Jump to content
IGNORED

Potential merit in matching DAC to ADC?


Recommended Posts

I think this was a claim of the codec that shall not be named (although AFAIK in practice there are no or virtually no commercial releases made with a MQA ADC), but putting this inflammatory association  to one side, could there be any merit per se in the idea of a DAC  (or perhaps a pre DAC processor) “knowing” what ADC etc had been used in a recording, and maybe also spatial info about recording venue  etc, and selecting bespoke filters and DSP to optimise reconstruction of  the analogue signal?  I recall  it being described as an “elegant” solution by some.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
39 minutes ago, Norton said:

...bespoke filters and DSP to optimise reconstruction of  the analogue signal?

 

I am unconvinced about about filters - like mansr says the ideal still remains, and out of phase (i.e. "minimum phase") filters are not the solution in any case - though some prefer the sound it still is not a fideality solution, rather it's a preference.  Other kinds of DSP I think fall into this preference category as well....

Hey MQA, if it is not all $voodoo$, show us the math!

Link to comment

Yes. If the playback chain 'knows' what the recording environment was, then before a note is played all settings that adjust the playback to suit the particular listener could be in place - rather than rely on dynamic correction, as the playback 'learns' from what's being fed to it.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...