Jump to content
IGNORED

W4S and other USB fixers (non curated)


Recommended Posts

OK, I'll bite to start a new thread.

 

I realize that there are other threads available but feel free to discuss any of the available USB fixers and new ones when they come out including:

 

Wyred 4 Sound Recovery

Uptone Audio Regen

Audioquest Jitterbug

Schiit Wyred

Intona Isolator

etc,......

 

A disclaimer on my part, I do not own any of these products but am in the market shortly, hello tax refund!

 

I have seen other CA members talk a little about ripping CD's with these products and how there are benefits to ripping to a thumb drive attached to a product like the Regen, for instance. Has anyone tried this in detail?

Jim

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just wanna say a hearty "thank you" for starting a non-curated thread. Open thought and dialogue....great idea.

 

My off-piste query about this kind of thing concerns how 'revealing' your other equipment needs to be before any of these gizmos have any positive effect? Are we talking about a situation where you should really only bother with this kind of tweakery if you've got $20,000+ worth of equipment already piled up in your music room?

Tidal / Qobuz--> Roon--> Fios Gigabit--> Netgear Prosafe GS105 --> Supra 8-->EtherRegen --> Fiber--> opticalRendu / CI Audio LPS --> Curious Evolved Link --> Chord Qutest--> AQ Water --> Belles Aria Integrated--> AQ Robin Hood--> Kudos Super 20's

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just wanna say a hearty "thank you" for starting a non-curated thread. Open thought and dialogue....great idea.

 

My off-piste query about this kind of thing concerns how 'revealing' your other equipment needs to be before any of these gizmos have any positive effect? Are we talking about a situation where you should really only bother with this kind of tweakery if you've got $20,000+ worth of equipment already piled up in your music room?

 

Likewise. The curated threads read more like many manufacturers forums, where any non favourable reports or awkward questions quickly disappear.

My understanding is that even owners of stock standard Mac Minis are reporting improvements with the Uptone USB Regen and the Intono USB Isolator, with the rest of their gear ranging from relatively inexpensive to expensive. My own experience however, is that the USB Regen improves markedly when using a good Linear PSU or a battery derived PSU, compared with the supplied Meanwell 7.5V SMPS supply.

 

How a Digital Audio file sounds, or a Digital Video file looks, is governed to a large extent by the Power Supply area. All that Identical Checksums gives is the possibility of REGENERATING the file to close to that of the original file.

PROFILE UPDATED 13-11-2020

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From my experience (but I can only talk for myself) is that the Intona USB Isolator (galvanic isolation) (industrial version - I did not get the regular version, but it should do the same) the Intona is a "must" but beware if your dac needs the vbus (5V), since the amperage may not be enough...

 

I use it with a PC and the NOS1 Phasure dac.

 

It has opened everything. The results are hard to describe, as it seems to cure a lot of things, mostly the "pollutants" that happily ride with the signal...

 

But it does not exclude the utility of other components (Regen, RUR, etc...). For me it is enough, but all you can do it experiment on your own system to see to what extent it shows its prowess :)

 

I do not thing it is necessary to have an expensive sound system to appreciate the results.

 

I actuall took a Sotm PCIe USB 3 controller card from the drawer to send clean 5V with a JS-2 at the Intona. For the moment it is under evaluation (again)...

Alain

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds like there's a lot of factors and small improvements that can benefit one's system. Like, does the Intona work best with an adapter out of the USB port from the PC/MAC? With an audiophile USB card? Is that all I need or can a Regen also improve the system chain? If battery operated? No 5V? Jkenny mod? If yes, to the Regen, then also an adapter from Intona output to Regen?

 

So far, from others reports, I've concluded that the Chord Hugo DAC benefits from the Intona regardless of optimized streamer/PC. It's just a question of how much the Regen (w/Jkenny battery mod) can add without subtracting from SQ? And which connectors are best.

(JRiver) Jetway barebones NUC (mod 3 sCLK-EX, Cybershaft OP 14)  (PH SR7) => mini pcie adapter to PCIe 1X => tXUSBexp PCIe card (mod sCLK-EX) (PH SR7) => (USPCB) Chord DAVE => Omega Super 8XRS/REL t5i  (All powered thru Topaz Isolation Transformer)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is probable that if I was adding another accessory to what I have (Regen, RUR, or else), I would be aware that there could be a potential to defeat what the Intona is doing (isolating up to the dac), unless the following component is powered by batteries ? For me the Intona is a barrier, so there should not be anything between it and the dac.

 

But I probably am wrong...

 

As for the hard adapters, unless one is know to really be well built (how to verify this apart from getting a few of them ?), I would probably go for a Curious cable (from what I read about its qualities), but again, how will it behave with each different system... And will the Intona suffice to bring power to a dac in need of it...

 

Not easy to know in advance... :(

Alain

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All need to be taken with a grain of salt, unless a precise question is raised and the answerer has a satisfying response...

 

For instance, if a poster listens to rock music, his goal may be completely different from those of another that listens to classical music. The details that one will notice may probably not be the same, so the more the explanations from the poster, the more pertinent the response will makes sense... I forget to mention what kind of music I listen to when I describe my subjective evaluation. And I do not like the "jaw dropping" image or the alike, so my answers can be quite diluted. I understand that the right choice of words may affect how someone receives the answer, but it all comes to trust but even more to experiment.

 

I have a lot of accessories that I have bought through time and... Well, they prevent dust from falling deeper...

Alain

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For years I have tried to make USB work and tried many USB cleaners and spent more money than I ever wanted on this shite. Not one DAC I ever tried did not benefit from an USB cleaner including really pricy ones.

 

Some of my experience in a nutshell:

 

1. The best USB cleaner is no USB at all and avoid USB conversion all together. USB is shite for audio. Optical LAN is the way to go.

 

2. My fav cleaner was the Berkeley Alpha. Very expensive but it made USB audio bearable. There is a reason even BADA's reference DAC has no USB input.

 

3. Regen Amber is a very cost effective bit of kit and I would recommend anyone forced to go USB to start here. It helped even a >€10K DAC's USB input.

 

4. IFI USB Power was another good unit but required an LPSU to shine. It also allowed for the Gemini cable to avoid having data and power run side by side.

 

4. IFI purifier (1st gen) is a waste of money and makes things worse

 

5. In conjunction with the IFI USB, taping off the ground and 5V at the computer end helped, with IFI providing cleansed 5V and ground.

 

Hopefully that will help someone in making a decision. More and more of these bandaids are coming available every week, which really should make you take a step back and really think if you want USB in your sound path at all.

 

A little side note, it did not matter what music I listened to, which varies from classical to gabber and everything in between.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More and more of these bandaids are coming available every week, which really should make you take a step back and really decide if you want USB in your sound path at all.

 

+1

Even your typical Linear PSU for these gadgets causes a degree of Earth Loop problems, and it's best to use a battery derived supply which is completely removed from the AC mains supply.

USB is a cantankerous format too, often seeing devices disappear, and perhaps needing a PC Restart, or even fail with annoying warnings such as "USB Device is not recognised " despite just having worked O.K.

 

How a Digital Audio file sounds, or a Digital Video file looks, is governed to a large extent by the Power Supply area. All that Identical Checksums gives is the possibility of REGENERATING the file to close to that of the original file.

PROFILE UPDATED 13-11-2020

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But, but... I do have a dac that I like very much and its input is USB. Yes I know, there are a lot of gadgets to try to cure its flaws, but I must say that I really enjoy what I hear through USB... I would not flush the baby with the bath water... ;) If we are to start by saying "USB is rotten, bad, very very bad...", there will not be much encouragment for comparing different USB accessories that may be of help ;)

Alain

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For years I have tried to make USB work and tried many USB cleaners and spent more money than I ever wanted on this shite. Not one DAC I ever tried did not benefit from an USB cleaner including really pricy ones.

 

Some of my experience in a nutshell:

 

1. The best USB cleaner is no USB at all and avoid USB conversion all together. USB is shite for audio. Optical LAN is the way to go.

 

2. My fav cleaner was the Berkeley Alpha. Very expensive but it made USB audio bearable. There is a reason even BADA's reference DAC has no USB input.

 

3. Regen Amber is a very cost effective bit of kit and I would recommend anyone forced to go USB to start here. It helped even a >€10K DAC's USB input.

 

4. IFI USB Power was another good unit but required an LPSU to shine. It also allowed for the Gemini cable to avoid having data and power run side by side.

 

4. IFI purifier (1st gen) is a waste of money and makes things worse

 

5. In conjunction with the IFI USB, taping off the ground and 5V at the computer end helped, with IFI providing cleansed 5V and ground.

 

Hopefully that will help someone in making a decision. More and more of these bandaids are coming available every week, which really should make you take a step back and really think if you want USB in your sound path at all.

 

A little side note, it did not matter what music I listened to, which varies from classical to gabber and everything in between.

 

I can agree here a lot.

 

1. Can't argue much with that. The Intona has improved USB transmissions a big deal, after living with AES3 for 12 months, it's cleaner, very happy with USB now plus a proper DDC to go with it helps.

 

2. no comment, didn't purchase.

 

3. Many people have the same reply, so must be good, but didn't purchase.

 

4. #1 See 2.

 

4. #2 Totally agree, but it was handy to use the USB B to Mini B adapter, the Purifier is boxed up, but the adapter is in use :)

 

5. Ground lift is a big deal with USB, it seems to work better with elevated voltages above ground (earth).

AS Profile Equipment List        Say NO to MQA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I disagree about USB being shite. USB has come a long way in recent years and is now the superior sounding mainstream means of streaming musical data. But, obviously much care needs to be taken. That's where a thread like this may save some folks a lot of cash and time asking questions and learning from others experiences. Results can be very good, better than anything I've ever heard. I'm always surprised when I reach a new level in SQ never heard before via USB.

(JRiver) Jetway barebones NUC (mod 3 sCLK-EX, Cybershaft OP 14)  (PH SR7) => mini pcie adapter to PCIe 1X => tXUSBexp PCIe card (mod sCLK-EX) (PH SR7) => (USPCB) Chord DAVE => Omega Super 8XRS/REL t5i  (All powered thru Topaz Isolation Transformer)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for creating a new thread without the draconian "censorship" disguised as "keeping the thread on topic".

 

Unfortunately, Mr. Zero Self-Awareness who lives on the forum will just self-bump his useless wall-of-text posts/threads. Hopefully, your thread will stay on the first page and people can stop getting mislead and/or incomplete information.

 

As for the topic, I tried the Regen, jitterbugs, iFi, and various power supply options. I have yet to try the Intona, but now I'm simply using just the Regen with a LPS. I can't reliably endorse the JB or using the iFi in series...I can't say it hurts, but my initial impressions of modest benefits haven't really stood the test of time.

 

One probable reason....Since first trying these devices, I upgraded my DAC and server, so I suspect that had more to do with the diminishing returns than anything.

 

I may try the Intona, but a properly designed DAC/server shouldn't benefit much from the galvanic isolation. Sometimes galvanic isolation can cause it's own problems depending on how it's done. Has anyone determined what else the Intona is doing? It doesn't seem like it was designed for audio purposes which may be a good thing.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Computer Audiophile mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

About USB - as the saying goes let's not throw away the baby with the bathwater.

 

While USB does have room for improvement it has allowed us to move to hi res DSD and DXD - formats that would not be possible with SPDIF and TosLink. I'm willing to wager that ethernet is going to have it's own share of problems once we start using devices equipped with ethernet ports. Optical networking is the next logical progression in terms of network isolation. I'm pretty sure we're going to hit some bumps there as well when we get to that point. Until then ... let's just enjoy the ride.

 

I'm still happy with the Regen in my setup. The Intona looked like a great product. That is until some of us reported connectivity issues just as some users of the RUR have reported. That to me is a serious flaw given that I have to order these things from overseas to where I live. Until those problems are fixed ... I'm out.

Win10 Transport + Fidelizer 8.7 + JRMC 28 & HQPlayer | Mutec MC-3+ Smart Clock USB |  Job INT | Green Mountain Audio Eos HX

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...

While USB does have room for improvement it has allowed us to move to hi res DSD and DXD - formats that would not be possible with SPDIF and TosLink. I'm willing to wager that ethernet is going to have it's own share of problems once we start using devices equipped with ethernet ports. Optical networking is the next logical progression in terms of network isolation. I'm pretty sure we're going to hit some bumps there as well when we get to that point. Until then ... let's just enjoy the ride...

 

Many are enjoying USB DACs, but they are all improved by cleaner devices.

 

But there are now some options appearing such as MSB, Focusrite, NADAC, Linn, etc. where this USB kludge is no longer needed. So my comment really is more for those that are starting out fresh or want to improve upon.

 

Now of course it is all in the implementation and system synergy.

 

From my own experience, which really also means shite, a streamer DAC which uses the femto clock of the DAC as master, bypasses SPDIF and USB, handles all the formats mentioned with optical LAN feed beats every digital setup I have heard thus far.

 

But until these systems become the standard and more affordable an USB cleaner is absolutely recommended no matter how expensive the USB DAC is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But until these systems become the standard and more affordable an USB cleaner is absolutely recommended no matter how expensive the USB DAC is.

 

+1. Absolutely.

Win10 Transport + Fidelizer 8.7 + JRMC 28 & HQPlayer | Mutec MC-3+ Smart Clock USB |  Job INT | Green Mountain Audio Eos HX

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a REGEN amber which slightly helps the Auralic VEGA DAC (fed by Aurender N100) with separation and soundstage but at the expense of ever so slightly hardening the mids.

 

My W4S Recovery will arrive either today or tomorrow. Will post an opinion when it's setup.

 

If you deploy any of these devices do not use any SMPS, only LPS to power them and ensure that you optically isolate your LAN in any case.

 

Also if you can try to drop the 5v rail and even the gnd line, this works for me and delivers the best results.

 

PS: I'm interested in opinions of the Intona USB isolator, particularly from those with Aurender players and the VEGA DAC.

 

PPS: Given this post alone covers 3 different products, non use of SMPS, data only connection and implementation of isolated LAN, curated threads that cover one product/issue appear to be absolutely daft and counter productive to me.

Source:

*Aurender N100 (no internal disk : LAN optically isolated via FMC with *LPS) > DIY 5cm USB link (5v rail removed / ground lift switch - split for *LPS) > Intona Industrial (injected *LPS / internally shielded with copper tape) > DIY 5cm USB link (5v rail removed / ground lift switch) > W4S Recovery (*LPS) > DIY 2cm USB adaptor (5v rail removed / ground lift switch) > *Auralic VEGA (EXACT : balanced)

 

Control:

*Jeff Rowland CAPRI S2 (balanced)

 

Playback:

2 x Revel B15a subs (balanced) > ATC SCM 50 ASL (balanced - 80Hz HPF from subs)

 

Misc:

*Via Power Inspired AG1500 AC Regenerator

LPS: 3 x Swagman Lab Audiophile Signature Edition (W4S, Intona & FMC)

Storage: QNAP TS-253Pro 2x 3Tb, 8Gb RAM

Cables: DIY heavy gauge solid silver (balanced)

Mains: dedicated distribution board with 5 x 2 socket ring mains, all mains cables: Mark Grant Black Series DSP 2.5 Dual Screen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BTW, according to Archimago's measurements, Toslink SPDIF can be virtually identical in performance to Async USB ,without the need for additional USB Regens, Intona USB Isolators, expensive boutique USB cables, low noise external linear PSUs or special internal USB cards.

The format does however appear to be limited by the quality of some Toslink transmitters and receivers.

The Well-Tempered Computer

 

How a Digital Audio file sounds, or a Digital Video file looks, is governed to a large extent by the Power Supply area. All that Identical Checksums gives is the possibility of REGENERATING the file to close to that of the original file.

PROFILE UPDATED 13-11-2020

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a Regen and a Wyrd. Got the Wyrd first. Using it was the first time I felt the USB was as good as the FW on my Mytek 192 DSD.

Later added the Regen. It's a little better than the Wyrd on it's own. I now run them in series, which I think offers a slight additional improvement over the Regen by itself.

 

I'm not going to by the W4S b/c I don't want to invest more money in these gadgets - I'll buy a new DAC sometime first. But the W4S sounds really good on paper, possibly better than the other devices of it's ilk.

 

I'd be interested in hearing comparisons from some non-fanboys of W4S to the other USB helper devices.

 

USB inputs in DACs are improving: note the recent review of the Audio-Alchemy DAC where Chris' said it didn't need any help on its USB port. That's pretty significant, because till now he seems to have always thought his Berkeley USB to SPDIF converter gave the best results with DACs (at least since he purchased the Berkeley converter). There have been a few other recent DACs where the same thing seems to be true. So USB can be good if the DAC manufacturer is willing to invest the time and money.

Main listening (small home office):

Main setup: Surge protector +_iFi  AC iPurifiers >Isol-8 Mini sub Axis Power Conditioning+Isolation>QuietPC Low Noise Server>Roon (Audiolense DRC)>Stack Audio Link II>Kii Control>Kii Three >GIK Room Treatments.

Secondary Listening: Server with Audiolense RC>RPi4 or analog>Matrix Element i Streamer/DAC (XLR)+Schiit Freya>Kii Three .

Bedroom: SBTouch to Cambridge Soundworks Desktop Setup.
Living Room/Kitchen: RPi 3B+ running RoPieee to a pair of Morel Hogtalare. 

All absolute statements about audio are false :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BTW, according to Archimago's measurements, Toslink SPDIF can be virtually identical in performance to Async USB ,without the need for additional USB Regens, Intona USB Isolators, expensive boutique USB cables, low noise external linear PSUs or special internal USB cards.

The format does however appear to be limited by the quality of some Toslink transmitters and receivers.

The Well-Tempered Computer

 

The test was for a 16/44.1 signal.

It also mentioned this at the bottom of the test report

 

Be design all this measurements are valid for the implementations tested.

You can’t generalize and call the results as being valid for all possible SPDIF or USB implementations.

 

You cannot use TosLink for hi res DSD or DXD formats.

Win10 Transport + Fidelizer 8.7 + JRMC 28 & HQPlayer | Mutec MC-3+ Smart Clock USB |  Job INT | Green Mountain Audio Eos HX

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BTW, according to Archimago's measurements, Toslink SPDIF can be virtually identical in performance to Async USB ,without the need for additional USB Regens, Intona USB Isolators, expensive boutique USB cables, low noise external linear PSUs or special internal USB cards.

The format does however appear to be limited by the quality of some Toslink transmitters and receivers.

The Well-Tempered Computer

 

Quoting Archimago is as useless as t#ts on a bull, unless for light hearted entertainment?

AS Profile Equipment List        Say NO to MQA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



×
×
  • Create New...