Jump to content
  • The Computer Audiophile
    The Computer Audiophile

    Sonore microRendu Review, Part 2

    microRendu_1024px.jpg

    1-Pixel.png

    In Part 1 of my Sonore microRendu review I went into detail about the product's design and hardware. In Part 2 I will touch on the software, power supply options, a less expensive but less capable version (Sonicorbiter SE), and give an assessment on how my HiFi system sounds with the microRendu.

     

    Since the microRendu was announced it has been a very hot topic on CA. Since the product was released it has become a very hot topic in high end audio circles everywhere. This product has many high end manufacturers concerned, and rightly so. It's $640, plus the cost of a power supply ($50+), and it outperforms much more expensive products on the market. The first production run of the "mR" sold out almost immediately. The second production run is well one its way to selling out. It appears that this tiny product from a tiny company is currently the biggest thing in HiFi.[PRBREAK][/PRBREAK]

     

     

     

    Software

     

     

    The microRendu runs the Sonicorbiter operating system. This OS was created through a collaboration between Sonore by Simple Design and Small Green Computer. It may be new to many CA readers, but the fact is both Jesus and Andrew from SGC have been working on parts of this OS for many years. One doesn't simply come up with the idea for an OS and make it work over the weekend. If there were one or two DACs on the market and a single PCM sample rate and no other variables, that would be one thing, but given the current market conditions with PCM, DSD, upsampling, and an endless number of USB DACs in customers' hands, creating a very successful OS takes years of fine tuning.

     

    Sonicorbiter is based on Fedora Linux and relies on several open source projects in addition to proprietary customizations. Sure, Sonore benefits from the work of others in the open source community, but Jesus and Andrew are also part of that community helping to improve this software so even other manufacturers receive the benefits. Sonicorbiter itself isn't available as a software only product, as it's only provided with the microRendu and the Sonicorbiter SE hardware. Other than this information, the end user really doesn't need to know a thing about the OS or Linux. It works like a toaster. Plug it into the network, click play, listen not music.

     

    At the risk of sounding redundant, I will briefly cover the output modes available on the microRendu though the Sonicorbiter software. Much of this information is already documented on the Sonore microRendu website.

     

    After connecting the microRendu to one's network, the user can simply go to the sonicorbiter.com website to see the microrendu and other Sonore / SGC products on the network. There is no need to know the IP address or name or anything about the microRendu. This website gives the user all that's needed. In my situation, the microRendu was listed and a link to its own webpage was provided. Clicking the link brings the user to the simplistic configuration page of the microRendu. Among the options are the selectable output modes. The user can chose between several methods of delivering audio to his system.

     

    • SqueezeLite Output
    • ShairPort Output
    • MPD/DLNA Output:
    • HQ Player NAA Output
    • RoonReady Output

     

    To be honest I'm not a fan of Squeezelite or AirPlay / ShairPort, so I'll skip covering those in this review. I mostly use the RoonReady output during the review period and I plan to continue using this method until Sonore demands the microRendu back. I guess in that case I would purchase the unit immediately. I tested using the "mR" as an NAA (Network Audio Adapter), DLNA renderer, and MPD player we well.

     

    Using the mR with Roon is dead simple, as the device appears as a RoonReady endpoint within the Roon application. For the most part, using the mR as a DLNA renderer is just as easy because it appears as a zone within applications like JRiver Media Center. Years ago I used MPD with the MPaD application to control playback and thought it was pretty good. Considering the competition now, I think this option is fairly primitive. However, I know many CA readers are big fans of it and I can assure them that this method works very well. For those not familiar with this style of playback, the microRendu is set as an MPD output, the Drive Mounter application is installed through the Sonicorbiter webpage, and is directed to the location of one's music files on another computer or NAS. The MPaD application can then be used to control playback and browse one's library. It's a simple path, from NAS to microRendu, all controlled with an iPad.

     

    The other output method is NAA in combination with HQPlayer. Setting the microRendu in NAA mode enables the HQPlayer application to see it and send audio to it over the network. This option is simple to setup on the mR, but isn't for the faint of heart when it comes to getting the whole process working. It's certainly not rocket science, but it's also not Roon. During my review I tried HQPlayer with the mR and two different DACs. I used HQP's much touted upsampling / filters to convert everything to high rate PCM and DSD256. Once this is setup, it works pretty well and integrates with Roon should the user not be interested in HQP's austere interface. The sound quality from this combination was great and varied greatly depending on the DAC I used. As this is a microRendu review, I will say the mR was capable of handling 24/384 PCM and DSD256 over the network. Any other sonic differences heard shouldn't be the result of the microRendu rather the algorithms of HQPlayer. The mR simply delivers the audio it receives in a pristine fashion.

     

    One other item hard core audiophile may be interested in, is the ability to remove all outputs modes that one doesn't need. For example, if using the microRendu as a RoonReady endpoint, it's possible to remove Squeezelite, MPD/DLNA, HQP NAA, and ShairPort / AirPlay. I don't believe it really makes a sonic difference, but everyone is free to do what they please and decide for themselves if it makes a difference in their systems.

     

     

     

    microRendu Versus Sonicorbiter SE

     

     

    The custom designed microRendu at roughly $700 with power supply has some similarities to the $300 Sonicorbiter SE. Both run on the Sonicorbiter operating system and both feature USB output to a DAC. The Sonicorbiter SE also features a optical digital audio output (TosLink). It's built on the SolidRun CuBox platform. SolidRun designed these units to deliver as many of them as possible at an inexpensive price. The fact that audiophile happen to be using them with high end systems is inconsequential. On the other end of the spectrum, the microRendu and its bespoke hardware, with Sonicorbiter operating system customized to this hardware, is in a league of its own. Potential customers looking for a product that is good enough, and pretty dang good overall, should at least try the Sonicorbiter SE at less than half the price of the mR. A little bit more functionality for a lot less money. Audiophile seeking the best sonic performance are certainly free to try the Sonicorbiter SE, but I highly recommend going straight to the major leagues with the microRendu. The Sonicorbiter SE is an electrically noisier piece of hardware that can't be fixed with a better power supply. Its design is inherently flawed compared to the microRendu. For example, the mR's custom carrier board that sends linear power from the input to the USB output that feeds a high end audio system, is leaps and bounds better than the Sonicorbiter SE. The Sonicorbiter SE's hardware design results in less sonic resolution and detail. Hearing the back wall of a concert hall is less likely to happen with a Sonicorbiter SE as it is with he microRendu. Hearing reverb tails and the decay of an instrument that seemingly goes on forever, just doesn't happen with the Sonicorbiter SE as it does with the mR. That said, if one is hesitant or not sure he would notice the difference between thee two pieces of hardware, it never hurts to start with the less expensive option and move up should the need arise.

     

     

     

    Powering The microRendu

     

     

    The "base model" of the microRendu is $640. That doesn't include a power supply. I like the fact that Sonore gave customers the option to not purchase a PSU because many people may already have one on which they've spent a considerable amount of money. The mR requires between six and nine volts of power. A quick look at the Sonore site lists a number of recommended power supplies at all price levels, including, iFi iPower power supply - 9VDC, CIAudio linear power supply - 9VDC, Teddy Pardo linear power supply - 7VDC, HD-Plex - Linear power supply - 7VDC, SOtM linear power supply - 7VDC, Empirical Audio Dynamo - microRendu edition, Uptone Audio UltraCap LPS-1 power supply - coming soon, Uptone Audio JS-2 linear power supply - 7VDC, Vinnie Rossi - LIO with microRendu output stage, and the Sonore Signature Series linear power supply - 7VDC.

     

    During this review I used both the 7 volt Sonore Signature Series linear power supply ($1,399) and the 9 volt iFi iPower power supply ($49). The differences between these two power supplies, when powering the microRendu, are somewhat similar to the differences between the mR and Sonicorbiter SE. If one is satisfied with having less than the best, then start with the $49 iFi iPower. It's a no brainer. Fortunately for iFi and mR customers, the iPower is a terrific power supply. The sound quality I squeezed from the microRendu using the iFi iPower was stellar. It's amazing what solid engineering can accomplish for less than fifty bucks. The iFi is so good, I don't hesitate to suggest that readers who purchase a much more expensive PSU, also purchase the iFi to compare the two units. What's not to like about a $49 experiment that may lead to a substantial savings? In this hobby we usually tack on a couple zeros to the end of that price, and those zeros are before the decimal point! Again, starting with the iFi iPower is a prudent move for many microRendu customers. Other mR customers, who likely know who they are, will just want to start with the best they can afford. I haven't tried the Vinnie Rossi LIO with microRendu output stage, but I have a feeling it would be a wonderful way to power the mR. I have extensively used the Sonore Signature Series linear power supply with the mR. This power supply was designed by PS Audio alum and frequent CA forum contributor Barrows Worm and Sonore VP Adrian Lebena. The question for most readers is, is this PSU worth the $1,350 price premium over the iPower? The question of worth can never definitively be answered for another person, but I will say, if I was spending my hard earned money on the microRendu I would opt for the Signature Series supply. Trying to quantify the differences and figure out if the Signature supply is nearly 30x better than the iFi iPower, based on its nearly 30x price premium is a fools errand. In my system the sonic differences were large enough and enjoyable enough for me to justify the price premium. Plus, in a hobby where we frequently spend way more money on less critical or even questionable items, spending $1,399 on a great power supply is an easy decision.

     

     

     

    For Your Listing Pleasure

     

     

    During my review of the Sonore microRendu I focussed mainly on using my reference system, and mixed in a few DACs for testing. The testing I did with other DACs was for high sample rate upsampling through HQPlayer / NAA, and for USB interface compatibility. To test HQPlayer with the mR I used the Mytek Brooklyn DAC. This DAC accepts PCM up through 32/384 and DSD up through DSD256. The microRendu had no issues sending these sample rates to the Mytek Brooklyn. I also test Schiit Audio's Yggdrasil, Simaudio's 380D DSD, EMM Labs DAC2X, Bsyston's BDA-3, Audio Alchemy's DDP-1 for compatibility. The microRendu worked with these DACs without issue or configuration changes.

     

    My signal path for this review looks like this: NAS > Cisco Switch > microRendu > Berkeley Audio Design Alpha USB > Berkeley Audio Design Alpha DAC Reference Series 2 > Constellation Audio Inspiration PreAmp 1.0 > Constellation Audio Inspiration Mono 1.0 amps > TAD CR1 loudspeakers. Ethernet cabling is AudioQuest Vodka, audio cabling is Wire World Platinum Eclipse 7. I also try DACs connected directly to the power amps when this capability exists in the DAC.

     

    I listened to the microRendu in my system and other systems. Below is my assessment of the mR while listening to a handful of artists. There's no way I could write about, and people would read about, my experience listening to hundreds of different tracks and artists. Here is a sample.

     

    The other day I was searching online for the best Jazz albums of all time. One album I found that I'd never heard of, was Chet Baker's Embraceable You. I added the album to my Roon collection from Tidal. I've long been a fan of Chet's trumpet playing but his vocals have always left quite a bit to be desired. However, this album has a couple very simplistic tracks that work so well with his simplistic voice. Both track three, Embraceable You and track five, There's A Lull In My Life are super simplistic arrangements that feature Chet's vocal performance above all other instruments. The sound of both tracks through my system is extremely engaging and pure. I've never heard Chet's voice sound so raw in all its lack of glory. I bet I've listened to this album seven or eight times lately and listened to the aforementioned two tracks several more times. Simple tracks, featuring a simple voice, and simply wonderful sound quality through the microRendu.

     

    In addition to seeing Chet Baker's Embraceable You album on the lists of must have Jazz albums, I saw the much expected Kind of Blue from Miles Davis. In fact any list that doesn't feature this album, should be taken off the Internet. I remember the first time I heard the album. I purchased the CD at a local music store, having only heard of the album but never actually hearing the music. I drove my brand new 1999 VW Beetle home and brought the disc downstairs to my listening area at my parent's house. Yeah yeah, I was living at home right after graduating from college. I put the disc in my Adcom GCD-750 CD player, connected to my GFP-750 preamp and GFA-5802 amp, and played the entire album front to back through my B&W N802 loudspeakers. I couldn't believe what I had just heard. My mind = blown. Fast forward to last evening, roughly 17 years later. I listened to Kind of Blue, the 24 bit / 192 kHz version archived from a modified Ampex ATR 104 into a Pacific Microsonics Model Two analog to digital converter. After listening, I concluded that Kind of Blue was the best album of all time in any genre. I then queued up the Tidal version on my iPhone and went to bed listening through an AudioQuest DragonFly Red and JHAudio JH13 earphones. Not only is the music amazing, but the sound I'm getting right now through my system with the microRendu is a huge factor in my self-selecting this album as the greatest of all time. I've never heard King of Blue sound better. It's as if I was reintroduced to this classic and my mind was blown again for the first time. And, this time it was blown even more because it sounded so good. I can't imagine what I would have thought seventeen years ago if I'd have heard this incredibly high quality of sound back the day.

     

    Moving to a bit more abrasive yet thrilling rock and roll, I listened to Jimi Hendrix 2010 release Valleys of Neptune several times through my current system configuration. On the first two tracks, Stone Free and Valleys of Neptune, all the instruments are delineated very well for a Hendrix recording. Drums, bass, guitar, and vocals all have their own space present in the sound stage. There isn't a massive glob of sound with all instruments melded together in a distortion cloud. Listening to Mitch Mitchell tap on the cymbals delicately followed by smashing the heck out of them and again gently tapping them at the close of Stone Free, one can hear minute details and a fine shimmer of the made in Massachusetts Zildjian bronze. Likewise on Crying Blue Rain, it's not the ever-present Hendrix guitar that surprised me, rather it's the delicate percussion. Percussionist Rocky Dzidzornu is tapping the congas in the background and the sound has depth and texture even though it's not in the forefront. The unamplified congas sound very nice amongst the electrified guitar everyone expects to hear on a Hendrix track. These are fine details that some systems simply can't reproduce very well. I believe the microRendu's, with low noise being a hallmark of its design, is enabling the rest of my system to shine by delivering a pristine signal.

     

    CA reader note: Rocky Dzidzornu also played the congas on The Rolling Stones' Sympathy for the Devil.

     

    With Hendrix on the brain, I spent time listening to a very rare album called The Undertaker from Prince. On this album Prince's inner-Hendrix comes out in full force. The man can play guitar. Period. Track one titled The Ride has an opening guitar and bass grove that's crystal clear and fabulous. The lyrics to this track are classic Prince, about liking to watch etc..., but the musicianship is also classic Prince. In fact, I've never heard him play more guitar than on this album. The Undertaker album is pretty dynamically compressed, but through this system I haven't heard it sound better. That's what this hobby is all about, getting the most out of what one has in terms of music, not getting the most out of music for which one doesn't care. Prince gets his Hendrix on throughout The Ride and most of the album in an awesome display of musical genius. On the title track there's a great clean bass line from the beginning, and about 3:11 into the track an electric guitar comes in sounding, for lack of a better description, crazy and strange. The sound is striking, almost frightening because the listener is lulled into a daze by the drum and bass up to this point in the track. Prince's guitar comes in strikingly, sounding so live, raw, and real.

     

    CA reader note: Member of the CA Community and frequenter of audio shows around the world joelha first introduced The Undertaker album to me this year. I owe a big thank you to Joel for this introduction. A little note about this album from Wikipedia, "This recording was made in a continuous single live-in-the-studio pass in collaboration with NPG drummer Michael Bland and bassist Sonny T.. Prince originally intended to give this live CD away free with 1,000 copies of Guitar Player magazine in 1994 (uploading an original The Undertaker CD to iTunes, shows the year 1995 as the year the CD was "released"), but he was reportedly barred by Warner Bros. from doing so. Copies were leaked and bootlegged. The songs were guitar-heavy versions of rock and blues numbers, including a cover of The Rolling Stones' "Honky Tonk Women" and new recording of "Bambi" (originally from 1979's Prince). The title track was a cover of a song previously given to Mavis Staples, while "The Ride", "Zannalee", and "Dolphin" would all be re-recorded future releases. A video recording of the performance was released in Europe (on VHS and Laserdisc) with small edits throughout the performance and "Dolphin" replaced by the audio track from the official video of the song from The Gold Experience."

     

    Back to the music of The Purple One, on the album A Tribute To Joni Mitchell, Prince covers A Case Of You. Prince's vocal sounds so authentic, his high pitch juxtaposed with his deep vocals that come and go, sound so engaging. The hammer strikes of the piano on this track sound like the piano is right in the room. Not the most ambiance around the piano notes, but the transients are terrific. Even though Prince skips the opening lyrics, this track is a must-listen. On Nothing Compares To You (Live) from Prince's The Hits (Disc 1) album, this normally lackluster sounding track still sucks the listener into the live performance featuring Rosie Gains on vocals with Prince. Like everything else I've listened to since I placed the microRendu in my system, I don't believe I've heard this track sound better.

     

    One additional Prince performance that requires mentioning is While My Guitar Gently Weeps with Tom Petty, Jeff Lynne, Steve Winwood, Dhani Harrison (George's Son). This is one of the greatest guitar solos I've ever heard. I was very happy to find this one on Tidal, after seeing it on YouTube many times since Prince's death April 21, 2016. Throughout the track Prince can be heard making his guitar wail, but his solo starting at 3:30 is the stuff of legend. It gave me goose bumps to crank the solo up at high volume on this system with the microRendu, Alpha DAC RS2, Constellation amplifiers, and TAD loudspeakers. Sure it's not the best recording, but it's emotional as hell and this system brings out the emotion as good if not better than anything I've ever heard in my listening room.

     

    Keeping with the guitar spirit, I switched to Stevie Ray Vaughan's version of Little Wing on the Mobile Fidelity release of The Sky Is Crying. Sure one can hear his tube amp buzzing off and on throughout the track, but the sound of his guitar is enough to turn anyone into an SRV groupie. Through my system, each new note was better than the previous note as Stevie goes from heavy yet sweet sounding notes to a cooled down, I know I'm damn good, type of style about four minutes into the track. One can almost feel the texture of his strings as he slides his hand up and down the neck of the guitar. The sound of this track sucks the listener in so much, that one can virtually see the sweat dripping off Stevie's head, as he shook it back and fourth while bending the notes, and one can almost smell the smoke that would have been in the air had this been recorded in a small blues club during the 1980s. It's this kind of music and emotion that I long for when I power on my HiFi, not the sterile, lifeless, "perfect" performance by some goodie-two-shoes virtuoso and released in 22.2 surround at 32/384. Without question the microRendu enables the dirt and grime of rock and roll and the emotion of the blues to ooze through one's components and out through the loudspeakers.

     

     

     

    Conclusion

     

     

    cash-logo-black-thumb.jpgThe Sonore microRendu is the hottest piece of hardware in HiFi. It's versatile while avoiding the jack of all trades moniker. The mR was custom designed and built to deliver USB audio in the most pristine way possible, and it accomplishes this goal magnificently. Versatile software with uncompromising inflexible hardware is a great combination. There is one way in and one way out, Ethernet to USB. Don't like it, move on. Those willing to try the microRendu will likely be as impressed as I am. With the mR in my system, I'm getting the best sound I've ever heard in my house. That said, it may not be the best "source" available because all components are user and system dependent. Users seeking local storage, network-less audio, and a software/hardware solution from a single vendor must look elsewhere. Everyone else should seek out the microRendu without apprehension. The ultra low noise bespoke design of this unit, a micro computer designed for audio only, has lead to some amazing listening experiences for me over the last several weeks. From the beautiful distortion of Hendrix to the simplistic vocals and whisper soft trumpet of Chet Baker, the microRendu enabled all the music to shine in its best light. I don't believe I've had a sonically better source connected to my system at any time.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Product Information:

     

    • Product - Sonore microRendu
    • Price - $640, power supplies tested iFi iPower - $49, Sonore Signature Series - $1,399
    • Product Pages - microRendu Link
    • User Manual - Link
    • FAQs - Link
    • Sonore CA Forum - Link
    • Where To Buy - Link

     

     

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

     

     

     

     

    Associated Music:

     

     

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Associated Equipment:

     

     

     

    1-Pixel.png




    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    No, that is an oversimplification that misses the uRendu point. This is a complete redesign of the USB handshake like you may have never heard before...

     

    I agree its a oversimplification but what is this redesign of USB handshake you are talking about ? And handshake between whom ? the DAC and microRendu ?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Before you question, play critic or start recommending other products please at least have actually listened to this product.

     

    Fair enough. I was just sincerely curious about what the mR does that other renderers don't and my sceptisism is based on my own experiences with the USB interface, not with the mR itself. Network renderers have been around for about a decade and they pretty much all are computers built for the sole purpose of processing audio. The review to me suggests that the mR is the first product based on that design concept.

     

    Anyway, your input has got me intrigued. Thanks!

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Design concept: there is a differens between idea and execution.

     

    Most (all?) other similar product are based on generic motherboards with “custom” software. You could look at them as a repackaged computer.

     

    What makes the microRendu different is that the actual hardware is custom made. The core components – CPU and RAM chips etc – are of course standard items, but the mother board is completely unique with non standard ancillary circuits and selected components. It also has an onboard Regen.

     

    The microRendu is a highly specialized do-one-thing-well machine.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    FNetwork renderers have been around for about a decade and they pretty much all are computers built for the sole purpose of processing audio. The review to me suggests that the mR is the first product based on that design concept.

     

    Anyway, your input has got me intrigued. Thanks!

     

    They may be conceived of for that purpose, but few are built/designed - including the boards, OS, etc., - solely for that purpose. The mR is one of the few that is.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Is here anybody from Germany/Munich whom i could contact via mail or phone and ask him/her something about this topic. I've some really simple questions i don't want to ask in this forum. Nothing dramatic but fundamental. You can send me a message here. Thx Roland

     

    my actual configuration is Macmini - Pure Music - QB-9 - Amp

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Has anyone had the opportunity to compare the sound quality of the Microrendu to a local digital source such as the Melco N1A playing files from the internal disk drives and with direct USB connection to the DAC? I am curious if avoiding potential noise from a router or other devices on a network is necessary for best possible sound. Thanks.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    You can isolate the microRendu from the wired network with two MC200CM, or similar, and a cat7 cable into the mR. See the "Network Isolation" thread on CA.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    You can isolate the microRendu from the wired network with two MC200CM, or similar, and a cat7 cable into the mR. See the "Network Isolation" thread on CA.

     

    And remember, the network connection is already "isolated" by specification, even without additional gizmos...

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hello Chris!

     

    A comparison of microRendu with the new SoTM sMS-200 would be very interesting as well!

     

    Thanks!

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Has anyone had the opportunity to compare the sound quality of the Microrendu to a local digital source such as the Melco N1A playing files from the internal disk drives and with direct USB connection to the DAC? I am curious if avoiding potential noise from a router or other devices on a network is necessary for best possible sound. Thanks.

     

    I have my mRendu connected to the network through the Melco, so it benefits from some degree of isolation via the Melco. The sound quality of the two is really very close when connected in this way and by USB into the DAC. I haven't tried connecting the mRendu directly to the network or using my Synology NAS just because the Melco does such a good job.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Please ignore. Unable to delete my posting (so have to settle for this edit).

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    And wouldn't the result with the mR be somewhat dependant on the USB implementation on the DAC side?

     

    The implementation of any input always plays a major role. The mR, however, will allow that DAC's USB implementation to work at its full potential.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Is a network (switch or router) required? If yes, which one (a switch or router)?

     

    I am asking, because I would like my laptop to directly feed the microRendu, running PonoMusicWorld's version of JRiver.

     

    My flac files are stored on my laptop's SSD.

     

    Can I run an Ethernet cable directly from my laptop to the microRendu?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Is a network (switch or router) required? If yes, which one (a switch or router)?

     

    I am asking, because I would like my laptop to directly feed the microRendu, running PonoMusicWorld's version of JRiver.

     

    My flac files are stored on my laptop's SSD.

     

    Can I run an Ethernet cable directly from my laptop to the microRendu?

     

    There is some information about this topic here. However, I have not tried PonoMusicWorld's version of JRiver and have not feedback from customers on it.

     

    http://www.computeraudiophile.com/f26-sonore-sponsored/sonicorbiter-direct-connection-mac-pc-beta-28606/

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I've been following only casually (sorry) but if someone could indulge with a sentence, what does this do that an Auralic Aries doesn't? (I asked in the part 1 review) i.e. apart from SQ, why is it the hottest thing? I'm worried I've missed something basic.

    HQPlayer's NAA

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi,

    I own the MicroRendu and a friend owns the Airies. We've not done a shoot out but we both have excellent systems and I've long enjoyed his Airies. When he added a Regen it brought it up to another level. But the MicroRendu sounds awesome in my system. It's probably system dependent.

     

    Airies comes with a nice linear power supply which some choose to replace. MicroRendu is not supplied with a linear power supply. The better the linear power supply one supplies, the better the sound. I had a HD Plex available so I used it. The new UpTone Audio LPS-1 is supposed to be one of the best. I have one ordered so I'll know soon.

     

    The reason I bought the MicroRendu? I use ROON and HQPlayer and that enables one to use the MicroRendu as an NAA for HQPLAYER. To me that's a big advantage. My system sounds awesome when I connected it this way.

     

    Airies is rumored to be programmed soon with an NAA option but this rumor has been around for a while and nothing's happened. If it had the NAA option I'd go with the Airies.

     

    Airies has its own proprietary operating system called Lightning but can also work with ROON. . It seems very good and easy to use. Airies seems to always be synched with his network and always ready to play. My MicroRendu seems to be temperamental and needs restarted but whether it's the problem, ROON, or HQPlayer, or a bit of all three who can tell?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I own the MicroRendu and a friend owns the Airies. We've not done a shoot out but we both have excellent systems and I've long enjoyed his Airies. When he added a Regen it brought it up to another level. But the MicroRendu sounds awesome in my system. It's probably system dependent.

    Yes, surely it is system and DAC dependant.

    Airies comes with a nice linear power supply which some choose to replace. MicroRendu is not supplied with a linear power supply. The better the linear power supply one supplies, the better the sound. I had a HD Plex available so I used it. The new UpTone Audio LPS-1 is supposed to be one of the best. I have one ordered so I'll know soon.

    I have an Uptone JS-2 with which I power a mini (via the MMK), and I use the secondary output to power a W4S USB Reclocker (which reclocks the mini USB out).

     

    When I get the microRendu I will connect it directly to the DAC using the secondary JS-2 supply (so no reclocker) and use it as an NAA.

     

    The reason I bought the MicroRendu? I use ROON and HQPlayer and that enables one to use the MicroRendu as an NAA for HQPLAYER. To me that's a big advantage. My system sounds awesome when I connected it this way.

    Can you comment on the stability and sound quality of this combo please?

    Airies is rumored to be programmed soon with an NAA option but this rumor has been around for a while and nothing's happened. If it had the NAA option I'd go with the Airies.

    Yes... I asked on this forum about two years ago...

    Airies has its own proprietary operating system called Lightning but can also work with ROON. . It seems very good and easy to use. Airies seems to always be synched with his network and always ready to play. My MicroRendu seems to be temperamental and needs restarted but whether it's the problem, ROON, or HQPlayer, or a bit of all three who can tell?

    I use Aries with Roon as a RoonSpeaker, and it works very well - but no NAA so no HQP upsampling... I really don't like the restarting bit you're talking about... Roon+HQP out of the same computer is very stable for me. Is it the use of NAA that interferes?

    Thx.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I own the MicroRendu and a friend owns the Airies. We've not done a shoot out but we both have excellent systems and I've long enjoyed his Airies. When he added a Regen it brought it up to another level. But the MicroRendu sounds awesome in my system. It's probably system dependent.

    ---End Quote---

    Yes, surely it is system and DAC dependant.

    ---Quote---

    Airies comes with a nice linear power supply which some choose to replace. MicroRendu is not supplied with a linear power supply. The better the linear power supply one supplies, the better the sound. I had a HD Plex available so I used it. The new UpTone Audio LPS-1 is supposed to be one of the best. I have one ordered so I'll know soon.

    ---End Quote---

    I have an Uptone JS-2 with which I power a mini (via the MMK), and I use the secondary output to power a W4S USB Reclocker (which reclocks the mini USB out).

     

    When I get the microRendu I will connect it directly to the DAC using the secondary JS-2 supply (so no reclocker) and use it as an NAA.

     

     

    ---Quote---

    The reason I bought the MicroRendu? I use ROON and HQPlayer and that enables one to use the MicroRendu as an NAA for HQPLAYER. To me that's a big advantage. My system sounds awesome when I connected it this way.

    ---End Quote---

    Can you comment on the stability and sound quality of this combo please?

     

    ---Quote---

    Airies is rumored to be programmed soon with an NAA option but this rumor has been around for a while and nothing's happened. If it had the NAA option I'd go with the Airies.

    ---End Quote---

    Yes... I asked on this forum about two years ago...

     

    ---Quote---

    Airies has its own proprietary operating system called Lightning but can also work with ROON. . It seems very good and easy to use. Airies seems to always be synched with his network and always ready to play. My MicroRendu seems to be temperamental and needs restarted but whether it's the problem, ROON, or HQPlayer, or a bit of all three who can tell?

    ---End Quote---

    I use Aries with Roon as a RoonSpeaker, and it works very well - but no NAA so no HQP upsampling... I really don't like the restarting bit you're talking about... Roon+HQP out of the same computer is very stable for me. Is it the use of NAA that interferes?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    What's people's experience with NAA from HQP? Is it rock solid?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Airies is rumored to be programmed soon with an NAA option but this rumor has been around for a while and nothing's happened. If it had the NAA option I'd go with the Airies.

    Auralic's customer service tells me there's no current plans to incorporate NAA in the Aries firmware.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi Chris, the path showed for your review was; NAS > Cisco Switch > microRendu > Berkeley Audio Design Alpha USB > Berkeley Audio Design Alpha DAC Reference. I was wondering what USB cable you used?

    Thanks

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hello everyone,

     

    I am glad i found these review, i here am hesitating on how would be the best an simple way to achieve the best performance from The MicroRendu:

     

    1.- i have the SonicTrasporter i5 replacing my MacMini, is this a good device to upgrade over the Mac mini, or does a NAS Synology would be better?

    2.- I have the BJ CAT 6A, are they ok or Audioquest Vodka is a better way ti enhance the performance?

    3.- i have the MR connected directly to my Auralic Vega with a Curious Link USB cable, how can i better the sound from this, adding a Acousense AFI-USB or some similar converter, would it be better to convert the usb signal to a AES, BNC or SPDIF?

    4.- Should i add HQplayer/ROON instead of only ROON like i am using it now?

    5.- Does adding an Airport Express helps to SQ vs my regular modem?

     

    Thanks to everyone for your inputs on this

     

    kind regards

     

    Mike

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Guest
    This is now closed for further comments




×
×
  • Create New...