Jump to content
IGNORED

Euphony OS w/Stylus player setup and issues thread


Recommended Posts

On 4/14/2024 at 5:53 PM, abase said:

 

..in my system the best sound is not no LAN - These weekend I tested a few of my best songs with no LAN and with my LAN setup. The sound over the LAN is more engaging. I think it is the reclocker of the  melco switch (Pink Fraun Ultra OCXO) that do the magic. If I put the melco switch out of the chain the sound is good but lifeless, it loose the complete engagement that I have, if I hear the music with my normal setup (melco switch) It is so much that I compare it to the different between Holo audio Spring 3 KTE to Holo audio May KTE

There are a few explanations that might cause this. By disconnecting the LAN cable during playback, it might cause the OS to repeatedly look for a reconnection causing an extra loading. To solve this, did you also try the relax mode of Euphony before disconnecting the LAN cable - then Euphony shuts down the LAN access from within the OS? It’s in Expert settings or press and hold the play button. 
 

Still the bottom line is if it sounds good, that’s the path! Everything else is just theory. 

Link to comment
On 4/3/2024 at 12:00 AM, edwardsean said:

I'm still on the latest version of V.3. I've been happily using it with Tidal, but today all of sudden Euphony is giving me an error. 

 

Tidal problem: Client with token not found. 

 

I've tried restarting, rebooting, but nothing helps. 

 

Has anyone come across this, and know of a fix?

Tidal is working again at least for me running on v4.20230531.

Best Regards, Raimund

 

Living Room

Apple Mac mini Mid 2011 (MacOS Sierra 10.12.6, 64 GB OWC SSD, 16 GB OWC RAM, iTunes 12.9, Pure Music 3.09c) -> artistic fidelity USB cable -> artistic fidelity External USB-Module -> 3 Fibre Optical Cables -> artistic fidelity afis / arfi-psu -> artistic fidelity RJ45 cable -> artistic fidelity arfi-dac2 / arfi-psu -> artistic fidelity XLR-to-BNC cable -> Bakoon HPA-21 Headamp + Sennheiser HD 800

Home Office

Apple Mac mini End 2018 (MacOS Mojave 10.14.6, 128 GB SSD, 8 GB RAM, Audirvana 3.5.19) -> artistic fidelity USB cable -> Pro-Ject Pre Box S2 Digital / Pro-Ject Accu Box S2 USB PSU -> Abacus C-Box 2 Active Speakers

Link to comment

The problem with Audirvana Studio is that you cannot use the Izotope plugins in real time when you are on a network. You have to connect your computer to your DAC with a cable, it's completely stupid. So this is of no use to me. Additionally, the sound quality is much better on Euphony than on Audirvana, and is equivalent to Jplay Femto plus Audiophile Optimizer on Windows.

Link to comment
10 hours ago, Oskar said:

The problem with Audirvana Studio is that you cannot use the Izotope plugins in real time when you are on a network. You have to connect your computer to your DAC with a cable, it's completely stupid. So this is of no use to me. Additionally, the sound quality is much better on Euphony than on Audirvana, and is equivalent to Jplay Femto plus Audiophile Optimizer on Windows.

In all fairness, until now we've only been able to hear Audirvana running on Windows or macOS. It may run more efficiently and sound better on Linux.

Link to comment
On 4/22/2024 at 5:47 PM, genvirt said:

Good to know about Tidal has back:)

But this issue waste all my trial and Robert refuse to extend it… very pity that service goes down there:(

 

That's not good. Given Tidal was working for other playback software including Roon, Euphony should have extended some extra time, not only to trial users but to paid subscriptions which lost playback time during this period. Simply a gesture of goodwill.

 

They really don't know how to market themselves. 

Link to comment
3 minutes ago, flkin said:

 

That's not good. Given Tidal was working for other playback software including Roon, Euphony should have extended some extra time, not only to trial users but to paid subscriptions which lost playback time during this period. Simply a gesture of goodwill.

 

They really don't know how to market themselves. 

Yes , service far far away from that were given by žeiko indeed.

But to my case, hhh, Yesterday I’ve got a message from them that my trial were extended, but I already bought a legal licence because of urgent needs of streaming service, so trial not very bother me now… I only hope that service some how to be more “closer” to us in any meanings.

Link to comment
  • 3 weeks later...

I wrote to Euphony support around mid week, asking for an approximate date when the beta, that they released in February, would be a full release.  There has been no word back from them yet.
 

I don’t have time to mess around with glitchy software, so I have been putting off loading the beta.

 

I checked this site every day to see if there is a new release. The same way I have been doing for about a year since there haven’t been any new releases other than this beta. And now they’re sitting on the beta for months.  I wonder what they’re waiting for so that they can release it?
 

Will you guys please report on the beta? There were a few mentions when it was first release.

 

How does it sound?

Are any parts glitchy?

 

thank you

Will

Link to comment

What GUI things bug you?

 

What bugs me, is that every time you want to put an album into RAM you have to go through two menus and do it manually.

I believe previously, there was a setting, which put all songs played, automatically into RAM


also, when you put the album in RAM each track has a circle with an “I” on it, which is supposed to turn blue and then the software tells you that all songs have been placed into RAM. But some of the time blue circle turns blue and some of the time it does not, and then it tells me that everything was loaded. I don’t know whether to believe it or not.

 

I guess I’ll have to bite the bullet and load the beta.

I know that I have to check a dialogue box which allows me to get betas. Currently, I do not see beta when I check for updates.

Do you know which menu it is in, please?

Link to comment

I will soon need to renew my euphony licence. 

I use euphony exclusively as a Roon Core. Don't use stylus for several reasons. 

Are there any other options out there which offer Core Isolation, etc., like a lite version of Archlinux?

I couldn't get audiolinux to work properly.

Server | EMM | Dartzeel | Evolution Acoustics

Link to comment

Hi msb1,

 

I used Euphony exclusively as a Roon Core, too. I was switching to DietPi on a NUC8i3. Installation of Roon is very easy. Core isolation is possible, also I was reducing the max. frequency to 800 MHz. Sound quality is very good, no difference to Euphony.

 

You can try this solution by using an USB stick before copying everything to your hard disk.

 

To me, there is no reason for using Euphony sound wise if you only need it as an OS for Roon.

Link to comment
6 hours ago, tom_on_wheels said:

Hi msb1,

 

I used Euphony exclusively as a Roon Core, too. I was switching to DietPi on a NUC8i3. Installation of Roon is very easy. Core isolation is possible, also I was reducing the max. frequency to 800 MHz. Sound quality is very good, no difference to Euphony.

 

You can try this solution by using an USB stick before copying everything to your hard disk.

 

To me, there is no reason for using Euphony sound wise if you only need it as an OS for Roon.

Hi,

Is core isolation, frequency reduction and bridging networks easy on Dietpi? Do you know of a guide that you can send me the link to? I would be very interested in trying this. 

Server | EMM | Dartzeel | Evolution Acoustics

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...