5G - Are We Safe Or Insane?

[Audiophile Neuroscience]

1 hour ago, Ralf11 said:

hmmm... calcium channels again, eh

 

I can shoot you over a script for verapamil but perhaps a selective beta blocker might be better for combating radiation?

[Audiophile Neuroscience]

1 hour ago, AudioDoctor said:

That's it, I am wearing a faraday cage around my head from now on...

 

I think it's safe to say Bill has taken this threat seriously, judging by his new avatar !

[Audiophile Neuroscience]

" I have been curious why you appear to be wearing aluminum foil "

[Audiophile Neuroscience]

1 hour ago, esldude said:

I'm not at all worried about 5G radiation.

 

Well there is a neurosurgeon that regularly warns about  brain tumors/tumours from using mobile phones. I guess he sees a lot of brain tumor patients tho and they were all mobile phone users!🤔

[Audiophile Neuroscience]

39 minutes ago, MetalNuts said:

Sometimes I do wonder which scientist is trustworthy and we have all experienced lies from scientists and experts.  I can still recall in my teenage, people started eating magarine because sceintist claimed it is a healthy substitute of butter but now scientists are reversing the claim. 

 

Some scientists warn not to eat so many eggs and in particular eat only the egg white and not the yolk but again some scientists now are reversing the claim.

 

Here they talk about the effect of wi-fi on health but I would like to ask the question of why only wi-fi.  Do I need to be a scientist to know that too much wave of any kind will affect health or even harzardous, i.e. sea wave (tsunami), sound wave (sonic weapons), solar wave, electrical wave, magnetic wave.

 

 

 

Absolutely agree. In truth it is just noise and nonsense from faith based believers pretending, nay demanding it's science - it is scientism.

[Audiophile Neuroscience]

3 hours ago, Axial said:

5G is a huge advancement in creating more and more specialised expert doctors for a way more increased diagnosed infected cancerous sick society from the disastrous effects of 5G on humanity and its environment. The financial rewards are huge, outofthisorbit. It will create so many jobs in the medicine sector that there will be more doctors than patients...several doctors per patient in trying to cure them all,

 

I am opposed to this. Doctors' fees would plummet

[Audiophile Neuroscience]

6 minutes ago, Em2016 said:

This Neurosurgeon was warning of similar things back in 2009.

 

https://www.news.com.au/technology/brain-surgeon-dr-charlie-teo-warns-against-mobiles-home-appliances/news-story/a44c78d3671c38971f87687b990b34cf

 

"Dr Teo said while breast cancer doubled its cell numbers in weeks or months, the quickest brain cancers took just 16 hours.

No age group was immune and the incidence of brain tumours was growing.

"It's increasing in frequency both in this country and developing countries and it used to be ranked out of the top 10 but it's just joined the top 10 most common cancers," he said."

 

Charlie is an interesting and nice guy. He has come under some scrutiny for his opinions and practices from other neurosurgeons and neurologists.

 

 

3 minutes ago, Em2016 said:

 

The only other option is to turn your entire house into a Faraday Cage and never leave it? 

 

 

😀

[Audiophile Neuroscience]

2 hours ago, jabbr said:

21 hours ago, Audiophile Neuroscience said:

is an interesting and nice guy. He has come under some scrutiny for his opinions and practices from other neurosurgeons and neurologists.

 

 

 

😀

 

Ha ha! 

 

Ughhh certain types of photons do cause cancer and most types don’t. My clock radio? Really? That article was really trite.

 

 

Hi Jonathan,

not sure but maybe a slightly crossed wire here. I am not disagreeing. I have been in that neurosurgeons home and vice versa so yes IMO he is an "interesting and nice guy". His views do not always coincide with mine or would I endorse the articles you refer to.

2 hours ago, jabbr said:

consider this simplistic explanation: ionizing photons can lead to single strand DNA breaks or double strand breaks if strong enough. When single strands are broken that can lead to mutations and cancer. When double strands are broken the cells more often die. 

 

I am not a nuclear physician but don't doubt what you say. 90% of Pancreatic cancer,  among the deadliest of all cancers, is due to random or acquired mutations (10% being inheritable) and I venture to say probably very few of these relate to ionizing radiation.

[Audiophile Neuroscience]

3 hours ago, AudioDoctor said:

I am worried about the neutrino invasion that has thus far proven unstoppable...

 build a wall 🙃

[Audiophile Neuroscience]

9 minutes ago, AudioDoctor said:

9 hours ago, Audiophile Neuroscience said:

 build a wall 🙃

 

What should I build that wall out of [for stopping neutrinos]?

 

let's see concrete is first choice but steel is second choice. Pesky neutrinos can still slip through since they only interact via a weak nuclear force. Therefore I propose build it out of North Koreans !

[Audiophile Neuroscience]

1 minute ago, Mayfair said:

 

Absolutely! I mean, in terms of the innate animus of nature, the cumulative death rate from oxygen inhalation is 100%.  

 

I think I like you Mayfair: you give statistics; judging by your avatar you take blind testing seriously; and you are a fan of looney tunes' Sam Sheepdog !