Jump to content
IGNORED

Synergistic Research: SCAM


Recommended Posts

My opinion of Ted Denney is solely based upon his thinking out of the box and inventing products that others have never thought of. His products work in the real world, but unfortunately are difficult to appreciate via Youtube videos and scientific explanation. Some of the effects are subtle, some obvious, but all add up to a positive improvement. I was a total skeptic, scoffed at the explanations, thought this was all voodoo & bs until hearing with my (& my wife's) ears. I have a very critical ear, my wife's even more so, and we've walked away from many audio products that did nothing more than placebo. I don't know how his stuff works - but it does; and I don't know of anyone besides Mr Denney who have done what he has. That is why I consider him a genius. You may not like him, I have never spoken with him and frankly don't care about his personality or likeability, but what we hear in our system, products invented & developed from his fertile mind, is beyond denial - and damn impressive.

Link to comment

Why is a demonstration in which a product is added, then removed, as proof of its effect "snake oil salesman tactics"?? ...and how does a money back guarantee stand with products based on "fairy dust and magic"? In a recent conversation with Gordon Rankin (another I consider a genius for his literal invention of digital audio) he related how Mpingo discs transformed the sound of one of his AXPONA rooms a few years ago. Mpingo discs, Shun Mook monks; ummmm okay ...yet a scientific & educated person like Mr Rankin attests that they do indeed work. Audio is a funny endeavor; it is very subjective (the polar opposite of objective). Two different audio components can scientifically measure the same, yet sound very different. How? Two people listen to the same piece of music and one loves it while the other considers it awful. With Synergistic Research products I merely appreciate what they've done in my system, in my listening room, with my ears. They optimized my system and took it to a much higher level.

BTW, I have no dog in this fight. Am not friends with anyone at SR, don't work in the audio biz, get nothing for my opinion (except attacks from the naysayers). I suspect much of the SR attacks are from those who either cannot afford their products or those that require a scientific explanation before they will accept what their ears are telling them. There is also the law of diminishing returns; a $7000 subwoofer will have a much more profound effect on the listening experience than a $7000 SR Vibratron - (so I suggest buying the Vibratron after you already have the sub...). 

Link to comment

One addition; Synergistic Research cables and the Galileo SX active ground unit are tuneable. The tuning bullets can soften or sharpen the sound of the cables and there are four different sound & soundstage formats with the Galileo SX. These changes are very noticeable and are a great way to tune the sound of your system, your room, and your preferences. I know of no other gear that has this ability and is reminiscent of being able to tune the sound of tube gear via tube rolling. A very nice feature.  

Link to comment

fas42, you echo my thoughts. I don't understand the principles behind many of Synergistic Research's products and the explanations offered by them do indeed sound far fetched; but I do know what I hear when their items are inplace. Most of their items are high-quality cables and power cords, and acknowledged by most, these do indeed have an effect on the sound. I was very skeptical of their Vibratron until we tried a PMR Novum (the brass candy dish-looking thing) that had a nice effect especially on poor acoustic recordings. Now, added to our system, the Vibratron has an even greater effect than the PMR, in the sound's 'smoothness' and in the size of the soundstage. The other items we've purchased from SR seem to lower the noise floor which also has a positive effect. Besides that, tailoring the sound to our room & our preference via their bullets on their cables and four different sonic profiles of their Galileo SX active ground system also makes a noticeable difference in both the sound and soundstage. Those things all add up to a not-so-subtle improvement in the system's sound. I do not understand how these things work, and maybe Ted Denney doesn't either, but perhaps he discovered them by trial & error and experimentation. That said I can forcibly attest that they do indeed work - and the effect is obvious.

Link to comment

The bottom line to this entire subject is: does it make the sound better? Without analyzing the science (or lack of), how can it be, the price, does it defy logic, what's the physics, it cannot be, etc etc; ...does it sound BETTER? Gordon Rankin heard a noticeable improvement from Mpingo Discs; a small hockey puck looking disc of plastic(?) placed on his 300B amps; and although we've never tried them I don't doubt his ears or his judgement. Mikey from OCD Audio noted an improvement placing rose quartz crystals on his amps; and he has quite a nice system, much experience, and good ears.

There's a lot of things in this world that defy scientific explanation but are very real. What I can definitely attest to is that the soundstage of our system went from merely okay to absolutely huge (from the Vibratron), that we now have more solid & deeper bass (Power Cell SX), and the overall sound is better; cleaner, more natural (Galileo SX & power cords/ICs). I don't think our system or results are so different or unique than other people's. As previously stated, we have no dog in this fight; am a retired surgeon - and not in the audio business; but maybe some of the naysayers on this blog should actually give this stuff a try; there's a 30-day money-back guarantee. 

Link to comment

Racernetx: Thanks for the sage advice; but as a guy who has been into this hobby for 50+ years, and has owned many Many MANY excellent pieces of audio gear over those years (20+ amps, 30+ speakers, too many cables to recall, easily $1 million total, etc (including $98,000 Magico speakers & $28,000 Audio Note amps)); your veiled insult only demonstrates your ignorance & closed mindedness. You may trust your "COMMON sense" but me, I trust only one thing - my ears. BTW, you keep the rock.

Link to comment

Racerxnet; in the fifty years we've been into this, many things have changed. Tube gear went out, and then returned. Transisters were not so good, then got remarkably better. As these improvements developed, we changed too. From hard rock & Klipsches to vocal jazz & Avantgardes. We enjoy trying new & different technologies. Apparently we're not as well versed as you or on par with your Genesis system (some great speakers BTW), but we enjoy the hobby & the journey. One thing we learned, different ears prefer different things in different systems. My friend's Apogee Grands driven by no fewer than 6 big Krells sounds great to him; and torture to us (and we've owned and like Apogees). But tell me, should we bring weapons and have our vaccines in order when visiting Hunts ville? LOL 

Link to comment

boytrytis is grossly misinformed. The comparison tests I've witnessed at audio shows were several minutes with, followed by several minutes without, the device in question playing the same piece of music. The listening test at home is... thirty days. Of course if all of this is beyond your ability to afford, or your ability to evaluate, and either case really angers you, it really doesn't matter. 

Link to comment

MarkusBarkus, there's nothing wrong with being content with whatever you have. In fact, you're lucky. We have friends, both affluent professionals, that have a Bose Wave radio; and they love it. Years ago I gave them a pair of Apogee Slant 6s, a Velodyne sub, and a Golden Tube integrated amp, and they've never plugged them in. Who are we to say they're wrong? They listen to their Bose Wave, are content, and like what they hear.

As per scientific measurements, how many speakers are out there that measure perfectly but sound bad? Many. Why do tube amps in general measure poorly but sound beautiful and why do most solid state amps (particularly when compared to tubes) measure perfectly but sound flat & two dimensional? There's an intangible, unmeasureable aspect to sound, our hearing, and how we process it that defies scientific measure. Pertaining to Synergistic Research and those that say it's a scam, I think most have a) never given it an open-minded chance either due to either its price or questionable explanation, b) never actually auditioned it except in maybe a poorly situated audio show listening room, or c) have never actually tried it in their system in their homes. In our case, it's the best thing we've ever done for our system; it truly made an amazing improvement. 

Link to comment

Thanks Confused; you're obviously a learned audiophile. But... why do solid state amps that measure well often not sound good? Is it because they lack that lovely harmonic distortion, and if so, why haven't the years of solid state development figured out how to produce that? To wit, we recently had an expensive ($22,000) Rockna Wavedream SE & a ($12,000) Rockna Wavenet - highly acclaimed ultra-modern solid state - that was blown away by a $9000 Art Audio tube preamp w/$9000 Wavelength Pelham tube DAC. It wasn't even close. The Rocknas sounded flat, compressed, 2D; uninvolving;  whereas the old-tech measuring poorly & 'distorted' tubes... gorgeous. 

Link to comment

Just today we received a new Synergistic Research item; and it is truly amazing. AMAZING. It's their FEQ Carbon acoustic field generator with the tuning module that sits on top. This device makes the sound stage even more halographic and enhances the music's dynamic response. Bass is deeper, treble cleaner, voices suspend midair. Relatively poor recodings (as the Door's Riders On The Storm) now sound like a HD version; and are no longer bad recordings. The soundstage is bigger, taller, and even better than before. Sounds float midway between the plane of the speakers and our listening seat.

Josh offered to send us one last week and I was hesitant; our system was already mesmerizing; but he offered for us to try it for a month and if we didn't see any merit, return it. Man; this thing is a keeper. Already hearing from the many naysayers on this blog I'm sure this will trigger more cries of snake oil, it can't be, it doesn't add up scientifically, etc etc but I'm telling you, these effects are blatant; not at all subtle; and this device is a keeper. AMAZING.

Link to comment

Man... this thing is really something. I don't know if adding it to a system with no other SR components will have as profound an effect but for only $2300 with a 30 day guarantee it's worth a try. Oh, the Cobra? eye candy...

20220620_151227.jpg

20220620_151159.jpg

20200915_180720.jpg

Link to comment

A point to ponder; several have mentioned the really great sound in the SR room at shows, how they stop in just to hear the sound or the song playing. Indeed Scott Walker uses excellent components (Magico, Soulution, etc) but I can guarantee you that without the SR stuff you could never duplicate that same experience. The magic, the huge soundstage, the halographic presentation, the immersive effect would be missing. This Carbon acoustic field generator is like being in a large stadium with sound coming from all directions. 

Link to comment

A bit off subject but... noooo Sam; the stereo is ear candy, the Cobra eye & adrenaline candy. Guy sports. The only folks thinking 'affluence porn' are those guilty of envy. For a guy growing up poor & parentless, at ages 14-16 sleeping in the local Golden Gloves boxing gym, homeless back in the days before welfare & the gov safety net; a guy who worked his way up without any assistance except the GI Bill after Vietnam combat at age 18, a guy who for the past thirty years pays six digit fed income tax; I am proud, very proud, of where we are. 'nuff said.

Link to comment

Racerxnet: "dick swinging contest"?? ahhhh... just another prime blowhard. But that said; waaaay off topic. Sorry I posted the pic of our factory built continuation series; it was in the camera & popped up while dragging pics of the FEQ Carbon, but obviously it offends some of the low-Testosterone crowd on here. I'm done; thought that maybe as an actual owner of the latest SR gear I could shed some light on those interested; or those that merely enjoy the hobby (as we do). Too many haters, know-it-alls; so... see ya! 

Link to comment
  • 1 year later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...