mac_and_dac Posted August 27, 2016 Share Posted August 27, 2016 Hi The more I wade through online music, particularly Tidal, the more I see that there are a helluva lot of re-mastered albums out there. What are the principal reasons for these re-masters? Is it simply to try to improve on the SQ of the original issue? If so, what is being done to do this? Just curious ... mac_and_dac Front End: Neet Airstream Digital Processing: Chord Hugo M-Scaler DAC: Chord Dave Amplification: Cyrus Mono x300 Signatures Speakers: Kudos Titan T88 Link to comment
Gonzbull Posted August 27, 2016 Share Posted August 27, 2016 I'd safely say it is to increase loudness and to get better digital copies. AD converters have improved dramatically so SQ is automatically improved just by going through the process. However once that is done,the artistic decisions leave much to be desired quite often. If the album is just re-mastered it's pretty much the DR that changes. Small tweaks are made depending on the final medium. Link to comment
firedog Posted August 28, 2016 Share Posted August 28, 2016 It is to get a better version with the better digital tech available today; or an attempt to make something louder and more modern sounding; or an attempt to milk more money out of the public - or any combination of an number of the above. Main listening (small home office): Main setup: Surge protector +>Isol-8 Mini sub Axis Power Strip/Isolation>QuietPC Low Noise Server>Roon (Audiolense DRC)>Stack Audio Link II>Kii Control>Kii Three (on their own electric circuit) >GIK Room Treatments. Secondary Path: Server with Audiolense RC>RPi4 or analog>Cayin iDAC6 MKII (tube mode) (XLR)>Kii Three BXT Bedroom: SBTouch to Cambridge Soundworks Desktop Setup. Living Room/Kitchen: Ropieee (RPi3b+ with touchscreen) + Schiit Modi3E to a pair of Morel Hogtalare. All absolute statements about audio are false Link to comment
The Computer Audiophile Posted August 28, 2016 Share Posted August 28, 2016 Remasters are made to change the sound from the original release and to sell more copies of an album. The move from a purchase model to a rental model may have a large (negative) impact on the number of remastered albums in the future. Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems Link to comment
mav52 Posted August 28, 2016 Share Posted August 28, 2016 It is to get a better version with the better digital tech available today; or an attempt to make something louder and more modern sounding; or an attempt to milk more money out of the public - or any combination of an number of the above. The "an attempt to milk more money out of the public " seems to hold true when you get to those 60,70 and early 80's rock albums. I know I have wasted some money on downloads. But like anything, if the remaster was from a well recorded album / tape then you could end up with a better digitally enhanced remake if it was done right. The Truth Is Out There Link to comment
YashN Posted August 28, 2016 Share Posted August 28, 2016 It is to get a better version with the better digital tech available today; In rare cases, and ideally, it's not necessarily just the better tech, but just a better mastering process by the 'engineer'. Dedicated Line DSD/DXD | Audirvana+ | iFi iDSD Nano | SET Tube Amp | Totem Mites Surround: VLC | M-Audio FastTrack Pro | Mac Opt | Panasonic SA-HE100 | Logitech Z623 DIY: SET Tube Amp | Low-Noise Linear Regulated Power Supply | USB, Power, Speaker Cables | Speaker Stands | Acoustic Panels Link to comment
barrows Posted September 20, 2016 Share Posted September 20, 2016 Many things can be done in the re-mastering process which will change the sound. Perhaps sometimes the sound is even improved. Like: changing the EQ, running the audio through a tube device to "warm" it up a bit, etc. If the original multi tracks still exist, some albums even get re-mixed and re-mastered, as is the case with Steven Wilson's work on some of the classic prog, like the Yes, Jethro Tull, and Yes catalogues. Mobile Fidelity often improves the sound of classic albums in there re-mastering process. And of course, as noted, if the original master is analogue, just using a better ADC alone can result insignificant improvement if the master tape is in good shape. SO/ROON/HQPe: DSD 512-Sonore opticalModuleDeluxe-Signature Rendu optical with Well Tempered Clock--DIY DSC-2 DAC with SC Pure Clock--DIY Purifi Amplifier-Focus Audio FS888 speakers-JL E 112 sub-Nordost Tyr USB, DIY EventHorizon AC cables, Iconoclast XLR & speaker cables, Synergistic Purple Fuses, Spacetime system clarifiers. ISOAcoustics Oreas footers. SONORE computer audio | opticalRendu | ultraRendu | microRendu | Signature Rendu SE | Accessories | Software | Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now