Archimago Posted February 7, 2020 Share Posted February 7, 2020 Interesting interview... Lots of questionable stuff in there that might be worth commenting on. Archimago's Musings: A "more objective" take for the Rational Audiophile. Beyond mere fidelity, into immersion and realism. R.I.P. MQA 2014-2023: Hyped product thanks to uneducated, uncritical advocates & captured press. Link to comment
Popular Post Archimago Posted February 8, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted February 8, 2020 What a "great" interview :-). http://archimago.blogspot.com/2020/02/diy-archimagos-colorful-set-of-speaker.html A debate b/w Winer and McGowan would be fun... I think those guys could keep emotions in check without breaking down into a hysterical brawl. Ralf11 and marce 2 Archimago's Musings: A "more objective" take for the Rational Audiophile. Beyond mere fidelity, into immersion and realism. R.I.P. MQA 2014-2023: Hyped product thanks to uneducated, uncritical advocates & captured press. Link to comment
Popular Post Archimago Posted February 8, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted February 8, 2020 19 minutes ago, fas42 said: I read your piece... and see you falling down all the same rabbit holes as everyone else who wishes to debunk the impact of variation in non-obvious stuff. Are you sure those rabbit holes you speak of are real, Frank? Quote As an example, you say, People like yourself refuse to accept that typical rigs are imperfect enough to always add a signature to the sound of the recording - after all, if that weren't the case then every system "would sound the same" - so, what one hears is the actual sound of the recording PLUS the sound of the system; the distortion resulting from its imperfections. And a lot of the anomalies heard are the result of the lack of integrity of the connections between its parts. Yes, if all systems were perfectly transparent, then they'd sound the same given the same recording. Final sound = Recording + System Coloration Don't think I can agree that "a lot" of the anomalies are due to "integrity of the connection". I would say much of the coloration these days come from one's transducer (speakers, headphone) and room as may be the case. Quote This is not "as-yet-not-understood phenomena". Nor is worthwhile trying to measure it - because what is 'wrong' with the system will vary, per each system; a solution, as in changing the type of cable used, is simply that - a solution; measuring what actually happened is only useful in the sense of understanding why the system had a weakness the first place... if I find a rattle in a brand new car, and I work out which piece of loose plastic is giving me grief ... should I write a paper about it ... ? 😉 So you're arguing that each system has idiosyncrasies. That's true. But what Darko and McGowan are claiming is that cables in general are able to change sound substantially. The strange claims about the Ted Smith DAC is more akin to your "rattle in a brand new car" and suggests that it's a bad DAC design because of its idiosyncrasies. Teresa and Thuaveta 2 Archimago's Musings: A "more objective" take for the Rational Audiophile. Beyond mere fidelity, into immersion and realism. R.I.P. MQA 2014-2023: Hyped product thanks to uneducated, uncritical advocates & captured press. Link to comment
Archimago Posted February 9, 2020 Share Posted February 9, 2020 59 minutes ago, fas42 said: In general they will .. because parasitic properties derived from how they are made, and connected, will alter to some degree the "System Coloration" component - just enough to be audible, if one is sensitive to the type of sound changes that occur. Is there an objective way to prove that these parasitic properties from how they were connected? 59 minutes ago, fas42 said: The Ted Smith DAC is fairly typical of what many designers say, in candid interviews - get the technical performance right, then the real work begins ... nut out what has to be fine-tuned in the construction of the product to deliver actual acceptable SQ. There was an interesting piece by Stan Curtis, the designer of the first "audiophile" CDP, some time ago - he stated that the production examples of what he designed, no matter what it was, never sounded as good as his prototypes ... I would say, that the fine-tuning in the building of his original circuit could not be passed through to the manufacturing side; key decisions of "how to do it", affecting quality, were lost in this process. Maybe. Don't know if prototypes sounded better than the final product. Guess one would need to ask him... Archimago's Musings: A "more objective" take for the Rational Audiophile. Beyond mere fidelity, into immersion and realism. R.I.P. MQA 2014-2023: Hyped product thanks to uneducated, uncritical advocates & captured press. Link to comment
Archimago Posted February 9, 2020 Share Posted February 9, 2020 3 hours ago, fas42 said: There would be - as I quoted from PM above, Do that, then use DeltaWave to try and drill down and locate where there are meaningful differences between the two configurations - if one does this in a rigorous manner then I, for one, would be confident that there would be something there, that could be pointed to ... You think this would demonstrate connection differences and the parasitic properties you speak of? Give it a try with some USB cables and let us know what you find ;-). Archimago's Musings: A "more objective" take for the Rational Audiophile. Beyond mere fidelity, into immersion and realism. R.I.P. MQA 2014-2023: Hyped product thanks to uneducated, uncritical advocates & captured press. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now