gryphongryph Posted January 5, 2019 Share Posted January 5, 2019 Hi guys, first here is my stereo. MacBook Pro 2008 + ext hd + Roon Intona usb isolator Primare Dac30 DK Design VS.1 Reference MK2 Hybrid integrated amp with Nos Mullard’s in pre section Graham Audio LS 5/9 speakers. I would like to buy a iMac i5 to use as a photo editor and install Roon on it, so combining it with my stereo in the same room, plan is to use the Ethernet connection to a Pro-Ject Stream Box S2 Ultra, then usb into my dac 30, my question is, is the iMac totally quiet running Roon ? my 2009 IMac is quite noisy and the computer will probably be situated a meter behind me! hope for some input. Link to comment
gryphongryph Posted January 7, 2019 Author Share Posted January 7, 2019 No one using a iMac i5 for Roon streaming? Link to comment
AudioDoctor Posted January 7, 2019 Share Posted January 7, 2019 I can't imagine why it wouldn't be. I have an iMac a year old, but basically the same thing considering it has not yet been updated, and I ran ROON on it without any problems, and I was using my computer as the player as well, I wasn't streaming to anything. Fans never came on. No electron left behind. Link to comment
gryphongryph Posted January 7, 2019 Author Share Posted January 7, 2019 Nice to know, my old iMac sounds more like a boiler that a fan blowing, but one can hear it easily! Link to comment
AudioDoctor Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 Yeah, I have a 2011 Mini around here and ROON would get the fans running full blast. No electron left behind. Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 iMac Pro has much improved ventilation, so may have the quietest acoustic signature - for $$$ I suspect most people getting any iMac are going i7 Link to comment
gryphongryph Posted January 8, 2019 Author Share Posted January 8, 2019 I heard that the i7 iMac is quite noisy, that’s why I am more interested in the i5, the Pro is a bit too expensive and more than I would need. I am just a amateur photographer 😉 Link to comment
Popular Post AudioDoctor Posted January 8, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted January 8, 2019 I dont know who told you that, I have the i7 and its as quiet as a church mouse. tmtomh and wgscott 1 1 No electron left behind. Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 maybe based on the notion that more power ==> more noise ?? my 2017 i7 (40 G RAM 3TB Fusion) is very quiet until I do something like an HDR build in LR etc. - Roon might light it up? Link to comment
gryphongryph Posted January 8, 2019 Author Share Posted January 8, 2019 Lol, maybe, have just read on a lot of forums that the i7 can be a bit noisy, but the i5 is much quieter, but nice to hear differently, you guys use it with Roon ? Link to comment
MMMSA-10 Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 FWIW, I use a 2018 Mac Mini i3 and a 2017 iMac i7 with Audirvana and there is no audible fan activity with either. I have noticed fan activity on my iMac doing some photo edits, but using old/possibly defunct plugins from Topaz - ones like deNoise. tmtomh 1 Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 The way to think about this, is what sort of activity is likely to trigger the fan, and how does the architecture of the i5 vs. i7 correlate with that. Anyone can post in a forum, so I'd want to see if they tested, how they tested, or if it was just speculation was it well-founded in some mechanistic way. or... just get what works well for your total uses - you mention photography, so that may mean post-processing. Adobe Lightroom (for one) goes faster with CPU speed per se, and they are NOT using their high license fees to improve parallel processing, so more cores does little for you on LR. For audio, most uses are not CPU intensive. If you are doing a lot of upsampling in the computer then an i7 may help. Link to comment
gryphongryph Posted January 8, 2019 Author Share Posted January 8, 2019 Thanks Ralf, I have always bought the highest spec Mac I can afford, so as to make it last a long time, as my iMac is 10 years now, having put a aftermarket ssd in the dvd slot 4 years ago, the machine has given me a long service without any problems, it is time to replace it and therefore have been thinking about a machine that would be very usable for Roon too. Any opinions about the difference between usb out to dac or using the Ethernet out to a bridge into dac, would I hear a difference? Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 You might hear a difference depending on how much EMF noise is transmitted along the USB cable & how well your DAC deals with it. It might depend on the type of music too. The only way to be sure is to try it. Wired Ethernet has transformers that reduce this noise. Optical Ethernet eliminates it entirely, as does WiFi. There is also a forthcoming product to further reduce any problems with wired Ethernet. For USB, you could try out a Schiit Eitr or similar isolation device and see if it improves things. But... speakers, room tmts., DSP, and better masters/recordings will all make much greater improvement in SQ than addons for your DAC. I'd put a better DAC into the mix too, tho don't know what the Primare is like. It sounds like you need to keep the iMac near the listening position? Link to comment
AudioDoctor Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 If you are going to connect your iMac to your DAC via USB, and use it at the same time I would not use ROON, I would use Audirvana+. In my experience, doing just that, A+ blew ROON away regarding sound quality. However, if you're going to go to a network ROON device of some sort, then I am sure ROON would be just fine sounding. ROON really didn't like being ran and played on the same computer. In fact, that is the reason I did not go with ROON, It didn't work well enough in my use case to overcome what I already had, A+. The best part of this is, you can try them both for yourself. wgscott 1 No electron left behind. Link to comment
gryphongryph Posted January 8, 2019 Author Share Posted January 8, 2019 Plan is to have the iMac on my office desk 1 meter behind my listening sofa, therefore the Ethernet cable idea Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 Sure, go with that - test the UltraEthero or whatever they call it when it comes out Link to comment
Uni Posted January 12, 2019 Share Posted January 12, 2019 The true problem is core audio. Somehow the sound would be easily distorted. wgscott and tmtomh 1 1 Link to comment
tmtomh Posted January 12, 2019 Share Posted January 12, 2019 2 hours ago, Uni said: The true problem is core audio. Somehow the sound would be easily distorted. Evidence or documentation for this claim? Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted January 12, 2019 Share Posted January 12, 2019 or just toss a dart at this diagram to "pinpoint" the SQ is degraded for us, please? https://developer.apple.com/library/archive/documentation/MusicAudio/Conceptual/CoreAudioOverview/WhatisCoreAudio/WhatisCoreAudio.html Link to comment
AudioDoctor Posted January 12, 2019 Share Posted January 12, 2019 4 hours ago, Uni said: The true problem is core audio. Somehow the sound would be easily distorted. Or use the A+ Direct Mode which completely bypasses CoreAudio... No electron left behind. Link to comment
Uni Posted January 12, 2019 Share Posted January 12, 2019 1 hour ago, tmtomh said: Evidence or documentation for this claim? 14 minutes ago, Ralf11 said: or just toss a dart at this diagram to "pinpoint" the SQ is degraded for us, please? https://developer.apple.com/library/archive/documentation/MusicAudio/Conceptual/CoreAudioOverview/WhatisCoreAudio/WhatisCoreAudio.html Great research spirit. I have no knowledge of all these. My experience is simply based on the SQ of audirvana direct mode. It's possible that I am wrong. On the other hand I found out that using ipad to my USB DAC sound much better than iMac. Thanks for your url would this sentence provide any hints? "Core Audio in iOS is optimized for the computing resources available in a battery-powered mobile platform. There is no API for services that must be managed very tightly by the operating system—specifically, the HAL and the I/O Kit. " Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted January 12, 2019 Share Posted January 12, 2019 Audirvana can use DSD etc. which iTunes / HairPlay cannot. Is that what you mean? Or are you comparing Redbook to Redbook? Link to comment
Uni Posted January 12, 2019 Share Posted January 12, 2019 8 minutes ago, Ralf11 said: Audirvana can use DSD etc. which iTunes / HairPlay cannot. Is that what you mean? Or are you comparing Redbook to Redbook? @Ralf11 hi, not sure are you asking me. For my case, in terms of SQ Using A+ direct mode > without direct mode Roon Core@NAS iPad + USB DAC > iMac SSD + USD DAC So I am suspecting something wrong about CoreAudio. Of course there can be other factors too. Link to comment
ferenc Posted January 13, 2019 Share Posted January 13, 2019 On 1/8/2019 at 9:17 PM, gryphongryph said: Thanks Ralf, I have always bought the highest spec Mac I can afford, so as to make it last a long time, as my iMac is 10 years now, having put a aftermarket ssd in the dvd slot 4 years ago, the machine has given me a long service without any problems, it is time to replace it and therefore have been thinking about a machine that would be very usable for Roon too. Any opinions about the difference between usb out to dac or using the Ethernet out to a bridge into dac, would I hear a difference? Actually I am using a 18 core, 16 GB GPU, 64 GB RAM iMac Pro for Roon and HQplayer upconverting to 256x DSD with Poly - since - mp everything, feeding an RME ADI-2 DAC and sometimes Merging Hapi and few Dante devices as well, running Elgato EYEtv for 4 tv tuners and doing all sorts of other thing simultaneously as well through the building-in and an external Thunderbolt 3 monitor. My Roon database handling roughly 250000 tracks, 25000 albums, lots of high-res recordings from an external Lacie 48 TB Thunderbolt 3 disk array and streaming Tidal. No problem with the iMac Pro noise, sometime the LaCie is noisy, but tried to move it as far as the TB3 cables let it. OS X is the latest 10.14.3 developer beta. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now