UpTone Audio EtherREGEN (Objective Discussion Only)

[Seraph]

3 minutes ago, André Gosselin said:

Chris,

Please do something about it. This thread is really going nowhere.

Why don't you make an effort and contribute?

[Seraph]

Hey Chris,

Is this a case of: "I've gotten private messages from longtime members and seen the tone in this thread. I am making the decision that this thread is bad for my sponsors and the forum at large."? 

[Seraph]

Just now, André Gosselin said:

Please, tell me what exactly have you contributed ? You keep repeating the same story over and over, on a clear agenda. We have heard you.Please move on.

No! I won't move on before UpTone Audio answers my questions! 
This is their main advertising platform and they should step the hell up and defend their product!

[Seraph]

6 minutes ago, André Gosselin said:

Uptone has already repeated nth time that measurements will come in due time. Until then, please take a pause.

Do you hear what you are saying?
So UpTone developed an audiophile network switch, and put it up for sale, before researching if one is actually called for?
Do you realise how ass-backwards that sounds?

[Seraph]

Just now, André Gosselin said:

Quousque abutere, Catilina, patientia nostra ?

Until I get an answer!

[Seraph]

4 minutes ago, André Gosselin said:

Quousque abutere, Catilina, patientia nostra ?

  -- Cicero

"No pilluhan se on aina mielessä, mutta hypätään nyt ensin!" 

(toimittajan kysyessä Matilta, mikä on miehellä mielessä)

[Seraph]

1 minute ago, André Gosselin said:

OK, we know more now where you are coming from. I have neer been afraid of reveailing my true name and identity, it is all there since beginning in all my posts on AS. My address and phone number are available if you want. I challenge you to do the same.

Listen sandyk, give it a rest will you?
You already had your post removed for being off topic. Just move on.
We all know its you.

[Seraph]

6 minutes ago, Jud said:

It seems reasonably clear @Seraph wished to stir something up, and I'm quite surprised how eagerly so many otherwise intelligent people have accommodated him in what is supposed to be an objective thread.

 

Everyone who bought the ER knew the "backwards" situation (that a product was being sold prior to measurements being done of its efficacy). That is still the case, and it's fair comment to point that out, though not however many times @Seraph has done so in an attempt to have fun with those who rise to the bait.

 

I think that pretty well wraps it up unless/until we have more measurement data. I'd suggest anyone offended by our friend's repetition let it echo into emptiness, or let anyone who wants to repetitively state agreement do so freely.

Yes, I think this pretty much wraps it up. Thank you for your honest answer @Jud

[Seraph]

1 minute ago, sandyk said:

   Please go back to A.S.R.  where you will be more appreciated.

 I edited my own post, it was NOT removed. 

Neither have I sent any recent PMs to Admin about the posts in this thread or other threads, although I feel sure that others have complained about your posts in this Objective area.

I'm done with this topic. @Jud gave me a straight answer and I have no further reason to talk about this.

[Seraph]

1 minute ago, The Computer Audiophile said:

This is your one warning. Audiophile Style isn't your playground to insult people. Your "science" site may tolerate your behavior, but we don't around here. 

As I said earlier, I'm done with this topic. 

[Seraph]

1 minute ago, The Computer Audiophile said:

Please be done with the insults and abrasive behavior as well. 

I will do my best sir.