wdw Posted November 16, 2012 Share Posted November 16, 2012 ...considering the hit and miss we've all experienced with high rez downloads from HD Tracks, I hear by propose that we now just refer to them as: Might Be Tracks or MB Tracks to the initiates. something new comes out and we're all hesitant, posting questions to each other, paging up graphs, etc...why, in the most litigious nation in the world, are we so reluctant to simply order their products. I would assume that by now they would have their behinds sued off their tail end. Silly question, of course, but why don't they simply employ someone to confirm and check the product before selling. America is slowly turning into a low wage state...you've escaped Romney but not by much...Surely there's someone who could be gainfully employed checking this stuff out. Cheers, WDW Link to comment
spdif-usb Posted November 16, 2012 Share Posted November 16, 2012 Nah. HDTracks = Hesitant Downloading Tracks If you had the memory of a goldfish, maybe it would work. Link to comment
wdw Posted November 16, 2012 Author Share Posted November 16, 2012 Nah. HDTracks = Hesitant Downloading Tracks Highly divided tracks?.....nay "might be tracks" because you're never sure Link to comment
Daudio Posted November 16, 2012 Share Posted November 16, 2012 "Highly Debatable" Tracks ?? Link to comment
Paul R Posted November 16, 2012 Share Posted November 16, 2012 Some are "Heavenly Divine" and some "Hellishly Damned" - or something like that. -Paul Anyone who considers protocol unimportant has never dealt with a cat DAC. Robert A. Heinlein Link to comment
4est Posted November 16, 2012 Share Posted November 16, 2012 Hokey Distribution Tracks Forrest: Win10 i9 9900KS/GTX1060 HQPlayer4>Win10 NAA DSD>Pavel's DSC2.6>Bent Audio TAP> Parasound JC1>"Naked" Quad ESL63/Tannoy PS350B subs<100Hz Link to comment
wdw Posted November 16, 2012 Author Share Posted November 16, 2012 Some are "Heavenly Divine" and some "Hellishly Damned" - or something like that. -Paul ...so you're saying Half are Dodgy Tracks Link to comment
NOMBEDES Posted November 19, 2012 Share Posted November 19, 2012 "Highly Debatable" Tracks ?? Yes. Fanned. In any dispute the intensity of feeling is inversely proportional to the value of the issues at stake ~ Sayre's Law Link to comment
PeterSt Posted November 20, 2012 Share Posted November 20, 2012 Honestly Deteriorated ? Lush^3-e Lush^2 Blaxius^2.5 Ethernet^3 HDMI^2 XLR^2 XXHighEnd (developer) Phasure NOS1 24/768 Async USB DAC (manufacturer) Phasure Mach III Audio PC with Linear PSU (manufacturer) Orelino & Orelo MKII Speakers (designer/supplier) Link to comment
sandyk Posted November 20, 2012 Share Posted November 20, 2012 Hardly Decent ? How a Digital Audio file sounds, or a Digital Video file looks, is governed to a large extent by the Power Supply area. All that Identical Checksums gives is the possibility of REGENERATING the file to close to that of the original file. PROFILE UPDATED 13-11-2020 Link to comment
spdif-usb Posted November 20, 2012 Share Posted November 20, 2012 Hopefully Dynamic. If you had the memory of a goldfish, maybe it would work. Link to comment
DigiPete Posted November 21, 2012 Share Posted November 21, 2012 Having Doubts Tracks Half is Dodgy Tracks Hopeless or Divine Tracks Promise Pegasus2 R6 12TB -> Thunderbolt2 -> MacBook Pro M1 Pro -> Motu 8D -> AES/EBU -> Main: Genelec 5 x 8260A + 2 x 8250 + 2 x 8330 + 7271A sub Boat: Genelec 8010 + 5040 sub Hifiman Sundara, Sennheiser PXC 550 II Blog: “Confessions of a DigiPhile” Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now