Jump to content
  • entries
    47
  • comments
    385
  • views
    8185

Quantum-mechanical tunneling and cables


wgscott

I was poking around the USB cable thread and saw reference to this, so I went a hunting, and found the following claim:

 

By applying a two million volt signal to a cable at a specific pulse modulation, and ultra high frequency for an exact duration of time, we transform the entire cable at a molecular level through a phenomenon called Quantum Tunneling. This process is performed on all TESLA Series cables, from Galileo Basik Strings and Au 79 and Magnetic Tricon to Apex, and can be applied to models not Quantum Tunneled for an additional charge. The before and after is startling, with a lower noise floor and improvements in inner detail, air, low frequency extension, and overall transparency and signal speed.

 

http://www.synergisticresearch.com/tesla-series/tesla-series-technologies/

 

So, you might ask yourself, what is quantum-mechanical tunneling?

 

When I teach this (as I do, every year), I sometimes make reference to a more familiar phenomenon. If you take a laser beam, and point it at a glass prism, what you will find is that part of the beam is transmitted in the original direction, and part is split off, and reflected. If you change the angle of the prism relative to the incoming laser, there comes an angle, called the critical angle, beyond which all the light is reflected, and none is transmitted. It looks like this:

 

total_internal_reflection_at_the_hypotenuse_of_a_bh0618.jpg

 

Now take a second prism, and place it next to the first one. If the two glass surfaces touch, suddenly you get the laser beam propagating out in the un-bent, transmission angle again.

 

tunnel.gif

 

FTIR.jpg

 

That's the optical version of tunneling.

 

You can treat this classically, using something called an evanescent wave. You can also treat it quantum-mechanically, and it is again the same sort of wave phenomenon, except the wave now describes the probability of finding the particle in what we call a classically forbidden region. So it works exactly the same way for photons and electrons. The electron "tunnels" through a barrier despite not having enough energy to hop over it.

 

It doesn't change the molecular structure of anything. Not the glass. Not the wire. Nada.

 

These guys might be doing something else to "change the molecular structure" of the wire (which, by the way, isn't made of "molecules" in the first place, but rather an array of metal atoms). But it ain't quantum tunneling.

38 Comments


Recommended Comments



Too much voltage and amperes for my Sing Sing prison electric (listening) chair.

 

 

 

Needed only 2,000 to 2,200 volts at 7 to 12 amperes.

 

 

 

But I'm almost sure that the 614 prisoners executed on it saw the 'tunnel'...

 

 

 

Roch

Link to comment

I'll just add some random thoughts to this... and would love to keep these ideas/thoughts going....

 

 

 

 

 

http://www.superconductors.org/ultra.htm

 

These guys have won contracts from the Pentagon for their claims of a room temperature 'superconductor' they name Ultraconductor. I've been looking into this for a while, they haven't contacted me back... The link also has the patent number. (A extremely thin polymer material?)

 

 

 

For an ideal speaker wire... would we want almost zero resistance? We'd have infinite conductance, all of our amps' power would reach the speaker voice coil... no cable 'filter' to change the sound in our audio.. that many people hear... yes????

 

 

 

Sidebar: Graphene coated cables will be coming at some point

 

http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-10-graphene-copper-crystals.html

Link to comment

...but the Ultraconductor thing is bogus. No superconductivity in polymers at 90-odd C, sorry (which is what the 14 year old patent claims). In fact the most cited Journal of Superconductivity article about polymer superconductivity (at just over 2 Kelvin!) was retracted a couple of years later.

Link to comment

Hey Jud,

 

 

 

For sure, the Ultraconductor saga seems to warrant disbelief... yet part of me believes there must be advances going on in materials sciences...

 

 

 

Did you read that link on Graphene? A atom thick layer that exhibits all kinds of amazing potential.

 

 

 

Could Ultraconductors have been exploring a similar area, but with polymers instead of carbon?

 

 

 

Meh, this is all way above my background, and I struggle between the belief in progress, men in black suits, and the men wearing tinfoil hats...

Link to comment

...and materials science is also beyond our Synergistic friends, let alone quantum physics.

 

 

 

From the Synergistic web site:

 

 

 

By applying a two million volt extreme high frequency signal to a cable at a specific pulse modulation and frequency, for an exact duration of time, we alter the entire cable at molecular level....

 

 

 

From the Wikipedia article on Tesla coils:

 

 

 

...skin effect limits Tesla currents to the outer fraction of an inch in metal conductors....

 

 

 

Sorry to keep raining on the parade, and maybe the cables do sound good (though the descriptions seem to indicate they impart their sonic "qualities" to all material played through them, and are designed for system matching, both IMO wrongheaded and big no-nos), but this sort of ludicrous pseudo-scientific crap from Synergistic and others, and the deserved ridicule it brings, makes gaining mindshare far more difficult for serious designers trying to do good work.

Link to comment

"These guys have won contracts from the Pentagon for their claims of a room temperature 'superconductor' they name Ultraconductor."

 

 

 

I just have to ask myself "If these guys really have come up with a room temperature superconductor, would they really be wasting their time making hifi cables, instead of going for the Nobel Price?"

Link to comment

Invented (discovered if you like) by two UK university professors a year or so ago.

 

 

 

But it is not superconductive and they never made any claims that it was.

Link to comment

I would love to hear these things. I emailed them and they offered me a factory visit. But I'm on the other side of the Atlantic. There is UK dealer only a few miles away, they don't do demos but they will let you take them home and try them, which is better still.

 

 

 

I can ignore their psuedo scientific mumbo jumbo. But I think the prices are totally insane, so there is no point in wasting the dealers time or mine.

Link to comment

"this sort of ludicrous pseudo-scientific crap from Synergistic and others, and the deserved ridicule it brings, makes gaining mindshare far more difficult for serious designers trying to do good work"

 

 

 

Now you are just being negative! Remember, every time one of us does not believe in this stuff anymore, a magic cable dies somewhere.

Link to comment

I started with one used power cord and now my entire system is Synergistic cabling with two power cells. I bought the closeout models at a decent discount but still shiver when I think of the price. BUT the sound is the best I've ever had with this particular set of equipment. Actually, it is the best ever.

Link to comment

Their treatment might be good.

 

 

 

But it has nothing at all to do with quantum tunneling, which their process cannot induce. Shame really, their marketing BS might put some customers off what actually might be fine cables.

Link to comment

"By applying a two million volt signal to a cable at a specific pulse modulation, and ultra high frequency for an exact duration of time"

Leaving aside all the other issues, just how does one switch 2 million volts at a very high frequency ?? I don't know of any tube or solid state devices that are capable of achieving such a feat. I suppose some specialized equipment may exist in the scientific community, but I haven't heard of it.

 

Does anyone know if this is even possible ?

Link to comment




×
×
  • Create New...