Ralf11 Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 they're real (also Countably Infinite) Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted September 7, 2017 Share Posted September 7, 2017 3 hours ago, mansr said: I see it's time for the daily Lavorgna assault. He hasn't attacked any Asian cultures yet - PLEASE give him time. BTW, You are smart to not want your good name associated with his blog. Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted September 7, 2017 Share Posted September 7, 2017 Id think about IP addresses before I thought about computers. If they IP addresses are similar they may well allow it. Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted September 13, 2017 Share Posted September 13, 2017 You are forgetting about the next version. DRM 2.0 will allow a compressed stream-size equal to mp3, so you can stream it to your Apple Watch and ear buds. Once you get home, the full Hi-Res will continue on your home stereo without a break or gap in playback. Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted September 13, 2017 Share Posted September 13, 2017 oops - I meant MQA 2.0 hahaha Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted September 13, 2017 Share Posted September 13, 2017 11 hours ago, mansr said: That's impossible. Audio simply can't be compressed that much without losing quality. If it were possible, such a format would already exist. you know that was a joke, right?? Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted October 3, 2017 Share Posted October 3, 2017 186282 miles per second is c for a vacuum is it in a vacuum? Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted October 3, 2017 Share Posted October 3, 2017 4 hours ago, jhwalker said: According to my good friend Wikipedia "the refractive index of air for visible light is about 1.0003, so the speed of light in air is about 299,700 kilometres (186,200 mi)" So pretty much the same speed. I thought the signal was in metal... Link to comment
Popular Post Ralf11 Posted October 16, 2017 Popular Post Share Posted October 16, 2017 57 minutes ago, PeterV said: ... this time hou have fucked with the wrong guy! I just want to know if the copulation was deconvoluted or not? jabbr and esldude 1 1 Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted October 23, 2017 Share Posted October 23, 2017 Don't the TOS require disclosure of commercial interests? Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted October 23, 2017 Share Posted October 23, 2017 Tidal sucks - they use Class D amps!! Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted October 23, 2017 Share Posted October 23, 2017 4 hours ago, psjug said: I don't get the joke...? it's a play on some GUTB comments, saying all Class D amps suck if I could have worked some immersive WD stuff in too, I would have Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted October 23, 2017 Share Posted October 23, 2017 29 minutes ago, Samuel T Cogley said: Most of my listening to those LZ titles are from the original Barry Diament Redbook masters (Page/Marino remasters were horrible IMHO). I hear more detail in the hirez versions. Presumably not because of the sample rate, but because the ADCs are better now. The MQA versions (through a Meridian Explorer 2) produce listening fatigue for me in less than 30 minutes. I purchased the double LP Tusk on the release date. I remember it well. Overall, I've probably listened to that title more from vinyl than from digital. The original CD master shortened "Sara" so the whole double LP would fit on one CD. Overall the original Tusk CD was dull and lifeless. When Tusk first appeared on HDTracks (96/24), I was all over it. After all the downloading was done, and I was able to import the tracks into DAW software, the peak limiting was quite evident. And while the improved detail in the new remaster was undeniable, the peak limiting sometimes made that additional detail a bit grating. The MQA version (on Tidal) sounds just as peak limited, but now with pseudo detail on top of the remaster's level of detail, which only enhances the listening fatigue for me. THX, IRRC I am using the original CDs - I'd have to dig to find the actual CD, not the rip Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted October 24, 2017 Share Posted October 24, 2017 the real questions are whether the rabbit holes have been deconvoluted ...and if they ultimately lead the rabbits into a trap PeterSt 1 Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted October 26, 2017 Share Posted October 26, 2017 I guess I won't be able to unload my Beats on you guys, eh? - they came with the iMac Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted October 27, 2017 Share Posted October 27, 2017 What's wrong with China? Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted November 6, 2017 Share Posted November 6, 2017 has anyone declared a HiFi Emergency on this thread yet? Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted November 7, 2017 Share Posted November 7, 2017 one poster on this site has a sig. relating to HiFi Emergencies.... if there is one, it must be DRM Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted December 21, 2017 Share Posted December 21, 2017 On 12/7/2017 at 11:33 PM, synn said: Blind test completed. I added all three tracks into a folder, set it to play in random and put the player in my pocket for a good hour or so. I lost track of the number of times I heard the song play, but it was a LOT. Now and then, I took the player out of the pocket and checked the screen to see if I got the format correct. I picked the MQA file correctly every single time. Towards the end of the test I didn't even need to take the player out, I just knew when the MQA file was on. The file overall sounds very brittle compared to the PCM and DSD versions. The highs have a certain "Cheesegrater" quality to it, which is quite evident in my test track with some prominent percussion and wind instrumentation. The PCM and especially, DSD files feel much more mellow in comparison. I felt that the MQA sounded a bit more compressed as well, but I can't say this with certain authority. No no no, do not want. So overall, I have decided to give MQA a miss. No thank you. If I wanted grating highs, I'd buy an old Philips CD player and some Grados. I should also add that I found the DSD file very pleasant. I should be spending a bit more time with the DSD format and give it a fair shake, which I haven't really done till now. Were the 3 tracks all from the same 'album'? It's possible that some other album sounds better with MQA but... why bother is the issue Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted January 10, 2018 Share Posted January 10, 2018 There's something happenin' here What it is ain't exactly clear There's a man with DRM over there I'm tellin' you, we got to beware I said HEY! Who's that clown? Shilling aroun' Puttin' the MQA out all over town ... http://forums.stevehoffman.tv/threads/my-new-article-series-on-mqa.723574/ crenca 1 Link to comment
Popular Post Ralf11 Posted January 11, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted January 11, 2018 4 hours ago, Lee Scoggins said: So what? This is just accurate reporting. CA is a hostile community to many. Perhaps Chris thinks this brings out a more lively debate but the side effect of the hostility is that it scares off many experienced people. You and others have attacked my character without knowing me or my intentions. I don't see value in responding any more to your posts. CA is a hostile community to uniformed dupes trying to promote things that add nothing. I have yet to see any accurate reporting from you. MrMoM, maxijazz and mansr 2 1 Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted January 11, 2018 Share Posted January 11, 2018 30 minutes ago, Shadders said: Has Lee gone home ? I expect he has gone to yet another audio site to sell his wares. Expect him to pop up on Audiogon, Asylum or anywhere people aren't wise to the clickbait yet. MrMoM 1 Link to comment
Popular Post Ralf11 Posted January 11, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted January 11, 2018 6 minutes ago, Shadders said: Hi, What type of uniform does Lee wear ?. Regards, Shadders. uninformed my apologies PeterSt and Shadders 1 1 Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted January 13, 2018 Share Posted January 13, 2018 3 hours ago, Shadders said: Or, or.... The X is the frequency, and Y is the signal power in dB. Hey - did you just perform a convolution? Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now