MQA is Vaporware

[Fx Studio]

3 minutes ago, manisandher said:

 

A joker! But don't give up your day job.

 

Did you bother listening to it, or are you just going to keep making bitchy comments?

[MikeyFresh]

1 hour ago, Fx Studio said:

FLAC can't deliver that 3D "the artist is in the room" sound that MQA does.

Total BS, you are a troll.

[Fx Studio]

6 minutes ago, MikeyFresh said:

Total BS, you are a troll.

 

So which do you think is the better sounding of the two then ??

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1eh5gqnkmW8tcoI0u2O_EHl04FhIM1KAi/view

 

[stefano_mbp]

7 minutes ago, Fx Studio said:

 

So which do you think is the better sounding of the two then ??

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1eh5gqnkmW8tcoI0u2O_EHl04FhIM1KAi/view

 

… but where is the point? MQA is dead, cold and almost buried … 

[JoeWhip]

I have seen better research from flat earthers FX Studio and that is really saying something.

[Fx Studio]

2 minutes ago, JoeWhip said:

I have seen better research from flat earthers FX Studio and that is really saying something.

Then do you own research - hire the same equipment record it best you can and post it.

 

PS: flat earth is a Psyop in case you didn't know.

 

[danadam]

42 minutes ago, Fx Studio said:

But it is interesting that you spotted that the MQA is the better sounding of the two.

I did no such thing.

Or did you mean that I spotted a difference between mono and stereo? Well, yeah, but what does it have to do with mqa?

[Fx Studio]

3 minutes ago, danadam said:

I did no such thing.

Or did you mean that I spotted a difference between mono and stereo? Well, yeah, but what does it have to do with mqa?

 

So in your opinion which of the two STEREO tracks do you think is the better?

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1eh5gqnkmW8tcoI0u2O_EHl04FhIM1KAi/view

 

 

[JoeWhip]

1 hour ago, Fx Studio said:

Then do you own research - hire the same equipment record it best you can and post it.

 

PS: flat earth is a Psyop in case you didn't know.

 

You sound like a real conspiracy theorist. 

[Fx Studio]

10 minutes ago, JoeWhip said:

You sound like a real conspiracy theorist. 

 

And you lot sound like you're BOOOSTED 💉💉💉💉💉💉 to the eyeballs.

 

 Yep, total display of zero CRITICAL THINKING skills in here.

 

 

[MikeyFresh]

7 minutes ago, Fx Studio said:

Yep, total display of zero CRITICAL THINKING skills in here.

 

Nope, it's a total display of moronic trolling by you.

[Fx Studio]

5 minutes ago, MikeyFresh said:

 

Nope, it's a total display of moronic trolling by you.

But the funny thing is people here can't me tell which track sounds better - and the one person who did picked MQA.

 

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1eh5gqnkmW8tcoI0u2O_EHl04FhIM1KAi/view

[Currawong]

It sounds different because... the channels were switched. That's pretty funny. 

 

MQA making it sound like the players are in the same room... on outdoor PA speakers. That's even funnier. 

[Skirmash]

22 minutes ago, Fx Studio said:

 

And you lot sound like you're BOOOSTED 💉💉💉💉💉💉 to the eyeballs.

 

 Yep, total display of zero CRITICAL THINKING skills in here.

 

 

With all due respect Fx, you are a pot calling the kettle black and I think it would be wise to take a step back and re-evaluate your perspective and approach.

You do not seem to appreciate that a number of the people you are arguing with have been instrumental in debunking MQA - and their evidence has stood up to (industry) scrutiny over time - to such a degree that neither the myopic supporters of MQA in the audio press or MQA themselves have ever been able to refute it. 

You have come into this thread making claims on the benefits of MQA which have already been disproven with unrefuted evidence, while presenting your own flawed evidence and personal experience as being compelling reason why you are right. No one here will deny your personal experience - it is yours. That said, your proclamations are not credible and you would do well to put aside your ego and critically think your way through the 'evidence' you are presenting.

Ash

[JoeWhip]

21 minutes ago, Fx Studio said:

 

And you lot sound like you're BOOOSTED 💉💉💉💉💉💉 to the eyeballs.

 

 Yep, total display of zero CRITICAL THINKING skills in here.

 

 

Pure projection buddy. Either you are a troll or a fool, or both. 

[JoeWhip]

BTW, I moderate a discord server that deals with flat earthers plus a couple live chats on you tube. I have heard it all but you are special.

[Fx Studio]

4 minutes ago, Currawong said:

It sounds different because... the channels were switched. That's pretty funny. 

 

MQA making it sound like the players are in the same room... on outdoor PA speakers. That's even funnier. 

Nothing is switched and you should know that because FLAC can not produce the sound that MQA can, it simply hasn't the capability.

 

Its clearly all recorded in the same room and recorded with identical settings.

 

The speakers are not outdoor but used for indoor use including recording studios.

 

[Fx Studio]

1 minute ago, JoeWhip said:

BTW, I moderate a discord server that deals with flat earthers plus a couple live chats on you tube. I have heard it all but you are special.

Thanks !

[Fx Studio]

3 minutes ago, JoeWhip said:

Pure projection buddy. Either you are a troll or a fool, or both. 

 

Nope, there was a whole discussion about it here a few pages back, its quite clear where the posters stood.

 

[JoeWhip]

It’s been fun…nah.

[Fx Studio]

17 minutes ago, Skirmash said:

With all due respect Fx, you a pot calling the kettle black and I think it would be wise to take a step back and re-evaluate your perspective and approach.

You do not seem to appreciate that a number of the people you are arguing with have been instrumental in debunking MQA - and their evidence has stood up to (industry) scrutiny over time - to such a degree that neither the myopic supporters of MQA in the audio press or MQA themselves have ever been able to refute it. 

You have come into this thread making claims on the benefits of MQA which have already been disproven with unrefuted evidence, while presenting your own flawed evidence and personal experience as being compelling reason why you are right. No one here will deny your personal experience - it is yours. That said, your proclamations are not credible and you would do well to put aside your ego and critically think your way through the 'evidence' you are presenting.

Ash

 

I have debunked the so called "debunkers" - by showing that MQA is the better format if played on PA ribbons. 

Where is your evidence - Golden Sound with his totally flawed so called test that certainly wasn't any kind of a test? - because that's the only thing I've seen so far.

[Skirmash]

2 minutes ago, Fx Studio said:

 

I have debunked the so called "debunkers" - by showing that MQA is the better format if played on PA ribbons. 

Where is your evidence - Golden Sound with his totally flawed so called test that certainly wasn't any kind of a test, because that's the only thing I've seen so far.

Oh Fx. You have not debunked anything and there is much for you to learn about standards of evidence.

[Fx Studio]

Just now, Skirmash said:

Oh Fx. You have not debunked anything and there is much for you to learn about standards of evidence.

 

OK so standards of evidence - so where is it debunking MQA then ?

[JoeWhip]

So, you come on here spouting nonsense and it up to folks here to debunk you? Ignore you is more appropriate. 

[Fx Studio]

3 minutes ago, JoeWhip said:

So, you come on here spouting nonsense and it up to folks here to debunk you? Ignore you is more appropriate. 

 

So actually you have no real evidence except Golden Sounds highly flawed test.