Audiophile fuses

[Audiophile Neuroscience]

1 hour ago, CG said:

I may be alone on this, that is as much cognitive bias as they accuse subjectivists of.  

I find cavalierly dismissing people's observations to be very closed minded.  The observation might be misleading due to what could be called experimental errors.  Or, it could be plain wrong due to plain bad observing.  But, you don't know until you examine the observation more closely.  If there's nothing there after all, ok.

Well said, and you are definitely not alone. Do not be too concerned, this thread was click-bait from the beginning

Cheers

David

[Audiophile Neuroscience]

11 minutes ago, CG said:

 

As for me, I always find it uncomfortable to dismiss other people's observations in anything without examination.  That may be my problem and mine alone.  

 

As said, you are not alone.

 

11 minutes ago, CG said:

Everybody else is allowed to hold onto their own dogma - that's mine.  I'll explore this on my own.

 

I would recommend we all be less doctrinaire.

 

11 minutes ago, CG said:

So, I'll leave it, and this sub-forum, at that.

 

Please don't. You would be playing straight into the hands of the troll who started this thread and for the specific reason to incite belittling remarks about subjectivists. Chris removed a lot already.

[Audiophile Neuroscience]

1 hour ago, sandyk said:

 

Seraph  asked this same question in #83 of that thread. Yet there are no replies there.

 

Friday at 4:00 PM
#83
soekris said:
Hi Amir: Next of things to test, Those Audiophile Rated Fuses.... Or maybe those exotic Power Cables. All being promoted while ignoring the effects of the cabling from the Wall Outlet all the way back to the Power Station....

Audiophile rated fuses? Surely there is no such thing? Please share a link.

Audiofools Inc.

 

If you follow his link to the nonsense on Audiofools Inc.

you will see his agenda clearly stated. Skip to "Targets" , the top of the hit list being sponsorship based audio forums (like AS)

[Audiophile Neuroscience]

32 minutes ago, sandyk said:

 

#27 was provocative and not needed, and it wasn't the first time either.

 

 

Stirring up trouble on this site is exactly what the OP wanted

[Audiophile Neuroscience]

1 hour ago, alfe said:

Thank you my friend.

I suggest you are looking at the wrong person that should not be posting.

[Audiophile Neuroscience]

1 hour ago, sandyk said:

Fine .  I will abstain from further posting

 

I disagree with this

[Audiophile Neuroscience]

20 minutes ago, tapatrick said:

Thanks. The endless bickering is such a pain as it would be wonderful to have a proper, informative conversation about these kinds of fuses, which I'm curious about. There is an occasional nugget of info in this thread but it's hard to find it in all the noise.

 

However this background info is interesting and puts the whole thread in question.

I totally agree.  the topic was chosen by the OP to be divisive. We should all now place this in context and consider what objective evidence is for or against fuses making a difference in SQ. If, as i suspect there is none, let's express respectful opinions based on theory and belief.In other words lets achieve the opposite to the OPs intention.

[Audiophile Neuroscience]

39 minutes ago, danadam said:

And rightly so. Proving non-existence is one of logical fallacies and should have no place in objective forum.

We are looking for discussion of evidence, for or against. Not proof of a negative... or a positive.