USB cable comparisons

[mansr]

29 minutes ago, Richard Dale said:

All you are really saying is something along the lines of 'please shut up, you don't know what you are talking about'.

And you disagree with this why, exactly?

[mansr]

2 minutes ago, Richard Dale said:

Well I suppose I like to think I'm an experienced listener having been an audiophile for about 45 years, and know something about how to overcome the problems that may be in sighted listening auditions.

Yes, I suppose you like to think that.

[mansr]

20 minutes ago, barrows said:

LUSH vs. Inakustik Referenz.  The difference between these two is so large, i really doubt even the most fervent non-believer could deny it upon experiencing it.

Care to make a short recording with each so us infidels might catch a glimpse of the light?

[mansr]

36 minutes ago, barrows said:

Sorry, you are wrong.  I have worked in the home audio industry for quite a few years now, and have no experience of anyone attempting to trick anyone.  Audio companies engage in making the best products they can, which are made in an attempt to improve audio performance, you are just making up a conspiracy theory here.

That's rich coming from the man peddling magical, sound-enhancing "dark matter" blocks.

[mansr]

25 minutes ago, jabbr said:

Perhaps by "flaw" you mean "greatness"? Perhaps by "true" you mean "false"? Nonsensical discussion.

In another thread I was informed that "liberal" now means "fascist." There seems to be a pattern here.

[mansr]

2 minutes ago, tmtomh said:

I do, however, feel it's important to note that "measuring aural enjoyment" absolutely is possible to do.

Using a plethysmograph?

[mansr]

24 minutes ago, Ralf11 said:

were these blinded listening tests?

Of course not. The utter stress of not knowing what you're listening to makes it impossible to discern even night-and-day differences.

[mansr]

1 hour ago, Kimo said:

Who doesn't love the comedic insight of Russell Crowe.

 

[mansr]

1 hour ago, marce said:

Velocity factor tells you how fast the waves propagate through the wire, a VF of 1 means the signal speed is approx 300mm/ns so

VF=1 a 1m interconnect would have a propagation time of 3.33ns... The difference for the cables listed is from 5ns to 3.9ns, even a two m interconnect is not going to be an issue.

@The Computer Audiophile, surely this isn't tolerated outside the containment zone.

[mansr]

17 minutes ago, The Computer Audiophile said:

Rather than be part of a solution, you seem to want to be part of the problem. 

It was you who declared me, marce, and others like us a problem.

[mansr]

29 minutes ago, The Computer Audiophile said:

Absolutely not. I declared that people who can't have a civil conversation and live and let live need their own space. 

Are you seriously expecting Alex to use the new area?

[mansr]

18 minutes ago, The Computer Audiophile said:

Alex won't be allowed to talk about his non scientific appeals to authority in the Objective-Fi area. 

 

He wasn't included in the group of people who endlessly harass subjectivists when they plead to be respectfully ignored. 

Are you seriously saying Alex isn't part of the "people who can't have a civil conversation" group?