Roman880 Posted January 17, 2013 Share Posted January 17, 2013 Michael Jackson's Thriller was released recently on HDtracks (in 24/176 and 24/88.2): https://www.hdtracks.com/index.php?file=artistdetail&id=10430 I haven't bitten yet. Has anyone given it a listen yet? How does it sound? Is this the same master from the cca. 2000 SACD release? I'd like to buy it, but want to hear some feedback first; I've been disappointed by HDtracks' offerings in the past. Link to comment
Synfreak Posted January 17, 2013 Share Posted January 17, 2013 I'm pretty sure that this has been transfered from the SACD (as other Sony HDTracks releases, like Dave Brubecks Take Five). If so - and if the DSD to PCM convertion has been done with care *) - it is a no brainer. IMHO one of the best transfers available of this recording. Maybe a bit more limited/compressed as the first issued CD, but with a bit more ooohhhmmmp to the bass, and better resolution/detail. *) the analogue to DSD mastering was done at VERY HIGH levels, which not only exceed the -6db margin usually applied to DSD recordings, but even exceeds (at some very short peaks) the absolute DSD modulation maxima. So it wuld be interesting how the transfer has been done ... Esoterc SA-60 / Foobar2000 -> Mytek Stereo 192 DSD / Audio-GD NFB 28.38 -> MEG RL922K / AKG K500 / AKG K1000 / Audioquest Nighthawk / OPPO PM-2 / Sennheiser HD800 / Sennheiser Surrounder / Sony MA900 / STAX SR-303+SRM-323II Link to comment
One and a half Posted January 17, 2013 Share Posted January 17, 2013 Well the cover doesn't show SACD, should tell us something. The SACD is very good indeed, ripped even better to a native DSD DAC. Any PCM version couldn't compete. AS Profile Equipment List Say NO to MQA Link to comment
frederick184 Posted January 17, 2013 Share Posted January 17, 2013 I downloaded it. The PDF of the cover says "transferred from DSD" or something similar. I haven't had time to critically listen to it yet unfortunately. I have the 24/88.2 version. Colin Link to comment
GammaG Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 I have a couple of questions that perhaps someone can answer. I was looking on the HD tracks dot com website, and found the Michael Jackson Thriller album. It is available for download in Audiophile at 176 kHz/24bit and also 88 kHz/24bit. I had bought this cd years ago, and I would believe that it is a standard 44.1 kHz/16bit format. Here are my questions: 1. Considering that I have J River MC and am using an external dac connected by USB from pc to dac that is capable of up to 196kHz/24bit, would I get the better sound by downloading the 176kHz/24bit file versus the 88kHz/24 bit file? 2. I see that HD tracks are offering an option of downloading in 4 different file formats. Options are aiff, alac, flac, and wav formats. Should I download the flac format as I have Windows XP/7 as OS? 3. Would this be a waste of money to get the higher resolution format download from HD tracks, as I already own this cd in 44.1 kHz/16bit? I guess what it comes down to is the SQ I am looking for. I did read over Chris's configuring the dbpoweramp program correctly. I am wondering if I could perhaps rip this Thriller cd to flac, and then convert it to the formats that are offered at HD tracks. I am uncertain if this would be the same. Any help would be appreciated! Windows XP/7 > J River MC 20 > Wire World Platinum Starlight USB cable > Peachtree Audio Grand-Pre dac > Straight Wire Crescendo IC's > Odd Watt Audio Odd Block tube amps > custom speaker cables > Galt Audio 2.5 speakers > 15" Aura Sound subwoofer in Ported Reflex Enclosure/1000watt amp Link to comment
Synfreak Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 @ GammaG: to 1: I tend not to hear (easy to spot) differences between, say, 88,2/24 or 176,4/24 files (sourced from the same master!). So I would play safe and get the 88,2/24 version, as this was sourced/transfered from analogue tape to DSD. ut others may disagree here, so it will be up to you ... to 2: Yes, you might want to get the FLAC files in your case to 3: For me, the MOST important point is the mastering- (and recording-) quality. That can make quite huge differences. So it depends on what quality the mastering on your CD is, first. If it is not one of the first issues of this album on CD (mid 80ies), you will most likely own a quite compressed (very loud) mastered CD. If so, go get this download ;-) Esoterc SA-60 / Foobar2000 -> Mytek Stereo 192 DSD / Audio-GD NFB 28.38 -> MEG RL922K / AKG K500 / AKG K1000 / Audioquest Nighthawk / OPPO PM-2 / Sennheiser HD800 / Sennheiser Surrounder / Sony MA900 / STAX SR-303+SRM-323II Link to comment
GammaG Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 @ Synfreak: Thanks for your input! I am wondering if I do download the 88.2 kHz/24bit files, I guess I could always convert it to 176 kHz/196kHz-24bit with dbpoweramp to see if it makes a difference? The Thriller cd that I have by Michael Jackson is the special edition one. The disc itself is black with gold writing and the play side is gold. It shows on the label side 1982, 2001MJJ Productions Inc. It has a logo of Epic, which appears to be a trademark of Sony Music Entertainment Inc. I was reading on the back of the plastic cd holder and it says that it was re-mastered by Bernie Grundman, Los Angeles, California. Perhaps this info might tell if it is a good recording or I need to get the one from HD tracks-lol Windows XP/7 > J River MC 20 > Wire World Platinum Starlight USB cable > Peachtree Audio Grand-Pre dac > Straight Wire Crescendo IC's > Odd Watt Audio Odd Block tube amps > custom speaker cables > Galt Audio 2.5 speakers > 15" Aura Sound subwoofer in Ported Reflex Enclosure/1000watt amp Link to comment
Synfreak Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 Hi GammaG! The "Gold CD" you mention above is the 2001 "Special Edition" with added bonus tracks / interviews ... I do own that one, too. It has been mastered quite loud/compressed, but does not as sound as bad as one might think ... (Thriller just needs a bit of ooohhmmp, doesnt it?) But from an audiophile (sic!) point of view, the SACD/DSD mastering s far superior. I will post the dynamic range analysis later, so if someone who has got the HDTracks download want to join in, we might be able to sort it out ;-) Esoterc SA-60 / Foobar2000 -> Mytek Stereo 192 DSD / Audio-GD NFB 28.38 -> MEG RL922K / AKG K500 / AKG K1000 / Audioquest Nighthawk / OPPO PM-2 / Sennheiser HD800 / Sennheiser Surrounder / Sony MA900 / STAX SR-303+SRM-323II Link to comment
GammaG Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 Hi Synfreak! In your opinion, would you say that the SQ of the HD track version would have better clarity as well as what you've described as ooohhmmp-lol I guess if I did download the 88.2 kHz/24bit version, I won't be disappointed!? As far as the thriller cd's we own, I would imagine that by using the dbpoweramp program, one could use the "EQ" and play around with it to get to one's own liking! Thanks again for your relpy! Windows XP/7 > J River MC 20 > Wire World Platinum Starlight USB cable > Peachtree Audio Grand-Pre dac > Straight Wire Crescendo IC's > Odd Watt Audio Odd Block tube amps > custom speaker cables > Galt Audio 2.5 speakers > 15" Aura Sound subwoofer in Ported Reflex Enclosure/1000watt amp Link to comment
Zakus Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 Took a punt and downloaded the 24 bit 88.2. SQ is good but not 24 bit, DAC says 16bit 88.2, iTunes says 16 bit 88.2, what gives? PS sent copy post to HDT Link to comment
Zakus Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 Took a punt and downloaded the 24 bit 88.2. SQ is good but not 24 bit, DAC says 16bit 88.2, iTunes says 16 bit 88.2, what gives? PS sent copy post to HDT Embarassingly, just checked XLD and preferences set to 16 bit! Link to comment
GammaG Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 Embarassingly, just checked XLD and preferences set to 16 bit! Could you please let me know the SQ after you have reset XLD to 24-bit. Thanks! Windows XP/7 > J River MC 20 > Wire World Platinum Starlight USB cable > Peachtree Audio Grand-Pre dac > Straight Wire Crescendo IC's > Odd Watt Audio Odd Block tube amps > custom speaker cables > Galt Audio 2.5 speakers > 15" Aura Sound subwoofer in Ported Reflex Enclosure/1000watt amp Link to comment
Synfreak Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 so, finally ... for all those interested how the mastering of the Sony SACD - which is most likely used for the HDTracks offer - compares to other / older CDs: First press by EPIC (Japanese CD): Analyzed: Jackson, Michael / Thriller (Epic Japan)-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DR Peak RMS Duration Track -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DR12 -4.85 dB -18.45 dB 6:04 01-Wanna Be Startin' Somethin' DR13 -4.49 dB -19.74 dB 4:21 02-Baby Be Mine DR12 -5.71 dB -20.37 dB 3:43 03-The Girl Is Mine DR13 -4.15 dB -18.66 dB 6:05 04-Thriller DR13 -5.50 dB -20.63 dB 4:19 05-Beat It DR14 -4.98 dB -20.18 dB 4:57 06-Billie Jean DR14 -6.62 dB -21.69 dB 4:06 07-Human Nature DR13 -5.25 dB -19.74 dB 3:59 08-P. Y. T. (Pretty Young Thing) DR14 -5.25 dB -23.43 dB 5:01 09-The Lady in My Life -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Number of tracks: 9 Official DR value: DR13 2001 Special Edition CD: Analyzed: Jackson, Michael / Thriller (2001 Remaster / Special Edition)-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DR Peak RMS Duration Track -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DR9 -0.10 dB -9.95 dB 6:03 01-Wanna Be Startin' Somethin' DR9 -0.10 dB -10.81 dB 4:20 02-Baby Be Mine DR8 -0.10 dB -10.76 dB 3:42 03-The Girl Is Mine DR9 -0.10 dB -10.24 dB 5:58 04-Thriller DR8 -0.10 dB -9.20 dB 4:18 05-Beat It DR8 -0.10 dB -9.44 dB 4:54 06-Billie Jean DR10 -0.10 dB -10.89 dB 4:06 07-Human Nature DR9 -0.10 dB -10.42 dB 3:59 08-P.Y.T. (Pretty Young Thing) DR9 -0.10 dB -12.04 dB 4:59 09-The Lady in My Life DR11 -0.10 dB -13.67 dB 2:18 10-Interview with Quincy Jones DR9 -0.12 dB -12.52 dB 4:49 11-Someone in the Dark DR10 -0.12 dB -13.53 dB 2:04 12-Interview with Quincy Jones DR8 -0.10 dB -11.03 dB 2:20 13-Billie Jean (Home Demo 1981) DR12 -0.11 dB -15.16 dB 3:10 14-Interview with Quincy Jones DR13 -0.55 dB -15.88 dB 4:03 15-Interview with Rod Temperton DR11 -0.13 dB -14.12 dB 1:33 16-Interview with Quincy Jones DR13 -1.88 dB -20.23 dB 2:52 17-Voice-Over Session from Thriller DR14 -1.07 dB -17.85 dB 1:56 18-Interview with Rod Temperton DR12 -0.13 dB -15.25 dB 2:02 19-Interview with Quincy Jones DR9 -0.10 dB -10.95 dB 1:50 20-Carousel DR10 -0.13 dB -13.05 dB 1:18 21-Interview with Quincy Jones -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Number of tracks: 21 Official DR value: DR10 Note that all tracks of the regular album are quite compressed/limited and all peak at -0,10dB ... and here the 1999 SACD: Analyzed: Jackson, Michael / Thriller (1999 Remaster)-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DR Peak RMS Duration Track -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DR12 -3.98 dB -17.52 dB 6:05 01-Wanna Be Startin' Somethin' DR13 -3.02 dB -18.48 dB 4:20 02-Baby Be Mine DR12 0.00 dB -17.51 dB 3:42 03-The Girl Is Mine DR13 -2.88 dB -17.86 dB 5:59 04-Thriller DR13 0.00 dB -16.07 dB 4:18 05-Beat It DR16 0.00 dB -17.54 dB 4:54 06-Billie Jean DR13 -4.00 dB -18.87 dB 4:06 07-Human Nature DR13 -3.11 dB -17.85 dB 3:58 08-P.Y.T. (Pretty Young Thing) DR14 -2.08 dB -19.93 dB 4:58 09-The Lady In My Life -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Number of tracks: 9 Official DR value: DR13 Note that three tracks (Nos 3,5 & 6) hit the 0dB mark - these use the maximum possible level for DSD recording. Its also obvious that this mastering keeps the original dynamics (almost identical to the first press EPIC CD), while it adds some bass extension and better definition/resolution. So, the choice is yours ;-) Esoterc SA-60 / Foobar2000 -> Mytek Stereo 192 DSD / Audio-GD NFB 28.38 -> MEG RL922K / AKG K500 / AKG K1000 / Audioquest Nighthawk / OPPO PM-2 / Sennheiser HD800 / Sennheiser Surrounder / Sony MA900 / STAX SR-303+SRM-323II Link to comment
mbain Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 Synfreak, If you have the time and are so inclined could you offer an explanation of the headings "Dr Peak RMS"? This would very much increase my understanding of these matters. Mbain mbain Link to comment
Synfreak Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 Hi Mbain ! I'll try: "DR" stands for "Dynamic Range" Measured with the according Software (foobar PlugIn in my case): Dynamic range - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Loudness war - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia DYNAMIC RANGE | pleasurize music! DR Database It represents a "psycho-acousticaly" weighted RMS value which can be used to compare i.e. different masterings (like above) "Peak" lsits the maximum level for one track If the album shows identical (high) peak levels, one could be almost shure that there was some serious limiting used throughout - imho a bad thing, as it will also disroy "song to song dynamics". "RMS" = root mean square Root mean square - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia One might say, this is the basis for the DR calculations, but without the mentioned psycho-acoustical weighting, and without taking the peak levels into consideration. In my book, the difference between the DR ratings and the RMS values shows how much (multi-band) compression was used on the tracks. In short: the higher these ratings, and the larger the gap between DR and RMS, the more "natural" (ahh - uhhm ...) the musical dynamics where captured. Esoterc SA-60 / Foobar2000 -> Mytek Stereo 192 DSD / Audio-GD NFB 28.38 -> MEG RL922K / AKG K500 / AKG K1000 / Audioquest Nighthawk / OPPO PM-2 / Sennheiser HD800 / Sennheiser Surrounder / Sony MA900 / STAX SR-303+SRM-323II Link to comment
GammaG Posted January 20, 2013 Share Posted January 20, 2013 Hi Synfreak, Thanks for your time and effort! Would you say after the info that you gathered that the download at HD Tracks would sound better then the cd I have now? Thanks in advance! Windows XP/7 > J River MC 20 > Wire World Platinum Starlight USB cable > Peachtree Audio Grand-Pre dac > Straight Wire Crescendo IC's > Odd Watt Audio Odd Block tube amps > custom speaker cables > Galt Audio 2.5 speakers > 15" Aura Sound subwoofer in Ported Reflex Enclosure/1000watt amp Link to comment
Synfreak Posted January 20, 2013 Share Posted January 20, 2013 Hi GammaG! That's hard to say from a subjective point ... But, I would say it's technically - and even aural - in another league. And ... turn up that volume! ;-) Esoterc SA-60 / Foobar2000 -> Mytek Stereo 192 DSD / Audio-GD NFB 28.38 -> MEG RL922K / AKG K500 / AKG K1000 / Audioquest Nighthawk / OPPO PM-2 / Sennheiser HD800 / Sennheiser Surrounder / Sony MA900 / STAX SR-303+SRM-323II Link to comment
wisnon Posted January 20, 2013 Share Posted January 20, 2013 The DSD rip of this (from SACD) sounds great! Link to comment
Jay192 Posted January 20, 2013 Share Posted January 20, 2013 Synfreak, If you have the time and are so inclined could you offer an explanation of the headings "Dr Peak RMS"? This would very much increase my understanding of these matters. Mbain also here's an article Winning the Loudness Wars | Stereophile.com Link to comment
GammaG Posted January 21, 2013 Share Posted January 21, 2013 The DSD rip of this (from SACD) sounds great! Hi Wisnon! Do you know if the download of the Thriller album from HD Tracks is ripped this way? Thanks Windows XP/7 > J River MC 20 > Wire World Platinum Starlight USB cable > Peachtree Audio Grand-Pre dac > Straight Wire Crescendo IC's > Odd Watt Audio Odd Block tube amps > custom speaker cables > Galt Audio 2.5 speakers > 15" Aura Sound subwoofer in Ported Reflex Enclosure/1000watt amp Link to comment
labjr Posted January 21, 2013 Share Posted January 21, 2013 Hi Wisnon! Do you know if the download of the Thriller album from HD Tracks is ripped this way? Thanks The result would be the same whether they ripped the SACD or used the studio DSD files. The problem is that they then convert it to PCM using SARACON or some other software and there is a loss. Seems to me that most everything that's 88.2 and 176.4 is done this way. Link to comment
Roman880 Posted January 22, 2013 Author Share Posted January 22, 2013 Lots written on this thread, but back to the original question: Has anyone heard the actual HDTracks version of Thriller? Link to comment
wisnon Posted January 22, 2013 Share Posted January 22, 2013 Hi Wisnon! Do you know if the download of the Thriller album from HD Tracks is ripped this way? Thanks Sorry, I dont know. Link to comment
Roman880 Posted January 23, 2013 Author Share Posted January 23, 2013 Did a search for more info about the HDTracks release and came across a torrent site purporting to have the HDTracks release for illicit download. On the torrent site, this report was included. I browsed away from the iniquitous torrent purveyor, but not before copying the report pasted in below. I can't vouch for its authenticity, but it looks legit: Analyzed: Michael Jackson / Thriller -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DR Peak RMS Duration Track -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DR12 -3.85 dB -17.49 dB 6:03 01-Wanna Be Startin' Somethin' DR13 -2.67 dB -18.44 dB 4:20 02-Baby Be Mine DR13 -1.96 dB -17.54 dB 3:42 03-The Girl Is Mine DR13 -2.79 dB -17.83 dB 5:59 04-Thriller DR13 -0.39 dB -16.09 dB 4:18 05-Beat It DR16 -0.16 dB -17.51 dB 4:54 06-Billie Jean DR13 -4.08 dB -18.83 dB 4:06 07-Human Nature DR13 -2.80 dB -17.81 dB 3:58 08-P.Y.T. (Pretty Young Thing) DR14 -1.42 dB -19.89 dB 4:58 09-The Lady in My Life -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Number of tracks: 9 Official DR value: DR13 Samplerate: 176400 Hz Channels: 2 Bits per sample: 24 Bitrate: 5945 kbps Codec: FLAC ================================================================================ Link to comment
Synfreak Posted January 23, 2013 Share Posted January 23, 2013 Thanks, Roman880! Analyzed: Michael Jackson / Thriller-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DR Peak RMS Duration Track -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DR12 -3.85 dB -17.49 dB 6:03 01-Wanna Be Startin' Somethin' DR13 -2.67 dB -18.44 dB 4:20 02-Baby Be Mine DR13 -1.96 dB -17.54 dB 3:42 03-The Girl Is Mine DR13 -2.79 dB -17.83 dB 5:59 04-Thriller DR13 -0.39 dB -16.09 dB 4:18 05-Beat It DR16 -0.16 dB -17.51 dB 4:54 06-Billie Jean DR13 -4.08 dB -18.83 dB 4:06 07-Human Nature DR13 -2.80 dB -17.81 dB 3:58 08-P.Y.T. (Pretty Young Thing) DR14 -1.42 dB -19.89 dB 4:58 09-The Lady in My Life -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Number of tracks: 9 Official DR value: DR13 Samplerate: 176400 Hz Channels: 2 Bits per sample: 24 Bitrate: 5945 kbps Codec: FLAC My own SACDtoDSD rip has got these ratings (see post above): Analyzed: Jackson, Michael / Thriller (1999 Remaster)-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DR Peak RMS Duration Track -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DR12 -3.98 dB -17.52 dB 6:05 01-Wanna Be Startin' Somethin' DR13 -3.02 dB -18.48 dB 4:20 02-Baby Be Mine DR12 0.00 dB -17.51 dB 3:42 03-The Girl Is Mine DR13 -2.88 dB -17.86 dB 5:59 04-Thriller DR13 0.00 dB -16.07 dB 4:18 05-Beat It DR16 0.00 dB -17.54 dB 4:54 06-Billie Jean DR13 -4.00 dB -18.87 dB 4:06 07-Human Nature DR13 -3.11 dB -17.85 dB 3:58 08-P.Y.T. (Pretty Young Thing) DR14 -2.08 dB -19.93 dB 4:58 09-The Lady In My Life -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Number of tracks: 9 Official DR value: DR13 There are differences in the absolute levels, as the HDTracks download was converted to PCM at a slighly lower level. And it will have used a different anti-imaging filter for the conversion, which also tends to leed to small differences. But I'm pretty sure, that the same master - or even the SACD was used for the HDTracks version. And because of that, I'm also pretty sure that it will sound very good! Esoterc SA-60 / Foobar2000 -> Mytek Stereo 192 DSD / Audio-GD NFB 28.38 -> MEG RL922K / AKG K500 / AKG K1000 / Audioquest Nighthawk / OPPO PM-2 / Sennheiser HD800 / Sennheiser Surrounder / Sony MA900 / STAX SR-303+SRM-323II Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now