Jump to content
IGNORED

'Audiophile' Ethernet Cables.


Recommended Posts

So called 'audiophile' grade ethernet cables are making inroads into specialist audio dealers.

I haven't seen them mentioned on here yet so was wondering if anyone has used them and would care to relate their experience.

Logic tells me there should be no difference due the the existing ethernet protocol and the way data is shunted around. However, I await responses from those who have actually tried them.

 

OK, so it's another cable thread but maybe there's something to learn here, without provoking the arsonists. :)

MacMini 8Gb OSX > Pure Music / Bitperfect / Amarra / iTunes > Synology DS215J NAS > Schiit Wyrd > Stello U3 > Naim Uniti Atom, Harbeth P3ESR. Meier Corda Arietta Headphone Amp > Sennhieser HD650 Phones (Cardas rewire). Isol-8 Powerline Axis. Isotek GII Orion Power Conditioner. Cardas Clear USB Cable. Tellurium Q Black Speaker Cable. All other cables by Mark Grant.

Vinyl still has it's place. Technics SL1200. Modified with Mike New Bearing, KAB Strobe Disable, MCRU 2 box PSU, Isonoe Feet, SME M2-9 Tonearm > Goldring 2400 >Rothwell Simplex Phonostage.

Link to comment

There's even been a review by Michael Lavorgna on Audiostream.

 

AudioQuest Ethernet Cables | AudioStream

 

I'm a cable sceptic myself (I got both an analog IC and the basic USB from AQ just to "be safe" for my own psychology and because they looked decent), but when we get to Ethernet, this goes beyond me.

Link to comment

Earlier this year I replaced most with AudioQuest Forest Ethernet Cables. Honestly could not hear a difference but wasn't swapping them out with the old ones either. I've been happy with the quality of Audioquest cables in general and wanted a cable that would last plus were the only cables I have yet to upgrade. But again I can't remember ever having an ethernet cable go out on me, besides the plastic piece breaking off.

 

So I guess I got sucked right into that one.

Link to comment

This thing is pretty inexpensive and will test your Ethernet. Or buy anything from Fluke. Real World Certifier from Byte Brothers. Top quality handheld test equipment.

 

There is going to be a greater difference in network performance based on the switch and network card in use than the Ethernet cable in use. For critical applications I've always used fiber. Anyone want to start an Audiophile Ethernet switch company? j/k the Audioquest cables do look pretty though.

Link to comment

A bit more research and reading online has thrown up a few surprises. I'll not reference individual articles but just summise what I have read. A good proportion but not all (as evidenced here) those that have tried them report a positive effect. Placebo? possibly, I can't answer that.

It was interesting to note that generally, those who stream direct off HDD, NAS or whatever were the most enthusiastic but those (like myself) that use a player that first loads their tracks into memory were less so. The second groups 'results' were quite logical really when you think about it as the cable plays no part in the playback operation once the track has been stored in RAM.

I conclude (though I dont guarantee) that in my particular setup, there would be little, if any gain in upgrading my cabling so my ££ willl be going elsewhere.

YMMV depending on your setup.

Now, all this still doesn't explain the point I raised in my first post.

MacMini 8Gb OSX > Pure Music / Bitperfect / Amarra / iTunes > Synology DS215J NAS > Schiit Wyrd > Stello U3 > Naim Uniti Atom, Harbeth P3ESR. Meier Corda Arietta Headphone Amp > Sennhieser HD650 Phones (Cardas rewire). Isol-8 Powerline Axis. Isotek GII Orion Power Conditioner. Cardas Clear USB Cable. Tellurium Q Black Speaker Cable. All other cables by Mark Grant.

Vinyl still has it's place. Technics SL1200. Modified with Mike New Bearing, KAB Strobe Disable, MCRU 2 box PSU, Isonoe Feet, SME M2-9 Tonearm > Goldring 2400 >Rothwell Simplex Phonostage.

Link to comment

as the cable plays no part in the playback operation once the track has been stored in RAM

 

It's still electrically connected, so still subject to whatever electrical noise might make its way through the cable into the rest of the system. Not saying there would necessarily be enough noise to make a difference to anything, just pointing out that a model which says there can be no possible effect at all is probably too simple.

One never knows, do one? - Fats Waller

The fairest thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the fundamental emotion which stands at the cradle of true art and true science. - Einstein

Computer, Audirvana -> optical Ethernet to Fitlet3 -> Fibbr Alpha Optical USB -> iFi NEO iDSD DAC -> Apollon Audio 1ET400A Mini (Purifi based) -> Vandersteen 3A Signature.

Link to comment
as the cable plays no part in the playback operation once the track has been stored in RAM

 

It's still electrically connected, so still subject to whatever electrical noise might make its way through the cable into the rest of the system. Not saying there would necessarily be enough noise to make a difference to anything, just pointing out that a model which says there can be no possible effect at all is probably too simple.

 

OK. But unless there is some sort of inline filter, the purest of copper or silver will not make a difference.

W10 NUC i7 (Gen 10) > Roon (Audiolense FIR) > Motu UltraLite mk5 > (4) Hypex NCore NC502MP > JBL M2 Master Reference +4 subs

 

Watch my Podcast https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXMw_bZWBMtRWNJQfTJ38kA/videos

Link to comment
OK. But unless there is some sort of inline filter, the purest of copper or silver will not make a difference.

 

Intrinsically, a cable IS an inline filter with capacitance, inductance and resistance creating its own network, not to mention how it connects to the other gear.

Forrest:

Win10 i9 9900KS/GTX1060 HQPlayer4>Win10 NAA

DSD>Pavel's DSC2.6>Bent Audio TAP>

Parasound JC1>"Naked" Quad ESL63/Tannoy PS350B subs<100Hz

Link to comment
Intrinsically, a cable IS an inline filter with capacitance, inductance and resistance creating its own network, not to mention how it connects to the other gear.

 

Yes, but I'm speaking about a much higher level.

W10 NUC i7 (Gen 10) > Roon (Audiolense FIR) > Motu UltraLite mk5 > (4) Hypex NCore NC502MP > JBL M2 Master Reference +4 subs

 

Watch my Podcast https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXMw_bZWBMtRWNJQfTJ38kA/videos

Link to comment

Correctly implemented, an ethernet port is (or should be) galvanically isolated. While not providing filtration as such, there is no physical connection between the cable port and the circuits beyond.

Is this relavant, dunno :), just throwing it out there.

MacMini 8Gb OSX > Pure Music / Bitperfect / Amarra / iTunes > Synology DS215J NAS > Schiit Wyrd > Stello U3 > Naim Uniti Atom, Harbeth P3ESR. Meier Corda Arietta Headphone Amp > Sennhieser HD650 Phones (Cardas rewire). Isol-8 Powerline Axis. Isotek GII Orion Power Conditioner. Cardas Clear USB Cable. Tellurium Q Black Speaker Cable. All other cables by Mark Grant.

Vinyl still has it's place. Technics SL1200. Modified with Mike New Bearing, KAB Strobe Disable, MCRU 2 box PSU, Isonoe Feet, SME M2-9 Tonearm > Goldring 2400 >Rothwell Simplex Phonostage.

Link to comment

It's still electrically connected, so still subject to whatever electrical noise might make its way through the cable into the rest of the system.

 

Good point. With the PC builds, know anyone who has tested fiber gigabit in order to eliminate this?

 

The other test is to wait for the buffer to load, pull the ethernet out of the machine, then hear if there is a difference.

Link to comment

I replace all out-of-box cables with decent quality aftermarket cables right now from AudioQuest and Cardas. First I purchase to have some small peace of mind on build quality. I have experienced audible improvements on better grade interconnects, speaker cables and power cables. When it comes to digital cables including USB, FireWire, digital coax, Toslink and Ethernet impersonally have never experienced any sound improvement but would continue to buy them for build quality. I have just experienced too many equipment issues (not just with my audio system) with poor quality cables to leave the performance to chance.

"A mind is like a parachute. It doesn't work if it is not open."
Frank Zappa
Link to comment

Try to find some Belden CAT5/CAT6 cables with their Bonded Pair technology. No voodoo there...just easily measurable performance.

 

No sound-wise...not so sure there's an improvement.

 

Bill

Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.

Mac Mini->Roon + Tidal->KEF LS50W

Link to comment

I'm a believer when it comes to using good quality cables of any flavor. Ethernet cables are a perfect medium for carrying the really ugly stuff upstream to the devices that they attach to. Adding fuel to the fire are the low dollar switches and routers found throughout most home LAN environments that use even lower dollar wall wart power supplies/wireless controllers..etc. These noise generators have a straight shot via the Ethernet cable right into your audiophile grade music server which has its own problems to deal with without the help from all the crap upstream of it.

 

While I can't say I see the need for audiophile specific Ethernet cables at this stage of the game I do see the benefits of using foil shields and twisted pair wiring for Ethernet cables in general.

 

I wrote a blog post back before the CA site upgrade occurred that reviewed an Ethernet Opto-isolator device. Unfortunately that blog post seems to have fell off the face of the earth sometime during or after the site upgrade otherwise I would link it here for your review and consideration. I use this device myself to avoid the above mentioned issues and am very happy with its performance.

 

If interested I can send you the link to the place I sourced mine from.

Link to comment
It was interesting to note that generally, those who stream direct off HDD, NAS or whatever were the most enthusiastic but those (like myself) that use a player that first loads their tracks into memory were less so. The second groups 'results' were quite logical really when you think about it as the cable plays no part in the playback operation once the track has been stored in RAM.

 

I would second that notion as I have been doing some A/B comparisons between the same track stored locally on my Macbook and stored on my NAS; as long as it is stored in RAM before play, I cannot hear any difference.

Synology NAS>i7-6700/32GB/NVIDIA QUADRO P4000 Win10>Qobuz+Tidal>Roon>HQPlayer>DSD512> Fiber Switch>Ultrarendu (NAA)>Holo Audio May KTE DAC> Bryston SP3 pre>Levinson No. 432 amps>Magnepan (MG20.1x2, CCR and MMC2x6)

Link to comment
I wrote a blog post back before the CA site upgrade occurred that reviewed an Ethernet Opto-isolator device. Unfortunately that blog post seems to have fell off the face of the earth sometime during or after the site upgrade otherwise I would link it here for your review and consideration. I use this device myself to avoid the above mentioned issues and am very happy with its performance.

 

If interested I can send you the link to the place I sourced mine from.

 

Please provide the link. All I can find are transformer based solutions.

Demian Martin

auraliti http://www.auraliti.com

Constellation Audio http://www.constellationaudio.com

NuForce http://www.nuforce.com

Monster Cable http://www.monstercable.com

Link to comment

Well, yes. I was unable to detect any sonic difference between copper and fibre. Every difference I have noted has to do with how PCs handle ethernet transmissions, not the media.

 

With the exception of powerline networking, which does degrade the sound here. For lack of a better sonic descriptor, powerline networking added a "gray" background to the playback, if that makes any sense. Another way to say that is that the music sounded as if it were painted on a wall, instead of hanging in three dimensional space. Very much like the cues that provide soundstage depth were lost in some kind of noise. Annoying, and repeatable, here at least.

 

But between copper and fibre? The only fifference was in how well applications handled disk speeds. In almost every NAS based test, every application was slowed down by NAS, while ost srhoed increased performance when serviced with a SAN. That's in comparison to locally attached drives (SATA or Firewire 800), and includes iSCSI based SANs.

 

I plan to write all this up sometime in the future, when life slows down a bit. Results are 9 months old at this point, but still valid I expect.

 

Paul

 

 

Good point. With the PC builds, know anyone who has tested fiber gigabit in order to eliminate this?

 

The other test is to wait for the buffer to load, pull the ethernet out of the machine, then hear if there is a difference.

Anyone who considers protocol unimportant has never dealt with a cat DAC.

Robert A. Heinlein

Link to comment

RE power line network...

 

I would be interested if the powerline network degraded sound becaus word how the network works; or purely because it adds "noise" to the AC which is used as the transmission method. Not sure how you could test that - perhaps using an off the grid power source for the powerline.

 

(Hope that made sense)

 

Eloise

Eloise

---

...in my opinion / experience...

While I agree "Everything may matter" working out what actually affects the sound is a trickier thing.

And I agree "Trust your ears" but equally don't allow them to fool you - trust them with a bit of skepticism.

keep your mind open... But mind your brain doesn't fall out.

Link to comment

That puzzles me too, and I do not have an answer. I tend to think it must be noise pollution in the AC lines, somehow!

-Paul

 

RE power line network...

 

I would be interested if the powerline network degraded sound becaus word how the network works; or purely because it adds "noise" to the AC which is used as the transmission method. Not sure how you could test that - perhaps using an off the grid power source for the powerline.

 

(Hope that made sense)

 

Eloise

Anyone who considers protocol unimportant has never dealt with a cat DAC.

Robert A. Heinlein

Link to comment

Powerline networking runs in the 2-30 MHz range on the power line. The peak energy can be 2A in that range. its a ton of noise. The Monster network adapters have a filter to isolate connected loads from the noise that help but cannot be perfect.

 

The obvious test would be to plug in the PLN adapter and connect a laptop to it so its active but not connect it to the audio system.

 

Even the cheap adapters have plenty of bandwidth for audio, they have been designed to support Bluray video (50+ Mbps).

Demian Martin

auraliti http://www.auraliti.com

Constellation Audio http://www.constellationaudio.com

NuForce http://www.nuforce.com

Monster Cable http://www.monstercable.com

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...