job mixing that Dylan's guys (haha).
  12. Good news! The price has come down (I'm almost certain that I paid $300 a few years ago, and they are in Wirecutter as a top choice for $300). We have not had the durability issues mentioned, ours have been very rugged. Also note that you can get the noise cancellation version for well under $300. I still think you are better off without noise cancellation, even if both were the same price. Rock on! https://www.amazon.com/PSB-M4U-1-GRAY-Performance-Headphones/dp/B00AFUF2EE/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1544304019&sr=8-3&keywords=psb+headphone
  13. You might consider sacrificing the noise cancellation and Bluetooth in exchange for what might be fairly described as headphones for audiophiles who don't have much money or who don't want a super expensive pair banging around the airport. PSB has a pair for $300 that give a passive noise-cancelling seal around the ear and will sound much better than those with the features you describe. (Both active noise cancellation and bluetooth have a price in terms of both sound quality and dollars.) I use mine on the plane, my son uses his on the subway--two thumbs up! They're carried by both hifi shops and Amazon.
  14. Gorgeous! Plus, from a functional perspective, I love that all the MC2152 connections are in the back, as opposed to the left and right side connections of the MC275.
×
×
  • Create New...