The Computer Audiophile Posted July 13, 2016 Share Posted July 13, 2016 Hi Guys - Just received notification that JRiver Media Center 22 now features SoX resampler. NEW: Sox Resampling Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems Link to comment
Nikhil Posted July 13, 2016 Share Posted July 13, 2016 Just installed 22 beta and wow! Not sure if I'm hearing things but it just pops in comparison to v20 Will wait for others to pipe in but initial impression is that v22 is a step up in sound quality. Enabled Sox for Resampling but did not notice any difference. Although I need to understand how it works a little better. Still sound seems smoother in V22 and may be a touch louder. Interesting ... Custom Win10 Server | Mutec MC-3+ USB | Lampizator Amber | Job INT | ATC SCM20PSL + JL Audio E-Sub e110 Link to comment
tboooe Posted July 13, 2016 Share Posted July 13, 2016 Interesting. I've been using SOX with Minimserver for a while now. At least to my hears, my SOX settings created a smoother, more analog sound, which I prefer. 12TB NAS >> i7-6700 Server/Control PC >> i3-5015u NAA >> Singxer SU-1 DDC (modded) >> Holo Spring L3 DAC >> Accustic Arts Power 1 int amp >> Sonus Faber Guaneri Evolution speakers + REL T/5i sub (x2) Other components: UpTone Audio LPS1.2/IsoRegen, Fiber Switch and FMC, Windows Server 2016 OS, Audiophile Optimizer 3.0, Fidelizer Pro 6, HQ Player, Roonserver, PS Audio P3 AC regenerator, HDPlex 400W ATX & 200W Linear PSU, Light Harmonic Lightspeed Split USB cable, Synergistic Research Tungsten AC power cords, Tara Labs The One speaker cables, Tara Labs The Two Extended with HFX Station IC, Oyaide R1 outlets, Stillpoints Ultra Mini footers, Hi-Fi Tuning fuses, Vicoustic/RealTraps/GIK room treatments Link to comment
tedwoods Posted July 14, 2016 Share Posted July 14, 2016 Very noticeable difference! Instruments have more weight and body as well as better timbral accuracy. Guitars especially sound fleshier and the cymbals have lost some of the hash that seemed to have surrounded them. Does the Sox re-sampling benefits extend through through DLNA too? Link to comment
gldgate Posted July 18, 2016 Share Posted July 18, 2016 I've been using 22 for a few days and still putting it through it's paces. I will say that compared to the last few releases which seemed more video focused this release has some features for the audiophile to play with (Sox and play from memory). Digital System: Cybershaft 10MHz OCXO clock premium>Antelope Liveclock>RedNet D16>AES Cable>Mutec MC-3+ USB>AES Cable>Schiit Yggy Link to comment
zackthedog Posted July 23, 2016 Share Posted July 23, 2016 Just installed 22 beta and wow! Not sure if I'm hearing things but it just pops in comparison to v20 Will wait for others to pipe in but initial impression is that v22 is a step up in sound quality. Enabled Sox for Resampling but did not notice any difference. Although I need to understand how it works a little better. Still sound seems smoother in V22 and may be a touch louder. Interesting ... I agree that it seems like a big step forward, sonically. But for SoX to work don't you have to enable the Output DSP? Link to comment
mourip Posted July 23, 2016 Share Posted July 23, 2016 I've been using 22 for a few days and still putting it through it's paces. I will say that compared to the last few releases which seemed more video focused this release has some features for the audiophile to play with (Sox and play from memory). It has had play from memory for a long while. I thought that the new change was play album from memory but I do not see that choice. I installed v22 last week. "Don't Believe Everything You Think" System Link to comment
mourip Posted July 23, 2016 Share Posted July 23, 2016 I agree that it seems like a big step forward, sonically. But for SoX to work don't you have to enable the Output DSP? I believe that SoX is an upsampler so that would be correct. I use JRMC v22 and have SoX enabled because I am upsampling everything to 192K for my REDnet D16 ethernet to AES converter which currently does not support changing rates on the fly. I believe that this "feature" was enabled on purpose for Pro Audio reasons. It is rumored that it will be changed to allow rate changing on the fly in August after a firmware update. "Don't Believe Everything You Think" System Link to comment
Kal Rubinson Posted July 23, 2016 Share Posted July 23, 2016 I believe that SoX is an upsampler so that would be correct. I use JRMC v22 and have SoX enabled because I am upsampling everything to 192K ......................... I use JRMC v22 and have SoX enabled because I am downsampling to 176.4 and 192 in order to use DiracLive. Kal Rubinson Senior Contributing Editor, Stereophile Link to comment
Iain Posted July 23, 2016 Share Posted July 23, 2016 I believe that SoX is an upsampler so that would be correct. ... https://sourceforge.net/projects/soxr/ It's appropriately named, in that it will resample up or down. I use it in Foobar2000 to downsample decimated DSD files from 24/352 kHz PCM to 24/192 kHz PCM, when needed. http://www.soundonsound.com/ Link to comment
Nikhil Posted July 23, 2016 Share Posted July 23, 2016 I agree that it seems like a big step forward, sonically. But for SoX to work don't you have to enable the Output DSP? I have Output DSP enabled: up-sampling to 352.8KHz (or) 2xDSD in DoP I also have "Internal Volume" enabled and DSP plugin set to "Increase volume of DSD to PCM by +6dB" Custom Win10 Server | Mutec MC-3+ USB | Lampizator Amber | Job INT | ATC SCM20PSL + JL Audio E-Sub e110 Link to comment
mourip Posted July 23, 2016 Share Posted July 23, 2016 I use JRMC v22 and have SoX enabled because I am downsampling to 176.4 and 192 in order to use DiracLive. https://sourceforge.net/projects/soxr/ It's appropriately named, in that it will resample up or down. I use it in Foobar2000 to downsample decimated DSD files from 24/352 kHz PCM to 24/192 kHz PCM, when needed. Good point. Actually I have JRMC doing the same, even before SoX. Since my D16 only goes to 192K I down-sample higher rate music of which I really have little. "Don't Believe Everything You Think" System Link to comment
jriver Posted July 24, 2016 Share Posted July 24, 2016 It's now available in the Mac version. You can find a download link on the MC22 for Mac board on the JRiver forum. Jim Hillegass / JRiver Media Center / jriver.com Link to comment
Kal Rubinson Posted July 24, 2016 Share Posted July 24, 2016 Good point. Actually I have JRMC doing the same, even before SoX. Since my D16 only goes to 192K I down-sample higher rate music of which I really have little.Yes but SoX does it better. Kal Rubinson Senior Contributing Editor, Stereophile Link to comment
Musicophile Posted July 24, 2016 Share Posted July 24, 2016 It's now available in the Mac version. You can find a download link on the MC22 for Mac board on the JRiver forum. Thanks, just installed it. However, it doesn't seem to apply to post DSD to PCM conversion. My DAC has some issues with 176khz (and no native DSD capability) so if I playback DSD files I'd like to downsample 176 to 88.2. Is this possible? Check out my blog at musicophilesblog.com - From Keith Jarrett to Johannes Brahms Link to comment
Kal Rubinson Posted July 24, 2016 Share Posted July 24, 2016 However, it doesn't seem to apply to post DSD to PCM conversion. My DAC has some issues with 176khz (and no native DSD capability) so if I playback DSD files I'd like to downsample 176 to 88.2. Is this possible? I do not know what you mean by "post DSD to PCM conversion." I can convert DSD to any chosen PCM rate. Kal Rubinson Senior Contributing Editor, Stereophile Link to comment
Musicophile Posted July 24, 2016 Share Posted July 24, 2016 I do not know what you mean by "post DSD to PCM conversion." I can convert DSD to any chosen PCM rate. So where do you set that rate in Jriver? Check out my blog at musicophilesblog.com - From Keith Jarrett to Johannes Brahms Link to comment
Matt Ashland Posted July 24, 2016 Share Posted July 24, 2016 So where do you set that rate in Jriver? You can set the sample rate of the output here: DSP Studio > Output Format > Sample rate And you can configure the new SoX resampler here: Options > Audio > Settings > Use SoX for resampling Matt Ashland, JRiver Link to comment
Musicophile Posted July 24, 2016 Share Posted July 24, 2016 You can set the sample rate of the output here:DSP Studio > Output Format > Sample rate And you can configure the new SoX resampler here: Options > Audio > Settings > Use SoX for resampling That's what I tried, but it doesn't seem to apply for DSD to PCM conversions, which stay at 176khz no matter what I enter there. Check out my blog at musicophilesblog.com - From Keith Jarrett to Johannes Brahms Link to comment
Matt Ashland Posted July 24, 2016 Share Posted July 24, 2016 That's what I tried, but it doesn't seem to apply for DSD to PCM conversions, which stay at 176khz no matter what I enter there. 1x DSD to PCM will use the sample rate for 352,800 as the output rate. 2x DSD will probably use the 705,600 rate but I can't test that because I don't have a 2x DSD at home. Matt Ashland, JRiver Link to comment
Kal Rubinson Posted July 24, 2016 Share Posted July 24, 2016 1x DSD to PCM will use the sample rate for 352,800 as the output rate. 2x DSD will probably use the 705,600 rate but I can't test that because I don't have a 2x DSD at home. I can confirm. Quad-DSD works that way, too. Kal Rubinson Senior Contributing Editor, Stereophile Link to comment
Musicophile Posted July 24, 2016 Share Posted July 24, 2016 1x DSD to PCM will use the sample rate for 352,800 as the output rate. 2x DSD will probably use the 705,600 rate but I can't test that because I don't have a 2x DSD at home. Thanks! That worked. It's not very self-obvious though. Check out my blog at musicophilesblog.com - From Keith Jarrett to Johannes Brahms Link to comment
adias Posted July 26, 2016 Share Posted July 26, 2016 I tried MC22 on a Mac and it pales compared to Audirvana+. Constrained sound, compared to A+ detailed, and wide separation. I've tried its various up samplers, DSD conversion et al. I use A+ with its new DSD128 conversion filter. Am I missing some setting? My DAC is iFi's micro iDSD. Link to comment
jriver Posted July 27, 2016 Share Posted July 27, 2016 Am I missing some setting? My DAC is iFi's micro iDSD. I wonder if you have this problem? Weird and wonderful (freak problems and their solutions) Jim Hillegass / JRiver Media Center / jriver.com Link to comment
Musicophile Posted July 27, 2016 Share Posted July 27, 2016 I tried MC22 on a Mac and it pales compared to Audirvana+. Constrained sound, compared to A+ detailed, and wide separation. I've tried its various up samplers, DSD conversion et al. I use A+ with its new DSD128 conversion filter. Am I missing some setting? My DAC is iFi's micro iDSD. While I'm a big A+ fan and this is my primary player, on my PCM only Exposure DAC, the new JRiver has a sound profile that I quite like. I still love the resolution of A+, but I can happily live with JRiver as an alternative sound wise. Check out my blog at musicophilesblog.com - From Keith Jarrett to Johannes Brahms Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now