The Computer Audiophile Posted August 5, 2022 Share Posted August 5, 2022 View full article Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems Link to comment
AudioDoctor Posted August 5, 2022 Share Posted August 5, 2022 My first thought upon seeing the marker was that you had gone off the deep end and bought a green marker to color in the edges of your Dolby Atmos Blue Rays... Good, thorough article once again Chris. The Computer Audiophile 1 No electron left behind. Link to comment
mlknez1 Posted August 5, 2022 Share Posted August 5, 2022 You may want to note that neither KODI nor Shield support native playback of DSD audio for those that want their immersive (surround) audio in that flavor. JRiver does, however, and supports all of the other immersive sound formats as well. Link to comment
The Computer Audiophile Posted August 5, 2022 Author Share Posted August 5, 2022 25 minutes ago, mlknez1 said: You may want to note that neither KODI nor Shield support native playback of DSD audio for those that want their immersive (surround) audio in that flavor. JRiver does, however, and supports all of the other immersive sound formats as well. This article is about TrueHD Atmos for those who want easy. As soon as a computer with JRiver is involved, the level of complexity goes up. Plus, we then have to talk about no bit streaming on Mac, so it's only JRiver on Windows, but that has issues with these files, so there's a caveat. DSD is a topic for another day. Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems Link to comment
Tokyokyoto Posted August 5, 2022 Share Posted August 5, 2022 I love the Nvidia. Easy to navigate, never any issues, and great performance. For the past few years I have been powering mine with an ext. LPSU (19v) Farad. Things are kinda cramped but hopefully you can make out the pic. Just cut off the connector from standard wall wart psu and attach female barrel connector. The Computer Audiophile 1 Link to comment
Rt66indierock Posted August 5, 2022 Share Posted August 5, 2022 Chris the question is this. Is this easy enough for the audiophiles I meet at shows? Most audiophiles I meet show real fear when I suggest the next advances in high-end audio will be software. Link to comment
The Computer Audiophile Posted August 5, 2022 Author Share Posted August 5, 2022 11 minutes ago, Rt66indierock said: Chris the question is this. Is this easy enough for the audiophiles I meet at shows? Most audiophiles I meet show real fear when I suggest the next advances in high-end audio will be software. This is absolutely easy enough for anyone. Rt66indierock 1 Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems Link to comment
bbosler Posted August 6, 2022 Share Posted August 6, 2022 I found this out today while looking to do it the really easy way. I wanted a BluRay player to play my Atmos audio discs, and since it doesn't need to process video other than for the menus I figured why pay a premium for excellent video quality. I know this article is about playing files , not discs, but wanted to share in case anybody else is looking for one. If you google it or look at sites online you will find the only players that say they will play Atmos are the more expensive, high end players with cutting edge video capabilities like HDR10 and Dolby Vision. , However, I found out that a player that will output Dolby TrueHD will output Atmos from discs even if it doesn't say it will. So I bought a $99 Sony 4K BDP-S6700 player that says Dolby TrueHD and sure enough.... Atmos. You can save a few $$ by getting the model or 2 down that isn't 4K, but for $20 or so I went nuts and got the 4K. So if you don't want or need to play files from downloads or rip discs, a complete, easy Atmos solution on the cheap is an Apple 4K TV (now around $120) which will do Apple Music and Tidal along with a sub $100 BluRay like mine to play your discs. see my system at Audiogon https://systems.audiogon.com/systems/768 Link to comment
seeteeyou Posted August 6, 2022 Share Posted August 6, 2022 4 hours ago, bbosler said: So if you don't want or need to play files from downloads or rip discs, a complete, easy Atmos solution on the cheap is an Apple 4K TV (now around $120) which will do Apple Music and Tidal along with a sub $100 BluRay like mine to play your discs. Petition · True Lossless Dolby Atmos support on the Apple TV 4K · Change.org https://www.change.org/p/dolby-mat-v2-0-or-full-bitstream-audio-passthrough-support-on-the-apple-tv-4k https://discussions.apple.com/thread/253703728 Quote Apple TV 4K doesn’t support Atmos TrueHD natively. Instead Apple TV 4K supports Atmos Dolby Digital+ for input, as that is what streaming services use. Infuse on Apple TV will decode Atmos TrueHD into PCM Multichannel, but stripped from Atmos meta data, so you get 7.1 or 5.1. In other words, we'll have to replace Apple TV 4K with something else if we're going for TrueHD (i.e. lossless) version of Atmos down the road. Lossy DD+ is fine, though. Link to comment
ted_b Posted August 6, 2022 Share Posted August 6, 2022 18 hours ago, Tokyokyoto said: I love the Nvidia. Easy to navigate, never any issues, and great performance. For the past few years I have been powering mine with an ext. LPSU (19v) Farad. Things are kinda cramped but hopefully you can make out the pic. Just cut off the connector from standard wall wart psu and attach female barrel connector. great ideas about external power, BUT...these are NOT the pictures I would show a newbie in a thread about "EASY". :) The Computer Audiophile 1 "We're all bozos on this bus"....F.T. My JRIver tutorial videos Actual JRIver tutorial MP4 video links My eleven yr old SACD Ripping Guide for PS3 (needs updating but still works) US Technical Advisor, NativeDSD.com Link to comment
phoenixdogfan Posted August 9, 2022 Share Posted August 9, 2022 Is there a reason it has to be the Shield Pro? The only differences between the Pro and Shield TV are the Pro's USB input and larger internal memory. If DD+ Atmos streaming is coming from the internal Tidal App, and Atmos True HD files are coming from the NAS, there wouldn't necessarily be a need for the usb attached storage (unless you preferred an attached USB drive to NAS), or am I missing something? Link to comment
The Computer Audiophile Posted August 9, 2022 Author Share Posted August 9, 2022 5 hours ago, phoenixdogfan said: Is there a reason it has to be the Shield Pro? The only differences between the Pro and Shield TV are the Pro's USB input and larger internal memory. If DD+ Atmos streaming is coming from the internal Tidal App, and Atmos True HD files are coming from the NAS, there wouldn't necessarily be a need for the usb attached storage (unless you preferred an attached USB drive to NAS), or am I missing something? You got it. Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems Link to comment
bbosler Posted August 10, 2022 Share Posted August 10, 2022 On 8/6/2022 at 1:59 AM, seeteeyou said: On 8/5/2022 at 9:21 PM, bbosler said: So if you don't want or need to play files from downloads or rip discs, a complete, easy Atmos solution on the cheap is an Apple 4K TV (now around $120) which will do Apple Music and Tidal along with a sub $100 BluRay like mine to play your discs. Petition · True Lossless Dolby Atmos support on the Apple TV 4K · Change.org https://www.change.org/p/dolby-mat-v2-0-or-full-bitstream-audio-passthrough-support-on-the-apple-tv-4k https://discussions.apple.com/thread/253703728 Quote Apple TV 4K doesn’t support Atmos TrueHD natively. Instead Apple TV 4K supports Atmos Dolby Digital+ for input, as that is what streaming services use. Infuse on Apple TV will decode Atmos TrueHD into PCM Multichannel, but stripped from Atmos meta data, so you get 7.1 or 5.1. In other words, we'll have to replace Apple TV 4K with something else if we're going for TrueHD (i.e. lossless) version of Atmos down the road. Can someone explain this? I read the link to the petition and they were complaining that Apple TV4K (ATV4K) was decoding the audio and then sending it on, but that makes no sense to me since when I use my ATV4K my processor says Dolby Atmos. I understand it is not TrueHD, but it is my understanding that nothing streaming is TrueHD, so why the beef with the ATV4K? As I understand it the issue is the streaming services, not the ATV4K. Is it actually doing something to the audio stream or just passing it along? see my system at Audiogon https://systems.audiogon.com/systems/768 Link to comment
The Computer Audiophile Posted August 10, 2022 Author Share Posted August 10, 2022 6 minutes ago, bbosler said: Can someone explain this? I read the link to the petition and they were complaining that Apple TV4K (ATV4K) was decoding the audio and then sending it on, but that makes no sense to me since when I use my ATV4K my processor says Dolby Atmos. I understand it is not TrueHD, but it is my understanding that nothing streaming is TrueHD, so why the beef with the ATV4K? As I understand it the issue is the streaming services, not the ATV4K. Is it actually doing something to the audio stream or just passing it along? Infuse on an AppleTV will play local content that contains TrueHD. Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems Link to comment
jeffhenning Posted August 24, 2022 Share Posted August 24, 2022 Owning a Shield Pro now for a few years as well as using Kodi, I don't find Android TV or Kodi to be ideal for several reasons. Both of them bomb a few times every several weeks regardless of them being up to date. Hey, I realize this is the software and not the hardware. The Shield Pro is fantastic. The software it uses is much less so. Hell, I've had to uninstall Kodi and wipe it's associated data twice in 2 years. Android TV is a mixed bag that has never impressed. Kodi, at least. automatically adjusts the frame rate to the video source being played. For streaming channels (Netflix, Amazon), you have to guess what the frame rate is depending upon its provenance and select it manually in Android TV. That sucks. Bottom line: the Shield Pro and all of the software that runs it kinda sucks... I'm not sure, though, that there is anything for the price that surpasses it. As to playing any type of surround music, 99% of the time, I'm using my trusty old Oppo BDP-103 and spinning discs.. That player is still hanging in. Link to comment
The Computer Audiophile Posted August 24, 2022 Author Share Posted August 24, 2022 7 minutes ago, jeffhenning said: Owning a Shield Pro now for a few years as well as using Kodi, I don't find Android TV or Kodi to be ideal for several reasons. Both of them bomb a few times every several weeks regardless of them being up to date. Hey, I realize this is the software and not the hardware. The Shield Pro is fantastic. The software it uses is much less so. Hell, I've had to uninstall Kodi and wipe it's associated data twice in 2 years. Android TV is a mixed bag that has never impressed. Kodi, at least. automatically adjusts the frame rate to the video source being played. For streaming channels (Netflix, Amazon), you have to guess what the frame rate is depending upon its provenance and select it manually in Android TV. That sucks. Bottom line: the Shield Pro and all of the software that runs it kinda sucks... I'm not sure, though, that there is anything for the price that surpasses it. As to playing any type of surround music, 99% of the time, I'm using my trusty old Oppo BDP-103 and spinning discs.. That player is still hanging in. I hear ya, but there aren’t other better options. The options for playing lossless music and movies are few and far between unfortunately. Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems Link to comment
Marco Santos Posted December 30, 2022 Share Posted December 30, 2022 If you have something like NAD T 778, do you still need Nvidia? Isn't it a do it all? Link to comment
The Computer Audiophile Posted December 30, 2022 Author Share Posted December 30, 2022 2 hours ago, Marco Santos said: If you have something like NAD T 778, do you still need Nvidia? Isn't it a do it all? Good question. I don’t think the NAD duplicates the functionality of the Shield. NAD seems to be a decoding device but not a device capable of storing or selecting TrueHD Atmos MKVs for playback. I could be wrong though. Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems Link to comment
Kal Rubinson Posted December 30, 2022 Share Posted December 30, 2022 1 hour ago, The Computer Audiophile said: Good question. I don’t think the NAD duplicates the functionality of the Shield. NAD seems to be a decoding device but not a device capable of storing or selecting TrueHD Atmos MKVs for playback. I could be wrong though. Yes, it is a decoding device and will do Atmos if you can send the data, as evidenced by playing Atmos BDs via HDMI. Getting files to it it, as you imply, another issue and I am not enough informed on the NAD to help in that regard. Kal Rubinson Senior Contributing Editor, Stereophile Link to comment
sb6 Posted March 17, 2023 Share Posted March 17, 2023 Late to the game, however, great information, thanks. I think the biggest challenge with Atmos for the majority 2 - channel audiophiles is - we are always looking for better sonics which costs more and more $$, so the question then is - is it worth it to invest in a multi - channel system which, for the same budget as 2 - channel will be compromised in quality (e.g: 5 speakers vs. 2 speakers with the same budget) to be able to play Atmos? To appeal to the mainstream audiophile (oxymoron? :-) ) market, I think you'd need much more content available and even then, it may be somewhat cost prohibitive. 4x20A circuits | Shunyata Triton + Typhon | Source 1: HDPlex HD100 PSU -> OCX clock + EtherRegen -> Paul Hynes SR4T + HDPlex HD500 PSUs -> Music PC w/JCAT XE nic, HQPlayer, Roon, Tidal / Qobuz | TotalDAC D1 Twelve DAC + Mk II Streamer | Source 2: Acoustic Signature Ascona with Kuzma 4 Point tonearm | Koetsu Rosewood Signature cart | Pass XP-15 phono pre | Audionet Pre G2 preamp | Audionet Max mono blocks | Vivid Audio Giya Spirits | 4 JL Audio Fathom subs | Echole ICs /SCs / Siltech King jumpers, Shunyata/Audioquest PCs / Eth. Cs | Critical Mass CS2s -> components, Isoacoustics -> speakers + subs | Adona Eris II rack w/ Herbie's titanium footers | Fully treated and dedicated 2 channel room Link to comment
Popular Post El Guapo Posted March 17, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted March 17, 2023 1 hour ago, sb6 said: the question then is - is it worth it to invest in a multi - channel system which, for the same budget as 2 - channel will be compromised in quality Some of my friends who already invested more than 100,000USD+ on stereo systems came to my home and listened to my poor 10,000USD immersive system, they all quietly move to multichannel / immersive world. At least in past 6 months I heard 4 of my friends bought Hapi Mk2 and began to construct the immersive environment (one of them even owned hi-end StormAudio ISP). So to speak. 😁 The Computer Audiophile and sb6 1 1 Link to comment
seeteeyou Posted March 18, 2023 Share Posted March 18, 2023 23 hours ago, El Guapo said: At least in past 6 months I heard 4 of my friends bought Hapi Mk2 and began to construct the immersive environment (one of them even owned hi-end StormAudio ISP). Now that really raises an eyebrow or two, I've been reading some of your posts today https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Audiophile/search?q=author%3Aelguapo https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Headphone/search?q=author%3Aelguapo Do you think that maybe the latest RME Fireface UFX III would also get the job done since I'd like to stick with USB instead of RAVENNA? https://www.rme-audio.de/fireface-ufx-3.html That seemed to have 1 + 6 = 7 pairs of analog outputs, therefore we should have 7.1.4 covered. Of course it's only limited to 192kHz so that DXD wouldn't work natively, though. Link to comment
El Guapo Posted March 18, 2023 Share Posted March 18, 2023 2 hours ago, seeteeyou said: That seemed to have 1 + 6 = 7 pairs of analog outputs, therefore we should have 7.1.4 covered. The spec I saw it has 8 channels of balanced analog output (XLR x2 + TRS x6) plus 4 channels thru 2 unbalanced headphone output. This can cover 7.1.4 if you accept 2 unbalanced headphone output. 48 or 96 are sufficient for 95% immersive audio format. For initial build this UFX3 interface is a good choice IMHO. Link to comment
The Computer Audiophile Posted March 18, 2023 Author Share Posted March 18, 2023 9 hours ago, seeteeyou said: Now that really raises an eyebrow or two, I've been reading some of your posts today https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Audiophile/search?q=author%3Aelguapo https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Headphone/search?q=author%3Aelguapo Do you think that maybe the latest RME Fireface UFX III would also get the job done since I'd like to stick with USB instead of RAVENNA? https://www.rme-audio.de/fireface-ufx-3.html That seemed to have 1 + 6 = 7 pairs of analog outputs, therefore we should have 7.1.4 covered. Of course it's only limited to 192kHz so that DXD wouldn't work natively, though. Also look at what @bobfa is doing with a MOTU DAC that has USB and Ethernet. Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems Link to comment
bobfa Posted March 18, 2023 Share Posted March 18, 2023 On the RME study audio Routing, be sure you can map 12 channels of audio from USB to the outputs. Also, check on the audio levels out of those interfaces. I have an issue with my interface that I had to pad the levels down. Also, study volume control and how it works. The Computer Audiophile 1 My Audio Systems Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now