God and the Audiophiles

[wgscott]

If this is true, why is it you cannot seem to produce the evidence, for all your blustering?

 

 

Let me up the ante a bit here:

 

If you can produce the evidence, I will personally apologize to everyone whom you deem I have grossly offended via deployment of sarcastic remarks, and then I will close my account here at CA. You will be rid of me forever. All you have to do is produce evidence for your libelous claim.

 

(In case you missed it, here is your opportunity to cash in on your Messiah complex.)

[Audiophile Neuroscience]

That would be *your* assumption

 

instances where I have "want[ed] to use music ABX DBT as a scientific test for perception of complex musical experiences" ……

That number, to avoid any ambiguity, is absolutely zero.

 

are you now saying music ABX DBT is scientifically invalid, agreeing that it (currently) lacks the quality performance measures to be used by any reputable scientist eg sensitivity, speificity, reliability, validity, known true/false positives, known true/false negatives, positive and negative predictive values etc ? Yes or No ?

[wgscott]

I can clearly see the racist implications and how they lead directly to the question about ABX DBT's. And then the yes or no question clearly follows right along with the thinking to discern the level of racism inherent in one's position. {Typed with a puzzled look and asking oneself, "you have got to be kidding" while feeling somehow he isn't.} Maybe things really do rotate backwards below the equator as they go down the drain {wondering if this is somehow a racist statement as well}

 

Coriolis bigotry.

[wgscott]

Yes or No ?

 

You did use the libel word so decided not to pursue it. So why did you feel compelled to make your (nationality ≠ race) comment.

 

Implicit in your false, spurious and libelous accusation "racist slur yet about Australians" was the idea that if I had said something anti-Austrailian (which you and I both know I did not) is the assumption that nationality and race are synonymous. They are not.

 

Forget that and answer this

 

I have absolutely no intention of forgetting it:

 

 

If this is true, why is it you cannot seem to produce the evidence, for all your blustering?

 

 

Let me up the ante a bit here:

 

If you can produce the evidence, I will personally apologize to everyone whom you deem I have grossly offended via deployment of sarcastic remarks, and then I will close my account here at CA. You will be rid of me forever. All you have to do is produce evidence for your libelous claim.

[Audiophile Neuroscience]

I can clearly see the racist implications and how they lead directly to the question about ABX DBT's. And then the yes or no question clearly follows right along

 

Funny I can't. They are two separate issues. You seem to be getting confused Dennis.

[wgscott]

Funny I can't. They are two separate issues. You seem to be getting confused Dennis.

 

If this is true, why is it you cannot seem to produce the evidence, for all your blustering?

 

 

Let me up the ante a bit here:

 

If you can produce the evidence, I will personally apologize to everyone whom you deem I have grossly offended via deployment of sarcastic remarks, and then I will close my account here at CA. You will be rid of me forever. All you have to do is produce evidence for your libelous claim.

[Audiophile Neuroscience]

Coriolis bigotry.

 

I wonder whether that is ...never mind. My only "bigotry" is against sloppy science.

[wgscott]

I wonder whether that is ...never mind. My only "bigotry" is against sloppy science.

 

If this is true, why is it you cannot seem to produce the evidence, for all your blustering?

 

 

Let me up the ante a bit here:

 

If you can produce the evidence, I will personally apologize to everyone whom you deem I have grossly offended via deployment of sarcastic remarks, and then I will close my account here at CA. You will be rid of me forever. All you have to do is produce evidence for your libelous claim.

 

 

Put up or shut up.

[Audiophile Neuroscience]

I have "want[ed] to use music ABX DBT as a scientific test for perception of complex musical experiences" ……

That number, to avoid any ambiguity, is absolutely zero.

Are you now saying music ABX DBT is scientifically invalid, agreeing that it (currently) lacks the quality performance measures to be used by any reputable scientist eg sensitivity, speificity, reliability, validity, known true/false positives, known true/false negatives, positive and negative predictive values etc ? Yes or No ?

[wgscott]

Are you now saying music ABX DBT is scientifically invalid, agreeing that it (currently) lacks the quality performance measures to be used by any reputable scientist eg sensitivity, speificity, reliability, validity, known true/false positives, known true/false negatives, positive and negative predictive values etc ? Yes or No ?

 

I'm sorry, could you please repeat the question?

[wgscott]

Let me up the ante a bit here:

 

If you can produce the evidence, I will personally apologize to everyone whom you deem I have grossly offended via deployment of sarcastic remarks, and then I will close my account here at CA. You will be rid of me forever. All you have to do is produce evidence for your libelous claim.

 

 

Put up or shut up.

[Audiophile Neuroscience]

I'm sorry, could you please repeat the question?

 

I have "want[ed] to use music ABX DBT as a scientific test for perception of complex musical experiences" ……

That number, to avoid any ambiguity, is absolutely zero.

Are you now saying music ABX DBT is scientifically invalid, agreeing that it (currently) lacks the quality performance measures to be used by any reputable scientist eg sensitivity, speificity, reliability, validity, known true/false positives, known true/false negatives, positive and negative predictive values etc ? Yes or No ?

[wgscott]

You just simply can't back up your libelous accusations with any evidence.

[Audiophile Neuroscience]

Let me up the ante a bit here:

 

If you can produce the evidence, I will personally apologize to everyone whom you deem I have grossly offended via deployment of sarcastic remarks, and then I will close my account here at CA. You will be rid of me forever.

 

 

 

You mistake me for someone who cares whether you stay or not. I have told you, since you consider it libel i will not pursue it.

[Audiophile Neuroscience]

I have "want[ed] to use music ABX DBT as a scientific test for perception of complex musical experiences" ……

That number, to avoid any ambiguity, is absolutely zero.

 

 

Are you now saying music ABX DBT is scientifically invalid, agreeing that it (currently) lacks the quality performance measures to be used by any reputable scientist eg sensitivity, speificity, reliability, validity, known true/false positives, known true/false negatives, positive and negative predictive values etc ? Yes or No ?

[wgscott]

Coward.

[kumakuma]

You mistake me for someone who cares whether you stay or not. I have told you, since you consider it libel i will not pursue it.

 

I'm sure Bill would promise not to sue you if you just apologized.

[wgscott]

I'm not going to sue anyone. No conditions. He is simply incapable of backing up his libel with any evidence, and then has the temerity to suggest I engaged in an ad hominem attack by suggesting he wasn't competent to judge what is pseudo-science (which is no more an ad hominem attack than if he had suggested I was not competent to do neuroscience -- which of course I am not).

 

That really is the height of intellectual dishonesty.

[Audiophile Neuroscience]

ah back to ad hominem, how refreshing.

 

So how about answering the question or do you feel threatened ?

 

I have "want[ed] to use music ABX DBT as a scientific test for perception of complex musical experiences" ……

That number, to avoid any ambiguity, is absolutely zero.

 

 

Are you now saying music ABX DBT is scientifically invalid, agreeing that it (currently) lacks the quality performance measures to be used by any reputable scientist eg sensitivity, speificity, reliability, validity, known true/false positives, known true/false negatives, positive and negative predictive values etc ? Yes or No ?

[wgscott]

I'm not interested in answering any of your questions.

[Audiophile Neuroscience]

suggest[ed] I engaged in an ad hominem attack by suggesting he wasn't competent to judge what is pseudo-science.

this had a tad of ad hominem too, lol

I would simply point out that you are a supercilious, arrogant, haughty, conceited, disdainful, overbearing, pompous, condescending, superior, patronizing, imperious, proud, snobbish, smug, scornful, sneering, hoity-toity, high and mighty, uppity, snooty, stuck-up, snot-nosed mis-informed and grotesquely verbose twit.

[Audiophile Neuroscience]

I'm not interested in answering any of your questions.

 

Chicken?

[wgscott]

I had to look up supercilious to make sure I was using the correct word. Most of the rest is cut-and-paste from the list of synonyms.

[Audiophile Neuroscience]

I had to look up supercilious to make sure I was using the correct word. Most of the rest is cut-and-paste from the list of synonyms.

 

and that somehow makes it less ad hominem or are you saying you just didn't understand what you were saying?

[Audiophile Neuroscience]

I have "want[ed] to use music ABX DBT as a scientific test for perception of complex musical experiences" ……

That number, to avoid any ambiguity, is absolutely zero.

Are you now saying music ABX DBT is scientifically invalid, agreeing that it (currently) lacks the quality performance measures to be used by any reputable scientist eg sensitivity, speificity, reliability, validity, known true/false positives, known true/false negatives, positive and negative predictive values etc ? Yes or No ?