esimms86 Posted November 1, 2012 Share Posted November 1, 2012 The NY Times reports today that Scott Forestall has been let go by Apple and that hardware guru Jon Ive is now in charge of software. The textured look and real life images in Apple software are soon to be a thing of the past. Steve Jobs was in the Forestall camp so this is a shift in direction in the post-Jobs era at Apple. I haven't posted the link since I assume that it's not kosher to do so when alluding to an entity with paid subscribers such as the NY Times but it's easily accessible on the NY Times webpage. Esau Link to comment
manisandher Posted November 1, 2012 Share Posted November 1, 2012 I strongly recommend the Jobs biography by Isaacson for anyone interested in the future of Apple. Gaining an insight into the politics of the organization is simply fascinating - for example the status that Ive enjoyed in Jobs' day... and seems to be continuing to enjoy. (Having read the biography, I have to say that maybe 'enjoy' is the wrong word when talking about working for Apple :-) ) Mani. Main: SOtM sMS-200 -> Okto dac8PRO -> 6x Neurochrome 286 mono amps -> Tune Audio Anima horns + 2x Rotel RB-1590 amps -> 4 subs Home Office: SOtM sMS-200 -> MOTU UltraLite-mk5 -> 6x Neurochrome 286 mono amps -> Impulse H2 speakers Vinyl: Technics SP10 / London (Decca) Reference -> Trafomatic Luna -> RME ADI-2 Pro Link to comment
wgscott Posted November 1, 2012 Share Posted November 1, 2012 If this reverses the post 10.6 trend of dumbing down the interface and doing control-freak stuff like hiding the user's Library directory and all that horrid app-store crap, it might save Apple. I don't want my desktop computer to be an iPod on a stick. Link to comment
Jud Posted November 1, 2012 Share Posted November 1, 2012 If this reverses the post 10.6 trend of dumbing down the interface and doing control-freak stuff like hiding the user's Library directory and all that horrid app-store crap, it might save Apple. I don't want my desktop computer to be an iPod on a stick. I'm just wondering what percentage of Mac users know there is such a thing as the user's Library directory. One never knows, do one? - Fats Waller The fairest thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the fundamental emotion which stands at the cradle of true art and true science. - Einstein Computer, Audirvana -> optical Ethernet to Fitlet3 -> Fibbr Alpha Optical USB -> iFi NEO iDSD DAC -> Apollon Audio 1ET400A Mini (Purifi based) -> Vandersteen 3A Signature. Link to comment
wgscott Posted November 1, 2012 Share Posted November 1, 2012 The same percentage, or higher, that has ever had to change or delete a preferences plist file. Link to comment
Jud Posted November 1, 2012 Share Posted November 1, 2012 The same percentage, or higher, that has ever had to change or delete a preferences plist file. Yup, exactly. :-) One never knows, do one? - Fats Waller The fairest thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the fundamental emotion which stands at the cradle of true art and true science. - Einstein Computer, Audirvana -> optical Ethernet to Fitlet3 -> Fibbr Alpha Optical USB -> iFi NEO iDSD DAC -> Apollon Audio 1ET400A Mini (Purifi based) -> Vandersteen 3A Signature. Link to comment
new_media Posted November 1, 2012 Share Posted November 1, 2012 From what I understand, Forstall was (managerially) responsible for both Siri and the new iPhone maps app, both of which were not not ready for prime time, to put it nicely, upon release. Rumor is he refused to accept responsibility for their shortcomings. Anyway, looks like maybe Apple may be righting the ship. They've delayed the release of iTunes 11 by a month rather than put out another piece of buggy software. It looks like it's more or less just a facelift anyway. Link to comment
new_media Posted November 1, 2012 Share Posted November 1, 2012 For the record, I've gone into my library folder many times to delete preference files for software that was acting wonky. I have also edited the registry in Windows a few times, but only with very explicit instructions. Link to comment
realhifi Posted November 1, 2012 Share Posted November 1, 2012 I'm just wondering what percentage of Mac users know there is such a thing as the user's Library directory. ....or want to. Isn't that the idea? David Link to comment
wgscott Posted November 1, 2012 Share Posted November 1, 2012 Well, the idea is that the naive user should be protected from the computer (and I guess vice versa). They've always hid /usr, /sbin, /bin, /private/var, /private/etc and as a unix geek that annoyed me. But I understood the point. The whole reason for having ~/Library in addition to /Library and /System/Library is so that a user is able to configure stuff without having to mess with system files. There is a lot of stuff in there that a user might need, not least of which are his or her email files. The main objection is that the user is assumed to be an idiot. At the very least, if I use chflags to set that directory to nohidden, please stop changing it back with every point update without getting my approval. Link to comment
REShaman Posted November 1, 2012 Share Posted November 1, 2012 For the record, I've gone into my library folder many times to delete preference files for software that was acting wonky. I have also edited the registry in Windows a few times, but only with very explicit instructions. I have learned more from when things go wrong then when things go right. And developed a sense for which technical support person was competent to handle my problem and then learned while the support was being rendered. I too have (rather used to) done considerable repairs and changes in windows registry which required a delicate touch or else. Similarly but not extensively with OSX. Not that much goes wrong so my explorations are rather limited. And that's fine with me. OSX has become incrementally less reliable with small but annoying operations that go wrong or do not work as they used. Even something like sorting a directory by name is no longer working properly. Hoping the perspective for how the software operates excellently is more important than what it looks like, though no reason to ignore either -- form and function. I welcome all changes that improve our experiences with design and operations. Best, Richard Link to comment
mav52 Posted November 4, 2012 Share Posted November 4, 2012 What out Apple, this guy coud make life interesting if he went to Google. When Apple Fired Scott Forstall, It Fired Its Most Prolific Inventor - SFGate If Scott Forstall Joins Google, This Apple Story Would Go Truly Anakin Skywalker - Forbes The Truth Is Out There Link to comment
REShaman Posted November 4, 2012 Share Posted November 4, 2012 What out Apple, this guy coud make life interesting if he went to Google. When Apple Fired Scott Forstall, It Fired Its Most Prolific Inventor - SFGate If Scott Forstall Joins Google, This Apple Story Would Go Truly Anakin Skywalker - Forbes Thank you for making those two articles handy as I might not have gone looking for them. Provides more reflections of similar and the same and what might expect to witness down the line. In any case, thank you. Best, Richard Link to comment
Bob Stern Posted November 4, 2012 Share Posted November 4, 2012 If this reverses the post 10.6 trend of dumbing down the interface and doing control-freak stuff like hiding the user's Library directory ... I expect you and Jud know this, but for the benefit of others, here are two methods of accessing any hidden folder on the Mac: 1. The donation-ware utility FileXaminer allows you to turn off the Hidden attribute of any file or folder. 2. You can open any hidden folder by typing its path into Finder > Go menu > Go to folder (shift-cmd-G). After you open a folder that way, you can drag its icon from the top of the Finder window to the sidebar to make a shortcut. HQPlayer (on 3.8 GHz 8-core i7 iMac 2020) > NAA (on 2012 Mac Mini i7) > RME ADI-2 v2 > Benchmark AHB-2 > Thiel 3.7 Link to comment
Bob Stern Posted November 4, 2012 Share Posted November 4, 2012 Some considerations that complicate assessment of Forstall's contributions to Apple's patent portfolio: Many bosses pressure their subordinates into including their names as co-inventor of every patent application filed by the subordinates. I don't have a clue whether this is true of Forstall. The order in which inventors' names are listed on a patent has no legal significance. When company patent lawyers decide which inventions are important enough to warrant the cost of applying for a patent, it can be impolitic to reject an invention made by an executive. HQPlayer (on 3.8 GHz 8-core i7 iMac 2020) > NAA (on 2012 Mac Mini i7) > RME ADI-2 v2 > Benchmark AHB-2 > Thiel 3.7 Link to comment
wgscott Posted November 4, 2012 Share Posted November 4, 2012 I expect you and Jud know this, but for the benefit of others, here are two methods of accessing any hidden folder on the Mac: 1. The donation-ware utility FileXaminer allows you to turn off the Hidden attribute of any file or folder. 2. You can open any hidden folder by typing its path into Finder > Go menu > Go to folder (shift-cmd-G). After you open a folder that way, you can drag its icon from the top of the Finder window to the sidebar to make a shortcut. The terminal command chflags nohidden ~/Library will unhide it. The command open ~/Library will also open it in a finder window. Link to comment
Daudio Posted November 6, 2012 Share Posted November 6, 2012 Here is some more insight into the Apple management changes from Tidbits: Apple Management Shakeup Aimed at Improving Collaboration Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now