Miska Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 192/24 Studio Master download from Linn. Looks like recorded in 96k, upsampled (with less good algorithm) to 192k and then edited in 192k. Notice the frequency mirror effect at 48 kHz and the edits. Signalyst - Developer of HQPlayer Pulse & Fidelity - Software Defined Amplifiers Link to comment
mkrzych Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 Moght be and I found this recording sonics not the top class -- Krzysztof Maj http://mkrzych.wordpress.com/ "Music is the highest form of art. It is also the most noble. It is human emotion, captured, crystallised, encased… and then passed on to others." - By Ken Ishiwata Link to comment
wdw Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 192/24 Studio Master download from Linn. Looks like recorded in 96k, upsampled (with less good algorithm) to 192k and then edited in 192k. Notice the frequency mirror effect at 48 kHz and the edits. [ATTACH=CONFIG]4488[/ATTACH] I have downloaded this album. After reading your post, I've emailed Linn asking for their confirmation that it was truly sampled at 24/192 and not up-sampled from 24/96. Link to comment
Miska Posted March 2, 2013 Author Share Posted March 2, 2013 I have downloaded this album. After reading your post, I've emailed Linn asking for their confirmation that it was truly sampled at 24/192 and not up-sampled from 24/96. I also sent them email with the pic. All the tracks have similar effect around 48 kHz. Let's see what they'll answer. Signalyst - Developer of HQPlayer Pulse & Fidelity - Software Defined Amplifiers Link to comment
Mercman Posted March 2, 2013 Share Posted March 2, 2013 I was very disappointed with the sound as well of the 192/24 version. Steve Plaskin Link to comment
wdw Posted March 3, 2013 Share Posted March 3, 2013 I was very disappointed with the sound as well of the 192/24 version. Considering the influence of this web site, Linn would be foolish not to respond to Miska's assertions. Expect they will. Link to comment
wdw Posted March 5, 2013 Share Posted March 5, 2013 Considering the influence of this web site, Linn would be foolish not to respond to Miska's assertions. Expect they will. Reply from Linn: Thank you for your e-mail. The recording was made in Avatar Studios, on a Pro Tools rig which was set to record at 192kz. The recording was mixed 'in the box' (i.e. in pro-tools rather than through an analogue mixing desk) and from the look of the spectrum it would appear that the plug-in used as the vocal compressor is limited to 96kz. However it was the compressor that sounded best on Claire's voice, so that's what we went with. If you look at the piano and drum transients it is clear that there is real data above 48kz, part of this due to the use of Sanken Co-100k omnis on the piano. I hope this helps to clarify things for you. Best Regards Colin Customer Support Linn Products Limited Link to comment
Musicophile Posted March 5, 2013 Share Posted March 5, 2013 Reply from Linn:Thank you for your e-mail. The recording was made in Avatar Studios, on a Pro Tools rig which was set to record at 192kz. The recording was mixed 'in the box' (i.e. in pro-tools rather than through an analogue mixing desk) and from the look of the spectrum it would appear that the plug-in used as the vocal compressor is limited to 96kz. However it was the compressor that sounded best on Claire's voice, so that's what we went with. If you look at the piano and drum transients it is clear that there is real data above 48kz, part of this due to the use of Sanken Co-100k omnis on the piano. I hope this helps to clarify things for you. Best Regards Colin Customer Support Linn Products Limited At least that's what I call good customer service. I recently had contact with the same Colin, he's really very helpful. Check out my blog at musicophilesblog.com - From Keith Jarrett to Johannes Brahms Link to comment
Miska Posted March 5, 2013 Author Share Posted March 5, 2013 I got the same response. And have been trying to see the parts above 48k that are not mirrors (digital images) of things below 48k... I found some transients that could be. How much there is leak from other instruments to the vocal track? Or does Claire's voice have such strong ultrasonics? How does ProTools handle situation when one track of a mix needs to be 96k? I don't know... I'm just curious why there are such strong digital images/alias around 48k. Of course ProTools data at SRC Comparisons gives some information... Signalyst - Developer of HQPlayer Pulse & Fidelity - Software Defined Amplifiers Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now