Jump to content
IGNORED

Building a DIY Music Server


Recommended Posts

On 2/19/2020 at 12:32 PM, Nenon said:

I have been testing the JCAT Signature LAN Cable GOLD. It's really good.

 

https://www.whatsbestforum.com/threads/jcat-signature-gold-lan-cable.29888/#post-634557

Quote

Then comes the top performers, the SR Galileo SX and the JCat Signature Gold. To me, they were pretty much on the same level despite slightly different sound signature.

 

$2,995

https://www.synergisticresearch.com/cables/galileo-sx/galileo-sx-digital/galileo-sx-ethernet/

 

€1,100
https://jcat.eu/product/signature-lan-cable/

Link to comment
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 months later...
  • 3 weeks later...

https://www.whatsbestforum.com/threads/sotm-snh-10g-network-switches-x2-the-new-king-of-usb-network-gadget-setup.27758/page-17#post-620191

Quote

I do have the Duelund cap modded in the Sotm, which i feel imparts a strong sonic flavour of what such a quality cap brings.

 

You will void your warranty doing that, but am more than certain the improvements are above a Evox cap mod.

 

Speaking of caps, these guys turned out to cost £195 + VAT a pop these days

 

https://www.facebook.com/duelundcoherentaudio/videos/1161271837561490

https://www.facebook.com/duelundcoherentaudio/posts/3707228172640409

https://www.facebook.com/duelundcoherentaudio/posts/3752379124791980

GqoLstf.jpg

 

Could they perform (MUCH?) better when compared to MLytic AG by any chance?

 

https://hfc-fs.s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/duelund_pure_silver_cast_capacitors_-_review_by_j_audio_research.pdf

http://www.jimmyauw.com/2010/03/23/the-most-awaited-duelund-cast-silver-capacitor/

http://www.jimmyauw.com/2010/03/28/my-aikido-with-duelund-cast-silver-installed/

http://www.jimmyauw.com/2010/04/03/duelund-cast-ag-cast-silver-early-hours-impression/

http://www.jimmyauw.com/2010/08/16/battle-of-three-capacitors/

http://www.jimmyauw.com/2013/06/06/duelund-vsf-cast-silver-lead-out-upgrade/

http://www.aca.gr/index/hiend/hiendArticles?row=2253

http://www.humblehomemadehifi.com/Cap.html

 

And then let's imagine how that would sound with Mundorf Silver Gold Foil

 

http://www.hifi168.com/bbs/showtopic.aspx?topicid=237526&postid=3502892#3502892

auwIyRq.jpg

Link to comment

AFAIK the only (affordable) game in town for EPYC should be TureMetal UP10 (5,298 RMB / $775) from China plus an additional 600 RMB for their own custom-made heat sink

 

https://item.taobao.com/item.htm?id=590791895684

Quote

2.特殊的CPU,例如AMD 霄龙EPYC服务器CPU,或者AMD 第三代线程撕裂者、或者LGA3647铂金至强处理器。测绘建模设计制造,一条龙服务,仅600元。

 

A Super Fanless Chassis from TureMetal: For DIY & 0 db Workstations

https://www.anandtech.com/show/14562/turemetal-fanless-chassis-for-diy-highend-pcs

Quote

By contrast, the UP10 can house an ATX mainboard. Furthermore, the UP10 can remove 120 ~ 180 W of heat from a CPU as well as 170 ~ 250 W of heat from a GPU, enough for HEDT processors and top-of-the-range graphics cards.

 

TureMetal Builds a Fanless 32-Core EPYC PC with an RTX 2070

https://www.anandtech.com/show/15261/turemetal-fanless-pc-epyc-rtx-2080

Quote

The fanless system built by Turemetal is powered by AMD’s 32-core EPYC 7551 processor, listed as having a 180 W TDP, and GIGABYTE’s NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 video card with a 175 W TDP (355W total). These are both equipped into a Supermicro ATX motherboard, and then built inside a commercially available Turemetal UP10 chassis.

 

Dimensions of the motherboard must be under 30.5x32.5cm and therefore UP10 won't work for Asus WS C621E SAGE with 30.5x33.0cm at all.

Link to comment

Hi @ASRMichael, maybe wait for this one instead since the TDP of i9-9900K ain't that high to begin with

 

Noctua's Monster Fanless High-TDP Cooler Delayed to 2021: Roadmap

https://www.techpowerup.com/270423/noctuas-monster-fanless-high-tdp-cooler-delayed-to-2021-roadmap

 

Noctua Readies High-Performance Fanless Heatsink Building on 2019 Prototype

https://www.techpowerup.com/267437/noctua-readies-high-performance-fanless-heatsink-building-on-2019-prototype

Quote

For starters, last year's prototype was capable of handling 120 W TDP in PC cases with good natural ventilation, and up to 180 W in cases with quiet fans.

 

And then here's a little something

 

http://www.turemetal.com/about_en.html

Quote

Turmetal found by Chinese Overclocking Player&Professional hardware Reporter&Player Huang Chunhui.(Mical.Wong) in Shanghai.

 

https://fortune.com/2020/08/08/china-2020-floods-economy-gdp/

Quote

Fed by torrential rains, the flooding threatened to unleash humanitarian and economic catastrophe on the 480 million residents and sprawling metropolises—Shanghai, Wuhan, Chongqing—that sit in the Yangtze's 700,000-square mile basin, an area that accounts for one-third of China’s annual economic output.

 

Link to comment

@ASRMichael I saw 4.7GHz @ 96 °C / 150.212W here

 

https://twitter.com/LinusTech/status/1134436003639283712

onuwdRs.jpg

 

Maybe 5.0GHz could get away with stuff like this but most likely they don't sell the chassis separately

 

https://fit-iot.com/web/products/mintbox3/mintbox3-pro-specifications/

 

Or CUDA offloading could help quite a bit?

 

https://www.palit.com/palit/vgapro.php?id=3494

Link to comment

FYI - it's interesting to read what Marcin posted about his storage options with this pseudo-SLC drive

 

http://jplay.eu/forum/index.php?/topic/3543-tidal-playback-with-bubbleupnpjplay-femto/#entry52374

Quote

Apacer SLC SSD for OS (industrial extended temp. range)  64GB
APRO pSLC SSD for music (industrial extended temp. range)

 

And then I also found a way to get some affordable SLC SSDs (Samsung 983 ZET) that used to be bloody expensive

 

https://www.anandtech.com/show/13951/the-samsung-983-zet-znand-ssd-review

https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/samsung-983-zet-z-nand-optane-ssd,6036.html

https://www.tweaktown.com/reviews/8911/samsung-983-zet-nand-ssd-review/index.html

https://www.samsung.com/semiconductor/global.semi.static/Data_Center_SSD.Product_Brief.pdf#page=3

 

Insanely fast random 4K read

 

https://www.chiphell.com/thread-2181968-1-1.html

gi0aP3dl.png

 

Fairly decent prices for *REAL* SLC (not like others with only SLC cache, actually 983 ZET is powered by 1.5GB LPDDR4 DRAM buffer) drives, 480GB / 960GB = 1500 RMB / 3000 RMB (i.e. about $220 / $440) respectively and obviously 5-year warranty should be only valid in China

 

https://item.taobao.com/item.htm?id=611290937826

https://item.taobao.com/item.htm?id=611504434170

https://item.taobao.com/item.htm?id=611541110671

https://item.taobao.com/item.htm?id=611604755453

https://item.taobao.com/item.htm?id=615556705541

https://item.taobao.com/item.htm?id=617470212661

https://item.taobao.com/item.htm?id=620358612099

 

Here's what I found on fleBay

 

https://www.ebay.com/itm/Samsung-983-ZET-Series-960GB-NVMe-HHHL-SSD-MZ-PZA960BW-/133440891393

https://www.ebay.com/itm/480GB-Samsung-SSD-PCIE-983zet-MZ-PZA480BW-SLC-10DWPD-Solid-State-Dirve-SLC-/313070600674

https://www.ebay.com/itm/Samsung-960GB-PCIe-x4-3-1-NVMe-HHHL-983-ZET-Z-SSD-Z-NAND-SLC-Solid-State-Drive-/283741438197

 

IMHO they should be awesome storage options for WS C621E SAGE etc. since all on-board USB / LAN / SATA / M.2 ports are connected to the chipset, therefore *ALL* PCIe slots and U.2 ports are connected to both CPUs directly

 

https://dlcdnets.asus.com/pub/ASUS/mb/Socket3647/WS_C621E_SAGE/Manual/E16279_WS_C621E_SAGE_UM_V7_WEB.pdf#page=119

 

To power Samsung 983 ZET externally, not sure if stuff like this with Mini SAS HD cable were able to do the trick?

 

http://www.linkreal.com.cn/en/products/LRFC6911.html

qGDRqzqm.png

And then here's another adapter with USB type-C

 

http://www.linkreal.com.cn/en/products/LRNVC362.html

3o8p5dBm.png

Link to comment
  • 3 weeks later...

 CiTE954.png

 

Well, maybe there's a way to demonstrate the differences among switches by using an objectivist's tool?

 

https://deltaw.org/DeltaWaveSetup.zip

 

So far significant differences were found between 2 Linux distros

 

https://www.symphonic-mpd.com/forum/topic/126/deltawave

https://www.symphonic-mpd.com/release/files/deltawave_comparison_20200918.zip

 

And then we've got more comparisons here

 

http://mimizukobo.sakura.ne.jp/articles/articles029.html#001

9FXvX5u.png

 


 

Easy Ways to Record Windows Audio (Loopback)

https://forum.reasontalk.com/viewtopic.php?p=305913

https://jackaudio.org/faq/jack_on_windows.html

 

We could use ALSA loopback driver for recording audio files under Linux

 

https://superuser.com/questions/597227/linux-arecord-capture-sound-card-output-rather-than-microphone-input/597230#597230

Link to comment

Not exactly easy to acquire BS-GS2016 these days unless we're willing to import them from their country of origin.

 

Regarding the motherboard, maybe it kinda depends on the cost of motherboard itself since it's a bit too risky to fry an expensive one?

 

And then we also have to figure out where the on-board Ethernet is connected to, perhaps its original 25 MHz clock ain't worth the replacement if that were connected to the PCH? Sometimes we're lucky to find something that's connected the CPU directly but it might not be that common to begin with.

 

Ultimately we still have to take this into consideration if local files were all we need for a motherboard with BMC (baseboard management controller)

 

https://audiophilestyle.com/forums/topic/30376-a-novel-way-to-massively-improve-the-sq-of-computer-audio-streaming/page/656/?tab=comments#comment-1053701

On 5/22/2020 at 3:11 PM, darkfrank said:

I must say that even I'm already using the Telegartner M12 switch, by using ROON to play local file only, unplug the network cable still improve the SQ for about ~20%.

 

https://audiophilestyle.com/forums/topic/30376-a-novel-way-to-massively-improve-the-sq-of-computer-audio-streaming/page/699/?tab=comments#comment-1077821

On 9/4/2020 at 12:56 AM, austinpop said:
Disconnected is best: My preferred mode of listening is local playback (from local SSD) using HQPlayer, with the network disconnected. Not only does this sound sublime, but it forms a reference for what the network chain needs to achieve.

 

https://audiophilestyle.com/forums/topic/58164-building-a-diy-music-server/page/32/?tab=comments#comment-1082113

On 9/29/2020 at 1:55 PM, Nenon said:

But do we really need to spend that much money to buy both? I am not really sure. Even with both of these switches connected to my system, playing local files completely disconnected from the network sounded best. 

 


 

OTOH, we could also put our switches between the music server and the USB DAC instead

 

https://www.whatsbestforum.com/threads/sotm-snh-10g-network-switches-x2-the-new-king-of-usb-network-gadget-setup.27758/page-19#post-621571

Link to comment

Wise words from Emile

 

https://audiophilestyle.com/forums/topic/30376-a-novel-way-to-massively-improve-the-sq-of-computer-audio-streaming/page/616/?tab=comments#comment-1014096

On 12/16/2019 at 7:37 AM, romaz said:

You really want the least possible variation in load, and higher cpu power / bandwidth systems are better at that with very low load music playback processes."

 

https://www.nas.nasa.gov/assets/pdf/papers/NAS_Technical_Report_NAS-2014-01.pdf

Quote

One of the desirable features associated with InfiniBand, another network fabric technology, is its Remote Direct Memory Access (RDMA) capability. RDMA allows for communication between systems but can bypass the overhead associated with the operating system kernel, so applications have reduced latency and much lower CPU utilization. This results in much faster network performance rates than traditional TCP/IP.

JxVJe4X.png

mLimqg6.png

 

At some point maybe we've gotta leave TCP/IP behind since they aren't any good for our CPU(s) in terms of the least variation in load. Hopefully RDMA / RoCE / iWARP could get us one step closer to the "ideal" conditions of being unplugged / disco.

 


 

On the software side, there's a way to bypass the TCP/IP stack altogether

 

https://www.symphonic-mpd.com/forum/topic/97/rpi4版-v1-0系のサポートはこちら/300

Quote

一つは「カーネルのTCP/IPスタックをバイパス」すること。

 

Even both IP header and UDP header could be omitted

 

https://www.symphonic-mpd.com/forum/topic/97/rpi4版-v1-0系のサポートはこちら/302

Quote

直結に限定すれば、IPヘッダ・UDPヘッダを省くことも技術的には可能です。

 

Speaking of the least variation in load, IMHO most Linux distros and even stripped-down Windows 10 LTSC 2019 couldn't get anywhere close to this guy

 

https://audiodigitale.eu/?p=228

Quote

I built SqueezeCore because I needed a lightweight, minimal, plug&play OS to use it as a squeezelite player. The whole OS is 17MB and when running it occupies around 60MB of RAM; SqueezeCore must be installed on a USB drive and will run completely in RAM.

 

Link to comment

That's Juniper SRX300 with the same BCM53343 (Broadcom Hurricane 2 SoC)

 

https://www.juniper.net/us/en/products-services/security/srx-series/srx300/

https://audiophilestyle.com/forums/topic/30376-a-novel-way-to-massively-improve-the-sq-of-computer-audio-streaming/page/665/?tab=comments#comment-1058809

 

Last year used ones were like about 100 bucks each but now it's much more than that

 

https://www.ebay.com/itm/Juniper-SRX300-Networks-Services-Gateway-Security-Appliance/224174905635

https://forums.servethehome.com/index.php?threads/a-bunch-of-juniper-srx300-firewalls-dumped-cheap.23928/

Quote

Last week there were ~30 auctioned, and another ~30 this week. They all start at $95 and end between $120-140.

 

Though Buffalo did make their own wired router (with a different SoC?)

 

https://product.rakuten.co.jp/product/-/16f909880dac0a27ce97a24c59719b3c/

https://www.amazon.co.jp/バッファロー-VR-S1000-BUFFALO-IPsec対応-VPNルーター/dp/B00H2E882E

 


 

At the end of the day we just want something with relatively low power consumption while all on-board regulators could be replaced easily, stuff like RPi could be an interesting option

 

https://www.runeaudio.com/forum/3x-powersupply-for-rpi-t4141-10.html#p18674

https://www.runeaudio.com/forum/3x-powersupply-for-rpi-t4141-50.html#p22497

https://www.runeaudio.com/forum/3x-powersupply-for-rpi-t4141-70.html#p25808

http://www.easyaudiokit.com/bekkan/Raspberry/Raspberry2.html

http://www.headphoneclub.com/thread-694573-1-1.html

http://www.headphoneclub.com/thread-698551-1-1.html

http://www.headphoneclub.com/thread-736184-1-1.html

 

EtherBerry (with separate rails for 5V / 3.3V and its 25 MHz clock could be removed with ease)

http://www.industrialberry.com/etherberry-v1-6/

http://www.industrialberry.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Etherberry_sch.pdf

http://www.industrialberry.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/EtherBerry_Code_v1.6.zip

 

OpenWrt

https://github.com/coolsnowwolf/lede

https://downloads.openwrt.org/snapshots/targets/bcm27xx/bcm2711/

https://downloads.openwrt.org/snapshots/targets/scheduled_for_removal/brcm2708/bcm2711/

 

Running OpenWrt in a Docker container

https://forum.openwrt.org/t/running-openwrt-in-a-docker-container/56049

https://github.com/oofnikj/docker-openwrt/blob/gitlab-rpi/docs/rpi.md

https://hub.docker.com/r/minirailgun/openwrt-aarch64

 

Shield for Optane SSD

http://www.suptronics.com/miniPCkits/x872.html

 

Finally the kernel should be patched in order to improve the latency, and then the kernel frequency could also be changed accordingly

 

https://github.com/sam0402/pcp-8820hz/tree/master/xenomai3

Link to comment
On 9/9/2020 at 4:40 AM, ASRMichael said:

@seeteeyou the base clock TDP is only 95w, but I run at 5.0ghz with HQ player. So probably around 140w. 

 

https://www.monsterlabo.com/the-beast

https://www.monsterlabo.com/compatibility-the-beast

https://www.monsterlabo.com/page-d-articles/the-beast-batch-2

Quote

The ATX PC case with a dual passive cooling solution able to cool down 600W

 

Certainly NOT the cheapest by any means, though we don't have THAT many choices to begin with IMHO.

Link to comment

Neutron Star 3 reference clock incl. 230V Low Noise Power Supply (Class 2) and Cables 25.000000 MHz
Neutron Star 3 reference clock incl. Cables 25.000000 MHz
https://www.newclassd.com/index.php?page=200

 

Neutrino 2 Reference Clock incl. cables 25.000000 MHz

https://www.newclassd.com/index.php?page=168&hv=1

 

Network Switch Upgrade

https://www.fidelityaudio.co.uk/network-switch-upgrade-4616-p.asp

 

Clocks - Precision Low Jitter

https://www.fidelityaudio.co.uk/clocks---precision-low-jitter-143-c.asp

 

Definitely check with them and make sure that's compatible with BS-GS2016 first, the key word here should be LVCMOS.

 


 

Neutron Star seemed to be a viable replacement according to several members here, though that would be 24 MHz for USB instead of 25 MHz for Ethernet

 

https://audiophilestyle.com/forums/topic/22187-uptone-audio-regen/page/85/?tab=comments#comment-442146

https://audiophilestyle.com/forums/topic/24749-uptone-audio-regen-clock-mod/

 

Link to comment

There were some posts on another thread where the Schröder Method was mentioned

 

https://audiophilestyle.com/forums/topic/30376-a-novel-way-to-massively-improve-the-sq-of-computer-audio-streaming/page/665/?tab=comments#comment-1058990

https://audiophilestyle.com/forums/topic/30376-a-novel-way-to-massively-improve-the-sq-of-computer-audio-streaming/page/702/?tab=comments#comment-1084944

 

Now that we've got dual switches (or more) in series, dual regulators in series, as well as dual Xeon to dedicate a specific (physical) processor for HQP and NAA respectively, what if we're able to get dual DACs to synchronize? NOT talking about a dual-mono design with a pair of DAC chips here, I really do mean playing two "Schröderized" lossless files (will be explained below) on the same dual-Xeon music server followed by two separate units of DAC.

 

We're starting with a single lossless (i.e. in stereo / 2.0) first, and then ending up two separate mono / 1.0 lossless files

 

https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/AudioChannelManipulation

QBvEePF.png

 

After that, each mono file will be "Schröderized" separately. 1st DAC will receive 2X the left-channel and then both RCA / XLR outputs will be connected to left-channel input of the amplifier. Similarly, 2nd DAC will receive 2X the right-channel and then both RCA / XLR outputs will be connected to right-channel input of the amplifier. I guess that maybe monoblocks could reap even more benefits?

 

For 1st DAC → qC1k528.png 

 

qC1k528.png ← For 2nd DAC

 

Of course the $64,000 question is whether the ASIO driver could handle 2 identical units of DAC on the same instance of Windows 10 or otherwise. This particular one could even handle 3 units

 

https://audiophilestyle.com/forums/topic/14657-first-multi-channel-dsd-playback-solution-with-mytek/

 

With the right cables maybe we could even go for double-stacking a pair of identical amplifiers?

 

NLcCQMpl.jpg

NLcCQMpl.jpg

 

A similar but fairly different concept

 

7SEFgTXl.jpg

 

Essentially we should be aiming for stuff like a "dual-stereo" setup of some sort, though here's a genuine dual-mono DAC (Esoteric Grandioso D1X) just for reference

5nBd64Fl.jpg

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...