JohnSwenson Posted December 7, 2015 Share Posted December 7, 2015 I never said that I didn't use Firewire, I was merely answering the question about why people were saying that USB isn't great for audio. If I had a Mac Mini as my directly connected computer music source, I would, without a doubt, use Toslink (optical), but I use a Windows laptop for that chore and the only I/O on that computer even remotely suitable for direct connection to my DAC is USB. It's troublesome and not very reliable and requires a driver from the DAC manufacturer, but there it is. Increasingly, I'm using WiFi to stream my 24/96 music files (and my iTunes rips) from my Mac directly to my Logitech Squeezebox Touch and then to my DAC via Toslink. It's much more reliable than the Win laptop. If I didn't have a bunch of 24/192 files to which I like to listen, I would retire the laptop from audio duty altogether. The SB Touch with the EDO plugin can do 192 over USB, it works very reliably, and sounds great. With my DAC the USB interface is actually better than optical or coax S/PDIF. John S. Link to comment
sandyk Posted December 7, 2015 Share Posted December 7, 2015 With my DAC the USB interface is actually better than optical or coax S/PDIF. John S. I presume that you are talking about your own DAC that you designed ? How a Digital Audio file sounds, or a Digital Video file looks, is governed to a large extent by the Power Supply area. All that Identical Checksums gives is the possibility of REGENERATING the file to close to that of the original file. PROFILE UPDATED 13-11-2020 Link to comment
plissken Posted December 7, 2015 Share Posted December 7, 2015 I presume that you are talking about your own DAC that you designed ? I'm spitballing here but I think his first sentence mentions something about some low cost, now out of production DAC with a plug in enabling it to do 192 vs the 96Khz it was designed to play over USB very reliably and sounding great. Buy hey, that just might be me.... Link to comment
sandyk Posted December 7, 2015 Share Posted December 7, 2015 With my DAC the USB interface is actually better than optical or coax S/PDIF. In which case he wouldn't need to use his own Regen, unless he has done input modifications to this DAC. Very few standard DACs using generic USB input modules are able to either equal or outperform well implemented Toslink or Coax SPDIF without at least using expensive after-market USB cables etc.. If they were, then there would be only a very small market for John's Regen. How a Digital Audio file sounds, or a Digital Video file looks, is governed to a large extent by the Power Supply area. All that Identical Checksums gives is the possibility of REGENERATING the file to close to that of the original file. PROFILE UPDATED 13-11-2020 Link to comment
DEANO2 Posted December 7, 2015 Share Posted December 7, 2015 Thanks DEANO2 One further point avoid iTunes at all costs, if you don't set it up properly it can change your library without notice ( downsample your rips of CDs and even your hi res downloads). Sent from my SM-T113 using Tapatalk Link to comment
Jud Posted December 7, 2015 Share Posted December 7, 2015 Laptop, at least 16gb of ram, jriver21, dbpoweramp to rip (it sounds better) use Aiff it's ubiquitous and you don't lose meta data, external storage ( back it up always and frequently) whether Nas or USB external hard drive.USB capable DAC, half decent cable (Supra), interconnects, Amplification, Speakers or Headphones. DONE, Nuf said. Simple. Sent from my SM-T113 using Tapatalk DEANO2 has mentioned a "half decent [uSB] cable," the Supra. The topic of USB cables and whether they provide any difference in sound quality of the system is a topic of some, errm, "discussion" here, even in our forums, which as you have seen are ordinarily quite peaceful. [sidles out of the way to avoid any divine retributive lightning.] Nevertheless, I want to provide a couple of options for you should you decide to look into USB cables other than the most basic "printer cable" type, one a little more expensive than the Supra, one slightly less expensive. The less expensive cable (~$30 for .75 meter) is the Audioquest Forest. https://www.hideflifestyle.com/catalog/product/view/id/2643/s/audioquest-forest-usb-cable-0-75m/?fee=5&fep=2643&gclid=Cj0KEQiA-ZSzBRDp3ITHm5KO_JYBEiQA1JjHHL8yzqEqO-UazvIcwByQd2-J9pGAKs65v3iru0Ts8p8aAl3Q8P8HAQ The more expensive cable ($135 for 3 feet), and the one I use, is the Mapleshade Clearlink Plus. Male A to Male B - Most Popular-shop.mapleshadestore.com One never knows, do one? - Fats Waller The fairest thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the fundamental emotion which stands at the cradle of true art and true science. - Einstein Computer, Audirvana -> optical Ethernet to Fitlet3 -> Fibbr Alpha Optical USB -> iFi NEO iDSD DAC -> Apollon Audio 1ET400A Mini (Purifi based) -> Vandersteen 3A Signature. Link to comment
fastdart69 Posted December 7, 2015 Author Share Posted December 7, 2015 Agree, no plans to use iTunes. Although I have most of my CD's already ripped to iTunes on a desktop PC, I will be repeating this process likely using DB Poweramp and J Rivers Media Center on a separate computer. Link to comment
fastdart69 Posted December 7, 2015 Author Share Posted December 7, 2015 That explains it. It's just that DragonFly DACs are so famous and have had so much press in the last 3-4 years that I was surprised (taken aback, actually) that anyone interested in audio enough to post to a forum called "Computer Audiophile" could have possibly been unaware of the AudioQuest DragonFly. It's famous because it's both very good and cheap. I am familiar with (and have used) AudioQuest cables, and based on your post went to their website where I reviewed Dragonfly. There were also couple of nice whitepapers on computer audio that I read. Thanks. Link to comment
Jud Posted December 7, 2015 Share Posted December 7, 2015 Agree, no plans to use iTunes. Although I have most of my CD's already ripped to iTunes on a desktop PC, I will be repeating this process likely using DB Poweramp and J Rivers Media Center on a separate computer. What format are the rips? There may be no need to do the work of re-ripping. One never knows, do one? - Fats Waller The fairest thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the fundamental emotion which stands at the cradle of true art and true science. - Einstein Computer, Audirvana -> optical Ethernet to Fitlet3 -> Fibbr Alpha Optical USB -> iFi NEO iDSD DAC -> Apollon Audio 1ET400A Mini (Purifi based) -> Vandersteen 3A Signature. Link to comment
Paul R Posted December 7, 2015 Share Posted December 7, 2015 In which case he wouldn't need to use his own Regen, unless he has done input modifications to this DAC.Very few standard DACs using generic USB input modules are able to either equal or outperform well implemented Toslink or Coax SPDIF without at least using expensive after-market USB cables etc.. If they were, then there would be only a very small market for John's Regen. Actually, almost all current USB DACs sound better with their USB input than with the Coaxial or Optical inputs. (shrug) USB protocols and S/PDIF protocols are not that dissimilar. Now, if you go back a few years, the Coaxial and Optical inputs routinely sounded better, but that is not true today. And that is without ruinously expensive USB cables too. $50-$100 for a USB cable puts most people into extraordinary sound. Anyone who considers protocol unimportant has never dealt with a cat DAC. Robert A. Heinlein Link to comment
Norton Posted December 7, 2015 Share Posted December 7, 2015 Actually, almost all current USB DACs sound better with their USB input than with the Coaxial or Optical inputs. (shrug) USB protocols and S/PDIF protocols are not that dissimilar. Each to his or her own, but that's not my experience. From BDP2 Coaxial bettered USB whether into my Hugo, Oppo or Esoteric DACs, each of which pass for "current"', albeit it's the Oppo EU rather than D . Of course this says as much (more even?) about the source than it does the DAC. Link to comment
Paul R Posted December 7, 2015 Share Posted December 7, 2015 Each to his or her own, but that's not my experience. From BDP2 Coaxial bettered USB whether into my Hugo, Oppo or Esoteric DACs, each of which pass for "current"', albeit it's the Oppo EU rather than D . Of course this says as much (more even?) about the source than it does the DAC. Interesting, I get the opposite results with my Oppo, but I don't have a Hugo or Esoteric here to compare to. I wonder if you put a REGEN or even an iFI Power in front of them, what the difference, if any, would be? -Paul Anyone who considers protocol unimportant has never dealt with a cat DAC. Robert A. Heinlein Link to comment
Jud Posted December 7, 2015 Share Posted December 7, 2015 Of course this says as much (more even?) about the source than it does the DAC. Exactly. Implementation, implementation, implementation, at both sending and receiving units. One never knows, do one? - Fats Waller The fairest thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the fundamental emotion which stands at the cradle of true art and true science. - Einstein Computer, Audirvana -> optical Ethernet to Fitlet3 -> Fibbr Alpha Optical USB -> iFi NEO iDSD DAC -> Apollon Audio 1ET400A Mini (Purifi based) -> Vandersteen 3A Signature. Link to comment
Norton Posted December 7, 2015 Share Posted December 7, 2015 Interesting, I get the opposite results with my Oppo, but I don't have a Hugo or Esoteric here to compare to. I wonder if you put a REGEN or even an iFI Power in front of them, what the difference, if any, would be? -Paul I have no experience with the Regen, but if it did indeed eliminate (to my ears) the SQ gap between Coaxial and USB it would certainly be a top value upgrade. However, as I'm quite happy with Coaxial (noting that the BDP also outputs DoP via Coaxial or AES) there's no incentive for me to try, unless USB via Regen is likely to better the BDP's Coaxial which I'm guessing is unlikely. I could be wrong of course... Link to comment
Paul R Posted December 7, 2015 Share Posted December 7, 2015 I have no experience with the Regen, but if it did indeed eliminate (to my ears) the SQ gap between Coaxial and USB it would certainly be a top value upgrade. However, as I'm quite happy with Coaxial (noting that the BDP also outputs DoP via Coaxial or AES) there's no incentive for me to try, unless USB via Regen is likely to better the BDP's Coaxial which I'm guessing is unlikely. I could be wrong of course... Well, that is top quality gear you are talking about there, but for me at least, the best USB is better than the best Coax or TosLink. Of course, part of that may be DSD and very high sample rate PCM. I suspect you would hear little if any improvement though, given the high quality of your gear. Be fun to try though. Anyone who considers protocol unimportant has never dealt with a cat DAC. Robert A. Heinlein Link to comment
gmgraves Posted December 7, 2015 Share Posted December 7, 2015 Actually, almost all current USB DACs sound better with their USB input than with the Coaxial or Optical inputs. (shrug) USB protocols and S/PDIF protocols are not that dissimilar. Now, if you go back a few years, the Coaxial and Optical inputs routinely sounded better, but that is not true today. And that is without ruinously expensive USB cables too. $50-$100 for a USB cable puts most people into extraordinary sound. I would only use SPDIF over USB because it's more reliable than USB over Windows (IMHO). But since I don't know of any Windows laptop that has optical SPDIF out (like Mac laptops do) that the issue is largely academic. George Link to comment
gmgraves Posted December 7, 2015 Share Posted December 7, 2015 Exactly. Implementation, implementation, implementation, at both sending and receiving units. By "source", I assumed he was talking about recording quality; 95% of which are garbage -in all genres! George Link to comment
sandyk Posted December 7, 2015 Share Posted December 7, 2015 I wonder if you put a REGEN or even an iFI Power in front of them, what the difference, if any, would be? -Paul Both the Oppo 95 and 103 improve markedly with a battery or Linear powered (+9V) Regen in line with their USB input. How a Digital Audio file sounds, or a Digital Video file looks, is governed to a large extent by the Power Supply area. All that Identical Checksums gives is the possibility of REGENERATING the file to close to that of the original file. PROFILE UPDATED 13-11-2020 Link to comment
wgscott Posted December 7, 2015 Share Posted December 7, 2015 Both the Oppo 95 and 103 improve markedly with a battery or Linear powered (+9V) Regen in line with their USB input. Is there any evidence (tests, measurements, etc.) available that shows this? Link to comment
Audio_ELF Posted December 7, 2015 Share Posted December 7, 2015 Both the Oppo 95 and 103 improve markedly with a battery or Linear powered (+9V) Regen in line with their USB input. Just to clarify... You mean a Regen used with a memory stick connected via the (type a rectangular) USB? Eloise --- ...in my opinion / experience... While I agree "Everything may matter" working out what actually affects the sound is a trickier thing. And I agree "Trust your ears" but equally don't allow them to fool you - trust them with a bit of skepticism. keep your mind open... But mind your brain doesn't fall out. Link to comment
kumakuma Posted December 7, 2015 Share Posted December 7, 2015 Is there any evidence (tests, measurements, etc.) available that shows this? We are audiophiles. We don't need no stinking evidence. Sometimes it's like someone took a knife, baby Edgy and dull and cut a six inch valley Through the middle of my skull Link to comment
JohnSwenson Posted December 7, 2015 Share Posted December 7, 2015 I'm spitballing here but I think his first sentence mentions something about some low cost, now out of production DAC with a plug in enabling it to do 192 vs the 96Khz it was designed to play over USB very reliably and sounding great. Buy hey, that just might be me.... Actually two completely different subjects, sorry for not making it clearer. He was stating that he had to keep the laptop around because the SB Touch could not do 192. The first was that the SBT CAN play 192 over its USB port when using the EDO plugin and that this connection is one of the better USB sources out there, without having to go into all the tweaks that people get into with general purpose computers. The second was in response to the oft mentioned "S/PDIF is vastly superior to USB" stance. The DAC in question is one that has gone through many revisions over 6 years. It started out with S/PDIF, both coax and optical. I spent years working on circuits that get rid of noise and jitter. The result is one of the best S/PDIF interfaces out there. Then about 2 years ago I started adding USB to it. Again I did a lot of work on this to optimize the USB interface, cut down on ground plane noise etc. As it turned out the USB input is slightly better sounding than either S/PDIF input. (I can't tell any difference between coax or optical). I would consider both the S/PDIF and USB inputs to be very well designed and implemented input circuits. BTW a REGEN does make it sound better, which has spurred another round of development, aimed at improving things to the point where that doesn't happen. A lot of work to go on that though. I consider statements along the lines of "USB is garbage, S/PDIF is vastly superior" to not be true, it IS possible to do both very well, although it appears it is rather rare to have both in the same box. John S. Link to comment
sandyk Posted December 7, 2015 Share Posted December 7, 2015 Just to clarify... You mean a Regen used with a memory stick connected via the (type a rectangular) USB? Yes. I am presently unable to use USB direct from my PC tt the Oppo 103 using the Regen, as my PC isn't in the main listening room. How a Digital Audio file sounds, or a Digital Video file looks, is governed to a large extent by the Power Supply area. All that Identical Checksums gives is the possibility of REGENERATING the file to close to that of the original file. PROFILE UPDATED 13-11-2020 Link to comment
LCC0256 Posted December 8, 2015 Share Posted December 8, 2015 We are audiophiles. We don't need no stinking evidence. Now THAT was good !! Link to comment
BobSherman Posted December 8, 2015 Share Posted December 8, 2015 Is there any evidence (tests, measurements, etc.) available that shows this? People listen to music please stop trashing every thread. Thank you Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now