Jump to content
IGNORED

Roon on a Synology NAS


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, The Computer Audiophile said:

I've done it on a DS1812 and it was really slow with a 50,000 track library. The Synology units tend to be best at serving files over file sharing protocols like smb, and not the best for things like running apps. They are pretty weak when it comes to power compared to QNAP. 

 

That's a similar model to mine. Good to know, I guess I won't try it. Thanks. 

Link to comment
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

I have Roon installed on a Synology 916+ with 8GB RAM.

The offline usage works really well, accessing he library is very fast. 

However, I have a bit of an issue with Tidal because it is considerably slow compared to Roon on 2012 Mac Mini. I discussed this with Roon support and they told me it is due the NAS processor which is slower than the one on the Mac Mini. 

Anyway, if you do not use Tidal then you should be ok. 

 

 

Link to comment
  • 4 months later...
  • 5 years later...

I compared Roon-on-NAS  with  Roon-on-Nuc +NAS
for me, with my library, both hardware works just as well!
NAS = new Synology DS923+ and DSM7.2 (Roon core on usb key)
Intel NUC = I3 - SSD with Windows or Rock (the latter easier to manage)
library size = 2100 ripped CDs
my Roon-on-NAS findings:

  • a single Nas costs less (than 2 devices)
  • a single Nas pollutes less (than 2 devices)
  • the Nas is in the wine cellar, I can’t hear it
  • Processing speed - example 1 : 16/44 >> 24/176 = 94
  • Processing speed - example 2 : DSD64 >> 24/176 = 20
  • the real limitations do not concern me (DSD256/512, multi-room, HQP,…)
  • Syno DSM 7.2 offers everything (backup, redundancy, Wol, …) and is stable
  • as an alternative on the same Nas : UPnP MinimServer, aso ...

finally, I unplugged the Nuc I3 which adds nothing (in my case..)

less is more ?

Link to comment
  • 2 weeks later...

Depends on library size, and the NAS in question, of course.

 

IF, you have a nicely powered NAS ($$$), a good network, and appropriate renderer, great results can occur.

 

I ran a Synology NAS for a few years. As my library grew, and the processor got older, I noticed sluggishness of Roon. (I had an m.2 cache drive, and SSD disk for ROON) At some point you out kick your coverage.

 

Two other points

1) a NAS that will have this kind of processor is expensive, if you don't need a NAS for other duties, it makes for an expensive server.

2) if you do need the NAS for appropriate duties, it will be slower as well

3) {bonus} NAS software is cryptic to the non-initiated.

 

For a fraction of the cost of a NAS, and with a much better processor, a dedicated music server can be had. I currently run a NUC board, in a fanless case, with an internal m.2 driver for ROCK, and a PCIE SSD for music storage. It lives in the wife's closet with the Modem, Router, Switch, and Wireless Access Point. (a floor away from the music room)

 

Now, if you need a NAS, and have the wherewithal to manage it, and your library is manageable, the appropriate NAS will run the ROON server program. Your mileage may vary based on library size, and NAS specs.

[Home Digital] MSB Premier DAC > Modright LS300 > Atma-Sphere "Class D" Monoblocks > Daedalus Audio Muse Studio Speakers

[Home Analog] Technics SL-1200G > Boulder 508 (Benz Glider SL)

[Office] Laptop > Kitsune R2R lvl3 > Violectric V281 > Meze Liric / Meze Elite

[Travel] Laptop/iPad -> Focal Bathys

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...