Ralf11 Posted November 18, 2019 Share Posted November 18, 2019 neither gives you field strength Link to comment
Popular Post Ralf11 Posted November 18, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted November 18, 2019 9 hours ago, marce said: Say like EMC testing!😀 That is too advanced for audiophiles... marce, esldude and Teresa 2 1 Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted November 18, 2019 Share Posted November 18, 2019 2 hours ago, John Dyson said: ... snake-oil infused environment.... Phrase of the Week Award !! You have won a free Yoni Egg! esldude 1 Link to comment
Popular Post Ralf11 Posted November 24, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted November 24, 2019 17 minutes ago, mansr said: Apple won't allow GUIs that ugly on Mac. and yet... many people have viewed the new Tesla truck on their mac lucretius, fas42 and esldude 1 2 Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted November 25, 2019 Share Posted November 25, 2019 3 hours ago, botrytis said: a REAL computer like an IBM 360 ). System 360 sux a REAL computer is a CDC Cyber !! and... they were Funky -- Hit the ONES !! jomo48 1 Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 "None of them along the line know what any of it is worth” Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 Wrong. It mostly depends on age & training, and is no sure thing then. sandyk and Ralf11 1 1 Link to comment
Popular Post Ralf11 Posted January 27, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted January 27, 2020 yes, we should all eschew statistics -- also, physics, chemistry and virology Ajax and pkane2001 2 Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted January 28, 2020 Share Posted January 28, 2020 36 minutes ago, mansr said: How do you know it's genuine when you can't hear it? How do you know your "hearing" of differences is genuine when you don't test? Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted January 28, 2020 Share Posted January 28, 2020 8 hours ago, marce said: I am on about content to 55kHz, wot is the point any modulation of sound within the human hearing range is already done. I wonder how many real golden eared people there are out there... I do remember reading a paper many years ago and the number was not huge. As for us older ones 14kHz is probably all we can hope for. most characters follow a normal distribution curve - unless there is very strong selection on a trait, you can expect hearing to be distributed more or less like ht. is in a popn. then there is the issue of hearing performance factors other than the high freq. limit (for sine waves)... a spectrum of golden colors if you will Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 it's not that you can't see into the infrared, it's the crummy resolution in the IR that really matters if you don't believe me, just ask a pit viper Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 Sandy, are you posting from Christmas Island? sandyk 1 Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted February 1, 2020 Share Posted February 1, 2020 2 minutes ago, audiobomber said: just because someone is a math-head they know all there is to know about great sound. yes, you need some engineering chops too he does have that, so try not to get snarky - it just makes you look like an audiobummer why not ask a question instead? Here, I'll show you how: mansr, why would a designer use two different clocks for different clock rates, instead of doing the math (to adequate precision)? is it just for marketing or is there a functional reason? Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted February 1, 2020 Share Posted February 1, 2020 1 minute ago, audiobomber said: I tend to respond according to the tone of the post I'm responding to. then it is best to converse with Pacific Islanders, and NZers (kiwis), Mini-sotans, etc. not Aussies, SAers, Israelis, or Texans daverich4 and esldude 1 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now