Can System Noise be saved to HDDs, SDs, etc. in digital audio files?

[esldude]

1 minute ago, Ralf11 said:

pigeon net is susceptible to jitter from falcons

Wouldn't that actually be data loss?

[pkane2001]

2 minutes ago, esldude said:

Wouldn't that actually be data loss?

 

Only if there is no error correction 

[esldude]

18 minutes ago, pkane2001 said:

 

Only if there is no error correction 

RFC 1149 indicates data loss possible in storms and doesn't mention error correction.  There is always room for improvements of course. 

[mansr]

IP over Avian Carriers with Quality of Service

https://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/computing/networks/pigeonbased-feathernet-still-wingsdown-fastest-way-of-transferring-lots-of-data

[esldude]

1 hour ago, mansr said:

IP over Avian Carriers with Quality of Service

https://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/computing/networks/pigeonbased-feathernet-still-wingsdown-fastest-way-of-transferring-lots-of-data

Packet loss:

 

Routing carriers through the territory of similar carriers, without peering agreements, will sometimes cause abrupt route changes, looping packets, and out-of-order delivery. Similarly, routing carriers through the territory of predatory carriers may potentially cause severe packet loss. It is strongly recommended that these factors be considered in the routing algorithm used to create carrier routing tables. Implementers should consider policy-based routing to ensure reliable packet delivery by routing around areas where territorial and predatory carriers are prevalent.

There is evidence that some carriers have a propensity to eat other carriers and then carry the eaten payloads. Perhaps this provides a new way to tunnel an IPv4 packet in an IPv6 payload, or vice versa.

 

I'll note a possible added benefit.  As pigeons home in using magnetic fields maybe the effect of those fields on SD cards is minimized.  Leading to more analog like highs, deeper bass, and denser soundfields.  

[esldude]

I suppose Alex isn't going to take part.  He usually stops when we are getting somewhere.  Too bad.  

[tmtomh]

It could be that so many of us have earned a spot on his Ignore list that he doesn't even know the discussion is continuing. 🙂

[jabbr]

17 hours ago, esldude said:

RFC 1149 indicates data loss possible in storms and doesn't mention error correction.  There is always room for improvements of course. 

 

This is an IP / datagram protocol. TCP is the layer which implements packet reordering, retransmission etc.