Jump to content
IGNORED

CD Availability Nearing It's End And The Consequences


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, AnotherSpin said:

 

I don't remember the quality of the audio worrying me on vinyl days. Everything sounded quite natural. And only a few CDs could come close to that simple but hard to achieve analogue standard. The digital is inhumane. Yeah, pops and clicks were upsetting. It's a question of taste and the ability to adapt to natural wear and tear. Rubbed jeans are preferable to nylon pants, imho.

No question, especially in the early days of the introduction of cd's, the digital signature was simply too strident and analyitcal in many cases. As the years went on,  the masterings for CD's, the DAC and digital sections in the players improved. Thats why cd's became the choice for something on the order 80- 90% of audiophiles who, over time, dumped vinyl as the format they purchased. Out of perhaps a dozen serious audiophiles and musicophiles that I personally know well, only two have been long term, primary vinyl only users all this time.  

 

I recall the last large scale Detroit area audio show, The AK Fest, perhaps a dozen or so years back. Out of nearly fifty rooms where components and systems were being demoed, only four had turntables and vinyl in evidence. The vast majority were cd based demoes, along with a few reel to reels as sources, and perhaps ten early adapter laptop and digital file based rooms using Amarra, as I recall. That was the status quo at the time. 

 

To each his own as far as what format they pledge allegiance to.

 

I am just very concerned that my future ability to be able to access some music that I easily can now, will be gone with the disappearance of the cd format for reasons I noted in my previous post. And again, the music from the many less known groups/individuals that I always will be unavailable to me in any remaining format.   

 

JC

Link to comment
12 hours ago, Rexp said:

Sure, plenty of folks like CD, I just don't take audio advice from them. I'd also strongly advise any nooby reading this not to take audio advice from anyone who doesn't run an analog source. 

I owned turntables and vinyl based systems exclusively from 1968 through 1990, and have been involved with vinyl in one way or another, for 50 years? How about you? 

 

JC

Link to comment
11 hours ago, Summit said:

 

If it was just Millennial's that streamed music and had stopped buying physical records, it wouldn’t have that big of an impact on the music business.

 

The sale of vinyl is probable much larger because of the big second hand market which I don’t believe they have accounted for.

 

For the record (hehe) am no Millennial.

God points,but my comments never linked Millennials to streaming. If you look at the number of subscriptions to Tidal and Qobuz, they clearly aren't streaming in any meaningful way. Possibly except the essentially mindless free streams of Pandora and Spotify (although at least Spotify apparently offers supposedly better audio quality for a fee). 

 

JC

Link to comment
10 hours ago, Norton said:

It’s too big a leap from CD sales declining to an inability to own digital music.

 

Firstly, I’ve not noticed the music I’m interested in, at least, disappearing  from CD.  On the contrary, there’s been something of an explosion in the works of 19th and 20th c English composers on CD which suggests it’s a medium well suited to low volume niches (just how many copies of an Arnell symphony CD  does Dutton sell for example?).

 

So I would suggest that providing there is some market for it (which your preferences suggest there is) CD will continue.  Maybe after sales have plummeted it will arise as an artisan product, on audiophile quality polycarbonate?

 

I don’t  get though why a CD is in any way better to a download in terms of provenance, reliability, mastering?  The medium is not the music and in effect, a CD is just a download burnt to disc.  Not that the download market is that healthy though either.

You may have missed a major part of my point. The particular music I am afraid of losing access to is not available digitally, only on cd. And 

to this point, has not proven of enough interest to enough people for Tidal and Qobuz to ofer it. I'm talking about some outstanding but little known Celtic, golf, and indie performers that have never had an opportunity to offer their music on anything but cd's. 

 

For that matter, as cd sales fall like a rock, you also won't have access to the great boxed sets such as the recent Beatles anniversary editions of which cd's are a large part. And, to my knowledge, no box set, complete with the usual books, paraphernalia etc. has ever been offered with solely digital content?

 

JC

Link to comment
9 hours ago, Iving said:

On the stats I would reinforce what has been said about the hidden s/h market - there's a lot of trading and collecting still going on.

 

Like others I rue the cultural expiry of the Album.

 

Vinyl is and always will be sacred unless it is infected with digits. I listen to the music not the noise. It is indeed the most "natural" sounding medium. [I mean just look at the lengths we go to in order to mitigate digititis.] An expensive record deck is only needed for resolution or Hi-Fi. There's plenty of fun and goose bumps to be had even playing 45s on a mid-range player thru sympathetic amp and speakers. Wear and tear as such (cf. scratches etc) is irrelevant except for the most battered records. 

 

That said I listen to my computer-based system for both convenience and enhanced excitement. Recently I discovered Sandy Posey playing a trashed 7". Of itself that revelation was exquisite. But I just had to go buy a CD to sustain the thrill. Nowadays my main system is engineered for playback from an Optane drive.

 

All my digital music is ripped CDs. I never download or stream music.

 

I have more music from ripped CDs than I can listen to in my lifetime.

 

I agree that I can get most anything I want on CD. In the case of exceptions I'm willing to accept I must buy the 78 or the record. The only significant drawback to listening to ripped CDs is offensive, loud (re-)mastering.

 

I do fear I may end up with tons of shellac, vinyl and CDs that nobody will want when I am gone.

 

Even so I hope I never succumb to any online or subscription-based music source. CDs will continue to be vital to me and that's my main appreciation of the OP.

 

You never know. Most s/h (house clearance) shellac and vinyl is worthless. But there are gems, and the collector's market has always been there. Perhaps in time many CDs will remain appreciated if for no other reason than the commercial peddlers charging too much for online delivery or messing up the masters. Is MQA a case in point - although I have no experience and don't need to turn over those stones. Plus as has been mentioned the risk of hard drive failure etc.

 

The combined tonnage of all my 78s, records and CDs does sometimes cause me to stop for reflection.

 

In my early days, an honest Hi-Fi dealer told me I should spend more on music than equipment. Perhaps doing so is the hallmark of the true music lover.

 

Edit: I nearly forgot to mention nostalgia. Many folks regretted jettisoning their records - years after-the-fact. You don't know what you've got till it's gone.

I truly never thought it was possible that this discussion would yield a Sandy Posey reference. Well Done. 

And yes, the loss to the millennial generation of what an "album" is, and means is very sad. Perhaps a sing that they simply don't care about art, the view of the artists in creating a whole suite of music, and only want a quick hit from a single song that caught their ear. The ADD generation indeed.

 

JC

Link to comment
5 hours ago, firedog said:

It simply shows the contempt the recording industry has for it's customers, especially it's best ones. The cost to providing that info is next to nothing, yet it isn't done in most cases, even in expensive audiophile or deluxe versions. Few businesses treat their customers with such lack of respect. 

Well said, and disgraceful in the way we have been treated by the recording industry! 

 

JC

Link to comment
4 hours ago, gmgraves said:

Just my opinion, mind you. But I don’t see CDs going away. Now, they might disappear from the pop music scene, especially that section of the pop music market aimed at youngsters. But for more “serious” and/or “mature” music genres, unless some more convenient firmware format comes along, I just don’t see the little silver disc going away anytime soon. 

I sincerely hope you are correct. Thanks.

 

JC

Link to comment
21 hours ago, Kal Rubinson said:

I hear that and I've heard it before but, in general, it does not agree with my experience.  I have not bought a CD in years and have no desire to.  Of course, I do prefer hi-rez and multichannel but, as with CD-level stuff, all via downloads.

Kal, don't you find that dealing only with downloads (excluding those you get directly from the record companies, (which I dont think are available to the general public?)  distinctly limits the music that is available to you? Many lesser known artists, or artists in less popular musical genre's  simply are not available via download.

 

JC

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...