Popular Post The Computer Audiophile Posted March 3, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted March 3, 2021 53 minutes ago, HelpfulDad said: No it isn’t. Your imperfect understanding of how MP3 works vs. MQA leads you to think that. And, let me guess, you’ve never heard it fully decoded You’re even taking the argument a step further than MQA Ltd is willing to take it. Your arguments are so nonsensical that the only conclusion I can reach is that your trolling. labjr, botrytis, MikeyFresh and 1 other 4 Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems Link to comment
Popular Post The Computer Audiophile Posted May 25, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted May 25, 2021 1 hour ago, HelpfulDad said: There is more than adequate evidence to support MQA claims Awesome. Many of us have been waiting years for this. Post a link please. botrytis and MikeyFresh 1 1 Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems Link to comment
Popular Post The Computer Audiophile Posted May 25, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted May 25, 2021 3 minutes ago, HelpfulDad said: so tossing 12 wasted bits per sample doesn’t affect the accuracy of the individual sample. We already have 16 bit audio and it requires no proprietary decoder. 4 minutes ago, HelpfulDad said: There are also recording engineers like Bob Ludwig, et al who have actively endorsed the sound as a better representation than any other digital content. With all due respect, some engineers will endorse a vacuum cleaner if it helped them. Ask around about Bob. 5 minutes ago, HelpfulDad said: Or does everyone believe that MQA, Ltd is just “making it up” when they cite the content as accurate as per the band members and/or engineer? How many of the millions of batch converted tracks do you think were signed off by the original team who signed off on the original album, or signed off by anyone for that matter? 7 minutes ago, HelpfulDad said: All that hating is a contributing factor to neither hi-res disc format being successful Show me a single fact based anything that proves this. The market didn't want SACD or DVD-Audio, that's why they failed, not because some haters. 10 minutes ago, HelpfulDad said: I believe you when you say you don’t hear a difference, but to tell me I’m fooling myself when I hear what Bob Ludwig, Jimmy Page, et al hear is silly at best and actually offensive. What about Neil Young saying mQa sucks? What about the McGill study? 11 minutes ago, HelpfulDad said: I like nearly my whole music catalog on my iPhone or streaming over cellular without sucking down my entire data plan and then playing it back as a realistic session of music squeezing out every bit of performance my system can deliver. How are you decoding mQa in your car? Your car has quite a bit of DSP that isn't compatible with mQa and would perform much better with pure PCM files. MikeyFresh, UkPhil and botrytis 3 Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems Link to comment
Popular Post The Computer Audiophile Posted May 26, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted May 26, 2021 1 minute ago, HelpfulDad said: The thing I really don’t understand about you MQA haters is why do you give a sh!t why we like it so much you want to kill it? It meets a need. Because it removes options for people. Tidal has removed pure PCM for many albums because of mQa. In Canada, they can’t get Qobuz. They are stuck with Tidal if they use something like Roon. mQa is a solution in search of a problem. UkPhil and MikeyFresh 2 Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now