Jump to content
IGNORED

Audio Blind Testing


Recommended Posts

39 minutes ago, esldude said:

Curious to know what your thinking is to lead you to such a conclusion.  

The same experience that Scott Adams whimsically talked about for corporate America being afraid of making decisions in the absence of information. Unless your NASA, rigorous  testing means you will always be behind the evolving marketplace. You have to decide whats "enough" to be directionally correct. Unless the situation is simple, demand for double blind testing is basically a "filibuster" tactic.

Regards,

Dave

 

Audio system

Link to comment
1 hour ago, kumakuma said:

 

 

Who died and left you in charge?

 

 

Don't forget that the Audio Ayatollah has issued a Fatwah against the use of science

 

He did, however, make one point that is good to the extent it is relevant:

- some audio gear has gotten better since some tests were done

- but this is only relevant for specific gear compared, and it seems he did not read the several studies showing the importance of confirmation bias in general

Link to comment
19 minutes ago, Ralf11 said:

 

 

Don't forget that the Audio Ayatollah has issued a Fatwah against the use of science

 

He did, however, make one point that is good to the extent it is relevant:

- some audio gear has gotten better since some tests were done

- but this is only relevant for specific gear compared, and it seems he did not read the several studies showing the importance of confirmation bias in general

I told you he had his vaccinations.  Including the one against confirmation bias apparently. 

And always keep in mind: Cognitive biases, like seeing optical illusions are a sign of a normally functioning brain. We all have them, it’s nothing to be ashamed about, but it is something that affects our objective evaluation of reality. 

Link to comment
57 minutes ago, Ralf11 said:

Don't forget that the Audio Ayatollah has issued a Fatwah against the use of science

 

Randy

What part of this reply to Dennis were you unable to understand ?

 

Quote

You are also well aware that I had enough faith in correctly performed DBTs to work , to submit my reports to someone well qualified to evaluate them. I only did this after previous non sighted evaluation beforehand by several technical friends

 

 There is a time and a place for almost  everything, but continually demanding DBTs in an Audiophile forum is not one of them !

Especially when people like yourself will always call foul when the results don't go the way you want them to.

 

BTW, I also own , AND use, equipment such as a good DMM, C.R.O, Function Generator, Frequency Counter, Dual Polarity 0 -20V Bench PSU etc.

 

How a Digital Audio file sounds, or a Digital Video file looks, is governed to a large extent by the Power Supply area. All that Identical Checksums gives is the possibility of REGENERATING the file to close to that of the original file.

PROFILE UPDATED 13-11-2020

Link to comment
5 minutes ago, Ralf11 said:

this thread is about blind testing

 

post your rants elsewhere, please

 

 Randy

Didn't you even bother to read any of my previous reply ?

It was completely on topic !

 

Quote

You are also well aware that I had enough faith in correctly performed DBTs to work , to submit my reports to someone well qualified to evaluate them. I only did this after previous non sighted evaluation beforehand by several technical friends

Note also that I mentioned the use of suitable test equipment that I own, yet you dare to accuse me of not using any scientific methodology .

Your claim to be a Scientist  is seeming even more less likely with every reply you make, as you appear to lack reading comprehension skills despite U.S. English being your native language. 

 

How a Digital Audio file sounds, or a Digital Video file looks, is governed to a large extent by the Power Supply area. All that Identical Checksums gives is the possibility of REGENERATING the file to close to that of the original file.

PROFILE UPDATED 13-11-2020

Link to comment
12 minutes ago, sandyk said:

Note also that I mentioned the use of suitable test equipment that I own, yet you dare to accuse me of not using any scientific methodology .

 

I own a hammer, saw, and tape measure. Even know how to use 'em. Doesn't make me a carpenter. 

Sometimes it's like someone took a knife, baby
Edgy and dull and cut a six inch valley
Through the middle of my skull

Link to comment
3 minutes ago, kumakuma said:

 

I own a hammer, saw, and tape measure. Even know how to use 'em. Doesn't make me a carpenter. 

 

 So you own an  "American Screwdriver"  too ! Whoopee do !

 What has that got to do with Blind Testing ?

 Do you close your eyes when hammering in a nail ?

 

How a Digital Audio file sounds, or a Digital Video file looks, is governed to a large extent by the Power Supply area. All that Identical Checksums gives is the possibility of REGENERATING the file to close to that of the original file.

PROFILE UPDATED 13-11-2020

Link to comment
5 minutes ago, sandyk said:

 

 So you own an  "American Screwdriver"  too ! Whoopee do !

 What has that got to do with Blind Testing ?

 Do you close your eyes when hammering in a nail ?

 

Don't know what an American Screwdriver is.

 

 I do have dozens of "Canadian Screwdrivers" though (used for Robertson screws).

 

BTW, what does you bragging about owning and using "equipment such as a good DMM, C.R.O, Function Generator, Frequency Counter, Dual Polarity 0 -20V Bench PSU etc." have to do with blind testing?

Sometimes it's like someone took a knife, baby
Edgy and dull and cut a six inch valley
Through the middle of my skull

Link to comment
13 minutes ago, kumakuma said:

 

Don't know what an American Screwdriver is.

 

 I do have dozens of "Canadian Screwdrivers" though (used for Robertson screws).

 

BTW, what does you bragging about owning and using "equipment such as a good DMM, C.R.O, Function Generator, Frequency Counter, Dual Polarity 0 -20V Bench PSU etc." have to do with blind testing?

 

 An "American  Screwdriver" is an old nickname for a Hammer !

 I mentioned the gear that I still own, and use, in  part of a reply to Ralf11 who accused me of not using any scientific methodology.

Unlike both of you, I have some DIY Electronic skills which need the use of a minimum of test equipment for their optimisation.

.

 

How a Digital Audio file sounds, or a Digital Video file looks, is governed to a large extent by the Power Supply area. All that Identical Checksums gives is the possibility of REGENERATING the file to close to that of the original file.

PROFILE UPDATED 13-11-2020

Link to comment
1 hour ago, pkane2001 said:

 

i.e., all those familiar with how senses and perception actually work? You're right!

 

The senses are supremely capable of making sense of the universe, by "jumping to conclusions" all the time - it means we don't waste unnecessary energy getting things done, because we are forced to constantly analyse, thoroughly, what's going on around us. If we didn't have this happening it would be a nightmare driving, we would be drenched in sweat from the concentration needed to navigate safely to the end of our journey.

 

And so it should be for listening to audio reproduction - if you have to constanly think about whether it's right or not ... well, it's wrong!! Quite simple, really ...

 

The ear/brain has to be fooled into going with the sound, not constantly catching it out as "not getting it quite right" - DBT has absolutely nothing to do with this ...

Link to comment
2 minutes ago, sandyk said:

 

 An "American  Screwdriver" is an old nickname for a Hammer !

 I mentioned the gear that I still own, and use, in  part of a reply to Ralf11 who accused me of not using any scientific methodology.

 

Must be an Australian expression...

 

BTW, do you use Robertson screws in Australia?

Sometimes it's like someone took a knife, baby
Edgy and dull and cut a six inch valley
Through the middle of my skull

Link to comment
9 minutes ago, Ralf11 said:

 

 

Exactly.  He seems to think that use of certain instruments makes someone a scientist.

 

Sad.

 

Yes, a scientist is someone who can generate a large screed of numbers by some means, and graphs, and then write a "technical article" about such, throwing in plenty of equations on the way  - the fact that the experiment was ill-conceived, badly controlled, and doesn't provide any real answers to anything is quite irrelevant, really ... :P:D

Link to comment
5 minutes ago, kumakuma said:

 

Must be an Australian expression...

 

BTW, do you use Robertson screws in Australia?

 I have nothing further to say to you in  this thread.

I have better things to do, like completing a DIY 12V  5A battery charger for my car, which has intermittent false intruder alarm problems, which appear to be mainly due to the aging Engine Management System of this 2003 Mitsubishi Magna.

 

How a Digital Audio file sounds, or a Digital Video file looks, is governed to a large extent by the Power Supply area. All that Identical Checksums gives is the possibility of REGENERATING the file to close to that of the original file.

PROFILE UPDATED 13-11-2020

Link to comment
3 minutes ago, Ralf11 said:

 

 

so that's how they found those big phaaat bosons!!

 

Standard Model Rules!    String "Theory" Drools!!

 

 

 

That was a mighty jump! ... from driving a car, to understanding the inner workings of the universe - using the exact same human machinery for both ...

Link to comment
4 minutes ago, fas42 said:

 

The senses are supremely capable of making sense of the universe, by "jumping to conclusions" all the time - it means we don't waste unnecessary energy getting things done, because we are forced to constantly analyse, thoroughly, what's going on around us. If we didn't have this happening it would be a nightmare driving, we would drenched in sweat from the concentration needed to navigate safely to the end of our journey.

 

And so it should be for listening to audio reproduction - if you have to constanly think about whether it's right or not ... well, it's wrong!! Quite simple, really ...

 

The ear/brain has to be fooled into going with the sound, not constantly catching it out as "not getting it quite right" - DBT has absolutely nothing to do with this ...

 

DBTs have everything to do with the fact that sensory perception is flawed and often fooled. DBTs are one way to eliminate at least some undue influences and to determine if a change really rises to the level audibility.

 

By your own admission, senses ‘jump to conclusions all the time’. These conclusions are frequently wrong and this makes a more controlled test a must. 

Link to comment
2 minutes ago, sandyk said:

 I have nothing further to say to you in  this thread.

I have better things to do, like completing a DIY 12V  5A battery charger for my car, which has intermittent false intruder alarm problems, which appear to be mainly due to the aging Engine Management System of this 2003 Mitsubishi Magna.

 

 A Magna man, eh ... I'm keeping an even older one trundling along ... :)

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...