Jump to content
IGNORED

A novel way to massively improve the SQ of computer audio streaming


Message added by The Computer Audiophile

Important and useful information about this thread

Posting guidelines

History and index of useful posts

Most important: please realize this thread is about bleeding edge experimentation and discovery. No one has The Answer™. If you are not into tweaking, just know that you can have a musically satisfying system without doing any of the nutty things we do here.

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, LTG2010 said:

The variations in the process clock frequency modulation can cause measurable jitter over 20ns according to some chipset manufacturers. The Jittered signal might explain the audible difference, unless you are of the opinion that jitter is dealt succesfully by the DACS buffers, then its not an explanation.

 

See here's the thing: adding spread spectrum by definition adds waaaaayyyy more than 20ns jitter, so it totally swamps variations in logic process (very real) as well as clock oscillator.

Custom room treatments for headphone users.

Link to comment
3 hours ago, vortecjr said:

John S. has a hypothesis that oscillators can negatively  impact each other. Unfortunately, I don't think that his research is far enough along to comment on the exact mechanism. My contention has been since this is so hard to measure its impact most be very small. Understand that he is having to build very low noise hardware to even start the investigation. Having said that....it's probably not a good idea to add more noise:) 

 

Einstein described this long before John S. was born, nor hypothesized. It remains an active area of research ?http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/04/einstein-s-spooky-action-distance-spotted-objects-almost-big-enough-see

Custom room treatments for headphone users.

Link to comment
20 minutes ago, jabbr said:

See here's the thing: adding spread spectrum by definition adds waaaaayyyy more than 20ns jitter, so it totally swamps variations in logic process (very real) as well as clock oscillator.

Uh, could you clarify that a bit? For PCIe and USB3, we're talking about modulating the unit interval by 1 ps or less. Where are you getting 20 ns?

Link to comment
13 minutes ago, mansr said:

Uh, could you clarify that a bit? For PCIe and USB3, we're talking about modulating the unit interval by 1 ps or less. Where are you getting 20 ns?

 

I was quoting to quickly. The 20ns number isn't right because PCIe allows no more than 12ns skew. Its also roughly the width of a DAC clock cyle (if roughly 50 Mhz). Process phase error variation is often in the ps to 10s to 100s range. Misread ns as ps...

 

The point is that going with a "femotosecond" clock which is the topic of this read doesn't make sense when spread spectrum is adding 0.5% jitter -- the actual number. The amount in ps depends on the particular clock.

 

https://www.microsemi.com/document-portal/doc_view/135439-white-paper-spread-spectrum-clocking

 

 

 

Custom room treatments for headphone users.

Link to comment
40 minutes ago, jabbr said:

The point is that going with a "femotosecond" clock which is the topic of this read doesn't make sense when spread spectrum is adding 0.5% jitter -- the actual number. The amount in ps depends on the particular clock.

Nobody is applying spread spectrum to the DAC clock. That would be insane.

Link to comment
1 minute ago, mansr said:

A lot of things are being talked about.

Let me summarize the actual situation: 

 

Modern miniaturized logic uses sharper and sharper rise times, which leads to increased ringing at logic interfaces as well as increased EMI in certain situations, as well as increased switching noise. These noises can be averaged out by adding phase noise to the clock and de syncing the logic. 

 

For audiophile purposes the true solution is to redesign  the logic itself and properly reduce ground plane noise as well as EMI. 

That ain’t likely to happen in a mass market PC motherboard. Good luck trying to fix that with good power supplies and Femto clocks.

Custom room treatments for headphone users.

Link to comment
1 hour ago, lmitche said:

Ok, so I just disabled spread spectrum for PCIE and had a listen.  Not good, everything sounds dead. I turned it back on and quality was restored. Phew!

 

I'll try disabling SS for the VRM next. Stay tuned.

 

FYI - this test was done with the BLCK SS turned off.

So SSC isn't all bad then.

Link to comment
14 hours ago, mansr said:

So SSC isn't all bad then.

No, of course not. We just need to know where to use it and where to disable it. It seems to be a simple trade-off of a more stable clock vs. an increase in EMI, although I suspect the underlying mechanisms are much more complex.

 

No matter, I have excellent measurement tools so it's easy to find the best combination of the three motherboard settings.

Pareto Audio aka nuckleheadaudio

Link to comment
4 minutes ago, mansr said:

Anyhow, it'll be interesting to learn what you find. What settings do you have available?

There are three switches for ssc, enable/disable for bclk, vrm and pcie. Best SQ so far is bclk disabled, pcie enabled, both with vrm enabled. Will test vrm today.

Pareto Audio aka nuckleheadaudio

Link to comment
22 hours ago, mansr said:

So SSC isn't all bad then.

 

8 hours ago, lmitche said:

No, of course not. We just need to know where to use it and where to disable it.

Some of it must be friendly jitter :)

SSC does mess with power management so if you disable PCIE SSC and its drawing more current whilst VRM SSC is limitting current, might not play - well worth trying all disabled in your tests.

I switched SSC - ON with my motherboard ( there was only one general setting ) Maybe a slight loss of focus, but nothing major on my setup.

Now as for disabling HPET much more interesting, cleaner more 3D sound and an annoying micro stutter sometimes when using remote desktop disappeared.

Link to comment
4 minutes ago, LTG2010 said:

Now as for disabling HPET much more interesting, cleaner more 3D sound and an annoying micro stutter sometimes when using remote desktop disappeared.

If you're getting stutter, you should look at increasing audio buffer sizes wherever possible.

Link to comment
19 minutes ago, LTG2010 said:

 

Some of it must be friendly jitter :)

SSC does mess with power management so if you disable PCIE SSC and its drawing more current whilst VRM SSC is limitting current, might not play - well worth trying all disabled in your tests.

I switched SSC - ON with my motherboard ( there was only one general setting ) Maybe a slight loss of focus, but nothing major on my setup.

Now as for disabling HPET much more interesting, cleaner more 3D sound and an annoying micro stutter sometimes when using remote desktop disappeared.

 

I thought enabling HPET was a good thing.  It's also a setting in Audiophile Optimizer.  Will have to try that myself.

Link to comment
33 minutes ago, mansr said:

If you're getting stutter, you should look at increasing audio buffer sizes wherever possible.

Yes have put all buffers back to default.

 

23 minutes ago, Johnseye said:

I thought enabling HPET was a good thing.  It's also a setting in Audiophile Optimizer.

Yep so did I, I think it was the stuttering - when I noticed the setting in BIOS I recalled that turning HPET off improves stuttering in Gaming, so gave it a go. Perhaps it doesn't play well with sCLK or it's just my server, but its well worth a test. I also think AO's HPET works independently of the BIOS so you could have BIOS off and AO on.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...