Jump to content
IGNORED

Design a PC/Server for ROON and HQ Player


sgr

Recommended Posts

That was lightning fast :) Thanks, will look for one. And what is in the other end, if you are not fed up with me asking questions that are probably answered already( I did try to find, honestly)?

 

The Mellanox uses a Cisco SFP, and then fibertronics cabling to a Diablo fiber switch. Its all detailed in this thread:

http://www.computeraudiophile.com/f22-networking-networked-audio-and-streaming/optical-network-configurations-24641/index4.html#post437616

Link to comment
That was lightning fast :) Thanks, will look for one. And what is in the other end, if you are not fed up with me asking questions that are probably answered already( I did try to find, honestly)?

 

I have a Mellanox card that I was using in my music server but am no longer using. Switched to an Intel card because the drivers are included standard in Linux OS. PM if interested in Mellanox card. I bought off eBay for not much $$. It has the 1/2 height bracket.

Link to comment

I am trying to build 2-pc's with Gigabyte GA-Z170X motherboards. I ordered one Intel 65 W i7 6700, and one 95W i7 6700K. I will use an HDPlex H5 fan less case for 6700, and a Fractal Design R5 for 6700K.

 

The 65W 6700 I received came with a fan, and the 95W 6700K I received did not come with a fan (I must not have ordered them correctly, I think both can come with or without fan). The one which came with fan will go in a fan less box, and the one that did not come with a fan will go in a conventional box with fans.

 

Do I need to install the fan on 95W 6700K (I can use the one that came with 65W 6700), or I do not need that because it is going in a conventional box with fans.

 

I will test the SQ from both pc's; one low(er) powered fan less, and one higher powered with conventional build. Thanks.

Link to comment
My build is up, operational, and sounds incredible. Redbook to DSD512 averages 27% cpu and about 40% GPU (assuming I'm reading right). I moved the Fractal stock fan on the back (exhaust) to the front panel bottom position, and added a Phanteks 140mm for the exhaust, as it is more powerful and I was concerned about the addtl heat produced by my Mellanox fiber card. The dual front fans decision was aided by the fact that they are slightly reduced in their CFM due to pulling air in through dust filters. The filtering in this case is exceptional and I am very pleased.

 

Here is the complete build list:

Intel Core i7-6700K 4.0GHz Quad-Core Processor

Noctua NH-L9x65 33.8 CFM CPU Cooler

Gigabyte GA-Z170X-UD5 ATX LGA1151 Motherboard

Kingston HyperX Fury Black 32GB (4 x 8GB) DDR4-2133 Memory

Asus GeForce GTX 960 Overclocked 4GB GDDR5 PCI-E Video Card

SeaSonic 520W 80+ Platinum Certified Fully-Modular Fanless ATX Power Supply

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro OEM (64-bit)

Phanteks 140mm Cooling Fan (PH-F140SP_BK)

Mellanox Connectx-2 Optical (Fiber) Network PCI-E card

SanDisk SSD PLUS 2.5" 120GB SATA III Internal Solid State Drive (SSD), OS only, no music

Fractal Design Define R5 case

iFi iUSB 5V power supply for SSD

Roon server

Audiophile Optimizer 2.0 beta 15 (using "strip down Windows 10" service tool option)

HQplayer (sends to NAA)

 

Thanks to Jussi for 90% of this build idea.

 

Have you carried on any experiments with RAM-disk?

Based on my experience I should note that SQ in configuration with NAA is better than even in direct DSD mode while music files are loading from RAM-disk on HQplayer PC.

 

What is the platform of your NAA machine? Does it have USB 3.0 ports?

My new NAA nettop (ZOTAC ZBOX CI320 nano) demonstrates quite a sufficient SQ difference between via USB 2.0 and USB 3.0 ports. USB 3.0 port using makes sound so smooth (analog like) and almost eliminates SQ difference between DSD128 (max for my DAC) and DSD64.

Link to comment

I have not done any ramdisk. I tried it (probably incorrectly) a year ago this time, with WS2012R2 and a much smaller machine and it flopped flat, boring and a PITA) I am open to what the Win 10 Pro and HQPlayer ramdisk best practices are these days; heck I have 32GB of RAM. :)

 

My NAA is a WS2012R1 running AO. It is a CAPS Carbon (Atom processor) with a wonderful JCAT USB card (so mobo USB ports, regardless of type, are irrelevant). It is connected via a FMC and fiber to my Diablo fiber switch.

Link to comment
  • 2 weeks later...

Most of the build I see here needs quiet a few fans for cooling. Was anyone able to build a HQP/Roon PC, passive/active cooling or not, which has silent operation and can be kept inside the music room ? Or is this not a viable solution at the moment for DSD512 up-sampling ?

Link to comment
Most of the build I see here needs quiet a few fans for cooling. Was anyone able to build a HQP/Roon PC, passive/active cooling or not, which has silent operation and can be kept inside the music room ? Or is this not a viable solution at the moment for DSD512 up-sampling ?

 

The SGM 2015 does Roon 1.2 > HQ Player > DSD 512 all passively cooled :-)

 

It's also important to note that to get really good Sound Quality with a Windows ASIO DAC such as the T+A DAC 8 DSD running Roon to HQP, one needs a reduced an optimized OS. Roon is a very busy app, and getting Windows to be minimally active is very much a necessary condition for good SQ

Sound Test, Monaco

Consultant to Sound Galleries Monaco, and Taiko Audio Holland

e-mail [email protected]

Link to comment
Most of the build I see here needs quiet a few fans for cooling. Was anyone able to build a HQP/Roon PC, passive/active cooling or not, which has silent operation and can be kept inside the music room ? Or is this not a viable solution at the moment for DSD512 up-sampling ?

 

I have built with HDplex H5 case; passively cooled. i7 6700 at 65 TDP. That case can handle 95 TDP (6700K).

Link to comment

So I'm trying to get to DSD512 with the poly-sinc-mp filters and my current system does -2s well but hiccups at poly-sinc-mp. Not sure that its a pure CPU issue because my system loads to 32% (6x 3.4Ghz 4930k processor). The GTX 760 doesn't seem to help.

 

So:

i7-6700k (4.0) vs.

E3-1275 V5 (3.6)

vs.???

 

adding a GTX 1080 I'm assuming this will do DSD512 poly-sinc-mp fine ...

any idea about DSD1024? ...just because ... :cool:

Custom room treatments for headphone users.

Link to comment
The SGM 2015 does Roon 1.2 > HQ Player > DSD 512 all passively cooled :-)

 

yeah, I know that but honestly its beyond my budget at this point :-)

 

It's also important to note that to get really good Sound Quality with a Windows ASIO DAC such as the T+A DAC 8 DSD running Roon to HQP, one needs a reduced an optimized OS. Roon is a very busy app, and getting Windows to be minimally active is very much a necessary condition for good SQ

 

I agree. My experience has been that AO/Fidelizer Pro/PL has been a tremendous help in this area, along with tweaking some of the bios parameters.

Link to comment
I have built with HDplex H5 case; passively cooled. i7 6700 at 65 TDP. That case can handle 95 TDP (6700K).

 

How are you powering it ? Are you sure its able to do DSD512 up-sampling without any issues ? Miska suggests using a cuda graphic card to offload some of the computations and if I were to use one, the whole pc would at least need about 400watts.

Link to comment
So I'm trying to get to DSD512 with the poly-sinc-mp filters and my current system does -2s well but hiccups at poly-sinc-mp. Not sure that its a pure CPU issue because my system loads to 32% (6x 3.4Ghz 4930k processor). The GTX 760 doesn't seem to help.

 

Please check out the per-core load graphs in Resource Monitor. If any one of the cores is maxed out, then hiccups are likely to occur. Also note that for CPUs with HyperThreading, the CPU is practically fully loaded at 50% total load, because the virtual second CPU's from HT don't really help much with HQPlayer type of work loads.

 

adding a GTX 1080 I'm assuming this will do DSD512 poly-sinc-mp fine ...

any idea about DSD1024? ...just because ... :cool:

 

If the GTX 1080 performance is going to be anything like they promise, that won't be a bottleneck for DSD1024... Bottleneck is more likely to be the parts that still run on the main CPU. Let's see how much faster I can still make those ones.

 

 

Generally, if you go for CUDA, you can use CPU with higher base clock speed and less cores.

Signalyst - Developer of HQPlayer

Pulse & Fidelity - Software Defined Amplifiers

Link to comment
Most of the build I see here needs quiet a few fans for cooling. Was anyone able to build a HQP/Roon PC, passive/active cooling or not, which has silent operation and can be kept inside the music room ? Or is this not a viable solution at the moment for DSD512 up-sampling ?

 

Dev: I do not have a DAC that does DSD512. I was just suggesting a fan less box. I have not tried graphic card off-loading yet. So far for my 2-ch HQP or IB I am using an HDPlex 300W LPS (it sees about 70W total load with i7 6700, 3.4 GHz, and I will try down clocking once things settle down).

Link to comment
Can HQP dummy-upsample to DSD512 without being connected to a DAC just to see what load it generates?

 

Don't know. Maybe Miska can answer. Dev asked if there is any option to go fanless, and I suggested HDPlex H5. You can have all the processor power you need (or available today) is an i7 6700K at 4.0 GHz, and based on others experiences it can up sample to DSD512. As of power supplies; I think there is HDPlex 300W LPS, and then there are few Teradaks LPS's going up to 600W. So everything remains fanless, and you have the required processing power.

Link to comment
Don't know. Maybe Miska can answer. Dev asked if there is any option to go fanless, and I suggested HDPlex H5. You can have all the processor power you need (or available today) is an i7 6700K at 4.0 GHz, and based on others experiences it can up sample to DSD512. As of power supplies; I think there is HDPlex 300W LPS, and then there are few Teradaks LPS's going up to 600W. So everything remains fanless, and you have the required processing power.

 

Oh - I thought you had built a server with those specs.

Link to comment
Oh - I thought you had built a server with those specs.

 

Yes, I have a server built with;

 

Intel Core i7-6700 3.4 GHz Quad-Core Processor

Gigabyte GA-Z170X-UD5 TD ATX LGA1151 Motherboard

HDPlex H5 case

and HDPlex 300 W LPS.

Link to comment
Yes, I have a server built with;

 

Intel Core i7-6700 3.4 GHz Quad-Core Processor

Gigabyte GA-Z170X-UD5 TD ATX LGA1151 Motherboard

HDPlex H5 case

and HDPlex 300 W LPS.

 

So if you have HQPlayer on it can you just set it to see if it will upsample to DSD512 and advise the CPU load?

Link to comment
Please check out the per-core load graphs in Resource Monitor. If any one of the cores is maxed out, then hiccups are likely to occur. Also note that for CPUs with HyperThreading, the CPU is practically fully loaded at 50% total load, because the virtual second CPU's from HT don't really help much with HQPlayer type of work loads.

 

 

 

If the GTX 1080 performance is going to be anything like they promise, that won't be a bottleneck for DSD1024... Bottleneck is more likely to be the parts that still run on the main CPU. Let's see how much faster I can still make those ones.

 

 

Generally, if you go for CUDA, you can use CPU with higher base clock speed and less cores.

 

Good post. I know I keep reading an i7 is min. for DSD512, but here's a screenshot of my cores while upsampling DSD64 to 256. So do you think for sure that my Mini wont do DSD512 on a Windows bootcamped?

Screen Shot 2016-05-16 at 10.16.47 AM.png

Ryzen 7 2700 PC Server, NUC7CJYH w. 4G Apacer RAM as Renderer/LPS 1.2 - IsoRegen/LPS-1/.2 - Singxer SU-1/LPS1.2 - Holo Spring Level 3 DAC - LTA MicroZOTL MZ2 - Modwright KWA 150 Signature Amp - Tidal Audio Piano's.  

.

Link to comment
Good post. I know I keep reading an i7 is min. for DSD512, but here's a screenshot of my cores while upsampling DSD64 to 256. So do you think for sure that my Mini wont do DSD512 on a Windows bootcamped?

 

I'm pretty sure it won't. Going DSD256 -> DSD512 at least doubles the load, and you have two cores already at around 75%. Based on your load figures, you are now at optimal max of your machine. There's some margin left for the Roon GUI.

Signalyst - Developer of HQPlayer

Pulse & Fidelity - Software Defined Amplifiers

Link to comment
I'm pretty sure it won't. Going DSD256 -> DSD512 at least doubles the load, and you have two cores already at around 75%. Based on your load figures, you are now at optimal max of your machine. There's some margin left for the Roon GUI.

 

So it's hard to find a mac with appropriate capacity for going to DSD512.

I am looking and not finding an imac with i7...

 

Should we assume that only the mac-pro will do?

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...