Jump to content
IGNORED

Just got a Yggdrasil!


Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, manisandher said:

 

I'm not sure what you're saying. The test is about the harmonic distortion of the DAC - you can see that all the distortion peaks are multiples of the 50Hz fundamental. Most DACs have reasonably low distortion even into punishing 600 ohm loads. But the Yggy showed terrible performance into 600 ohms, so he seems to have given it another go into a benign 100k.

 

Mani.

 

Yes, but the Yggy showed "terrible" performance into 100K ohms as well - worse than the Altair into 600 ohms.  This seems to indicate (if I am not mistaken) that it is not about the ohm rating at all (the Yggy is "terrible" no matter the ohm load and the Altair is good/acceptable/normal/expected no matter the ohm rating).  

 

If it is not about the ohm rating than the test revealed this performance difference "by accident" as it were.  What am I missing?  A whole lot know doubt ;)

Hey MQA, if it is not all $voodoo$, show us the math!

Link to comment
2 minutes ago, crenca said:

 

Yes, but the Yggy showed "terrible" performance into 100K ohms as well - worse than the Altair into 600 ohms.

 

No, I don't think the Yggy's performance into 100k is "terrible". Below average for sure.

 

Mani.

Main: SOtM sMS-200 -> Okto dac8PRO -> 6x Neurochrome 286 mono amps -> Tune Audio Anima horns + 2x Rotel RB-1590 amps -> 4 subs

Home Office: SOtM sMS-200 -> MOTU UltraLite-mk5 -> 6x Neurochrome 286 mono amps -> Impulse H2 speakers

Vinyl: Technics SP10 / London (Decca) Reference -> Trafomatic Luna -> RME ADI-2 Pro

Link to comment
2 minutes ago, manisandher said:

 

No, I don't think the Yggy's performance into 100k is "terrible". Below average for sure.

 

Mani.

 

 

Just using the word you used :) 

 

Is this harmonic distortion worse/similar than those tubeified DAC's (e.g. Lampizator) I wonder?

Hey MQA, if it is not all $voodoo$, show us the math!

Link to comment
4 minutes ago, Jud said:

 

Which is *exactly* what is wrong here.  Suddenly saying something perfectly ordinary and true about another person is "picking sides." What are these "sides," exactly?  Like or dislike Yggy?  I like it.  Like or dislike Mani?  Is this high school, and I don't get to sit at the cool kids' lunch table, 'cause saying "He ain't so bad" about a kid who's disliked means I'm uncool too?

 

You're triangulating.  This thread started as someone who recently received a Yggy sharing in the experience.  I submit that a forum newcomer would not have been afforded the amount of tolerance that Mani was for crapping all over the thread.  Even now, you're trying to find some way to save some face by subtly inferring immaturity on my part.

 

I'm sorry Jud, you have to own some amount of Mani's rudeness in this thread.  He might be an angel in all the other threads.  I only became aware of his existence in this thread.  So perhaps my sample size is small.  But I will say that even in this post, you're still defending his incivility, apparently at my expense.  So be it.

 

When Hiro started slagging the Yggy, Chris asked Hiro to start a new thread for Yggy slagging.  The fact that reps from Schiit themselves came into the thread might have had something to do with that.  But I'm still rather stunned that Mani's threadcrapping here seems to be formally sanctioned.  No amount of trying to shame me into admitting to immature behavior will change that.  I think we're just going to have to agree to disagree and move on.

Link to comment
32 minutes ago, Samuel T Cogley said:

 

The issue isn't JA.  The issue is a thread that was started for an audience much closer to Schiit's target demographic being utterly crapped on by someone outside of that demographic trying very hard (for reasons I still don't quite understand) to "educate" everyone about how apparently awful the Yggy is.

Possibly ulterior  motives as Mani is very close to his dac manufacturer . Fact ! 

Link to comment
2 minutes ago, crenca said:

Just using the word you used :) 

 

But I was referring to the Yggy's 600 ohm performance, and not its 100k ohm performance. I never mentioned anything like "terrible 100k performance", because I don't think it is.

 

Mani.

 

24 minutes ago, manisandher said:

But the Yggy showed terrible performance into 600 ohms, so he seems to have given it another go into a benign 100k.

Main: SOtM sMS-200 -> Okto dac8PRO -> 6x Neurochrome 286 mono amps -> Tune Audio Anima horns + 2x Rotel RB-1590 amps -> 4 subs

Home Office: SOtM sMS-200 -> MOTU UltraLite-mk5 -> 6x Neurochrome 286 mono amps -> Impulse H2 speakers

Vinyl: Technics SP10 / London (Decca) Reference -> Trafomatic Luna -> RME ADI-2 Pro

Link to comment
Just now, manisandher said:

 

But I was referring to the Yggy's 600 ohm performance, and not its 100k ohm performance. I never mentioned anything like "terrible 100k performance", because I don't think it is.

 

Mani.

 

 

 

Ah, I see.  Still, it is certainly more than typical for modern SD chip designs.  I wonder if it is comparable to these tubeified DAC's...

Hey MQA, if it is not all $voodoo$, show us the math!

Link to comment
3 minutes ago, GUTB said:

Also, if you look at the comments posted on the Stereophile review, JA says Schiit's claim of LSBs not being truncated is false because he says the measurements show that they are, in fact, being truncated.

 

When you have 24-bit data but 20-bit DACs, you need to dither those data to match the DAC. Otherwise, simply chopping off the 4 LSBs, called "truncation," reintroduces quantizing distortion. Schiit's Jason Stoddard has subsequently said that the Yggdrasil "rounds" 24-bit data but my measurements suggest that the LSBs of 24-bit data are simply truncated.

 

JA, Stereophile.

Main: SOtM sMS-200 -> Okto dac8PRO -> 6x Neurochrome 286 mono amps -> Tune Audio Anima horns + 2x Rotel RB-1590 amps -> 4 subs

Home Office: SOtM sMS-200 -> MOTU UltraLite-mk5 -> 6x Neurochrome 286 mono amps -> Impulse H2 speakers

Vinyl: Technics SP10 / London (Decca) Reference -> Trafomatic Luna -> RME ADI-2 Pro

Link to comment

In all the Schiit bashing, I wonder if it's occurred to any bashers that perhaps Schiit's designs anticipated tests like the ones run by JA (the Ragnarok certainly comes to mind) and were intentionally designed to fail the tests.

 

Maybe the joke's on JA?

 

Perhaps the disdain by the old school audiophile elite is a badge of honor for Jason and Mike?

Link to comment
11 minutes ago, Samuel T Cogley said:

In all the Schiit bashing, I wonder if it's occurred to any bashers that perhaps Schiit's designs anticipated tests like the ones run by JA (the Ragnarok certainly comes to mind) and were intentionally designed to fail the tests.

 

Maybe the joke's on JA?

 

Perhaps the disdain by the old school audiophile elite is a badge of honor for Jason and Mike?

 

That Ragnarok measurement is a head scratcher for sure.  The truth is that Jason and Mike are definitively stepping out of the normal design box.  I for one appreciate it because how else do you innovate?  The fact that neither the Ragnarok nor the Yggy measure "normally" or "well" given their designs can mean more than one thing, but the measurements used I think are not trivial - they do correlate well historically with better/good sound and are in the main non-controversial.  The fact that both are well regarded and are generally reviewed as sounding at the top of the class as far as their price points go also is important obviously.

 

 

Hey MQA, if it is not all $voodoo$, show us the math!

Link to comment
10 minutes ago, JoeWhip said:

This thread has run its course and has veered so far off the original posters intent that it should be closed. I would suggest that Mani start his own thread. On most other forums I post on, this would have been taken care of by the moderator. It is too bad that it has had to go this far off course. 

The thread should be called "Mani hates the Yggy" . Or " Mani can sniff out a Schiit Yggy topic all the way from the U.K " 

 

 

Link to comment
20 minutes ago, crenca said:

 

That Ragnarok measurement is a head scratcher for sure.  The truth is that Jason and Mike are definitively stepping out of the normal design box.  I for one appreciate it because how else do you innovate?  The fact that neither the Ragnarok nor the Yggy measure "normally" or "well" given their designs can mean more than one thing, but the measurements used I think are not trivial - they do correlate well historically with better/good sound and are in the main non-controversial.  The fact that both are well regarded and are generally reviewed as sounding at the top of the class as far as their price points go also is important obviously.

 

 

 

I would say that Jason and (especially) Mike do not share the typical amount of respect for JA that he enjoys from "traditional" audiophiles.

 

I still say there's a chance that the designs are intentional with regards to anticipating the testing by "traditional" audiophiles.

Link to comment
13 minutes ago, manisandher said:

 

What was his 'original intent'? Let me help you...

 

The OP is a reviewer. He has been sent an Yggy for review. In this circumstance, I think my sharing of factually correct information about the Yggy is perfectly legitimate.

 

Mani.

 

But it's second hand, correct?  The OP was providing his first hand insights and you were regurgitating JA?  And that's what passes here for "perfectly legitimate"?

Link to comment
6 minutes ago, Samuel T Cogley said:

 

But it's second hand, correct?  The OP was providing his first hand insights and you were regurgitating JA?  And that's what passes here for "perfectly legitimate"?

 

Did OP produce graphs?  If he did then what you're reasoning is valid.  Otherwise, his first hand subjective impressions are no more or less valid than Mani's first hand impressions (which he has made known).

Link to comment
12 minutes ago, manisandher said:

 

 

One of these days, you're going to say something factually correct, but I'll not hold my breath.

 

 

Mani.

So you havent listened to those items. Big damn deal. Your stats mean nothing. You fail to add in other threads like the Chord 2 qute where you compared it to .........drum roll ... the Yggy!

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...