Jump to content
  • joelha
    joelha

    It Is The Best of Times . . . Hands Down

     

     

        

        Audio: Listen to this article.

     

     

     

    It is the best of times . . . hands down.

     

    While it’s hard to know how many readers agree, I’ll first deal with the reasons to disagree:

     

    High-end audio stores are becoming a rarity in the U.S. and many stores now reside in store owners’ homes. As a result, we have fewer opportunities to audition equipment, leaving us with audio shows, friends who live nearby who might have the component we’re interested in, and audio reviews. Hardly ideal alternatives.

     

    Speaking of audio shows, they’re infrequent and, if you have to travel a long way, expensive. What’s more, the show’s rooms (typically hotel rooms) are rarely ideal for critical listening. Finally, it’s always frustrated me that there’s an acceptance of conversation during listening sessions. I know people want to share opinions and conduct business but the primary reason for an audio show should be to hear audio.

     

    Online trolls are a downside of the industry. For reasons that are hard to understand, some people delight in trying to make others miserable. I’ll offer a theory in spite of the fact that it doesn’t reflect well on our hobby. Ours is generally a hobby enjoyed alone. Unlike a group getting together to watch a televised football game, we usually don’t invite “the guys” over to listen to Mahler. Does that mean we audiophiles are a bunch of social misfits? No, and I have a number of dear friends in the industry who certainly don’t fit that description. But I wonder, because of the nature of our hobby, if we have more than our share of maladjusted hobbyists.

     

    You might be thinking that there’s nothing new about trolling. People have always raised their “issues”. While that’s true, the internet has brought us online forums and anonymity which allows for far more obnoxious behavior. Where there used to be disagreeable letters to magazines, now there can be tiresome exchanges which often substitute vitriol for substance.

     

    There’s also the economy. Many people are struggling to pay their bills. How can it be “the best of times” when people struggle to pay for gas, groceries, and rent?

     

    Probably the best objection to my “best of times” claim is that, at least in the U.S., the high-end audio industry is shrinking. This is an existential issue that has been well documented and frequently discussed. In general, the younger generations seem to care more about audio convenience than audio quality. It’s not only their loss but ours as well. As we lose hobbyists we lose the high-end industry. It’s disappointing to see the advancing age of the average U.S. audio show attendee. Furthermore, how many non-audiophiles know of even reasonably priced audio brands such as Magneplanar and NAD let alone the higher-priced brands such as Wilson Audio or D’Agostino? I’ll bet a pretty small percentage. At least I can dream of owning a Learjet because I know what it is. But how does one aspire to own a product they’ve never even heard of?

     

    After all of that, what could be good?

     

    Fortunately, quite a bit.

     

    Without a doubt, the most significant advancement in our industry is technology and the internet.

     

    When I was a teen, the only way to add to my audio system or music collection was to either buy mail order products or hope there was an audio or music store nearby.

     

    Today, we have easy access to products in almost any part of the world. We can quickly learn about and order products from China, Europe, and Australia. We can view various manufacturers’ information online and quickly make comparisons between products. Internet searches not only help us find product reviews but find forums which allows us to interact with listeners internationally.

     

    Forums can also be indispensable for problem-solving. I can’t count the number of times I’ve been helped by someone willing to sacrifice their time to solve my audio issue.

     

    How about music downloads? It’s not easy to list all the sources of downloadable music (Qobuz, Hdtracks, Bandcamp, etc.). And the selection is growing, not only in terms of variety but also in terms of high resolution and surround options.

     

    You’d rather buy cd’s and vinyl instead of downloads? Discogs, Amazon, Analog Productions, and so many other companies offer a tremendous variety of music in almost any genre, new and used. Here again, an internet search will produce purchase options from all over the world.

     

    How about the renaissance in tape playback? Some are not only going back to reel-to-reel tape but even cassette tape.

     

    At least to some listeners, sound can be upgraded using a variety of upsamplers and programs minimizing the processes employed by Windows. There are countless other programs and tweaks available at the click of a mouse tempting many audiophiles to continually explore the possibility of getting even better sound.

     

    Room correction software is yet another method many are using to improve the sound they get in their listening space. While not as simple as a music download, the software is easy to get and can be installed and operated by someone with average computer skills.

     

    The benefits of these technical advancements don’t stop with the end-user. The ability of manufacturers to measure their products and globally source components is greater than it’s ever been. Ultimately, we are the beneficiaries.

     

    And how could I leave out streaming? Literally millions and millions of tracks are available, not only in two-channels but in surround as well, delivered to our rooms (or phones) in seconds for a relatively modest monthly charge.

     

    As for prices, I never understood the complaints I’ve read so often about high-priced audio. Sure, there are many uber-priced components which roughly equate to the price of a nice home. But in what way do those products affect our ability to shop at the lower end of the market? With a laptop or PC, even $100 will get you a decent tiny USB dac and in-ear monitors. For $500 you can get a nice dac, deskop amplifier and desktop speakers. And $1,000 will you a surprisingly good system including stand mount speakers, integrated amplifier and dac. And that’s shopping for new product. Shopping on-line for used products offers even more possibilities.

     

    I realize almost everyone reading this article is well aware of most if not all of the points I’ve made. But I’m not sure how many audiophiles have taken the time to reflect on the great audiophile times in which we live. It is easy to take all that we have for granted and, given the frustrations we experience in our hobby and even in life, it’s important to reflect on what is right in our lives. The title of my article doesn’t say or even imply “perfect”. I’ve listed a number of reasons to be frustrated but I’ll take today to any time in the past . . . hands-down.

     

     




    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    1 hour ago, The Computer Audiophile said:

    Hi Tom, as always, a thoughtful and respectful reply from you. Yes, we disagree but that’s part of what makes it interesting. 
     

    An interesting article I recently read, Millennials Set To Become The Richest Generation in History. No clue if it checks out, but it’s food for thought. 

     

    https://fortune.com/2024/02/29/america-wealthest-one-percent-minimum-millennials-richest-generation/amp/

    paywall - but found it on yahoo
    https://finance.yahoo.com/news/millennials-become-richest-generation-history-122845663.html?guccounter=1
    however, I may assume there might be some changed demographics behind it, like older parents from the top bracket (example Robert de Niro) - with a limited number of kids inheriting earlier than the majority of our generation.

    I have friends older than me with parents in their 90s, which seems to be great, but rationally its less great from a personal wealth perspective as it is in focus in the fortune article, which -imho-  shows a couple of numbers that aren't worthwile without context.

    Another thing not effectively explained is the difference in net value compared to the base (i.e. 1980). There is a rate of inflation, rocketing imobilia prices and such. You may not inherit more than your parents (a house, some ground, some money, some gold) , but the nominal value may be tripled ...

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    "The limited budget of young people make different technologies and services compete against each other."

     

    This could be said of anything, not just audio, though. You and I were both young once, we didn't wake up one day around age 50 and decide to become an audiophile. At least I didn't. Through the years my playback quality, and cost of equipment, has steadily increased as I bet yours has as well. Likewise, I can't do every hobby or activity I want to do, due to finances as well. I have to decide where to put my funds and what will be most important to me. I bet this is a common decision that most people have to make, regardless of age, perhaps the hobbies even get more expensive too.

     

    Lastly, audio companies make high priced equipment for the same reason car manufacturers make HALO models and race. To get people in showrooms to buy the lower priced models. No one needs a Porsche 918 for 1 million bucks, but that car sure gets interest and bodies in Boxsters/Caymans.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, AudioDoctor said:

    "The limited budget of young people make different technologies and services compete against each other."

     

    This could be said of anything, not just audio, though. You and I were both young once, we didn't wake up one day around age 50 and decide to become an audiophile. At least I didn't. Through the years my playback quality, and cost of equipment, has steadily increased as I bet yours has as well. Likewise, I can't do every hobby or activity I want to do, due to finances as well. I have to decide where to put my funds and what will be most important to me. I bet this is a common decision that most people have to make, regardless of age, perhaps the hobbies even get more expensive too.

     

    Lastly, audio companies make high priced equipment for the same reason car manufacturers make HALO models and race. To get people in showrooms to buy the lower priced models. No one needs a Porsche 918 for 1 million bucks, but that car sure gets interest and bodies in Boxsters/Caymans.

    Yes. In my first system when I was 17, I started with headphones and no speakers, as I couldn't afford decent ones together with the amp and turntable. I then got one speaker and listened in mono, headphones for stereo. I bought the second speaker after a few months to complete the system. I got the most audiophile gear I could afford at the time. Then multiple upgrades over the years. Money wasn't what kept me from being an audiophile.

     

    I know lots of young people - kids of friends. None see the need to spend serious amounts of money on sound equipment. Some of them appreciate my system, but they listen over headphones and BT speakers. It's more lifestyle and convenience for them.

     

    They don't like music less than me, they just don't "sit and listen" in front of a system.

     

    Spending big bucks on listening equipment isn't an idea they subscribe to. BTW, almost none of  their parents still have/use a good system, even if they once had one. They've also gone for convenience space saving, etc. The system sits idle - if it is still there. Many aren't even willing to pay $10 a month for streaming. They think free Spotify and YT are good enough. Why pay for music if it's free? Very few listen in anything other than mp3. 

     

    A few of the youngsters have invested in good headphones. Possibly in 15-20 years if they are settled and with a bigger living space, they will buy components  - probably as part of a movie-TV  playback system.

     

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    28 minutes ago, firedog said:

    Spending big bucks on listening equipment isn't an idea they subscribe to. BTW, almost none of  their parents still have/use a good system, even if they once had one. They've also gone for convenience space saving, etc. The system sits idle - if it is still there. Many aren't even willing to pay $10 a month for streaming. They think free Spotify and YT are good enough. Why pay for music if it's free? Very few listen in anything other than mp3. 

    Very true, this !


    I've played my youngest son's favorite piano piece for him through his IPhone - BT - Spotify to (then mine/now his) active speakers - and then made him listen to the same in 24/96 flac. He completely appreciated the day/night difference in sound quality, though he continued listening with Spotify quality by BT. He is not buggered at all by this difference, as he values ad-hoc conveniance in daily live much higher than having to invest (time, money, knowledge) into exceptional quality.

    I have the feeling that the pure act of listening to music and it's sound qualites as standalone task that receives full concentration is likely quite uncommon for today's younger generations.  Consequently, the perceived value and the attached active invest may be at different levels than with the boomer and gen x.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Although I can think of many reasons, for me the most important one is mobility.

     

    We had to physically go to a specific place where to find information, listen to music, watching TV.

    Now, information in the broadest meaning, is available to youngsters (and ourselves of course) everywhere to go and whenever they want.

    It has become an extention of ourselves ( with possible big changs coming in the near future with implants)

     

    And as a consequence, youngsters are distracted all the time, very hard to be focussed on one 'task' at a time.

     

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 hours ago, firedog said:

    Yes. In my first system when I was 17, I started with headphones and no speakers, as I couldn't afford decent ones together with the amp and turntable. I then got one speaker and listened in mono, headphones for stereo. I bought the second speaker after a few months to complete the system. I got the most audiophile gear I could afford at the time. Then multiple upgrades over the years. Money wasn't what kept me from being an audiophile.

     

    I know lots of young people - kids of friends. None see the need to spend serious amounts of money on sound equipment. Some of them appreciate my system, but they listen over headphones and BT speakers. It's more lifestyle and convenience for them.

     

    They don't like music less than me, they just don't "sit and listen" in front of a system.

     

    Spending big bucks on listening equipment isn't an idea they subscribe to. BTW, almost none of  their parents still have/use a good system, even if they once had one. They've also gone for convenience space saving, etc. The system sits idle - if it is still there. Many aren't even willing to pay $10 a month for streaming. They think free Spotify and YT are good enough. Why pay for music if it's free? Very few listen in anything other than mp3. 

     

    A few of the youngsters have invested in good headphones. Possibly in 15-20 years if they are settled and with a bigger living space, they will buy components  - probably as part of a movie-TV  playback system.

     

    This is my contention.

     

    I only wish price were more of the issue.

     

    There is quality audio equipment at almost every price point.

     

    I confess I have no hard statistics but I read far more about many in the younger generation wanting to buy a more expensive graphics card or better monitor for their gaming PC than I do those trying to get enough money together to buy a decent integrated amp.

     

    In short, for our hobby to compete on their list of priorities, it first must appear on their list of priorities.

     

    Sadly, in far too many cases, I don't think it does.

     

    Joel

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    17 minutes ago, joelha said:

    This is my contention.

     

    I only wish price were more of the issue.

     

    There is quality audio equipment at almost every price point.

     

    I confess I have no hard statistics but I read far more about many in the younger generation wanting to buy a more expensive graphics card or better monitor for their gaming PC than I do those trying to get enough money together to buy a decent integrated amp.

     

    In short, for our hobby to compete on their list of priorities, it first must appear on their list of priorities.

     

    Sadly, in far too many cases, I don't think it does.

     

    Joel

     

    There is a difference between a 2K graphics card and a 150K set of speakers. The young people have different priorities. Totally agree.

     

     

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now




×
×
  • Create New...