Shadders Posted February 10, 2018 Share Posted February 10, 2018 15 hours ago, eclectic said: Get a room or move it to Grindr.. i think you're right. Seeing as there are pills involved, it's not the sort of event i would participate in, especially with the threat of seeing how deep your rabbit hole goes... rando 1 Link to comment
Popular Post Shadders Posted February 10, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted February 10, 2018 57 minutes ago, manisandher said: But he didn't choose the blue pill ;-) (I've been told that's the colour they are - I have no idea myself, of course.) Mani. The blue pills are called Viagra. Do you know the correct name (pharmaceutical description) for Viagra ?? Mycoxaflopin. Da boom, tsshhh botrytis, plissken and Indydan 2 1 Link to comment
Shadders Posted February 10, 2018 Share Posted February 10, 2018 3 minutes ago, Spacehound said: Is he providing naughty ladies too? If there are, then i don't expect there to be any listening...... Link to comment
Shadders Posted February 11, 2018 Share Posted February 11, 2018 Hi, Temporal micro-structure is a made up phrase for audio. I examined briefly Bob Stuarts AES document - which is a scan of Sound Board 2015 article - temporal micro structure in audio is stated to be the same as spatial resolution in vision. So spatial resolution is effectively the number of pixels representing an image. In audio - as long as the ADC can capture all the audio information, which it does for delta sigma ADC's, then it has sufficient resolution in the time domain (can capture all frequencies). Again, this is obfuscation, as an attempt to state temporal blur needs to be corrected. Temporal blur does not exist in ADC's since mid 1990's when the first Delta Sigma ADC's were being used You cannot correct temporal blur - dispersion. If temporal micro-structure is not sufficiently defined with clear examples, then any discussion is pointless. Regards, Shadders. Link to comment
Shadders Posted February 11, 2018 Share Posted February 11, 2018 34 minutes ago, manisandher said: It's going to be interesting coming up with another explanation if mansr hears the differences I (and pretty much everyone else who's taken a listen) do, and yet the ADC captures are identical. But this is jumping the gun somewhat. Mani. Hi, Not sure what the test will be - but any ADC in your house will be different to anything played through the speakers etc. from which the ADC was taken from. If it is the difference between the same track played via NAS, PC, or CD transport optical output etc., to a DAC, then buffering and noise can be the reason for the differences heard. If you cannot ensure that noise and buffering are the same for each source, then differences are possible. Regards, Shadders. Link to comment
Popular Post Shadders Posted February 15, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted February 15, 2018 1 hour ago, Spacehound said: I measure everything I can think of. And every measurement will be far more accurate than any ear, human or otherwise. I had a phase of doing that. I remember, it was 7 inches and a wrinkle, but given my age, it's now 7 wrinkles and an inch. mav52, Spacehound and sandyk 2 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now