Popular Post mansr Posted June 27, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted June 27, 2019 A DAC is both analogue and digital. fas42 and Teresa 2 Link to comment
mansr Posted June 27, 2019 Share Posted June 27, 2019 16 minutes ago, Paul R said: Good point - every digital playback system has a device that is a hybrid digital/analog device. I would tend to put DACs on the Digital Side, and ADCs on the Analog side, just based upon their input. It is just as valid to look at their outputs though. The performance of both devices is mainly determined by their analogue parts. Teresa 1 Link to comment
Popular Post mansr Posted June 28, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted June 28, 2019 11 minutes ago, AudioDoctor said: The most important factor is definitely the placement and total number of Shakti stones... Mpingo disks, surely. AudioDoctor and elcorso 1 1 Link to comment
Popular Post mansr Posted June 28, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted June 28, 2019 8 hours ago, Paul R said: I would suggest that the performance of a DAC, and probably an ADC, is much more determined by their software/firmware. The analog parts are easy to get right, in comparison. DAC filters seem to be much more of a distinguishing characteristic than the simple low power amp section. Of course, you can argue the opposite. What makes you think so? Low-noise, low-distortion analogue circuits are tricky to get right, even when conceptually simple. The digital portion of these devices, in contrast, is just shuffling bits around at rather mundane rates. Not much of a challenge. marce and Teresa 1 1 Link to comment
Popular Post mansr Posted June 30, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted June 30, 2019 28 minutes ago, sandyk said: Prove it by designing and submitting a relatively inexpensive DAC to Chris for review. Just a 24/192 DAC would do for starters . Prove what? That getting the analogue part right is tricky? By building a poor yet cheap DAC? Makes no sense. botrytis, Ralf11 and Teresa 3 Link to comment
mansr Posted June 30, 2019 Share Posted June 30, 2019 10 hours ago, sandyk said: Prove that getting the Digital part right too is a " piece of cake" like you keep insisting, although MANY members who post in the .Music Server area of the forum mainly, will strongly disagree with you. If I whip up a DAC quickly, chances are it won't be great. What does that prove? Link to comment
mansr Posted June 30, 2019 Share Posted June 30, 2019 6 minutes ago, sandyk said: Take your time then . You are the one making the claims about how easy it is to get the Digital area right , which is not what many other members are reporting elsewhere. If it doesn't perform well, how will you tell whether the analogue or digital side is (primarily) to blame? Link to comment
mansr Posted August 6, 2019 Share Posted August 6, 2019 7 minutes ago, Ralf11 said: "The recordings themselves (performance, mixing, mastering, media, etc) also are super important"... and a consumer can sometimes choose among different versions and formats. I think the whole thing needs to be based on what a consumer can choose. Loudspeakers are easy, room tmts. are pretty easy, new room is difficult, "versions" also difficult. Amps and DACs are really easy, and software literally takes just a click of the mouse. This explains a lot. elcorso 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now