Jump to content
  • ted_b
    ted_b

    PS Audio DirectStream DAC Review

    thumb.png

    1-Pixel.png

    PS Audio DirectStream DAC, a chameleon in the high foothills, by Ted Brady

     

    This has been the hardest review to write, for many reasons, not the least of which is that this DAC took me on a journey that seemed, at times, like a wild goose chase. But here we are, and if you, the reader, are like so many others, you'll go the end and find that this goose chase resulted in quite the golden goose. :)

     

    By now most of you know that this DAC is the brainchild of one Ted Smith, a longtime developer/designer/wunderkind who had been dabbling in this DAC design for over 10 years. Two major problems existed during that time: first, the technology didn't exist to do what he wanted; and second, he was but one guy in a lab, with no real ability to produce and distribute a DAC of this sort. The first problem was slowly solved by time....ingredients like the Xilinx Spartan 6 FPGA became available. The second problem was solved by one Paul McGowan of PS Audio fame. He offered Ted his help, and the result is the PS Audio DirectStream DAC, a major change in PS Audio's heretofore standard-chip PCM DAC evolution.

     

    This unit has been reviewed by others, and I invite you to visit those reviews for a more in-depth technical discussion of what this thing is made up of, including dimensions, shipping weight and pictures of its innards. I am not the most technical and will gladly leave that up to the major publications. What I can bring to the reader is another audio lover's perspective of having listened to dozens and dozens of DACs over the past several years, albeit with my own personal listening biases (my system is included in my signature link, although this session includes my recently acquired Aerial Acoustics 20T speakers).

     

    I first became excited to hear this DAC when, during a getaway to the Boulder, CO area with my wife, I was able to visit and chat with Paul at the PS Audio headquarters (thanks to friend and master cable maker Greg Graff of MG Audio Design for setting up the meeting and being our chauffeur). Paul took me on a tour of the facility, and it was clearly evident that this company knew what it was doing; it knew its strengths and had a long history of customer support and satisfaction. However, this DAC was new to all of them and was a "stretch" for PS Audio (my opinion, not theirs necessarily); they had never done a DSD product, and to my knowledge the DS was going to be their most expensive product to date, too. Paul was ready to go, though, and it was evident he was appreciative to have Ted Smith on this team.

     

    As a DAC designer Ted was presented with the typical choices of off-the-shelf DAC chips, all of which are very capable at ultimately delivering toe-tapping musical output, given a white glove treatment after the chip output (very high quality analog stage of either solid state or tubed design, quiet powerful ac supplies, etc). Some chips, like the ubiquitous ESS Sabre 9018, have incredible sample rate choices, but trade those choices for the need to harness that power downstream lest one create what the audio lover has come to know as Sabre-allergy, the well-known easily-identifiable sound of a razor-sharp leading edge that can ruin the illusion of real musicians playing to one's whim. Folks like George Klissarov (exaSound) and Xuanqian Wang (Auralic) have figured out how to tame that beast better than others, and the results speak for themselves.

     

    Ted, on the other hand, had a design idea that no off-the-shelf chip could handle. He was battling his love of DSD (and its inherent noise shaping baggage) with the very different, but noisy nonetheless, PCM brick wall filters. What if he could take either format and send it into deep space (oversampling to, say, 30Mhz, and 30 bits, where the many-multiples of all known PCM and DSD noise filters all come together), send the noise into the ether, then return to a high earth orbit of 5.6Mhz. At that height there is still very little noise to interfere, and then "simply" send to an industry-proven set of PS Audio power supplies and analog parts? Would it sound better?

     

    Enter the field programmable gate array (aka FPGA, my audio acronym of the year). It is a sort of tabula rasa for DAC chips, a hardware/software platform chip that allows for almost infinite "roll your own" chip design. The code can be tens of thousands of lines, but the good news/bad news is that once a DAC manufacturer enters this hallowed world, it becomes a software company. Why is that good news? Because the consumer then buys into a product idea that has potential for significant improvement and change through downloadable firmware and software updates All audio equipment these days includes software, so why not invest in one where the code is owned and maintained by the equipment manufacturer, allowing for an evolving set of fixes, improvements and feature enhancements (within reason and scope). Companies like PS Audio, Chord and others are perfectly positioned for this new approach, as they have mature organizations and knowledge bases that can deliver updates and fixes in a reasonable process. Oh, the bad news? Not all audio companies can take this on, and not all audio units are designed for upgradeability. More to the point, this unit has already had two large FPGA and driver updates, and the resultant sound was improved both times.

     

    DSC_0039-200px.JPGThe PS Audio DirectStream DAC will accept PCM and DSD music up to 24/352.8K PCM (aka DXD) and DSD128 (aka 2X DSD) and will accept it in a plethora of digital inputs; the back panel includes RCA S/PDIF, toslink (limited to 96k), USB, AES/EBU and the house favorite for PS Audio users, the somewhat proprietary (oxymoron I know) I2S input, housed via a pin-compatible HDMI connection. Each of these inputs eventually meet at an internal I2S connection, and then to the FPGA. There is also a smart card input for the aforementioned code updates (FPGA code, USB driver, etc). There is an ethernet connector for their own networked Bridge product, as well.

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

     

    DSC_00399-200px.jpgOn the front panel the DS has a nice touch screen (an evolution from the look and feel of their earlier PerfectWave DAC units) which handles, along with the included remote, input selection, high/low gain selection, volume control (for direct to amp capability), balance, and software information (versions, etc), along with a running display of format and sample rate of the incoming signal. Note: I am not a huge fan of touch screens, given that my DAC is usually not within touch distance, nor can I read the screen from my listening position, but that's purely my own pet peeve (and poor eyesight). The screen display can be turned off remotely, and given PS Audio's long experience with them, they are likely not a huge cost issue nor repair issue. And it's a nice demo feature, too. :)

     

    The DAC's chassis is a beautifully done silver or black copy of their own transport (the Perfect Wave Transport) and includes a hand polished top cover of black-lacquered automotive-finished lexan-looking MDF. Very nice. As it should be for $6000 ($4000 for PS audio owners who are in the Company's long-standing upgrade program, as they turn in their former PWD DACs for upgrade; a nice feature given the poor resale value of ever-evolving digital gear on the audio classified sections).

     

    I was told (but forget by whom) that the DS would require significant break-in. Ted was not as adamant, but gave me a few hints on trying to accelerate that process (running on low gain will run more current through the transformer, etc). I have another good news/bad news item. The good news is that there seems to be nothing in this DAC that gets hot. The bad news, heat helps break in (eventually spoiling it, however) so my patience began to wear thin at about 800 hours. Why? Why not just listen and enjoy? Well, therein lies the theme of my first several months with the DirectStream.

     

    I tried every known input source I had on hand (pc running JRiver/Jplay using high-end USB card and power conditioning, Auralic Aries renderer via USB/toslink/spdif/AES, Aurender Linux server running USB, yada yada). What evolved (there's that word again) after the 800 hours was akin to the most amazing new 4K video display you've ever seen, with details that boggled the mind, yet never looked artificial nor over-enhanced. Subtle details and image densities that I'd never heard before, on recordings that I was so familiar with that when I heard an even 30 db down nuance new to me I would jump out of my chair. I am a music lover, but sometimes this demo-quality playlist stuff can drive one insane. Why did I not want to venture on to my real fave selections? Getting back to the CES demo of that incredible 4K display.....lo and behold they had somehow turned the color and hue knobs all the way down. ? Ansel Adams in black and white is nice; Stardust Memories in black and white is still funny (but not as funny as his earlier stuff); but....my favorite music in black and white? I was bored. I tried everything. I put the DS on the shelf for a few weeks and then went back to it. I would try the bloomiest of music, or tube roll my preamp to the bloomiest/timbre-soaked tubes of Mullard variety, still no relief, only a black and white depiction with newly introduced veils. Argh!

     

    I was stumped and ready to write a review that this DAC is the perfect fit, perfect antidote, for those systems that are overly colored, overly warm. Yes, a poorly hidden left-handed compliment. Not usable in my system, but maybe if you have one that already has plenty of color and tonality? (That is not to say my system is overly analytical, and therefore I felt bad that this review would be seen for what it was...throwing a bone to an otherwise good Company and good folks.)

     

    DirectStream-Rear-crop.jpg

     

    A few weeks ago I got a call from a good audio buddy, Jesus R of Sonore fame. He wanted me to hear his flagship UPnP renderer, the Sonore Signature Rendu. It is an ethernet to SPDIF (or I2S-HDMI) converter/renderer. Sure, why not. A couple weeks ago it arrived and I hooked it up via BNC/SPDIF to my Chird Hugo. Hmmm...very nice indeed. (Note: Chris's review of said Signature Rendu is due out presently). The DirectStream, gathering a little dust while I decided how to write the review, was calling out to me "play me, play me".

     

    Jesus is very proud of the work that went into the Signature Rendu, especially the very low jitter, very high quality I2S output (compatible with several pin-compliant I2S HDMI inputs on several different DACS, including the DirectStream.) As luck and irony would have it, the Rendu setup required me dusting off an old PS Audio P300 ac-generator to block some house-bound dc that caused the Rendu to drop off the LAN periodically (a fix that is coming soon, according to Jesus). After confirming that a P300-powered Sig Rendu was now rock solidly connected, I found a nice Nordost HDMI cable and entered the world of I2S (I can't tell you how many sources, format converters or DACs I've had in here that taunted me with this connection, but this was the first time I had input and output together in one room).

     

    This began one Monday evening at 8pm. My first taste of this combination lasted, without wine-induced bathroom break or any other silly distraction, until about 3am in the morning. It was an audiophile's best dream, an audio lover's best attempt of heaven on earth, a contender for one of two or three best audio listening sessions of my life. Due to my well-heeled assumptions, I went from WTF to laughter (yes, I think I physically laughed out loud a few times; thank god no one heard me; they were all asleep) then back to WTF several times. The display analogy: not only had they turned the color and hue controls back on, the display became 3D (without glasses, thank you) and had the blackest blacks I'd ever seen. Again, sorry, but WTF! Why, with this input (Ted promised me all inputs were identical) would the DirectStream now explode into colors, tones, rhythms, clarity, absurdly accurate image density, and overall musicality that I've maybe never heard before. Why? Yes, the Signature Rendu is a clearly a special piece, but it needs a partner, and the DirectStream danced with it like they have been secretly practicing every dance style for 30 years.

     

    I-squared-S is a native connection; by that I mean two things: 1) that both PCM and DSD can be natively streamed, without the need for DoP (DSD over PCM process, which for some odd paths requires wav or FLAC containerizing), so when using Minimserver one needs not do the Dopwav commands if your renderer formerly needed that; 2) it is an unencumbered signal path directly to the Xilinx FPGA Spartan 6. To this day I don't know what jitter sounds like, but as of that special night and going forward, I now think I know what no-jitter sounds like.

     

    nmd.jpgWhether it was demo tracks or any of my other regular rotation, this new combination threw a most musical, accurate (yes, those are not opposites) and detailed soundstage in front of me. On New Moon Daughter (Blue Note, 24/192) Cassandra Wilson's opening "Strange Fruit", a Billie Holiday classic, had all the wetness and organic vibe I'd ever heard from this tracks, with the cornet solo at the beginning occupying a perfect space at the rear of the left center soundstage. The decays sounded as natural as can be (dunno, I wasn't there when recorded). On Keith Richard's under-appreciated solo album Main Offender (Virgin, redbook) the capture of the amp buzz of those sessions is incredibly well done, and on the right systems the album sounds live and dynamic as heck. Yep, here too, in spades. On "Will But You Won't" you can actually here when the second guitar mic feed opens up, prior to first rip. Very wild indeed.

     

    Those two examples represent PCM playback with a machine that eventually treats everything as DSD128. What about, say, DSD and DSD128 (neither of which get a free pass...they are both upsampled to deep space). Well, on Us (Geffen, DSD) Peter Gabriel's 6th studio album, the SACD mastering is a huge step forward and is one of my favorite test albums for pop/rock DSD playback. The DS did not disappoint; "Only Us"/"Washing of The Water" combination is a nice test for leading edge, percussive tonality and noise floor. Let me start with noise floor. Whether it is I2S or what, the DS portrays a noise floor of cavernous proportions, a trait that seems to be the most influential on adjectives like clarity, micro-detail, air and even dynamics (since you can now hear the quietest of the musical nuances). I sat there for 58 minutes (the length of the album) and almost gawked at the energy and mix of colors and tones I was hearing. Oh, and as a dyed-in-the-wool computer audiophile I almost NEVER listen to a full album anymore...which is a confession I am not always proud of. Well, when listener fatigue becomes non-existent (and I don't need to work the next morning) this setup tempts me to listen all the way through.

     

    ericbibb.jpgOther DSD recordings, including my favorite Mari Kodama Beethoven Piano sonatas collection (Pentatone, DSD) played back with energy, sizzle (when appropriate) and a very 3D soundstage. Was this the best DSD I'd ever heard? Maybe not (dynamics and air are 95% of the best DSD I've heard), but as a dual format DAC (PCM and DSD) it leads the pack, and at the end of the day, I am not thinking about other DACs (ok, that sounds too creepy I guess, sorry). When given DSD128, like the wonderful Eric Bibb download compilation of analog-to-DSD tape transfers, A Selection of Analogue (Opus 3, DSD128) his slightly gravely-but-soft voice comes through in great detail, without sacrificing tone and, well, analog(ue) naturalness. Whether it's the pedal organ and the Deacon choir on "Where the Green Grass Grows" or the steel guitar solos throughout, the relaxed feeling of Eric Bibb music is conveyed nicely, thank you.

     

    This DAC is a difficult one to categorize. It is hyper-DSD internally, yet plays back PCM even better than it does DSD. It is supposed to be input-agnostic, yet I2S is easily the best input for me, followed by USB and then all the others relatively equally. By the way, it joins other open system DACs as being UAC2 compatible, meaning that no drivers are required for MAC or Linux (read: streamer) handshaking. That is a nice feature and shouldn't go un-noticed.

     

    So...what does one do if he/she has no I2S connection (all my listening feedback here was via I2S)? I tried going back and listening to the other inputs (especially my highest quality USB, as noted above) , and although this evolution (damn it) has seemed to continue to open them up a bit (especially USB via the JCAT card and either JCAT cable or TotalDAC D1 cable), there is no turning back for me. As a dual format USB DAC it is very good and recommended on all $5K+ budget's short list. As an I2S DAC I can't think of why this wouldn't be your first choice. And as a Signature Rendu owner, sell your blood, sell something quickly and go buy this DAC (and yes, give it 800 hours or more, although I don't know how good it would sound cold....maybe not bad at all!!!). :)

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

    Ted Brady

     

    CA Profile ex.png

     

     

    P.S. I welcome Ted Smith to please tell us why this last chapter (or more appropriately the first several bad ones) of listening happened, and why I am getting such different sonic experiences with different inputs.

     

     

     

     

    Manufacturer's comment:

     

    Thank you for your thorough and detailed appraisal. It's been a long journey to

    bring Ted Smith's*design into production, from the first time Gus Skinas played Ted's

    hand-built proof-of-concept*for us, until now.

     

    Starting with*Ted's brilliant vision and code, our Director of Engineering, Dave Paananen,

    our Chief Engineer, Bob Stadtherr*and their whole crew of designers and technicians have put in

    thousands of hours to bring DirectStream to market.

     

    The response to all the hard work has been gratifying; DirectStream has been well-received

    all over the world. Perhaps the most exciting part of DirectStream's design is that, thanks to its

    ability to be updated with new firmware, the best is yet to come!

     

    Paul McGowan, founder and CEO, PS Audio

     

     

     

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

     

     

    Product Information:

     

    • Product - PS Audio DirectStream DAC
    • Price - $5,999
    • Product Page - Link ex.png

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

     

     

    1-Pixel.png




    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Honestly I have not tried any orher dacs in weeks , why because I am beta testing he new bridge for ps audio. Going firm one dac to another will cloud this. Over the weekend I do intend to do so. And I expect it will be much closer then before. This new firmware is made for my brain. It removed the last of warmth and gave me the hyper details I love.

    But it's not digital sounding just really nice. Also the great pcm has returned and dsd is second again. Now this does not mean dsd is bad. It's not its just pcm is better.

    To my brain dsd has a bit less dynamics but I may be wrong. But the pcm bite is there in force. Something it was moving away from in 121

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Ajay, rolling back the upgrade is as simple as dleting the files off the sd card, then reinserting the sd card with the former files. But, I wouldn't go back. Pike is the real deal! And AlRainbow is about to find out (his firmware was f'd up); now that he redid it and it is showing Pike instead of something else he will be head over heels. Seriously! Also, I cheated and saw his updated comments over at the PS Audio forum. :) He loves it! We finally agree on something. :) This Pike OS sounds like mic feeds coming off the recording. Really.

     

    Hahahahaha.

     

    Good one. Glad there is general consensus now.

     

    Can you rank the input/Transport SQ?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    So after a winning first impression I've, over the past few days, started hearing a little lightness in body that I describe as a lessening of upper bass and lower midrange. Horns and female vocals tend to sound slightly recessed. I tube rolled, changed cables, etc. Nothing seemed to get this feeling out of my head. So I took two sweep recordings, one with 1.2.1 and one with PP and sent them to my acoustics hero, my acoustician Jeff Hedback (Jeff designed my latest acoustics makeover in my room back in 2011).

     

    Today Jeff got back to me and reports that the two sweeps (1.2.1 and PP) I recorded are virtually identical, and that what I am hearing is not being measured in this "in the room" test.

     

    I am going to dial back the evaluation mode I've been in, and just grab some of Al's scotch and sit back and listen. I will return to this in a week (if I can stay disciplined).

     

    My current summary: After a winning first impression I now find PP is slightly dry, has slightly less weight/body, and is every so slightly grainy sounding….but is easily more detailed and more dynamic for sure (which is why I like what it does for DSD, and the grain is less obvious there too, as it was too smooth earlier). My first impression reminded me of when one first evaluates new HDTVs visually. The sharper more saturated color usually looks better initially. The proof is in the longer term viewing. Stay tuned.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    So after a winning first impression I've, over the past few days, started hearing a little lightness in body that I describe as a lessening of upper bass and lower midrange. Horns and female vocals tend to sound slightly recessed. I tube rolled, changed cables, etc. Nothing seemed to get this feeling out of my head. So I took two sweep recordings, one with 1.2.1 and one with PP and sent them to my acoustics hero, my acoustician Jeff Hedback (Jeff designed my latest acoustics makeover in my room back in 2011).

     

    Today Jeff got back to me and reports that the two sweeps (1.2.1 and PP) I recorded are virtually identical, and that what I am hearing is not being measured in this "in the room" test.

     

    I am going to dial back the evaluation mode I've been in, and just grab some of Al's scotch and sit back and listen. I will return to this in a week (if I can stay disciplined).

     

    My current summary: After a winning first impression I now find PP is slightly dry, has slightly less weight/body, and is every so slightly grainy sounding….but is easily more detailed and more dynamic for sure (which is why I like what it does for DSD, and the grain is less obvious there too, as it was too smooth earlier). My first impression reminded me of when one first evaluates new HDTVs visually. The sharper more saturated color usually looks better initially. The proof is in the longer term viewing. Stay tuned.

    Ted,

     

    Thanks a lot for your honest opinion. That goes in my books as a highly respected reviewer...eagerly waiting for your update...

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Ted,

     

    Thanks a lot for your honest opinion. That goes in my books as a highly respected reviewer...eagerly waiting for your update...

     

    Ajay: I have similar experience with PP. I posted my experience on PS Forum. You can try, good thing; it is very easy to go back.

     

    Burning-in my DS........about 200 hrs. so far.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Ted,

     

    Thanks a lot for your honest opinion. That goes in my books as a highly respected reviewer...eagerly waiting for your update...

     

    Ajay: This is how I feel. I posted my opinion on PS Forum.

     

    Enjoying DS though with 1.2.1. I think it is improving as I burn it in.

     

    Good thing about the OS is that it is very easy to go back, so try it for yourself.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    i am waiting for my SSR, but had a setup question in the meantime.

     

    My Synology 415+ NAS has two LAN Ports. I have one port connected to my switch. Can I connect the second port on the NAS directly to SSR, that way I bypass the switch for music. I intend to use MinimServer/MinimWatch with Kinsky/Kazoo. Thanks.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Not sure if this belongs here. I am demoing a DS with mac mini and pure music (2.0.4). I am trying to understand and work with the gain/volume settings in both PM and the DS. Pure music has a dim setting which when on reduces volume by 12 db. DS has filter that is plus or minus 20 db. I like the sound of the plus 20 on the DS, but sometimes I cannot turn it down low enough. When I reduce the volume in PM, the sound is a bit muffled. I am using DS direct to my Genesis M60 tube monos. I am beginning to really enjoy the DS, but not broken in by far. Can somebody offer a little advice on settings please.

    With the DS filter down 20 db the volume needs to go way up and sound also is a bit veiled.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I know this is a long shot; that the price points are different; and if it's covered above, I missed it..... so.....

    anyone heard both the emm labs dac2x AND the ps audio dsd?

    and have comments they could share?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Not sure if this belongs here. I am demoing a DS with mac mini and pure music (2.0.4). I am trying to understand and work with the gain/volume settings in both PM and the DS. Pure music has a dim setting which when on reduces volume by 12 db. DS has filter that is plus or minus 20 db. I like the sound of the plus 20 on the DS, but sometimes I cannot turn it down low enough. When I reduce the volume in PM, the sound is a bit muffled. I am using DS direct to my Genesis M60 tube monos. I am beginning to really enjoy the DS, but not broken in by far. Can somebody offer a little advice on settings please.

    With the DS filter down 20 db the volume needs to go way up and sound also is a bit veiled.

    I feel your plite. The DS does attenuation in analog so nothing is lost. The pm is doing it in digital so you loose bits and quality . Can you use a preamp ? the new pike is really good for me it's best showing for theds so far. But like ted it lacks some body , note decay or meat what ever it's called . But other then this its by far the best as yet . And it may be perfect on most systems or for most people. New ones will,follow soon enough . As there is some already in the beta bridge forums . They are a variant of the pike.

    Al

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I feel your plite. The DS does attenuation in analog so nothing is lost. The pm is doing it in digital so you loose bits and quality . Can you use a preamp ? the new pike is really good for me it's best showing for theds so far. But like ted it lacks some body , note decay or meat what ever it's called . But other then this its by far the best as yet . And it may be perfect on most systems or for most people. New ones will,follow soon enough . As there is some already in the beta bridge forums . They are a variant of the pike.

    Al

     

    Slightly off topic, but did you enjoy the MSB UMT plus with the I2S Pro into the MSB DAC better than the Sonore Rendu Signature going via I2S into the PS Audio DS DAC?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Have little more than 800 hrs on DirectStream. Just got SSR, playing for last few hours, initial impressions; I got the warmth and bass back (which was slightly better in Hugo) and the musicality of the DS.

     

    Best of both worlds? Surely best I have heard from my system so far.

     

    I am using a BlueJeans Series-1 HDMI cable. I was told it is the best with SSR. Cannot find Nordost Silver Screen anywhere to compare.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    i am waiting for my SSR, but had a setup question in the meantime.

     

    My Synology 415+ NAS has two LAN Ports. I have one port connected to my switch. Can I connect the second port on the NAS directly to SSR, that way I bypass the switch for music. I intend to use MinimServer/MinimWatch with Kinsky/Kazoo. Thanks.

    I needed this as well and did some research on it a while ago, but as it seems these ports on the NAS do not act as a layer 2 switch.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I just upgraded the OS to Pikes Peak says its 1.2.3. But if i like to go back i don't see 1.2.2? Did they jump from 1.2.1 to 1.2.3?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I just upgraded the OS to Pikes Peak says its 1.2.3. But if i like to go back i don't see 1.2.2? Did they jump from 1.2.1 to 1.2.3?

     

    Yes they did.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Yes they did.

     

    well first impression...vocals sound a little thin but improved transparency, bass and sound stage. Cant get over the fact that vocals are little thin and bright.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    well first impression...vocals sound a little thin but improved transparency, bass and sound stage. Cant get over the fact that vocals are little thin and bright.

    Some of us raised certain qualms about PP relative to 1.2.1, but don't recall "thin" voices being one of them. An elevated tonal balance was one I and some others raised, although since JPlay 6 came out, along with JPlay Streamer, MinimServer and Kazoo, that's been largely if not entirely mitigated here (haven't gone back and compared). Do know that PP exposes weaknesses in other parts of one's system.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    well first impression...vocals sound a little thin but improved transparency, bass and sound stage. Cant get over the fact that vocals are little thin and bright.

    Ajay, with 200 hrs on DSD+PP i started toying with cables, and replacing the DSD's power cable seemed to balance the highs out. AnalysisPlus10 PC seems to work best in my system after trying several more expensive ones. After power, the USB and interconnects both upgraded the SQ equal to PP or more, revealing the potential of the DSD+PP to push it's envelope of resolution far past what you hear from the OS upgrade. You can fine tune the SQ to your taste. Playing mostly vocal jazz and cello here thru very revealing headphones I found the USB to be the weakest link, replacing Audioquest CoffeeUSB which plays bright. Tweaking and pushing the DSD has been a joy because it reveals more than you expect. Good luck

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Some of us raised certain qualms about PP relative to 1.2.1, but don't recall "thin" voices being one of them. An elevated tonal balance was one I and some others raised, although since JPlay 6 came out, along with JPlay Streamer, MinimServer and Kazoo, that's been largely if not entirely mitigated here (haven't gone back and compared). Do know that PP exposes weaknesses in other parts of one's system.

     

    my system has excellent vocal inner details as i use 300b mono blocks. Moreover, with vinyl i get perfect vocals. so i would not say there are any weakness...may i choose the wrong words to describe...its not merely thin but does sound slightly digital compared to the older version OS and my vinyl. It does have a hint of brightness too.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    my system has excellent vocal inner details as i use 300b mono blocks. Moreover, with vinyl i get perfect vocals. so i would not say there are any weakness...may i choose the wrong words to describe...its not merely thin but does sound slightly digital compared to the older version OS and my vinyl. It does have a hint of brightness too.

    Perhaps weakness is not quite the the right term to imply, yet there are ways to recapture musicality, analog timbre, etc, by isolating and changing the weakest link in the signal chain. There are many posts dealing with PP on numerous sites and the USB appears to be a critical component. IE: Mapleshade, JCat, WW Starlight, Lightspeed, all have been mentioned and recommended here. Power cord swap opened up the signal and cut the brightness for me. After 2 months of cable auditions i found my DSD did not do well with PC's, IC's and HPC's with high silver percentage. just fyi. Good luck

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    So I had reported earlier that I evolved into not preferring Pikes Peak. I find that it has a hole in the lower midrange area, which affects vocal depth and overall vocal tonality..and makes transition to upper bass less seamless. It's clarity is astounding, though. So I found that some tube rolling in my COncert Fidelity CF-080 pre could compensate well enough for me that I often live with it. For the majority of my music, that worked (esp through SSR and I2S).

     

    I have been reviewing other DACS so I went back to my normal tubes in the pre. I forgot about Pikes Peak and the DS. Then two weeks ago Jared Sacks (Channel Classics, NativeDSD) and I were in my music room doing an informal review of all my DACs, in stereo (after a couple very musical days of listening to his stuff in multichannel). When I got to the DS he noticed it immediately!! Wow, I had forgotten, said nothing in advance, yet it was obvious to him (and what a great opportunity to use well-awarded ears to hear his own music in my system). He pegged it at lower midrange. There ya go! We then switched to 2.1 and he noticed it being more balanced frequency-wise. My $.02

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Perhaps weakness is not quite the the right term to imply, yet there are ways to recapture musicality, analog timbre, etc, by isolating and changing the weakest link in the signal chain. There are many posts dealing with PP on numerous sites and the USB appears to be a critical component. IE: Mapleshade, JCat, WW Starlight, Lightspeed, all have been mentioned and recommended here. Power cord swap opened up the signal and cut the brightness for me. After 2 months of cable auditions i found my DSD did not do well with PC's, IC's and HPC's with high silver percentage. just fyi. Good luck

     

    ajay, have you looked through the PP thread at PS Audio's forums (at least the first half or so)? Your comments would be helpful there. As I read your lastest post here, I was thinking the same thing as Hanuman about my use of "weakness," as opposed to weakest links or mix of individual component characteristics. Of the list he gives, I would think from experience that neither Lightspeed nor Mapleshade, with it's "leading edge" design philosophy, would be good matches for the DS (I ditched a Lightspeed for the TotalDac USB).

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Agree w/ Highstream. My DS's USB is always coupled to the Totaldac D1 cable. A nice synergy, especially given the comments above. I have the incredibly detailed JCAT cable too, and that one is amazing with my Hugo and a few others.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    ajay, have you looked through the PP thread at PS Audio's forums (at least the first half or so)? Your comments would be helpful there. As I read your lastest post here, I was thinking the same thing as Hanuman about my use of "weakness," as opposed to weakest links or mix of individual component characteristics. Of the list he gives, I would think from experience that neither Lightspeed nor Mapleshade, with it's "leading edge" design philosophy, would be good matches for the DS (I ditched a Lightspeed for the TotalDac USB).

     

    Actually I am having excellent SQ and synergy with the Lightspeed which brings a better sense of timing, inner resolution and musicality. System dependent as always. :)

    There are so many ways to skin the cat, as Ted mentions above..

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Guest
    This is now closed for further comments




×
×
  • Create New...